RESUMEN

The direct methods for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis have several limitations, therefore serological tests are the basis for the diagnosis of the disease. However, a meta-analysis estimating the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) on the main tests used in bovine brucellosis control programs worldwide has not been performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the DSe, DSp and thereby accuracy of serological tests individually used in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. The databases CABI, Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science were used to select articles. The search resulted in 5308 studies, of which 71 were selected for systematic review using quality assessment tools and 65 studies were included in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, 178 assays and 11 different serological tests were considered. To estimate DSe and DSp of the tests, studies were divided according to animal selection for the studies: (1) studies that carried out a random or consecutive selection of participants (noncasecontrol studies) and (2) all studies, including casecontrol studies. Considering only the non-case-control studies to estimate the DSe, the tests that exhibited the best and worst performance were the iELISA test (indirect enzyme immunoassay - bacterial suspension as antigen - BS) (96.5%, 95% CI: 94.1-97.9%) and 2ME (2- mercaptoethanol test) (85.0%, 95% CI: 79.6-89.1%), respectively; while for DSp, the FPA (fluorescence polarization assay) (99, 7%, 95% CI: 99.5-99.8%) and PCFIA tests (protein concentration fluorescence immunoassay) (78.5%, 95% CI: 70.0-85.1%) showed better and worse performance, respectively. Overall, our results showed an overestimation in the DSe and DSp of the eleven serological tests assessed when casecontrol studies were included in the meta-analysis, which is a concern considering its impacts on the time and costs associated with populational diagnosis of the diseases, since several of these tests are routinely used in the control and eradication programs of bovine brucellosis worldwide. Furthermore, the tests that exhibited the best DSe and DSp, iELISA (BS) and FPA, respectively, are relatively easy to perform and interpret and the test which showed the best overall accuracy was FPA.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is still in force, causing global public health challenges and threats. Although vaccination and herd immunity have proven to be the most efficient way to control the pandemic, massive and early testing of patients using the RT-qPCR technique is crucial for constant genomic surveillance. The appearance of variants of SARS-CoV-2 with new mutations can reduce the efficiency of diagnostic detection. In this sense, several commercial RT-qPCR kits have been the target of extensive analysis because low assay performance could lead to false-negative diagnoses. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the performance of three commercial RT-qPCR kits; Thermo Fisher (TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit v1), BGI and Roche (LightCycler® Multiplex RNA Virus Master) used for the diagnosis of COVID-19 throughout the pandemic in Santiago de Chile. Results: Under our best assay conditions, we found significant differences in Cq amplification values for control and viral probes, against the same nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPSs). In addition, in some cases, the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR kits decreased against viral variants. Conclusion: Our study suggests evaluating the RT-qPCR kits used to detect SARS-CoV-2 because variants such as Omicron, which has several mutations, can compromise their detection and underestimate viral circulation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Esophagectomy is a highly invasive surgery and one of its postoperative complications is anastomotic leakage, occurring in 53% of cases. The aim of the present study was to determine the sensitivity of the contrast-enhanced swallow study as a method for diagnosing anastomotic leak in patients that underwent esophagectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present retrospective study included the case records of patients that underwent esophagectomy with reconstruction and cervical anastomosis at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán within the time frame of January 1, 2000 and May 31, 2016. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data emphasizing clinical and radiographic anastomotic leak detection were identified. Descriptive statistics were carried out and contrast-enhanced swallow study sensitivity for diagnosing leakage was calculated. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of the patients was 50.6 years, 51 of the patients were men (72.86%), and 19 were women (27.14%). Indications for surgery were benign lesion in 29 patients (41.4%) and malignant lesion in 41 (58.6%). A total of 44.3% of the patients presented with a comorbidity, with diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure standing out. Thirty patients (42.85%) presented with anastomotic leak. Contrast-enhanced swallow study sensitivity for leak detection was 43.33%. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic sensitivity of the contrast-enhanced swallow study was very low. Therefore, we recommend the discontinuation of its routine use as a method for diagnosing anastomotic leaks.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Despite the worldwide occurrence of Francisella noatunensis subsp. orientalis (Fno) infection in farmed tilapia, sensitivity and specificity estimates of commonly used diagnostic tests have not been reported. This study aimed to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of bacteriological culture and qPCR to detect Fno infection. We tested 559 fish, sampled from four farms with different epidemiological scenarios: (i) healthy fish in a hatchery free of Fno; (ii) targeted sampling of diseased fish with suggestive external clinical signs of francisellosis during an outbreak; (iii) convenience sampling of diseased and clinically healthy fish during an outbreak; and (iv) sampling of healthy fish in a cage farm without a history of outbreaks, but with francisellosis reported in other farms in the same reservoir. The qPCR had higher median sensitivity (range, 48.8-99.5%) than culture (range, 1.6-74.4%). Culture had a substantially lower median sensitivity (1.6%) than qPCR (48.8%) to detect Fno in carrier tilapia (farm 4). Median specificity estimates for both tests were >99.2%. The qPCR is the superior test for use in surveillance and monitoring programmes for francisellosis in farmed Nile tilapia, but both tests have high sensitivity and specificity which make them fit for use in the diagnosis of Fno outbreaks.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

La tosferina es una enfermedad infecciosa causada por Bordetella pertussis, que se diagnostica mediante el cultivo como técnica de referencia, la cual tiene como limitante una baja sensibilidad. Es debido a esto, que el presente trabajo se centró en evaluar a la técnica de PCR a punto final amplificando las secuencias IS481 y PT, como una metodología alternativa diagnóstica a partir de 100 muestras pareadas de hisopado nasofaríngeo de pacientes provenientes de distintas regiones de Venezuela. Dichas muestras pareadas constaron de un hisopado para realizar el cultivo bacteriano y el otro para la detección de ADN específico. La identificación microbiológica de B. pertussis incluyó el aislamiento del microorganismo en agar Regan-Lowe, identificación bioquímica y la confirmación por coaglutinación. El análisis de los resultados fue realizado empleando el programa SPSS 21.0.0., usando como herramienta estadística el test de McNemar. La sensibilidad obtenida por el protocolo de PCR a punto final fue 50%, en concordancia con reportes previos. De acuerdo al valor de p=0,002 obtenido, la detección de B. pertussis mediante los dos métodos presentó una diferencia para el diagnóstico de tosferina estadísticamente significativa, por lo que no es indiferente emplear ambas técnicas diagnósticas. Sin embargo, se recomienda emplear en forma combinada ambas metodologías para incrementar la probabilidad de realizar el diagnóstico.

Whooping cough is an infectious disease caused by Bordetella pertussis, diagnosed by culture as a reference technique, which has low sensitivity as limiting. It is because of this that the present work focused on evaluating the PCR technique endpoint amplifying IS481 and PT sequences, as an alternative methodology diagnostic from 100 paired samples of nasopharyngeal swabs from patients from different regions of Venezuela. Such paired samples comprised a swab for bacterial culture and the other for detection of specific DNA. Microbiological identification of B. pertussis included the isolation of the microorganism in agar Regan-Lowe, biochemical identification and confirmation by Coagglutination. The analysis of the results was performed using the SPSS program 21.0.0., as a statistical tool using the McNemar test. The sensitivity obtained by the PCR protocol endpoint was 50%, consistent with previous reports. According to the value of p = 0.002 obtained, detection of B. pertussis by the two methods showed a difference for the diagnosis of pertussis statistically significant, so it is not indifferent both diagnostic techniques employed. However, it is recommended to use both methods in combination to increase the likelihood of diagnosis.

Asunto(s)