Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 37(1): 2371047, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38926094

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Preeclampsia is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preterm delivery. The maternal serum ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) can be used to evaluate placental dysfunction in cases of preeclampsia and FGR. A need for delivery within 2 days has been recommended for sFlt-1/PlGF ratios > 655 (normal ratio < 38) measured before 34 weeks' gestation. However, few studies have assessed this recommendation in a real-world setting and there remains a need for further evidence-based guidance on the use of the ratio in delivery timing planning in this situation. AIM: To assess the need for delivery within 2 days associated with sFlt-1/PlGF ratios > 655 before 34 weeks' gestation. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test results obtained at a single maternity hospital between September 2016 and November 2022. The primary outcome was time to delivery after recording a ratio > 655 in patients with a pregnancy between 20 + 0 and 33 + 6 weeks' gestation. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v29.0.0.0. RESULTS: During the study period a total of 33 patients with suspected or confirmed preeclampsia and/or FGR recorded sFlt-1/PlGF ratios > 655 before 34 + 0 weeks' gestation. Amongst cases with ratios > 655, median time to delivery was 4 days (IQR 1.0-9.0), with 14 (42.4%) delivering in ≤ 2 days, 8 (24.2%) delivering between 2 and 7 days and 11 (33.3%) delivering after 7 days. A significant inverse correlation was observed between time to delivery and gestational age at the time of ratio testing (rs = -0.484, p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: This study provides updated recommendations on the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in predicting the risk of imminent delivery amongst those with high ratios > 655 measured before 34 weeks' gestation. Our results suggest that the risk of imminent delivery can be stratified based on ratio level and gestational age, which in combination with the results of other clinical assessments, can be used to plan delivery timing and allow for considerations of fetal lung maturing corticosteroid and neuroprotective magnesium sulfate therapies prior to delivery.


Asunto(s)
Factor de Crecimiento Placentario , Preeclampsia , Nacimiento Prematuro , Receptor 1 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptor 1 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/sangre , Factor de Crecimiento Placentario/sangre , Adulto , Nacimiento Prematuro/sangre , Preeclampsia/sangre , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Edad Gestacional , Biomarcadores/sangre , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/sangre , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Recién Nacido
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 36(1): 2210727, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37150597

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal gestational age of planned delivery in pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension requiring antihypertensive medications that minimizes the risk of adverse perinatal events and maternal morbidity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies after 37 weeks of gestation complicated by chronic hypertension on antihypertensive medication, delivered at 7 hospitals within an academic health system in New York from 12/1/2015 to 9/3/2020. Two comparisons were made (1) planned deliveries at 37-376/7 weeks versus expectant management, (2) planned deliveries at 38-386/7 weeks versus expectant management. Patients with other maternal or fetal conditions were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes including stillbirth, neonatal death, assisted ventilation, cord pH < 7.0, 5-minute Apgar ≤5, diagnosis of respiratory disorder, and neonatal seizures. The secondary outcomes included preeclampsia, eclampsia, primary cesarean delivery, postpartum readmission, and infant stay greater than 5 days. Odds ratios were estimated with multiple logistic regression and adjusted for confounding effects. RESULTS: A total of 555 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent planned delivery at 37 weeks compared to expectant management did not appear to be at higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (14.9% vs 10.4%, aOR 1.49, 95% CI: 0.77-2.88). Similarly, we did not find a difference in the primary outcome in patients who underwent planned delivery at 38 weeks versus those expectantly managed (9.7% vs 10.1%, (aOR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.39-1.76). There were no differences in the rates of primary cesarean or preeclampsia at 37 and 38 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there is no difference in neonatal or maternal outcomes for chronic hypertensive patients on medication if delivery is planned or expectantly managed at 37 or 38 weeks' gestation.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Preeclampsia , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Femenino , Humanos , Cesárea , Edad Gestacional , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 308(3): 831-838, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36030428

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcome. Evidence for improvement by obstetric management is sparse. Common international guidelines recommend induction of labor before term, however, they differ in recommendations of monitoring the disease and time point of active management. So far, an official guideline for treatment and management of ICP in Germany does not exist. This study aims to compile common practice and policy in obstetric management of ICP in German maternity units. The objective is to gather obstetricians' opinion on management of ICP, and to estimate the need for standardization of current practice in Germany on the background of existing evidence. METHODS: A questionnaire focusing on indications for interventions was developed including fourteen multiple-choice questions comprising the areas of diagnostic criteria, laboratory testing, fetal monitoring, treatment, and delivery timing. The survey was sent to 699 maternity clinics and was distributed to participants of the annual congress hosted by the German society of perinatal medicine (DGPM). Collected data were summarized and evaluated in relation to available evidence and existing guidelines. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used. RESULTS: 334 completed questionnaires returned corresponding to a response rate of 48.1%. Coinciding with existing international guidelines, 48.8% of the participants acknowledge bile acid concentrations above 10 µmol/L to be indicative of ICP. 85.0% of obstetricians recommend antenatal testing with cardiotocography, exceeding common standards of maternity policy guidelines; 50.3% execute active management in ICP-affected pregnancies as they generally recommend a delivery between 37 + 0 and 38 + 6 weeks of gestation. Although recent studies evinced a risk of stillbirth in ICP-affected pregnancies not until a bile acid concentration of > 100 µmol/L, 22.2% of the respondents recommend delivery before 37 + 0 weeks of gestation due to raised bile acids of 40-99 µmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Opinions on the management of ICP in German maternity units differ widely and partly deviate by large from international standards. Reasons for this may be the lack of a national guideline and the low awareness due to the rarity of the disease on the one hand and the very slow dynamics in evidence generation and thus the uncertainty about the actual risks and optimal management on the other. The present data highlight the need for further research and clinical guidelines to standardize and optimize treatment based on the best available evidence.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis Intrahepática , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Mortinato , Colestasis Intrahepática/diagnóstico , Colestasis Intrahepática/terapia , Colestasis Intrahepática/complicaciones , Ácidos y Sales Biliares
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 10162-10167, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36093853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report on the association of gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcomes in prenatally diagnosed vasa previa. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at two academic/community hybrid hospitals, covered by the same maternal-fetal medicine group. Neonatal characteristics and outcomes were compared between cases of prenatally diagnosed vasa previa delivered at gestational age <36 weeks and ≥36 weeks. RESULTS: We identified 59 cases of vasa previa, of which 2 were excluded, one due to delivery at 28 weeks for preeclampsia, and one because it was not diagnosed prenatally, leaving 57 pregnancies in our study. There were 2 sets of twins. As such, there were 59 newborns. The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.08 (± 0.27) weeks for those delivered at <36 weeks, and 36.11 (±0.16) weeks for those delivered ≥36 weeks. All cases were delivered by cesarean. Delivery at ≥36 weeks was associated with greater mean birth weight (2774 g (±376.3 g)) compared with 2292.5 g (± 406.8 g) for those babies delivered at <36 weeks (p < 0.001). In addition, there were shorter hospital stays for the babies delivered at ≥36 weeks (median 3 days; interquartile range (IQR) 3,3) when compared with those delivered at <36 weeks (median 13 days; IQR 3,20). In addition, delivery at ≥36 weeks was associated with lower rates of intubation, jaundice and respiratory distress syndrome. Importantly, no cases of rupture of the membranes or vessel rupture occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that delivery at ≥36 weeks is safe for asymptomatic patients with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa, and may be associated with improved neonatal outcomes. We suggest that stable asymptomatic patients with prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa be delivered at 36 weeks rather than at less than 36 weeks. This will reduce neonatal morbidity with no apparent increased risk to babies.


Asunto(s)
Vasa Previa , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Lactante , Vasa Previa/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasa Previa/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diagnóstico Prenatal
6.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(16): e025791, 2022 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943056

RESUMEN

Background Current recommendations for delivery timing of pregnant persons with congenital heart disease (CHD) are based on expert opinion. Justification for early-term birth is based on the theoretical concern of increased cardiovascular stress. The objective was to evaluate whether early-term birth with maternal CHD is associated with lower adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Methods and Results This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant persons with CHD who delivered a singleton after 37 0/7 weeks gestation at a quaternary care center with a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics care team between 2013 and 2021. Patients were categorized as early-term (37 0/7 to 38 6/7 weeks) or full-term (≥39 0/7) births and compared. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to calculate the adjusted odds ratio for the primary outcomes. The primary outcomes were composite adverse cardiovascular, maternal obstetric, and adverse neonatal outcome. Of 110 pregnancies delivering at term, 55 delivered early-term and 55 delivered full-term. Development of adverse cardiovascular and maternal obstetric outcome was not significantly different by delivery timing. The rate of composite adverse neonatal outcomes was significantly higher in early-term births (36% versus 5%, P<0.01). After adjusting for confounding variables, early-term birth remained associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 11.55 [95% CI, 2.59-51.58]). Conclusions Early-term birth for pregnancies with maternal CHD was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes, without an accompanying decreased rate in adverse cardiovascular or obstetric outcomes. In the absence of maternal or fetal indications for early birth, induction of labor before 39 weeks for pregnancies with maternal CHD should be reserved for routine obstetrical indications.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Oportunidad Relativa , Parto , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 4(6): 100727, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Threatened preterm birth is the most common reason for antepartum hospitalization in the United States, accounting for approximately 50% of these admissions. However, fewer than 10% of patients with inpatient evaluation for signs or symptoms of preterm labor ultimately deliver before term. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to generate predictive models to assess the risk of preterm delivery and time to delivery based on clinical signs and symptoms of patients evaluated in our institution for preterm labor concerns. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies evaluated for signs and/or symptoms of preterm labor, including contractions, abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and short cervix, between 22 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation. Inpatient evaluations were classified by patient presentation: (1) symptomatic with cervical findings (transvaginal cervical length of <2.5 cm or cervical dilation of ≥2.0 cm), (2) asymptomatic with cervical findings, and (3) symptomatic without cervical findings. The primary outcomes included incidence of spontaneous preterm birth and interval from presentation to delivery, compared between groups. The risk of preterm delivery was evaluated using log-binomial regression, and presentation to delivery timing was assessed by survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Of 631 patients with preterm labor concerns, 96 (16%) were symptomatic with cervical findings on evaluation, 51 (8%) were asymptomatic with cervical findings, and 466 (76%) were symptomatic without cervical findings. The occurrence of preterm birth was significantly higher among symptomatic patients with cervical findings (49%) than among those with cervical findings alone (31%) or symptoms alone (11%) (P<.0001). In addition, symptomatic patients with cervical findings were significantly more likely to deliver within 48 hours (20%), 1 week (30%), 2 weeks (33%), and 1 month (43%) of presentation than patients with cervical findings alone (2%, 2%, 6%, and 10%, respectively) or symptoms alone (0.4%, 1%, 1.5%, and 5%, respectively) (P value for trend<.0001). Adjusted for gestational age at presentation and previous preterm birth, the overall risk of preterm delivery was significantly higher among patients with symptoms and cervical findings than among patients with cervical findings alone (relative risk, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-4.54) or symptoms alone (relative risk, 4.39; 95% confidence interval, 3.16-6.09). Adjusted for the same variables, symptomatic patients with cervical findings were also at higher risk of delivery over time after assessment than patients with cervical findings alone (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.90) or symptoms alone (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-2.70). The negative predictive value of these models suggested that only 1% of patients with isolated symptoms or cervical findings are at risk of preterm delivery within 1 week of initial presentation. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients with cervical findings suggestive of preterm labor were at the greatest risk of preterm birth and a shorter interval from presentation to delivery. The study findings supported a risk profile that may facilitate the selection of patients most appropriate for admission and targeted management. Nonetheless, as nearly 50% of patients meeting this risk profile subsequently deliver at term, future research is needed to identify which of these patients will require intervention.

8.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 158(2): 385-389, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34625970

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with neonatal hypoglycemia among neonates exposed to antenatal corticosteroid (ACS). METHODS: A retrospective study conducted during 2017-2019 at a tertiary-care center including all neonates delivered between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation after ACS administration. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl). RESULTS: Overall, 362 early preterm neonates, including 205 singletons and 157 twins, were exposed to ACS before delivery and constituted the study group. Of them, 275 (76.0%) were exposed to a single ACS course and 87 (24.0%) to an additional rescue ACS course. Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred in 84 (23.2%) neonates. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly higher in those delivered between 24 and 48 h after ACS administration compared with those delivered outside this time interval (10/25, 40.0% vs 74/337, 21.9%; P = 0.049). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for neonatal birth weight and gestational age, delivery within 24-48 h after ACS administration was the only independent risk factor associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (adjusted odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.68; P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred in over one-fifth of those exposed to ACS, and was independently associated with delivery between 24 and 48 h after ACS administration.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales , Hipoglucemia , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Prematuro , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 254: 141-146, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32966957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes among women with obesity and no additional comorbidities at 37-41 weeks. METHODS: This was a population based retrospective cohort study performed using US vital statistics data from 2014-2017. We included women with body mass index ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 and a singleton, cephalic, non-anomalous pregnancy who attempted labor and delivered between 37 0/7-41 6/7 weeks. Women with chronic hypertension, gestational diabetes, or pregestational diabetes were excluded. The co-primary outcomes were composite neonatal morbidity (Apgar score < 5 at 5 min, assisted ventilation > 6 h, neonatal seizures, or neonatal death within 27 days) and composite maternal morbidity (admission to the intensive care unit, blood transfusion, uterine rupture, or unplanned hysterectomy) with completed weeks of gestation as the primary exposure variable. All outcomes were examined using multivariate Poisson regression and were reported as adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). RESULTS: There were 15.8 million live births between 2014-2017, of whom 5.1 million (32.1 %) met the inclusion criteria. Composite neonatal morbidity was significantly increased in women delivering at 37 weeks (aRR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.78-1.90), 38 weeks (aRR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.10-1.17), 40 weeks (aRR 1.19; 95 % CI 1.16-1.22), and 41 weeks (aRR 1.49; 95 % CI 1.44-1.53) compared to 39 weeks. Composite maternal morbidity was similarly increased at 37 weeks (aRR 1.26; 95 % CI 1.19-1.34), 38 weeks (aRR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.02-1.13), 40 weeks (aRR 1.16; 95 % CI 1.11-1.20), and 41 weeks (aRR 1.42; 95 % CI 1.34-1.49). CONCLUSION: Composite neonatal and maternal morbidity among women with obesity and no additional comorbidities is increased with delivery at 37, 38, 40, or 41 weeks compared with 39 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Puntaje de Apgar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(3): 434-441, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28922969

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The risk of stillbirth associated with maternal obesity increases with gestational age; however, it is unclear if earlier delivery reduces the overall perinatal mortality rate. Our objective was to compare the risk of perinatal mortality associated with each additional week of expectant management to that of immediate delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton non-anomalous births in Texas between 2006 and 2011. Analyses were stratified based on maternal pre-pregnancy BMI class. For each BMI class, we calculated the rate of neonatal death and stillbirth at each week of gestation from 34 to 41 weeks. A composite risk of perinatal mortality associated with 1 week of expectant management was estimated combining the stillbirth rate of the current week and the neonatal death rate of the following week. This was compared with the rate of neonatal death of the current week. RESULTS: After all exclusions, 2,149,771 births remained for analysis. In the normal weight group, stillbirth risk increased from 0.8 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 5.7 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, whereas the neonatal death risk decreased from 76.5 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 30.4 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, there were no differences between expectant management and delivery for any gestational week. In the obese group, stillbirth risk increased from 1.8 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 10.5 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, whereas the neonatal death risk decreased from 67.7 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 26.2 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, the perinatal mortality risk favored delivery at 39 weeks (RR: 1.17; 99% CI: 1.01-1.36) and not thereafter. In contrast, in the morbidly obese group, stillbirth risk increased from 8.8 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 83.7 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, whereas the neonatal death risk decreased from 63.6 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 15.5 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, the perinatal mortality risk favored delivery from 38 weeks (RR: 1.53; 99% CI: 1.16-2.02) through 41 weeks (RR: 5.39; 99% CI: 1.83-15.88). CONCLUSION: The findings reported here suggest that delivery by 38 weeks in gestation minimizes perinatal mortality in pregnancies complicated by maternal morbid obesity.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad/mortalidad , Obesidad/terapia , Muerte Perinatal/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Espera Vigilante , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Obesidad/complicaciones , Mortalidad Perinatal , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Texas/epidemiología , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29606482

RESUMEN

A uniform approach to management of fetal growth restriction (FGR) improves outcome, prevents stillbirth, and allows appropriately timed delivery. An estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile with coexisting abnormal umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), or cerebroplacental ratio Doppler index best identifies the small fetus requiring surveillance. Placental perfusion defects are more common earlier in gestation; accordingly, early-onset (≤32 weeks of gestation) and late-onset (>32 weeks) FGR differ in clinical phenotype. In early-onset FGR, progression of UA Doppler abnormality determines clinical acceleration, while abnormal ductus venosus (DV) Doppler precedes deterioration of biophysical variables and stillbirth. Accordingly, late DV Doppler changes, abnormal biophysical variables, or an abnormal cCTG require delivery. In late-onset FGR, MCA Doppler abnormalities precede deterioration and stillbirth. However, from 34 to 38 weeks, randomized evidence on optimal delivery timing is lacking. From 38 weeks onward, the balance of neonatal versus fetal risks favors delivery.


Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Feto/irrigación sanguínea , Placenta/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Líquido Amniótico/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/mortalidad , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/fisiopatología , Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Peso Fetal , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Edad Gestacional , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Humanos , Placenta/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagen
12.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 31(4): 469-473, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28139949

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact on stillbirth risk, cesarean deliveries, and delivery-related healthcare cost associated with induction of labor compared to expectant management of term pregnancies in an obese population. METHODS: A decision analysis model was designed to compare the delivery and cost outcomes associated with a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 term pregnancies, complicated by obesity, that were planning a vaginal delivery. The model predicted stillbirths, cesarean deliveries, and total delivery-related health care cost from routine induction at 39 weeks compared to expectant management and routine induction each week from 40 to 42 weeks. RESULTS: There were 387 stillbirths avoided by routine induction at 39 weeks compared to the worst-case model of expectant management with induction at 42 weeks. 9234 cesarean deliveries were avoided by routine induction at 39 weeks compared to the worst-case model of expectant management and induction at 41 weeks (30,888 vs. 40,122) . Routine induction at 39 weeks showed a savings in delivery-related health care cost of 30 million dollars compared to the worst-case model of expectant management and induction at 41 weeks (536 million vs. 566 million). CONCLUSION: Utilizing this computational model, routine induction at 39 weeks minimizes stillbirths, cesarean deliveries, and delivery-related health care cost.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Edad Gestacional , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/economía , Obesidad , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Mortinato
13.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 30(23): 2864-2870, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892784

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the gestational age (GA) at which risk of mortality and severe outcome was minimized comparing preterm delivery and expectant management. METHODS: Retrospective study performed between 2009 and 2014 of newborns with gastroschisis in three large French level III neonatal intensive care units. Each department followed two distinct strategies: elective delivery at 35 weeks' GA and a delayed approach. RESULTS: We included 69 gastroschisis cases. The lengths of stay lasting more than 60 days were significantly greater in the planned delivery group than in the expectant approach group (18/30 (60%) vs. 8/39 (20.5%), p = 0.001). Gastroschisis cases receiving antenatal corticoids during the last two weeks of gestation required significantly less surgeries during their initial stay (p = 0.003) as well as shorter parenteral feedings (p = 0.002). A multivariate logistic regression showed that a GA of less than 36 weeks' GA was is a pejorative factor for a stay above 60 days, regardless of whether it was a simple or complex gastroschisis, (OR= 3.8; p = 0.021). A complex gastroschisis was a risk factor for significantly longer parenteral feedings, regardless of the center where patient is treated (Beta = -0.3, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on decisions about delivery timing by incorporating risk of neonatal morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis/diagnóstico , Gastrosquisis/terapia , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Fetal Pediatr Pathol ; 35(6): 359-368, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27494350

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Compare short-term urologic outcomes with delivery timing in fetuses with severe hydronephrosis. METHODS: An ultrasound database was queried for severe hydronephrosis. Cases were categorized into late preterm/early term (36 0/7 - 38 6/7 weeks) and full term (39 0/7 weeks or greater) groups. Baseline characteristics were compared using standard statistical methods. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed for grade and severity of hydronephrosis on first postnatal ultrasound with gestational age at delivery. RESULTS: Of 589 cases, 79 (33 late preterm/early term, 46 full term) met criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Spearman's correlation coefficients (rs) indicated that increased postnatal Society for Fetal Urology grade, rs= -0.26 (95% CI [-.48, -.002]), and severity of hydronephrosis, rs= -0.39 (95% CI [-.59, -.14]), both correlated with earlier delivery. CONCLUSION: Late preterm/early term delivery resulted in worse short-term postnatal renal outcomes. Unless otherwise indicated, delivery for fetal hydronephrosis should be deferred until 39 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Edad Gestacional , Hidronefrosis/fisiopatología , Adulto , Femenino , Desarrollo Fetal/fisiología , Humanos , Hidronefrosis/embriología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pielectasia , Factores de Tiempo
15.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(5): 690-5, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25754212

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of delivery in late preterm intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) indices. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was built to determine the optimal gestational age (GA) of delivery in a theoretic cohort of 10 000 IUGR fetuses with elevated UAD systolic/diastolic ratios diagnosed at 34 weeks. All inputs were derived from the literature. Strategies involving expectant management accounted for the probabilities of stillbirth, spontaneous delivery and induction of labor for UAD absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (AREDF) at each successive week. Outcomes included short- and long-term neonatal morbidity and mortality with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) generated based on these outcomes. Base case, sensitivity analyses and a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. RESULTS: The optimal GA for delivery is 35 weeks, which minimized perinatal deaths and maximized total QALYs. Earlier delivery became optimal once the risk of stillbirth was threefold our baseline assumption; our model was also robust until the risk of AREDF at 35 weeks was half our baseline assumption, after which delivery at 36 weeks was preferred. Delivery at 35 weeks was the optimal strategy in 77% of trials in Monte Carlo multivariable sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Weighing the risks of iatrogenic prematurity against the poor outcomes associated with AREDF, the ideal GA to deliver late preterm IUGR fetuses with elevated UAD indices is 35 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/terapia , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Arterias Umbilicales/anomalías , Malformaciones Vasculares , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Arterias Umbilicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Vasculares/epidemiología
16.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 210(6): 578.e1-9, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24607757

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prospective risk of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) at ≥34 weeks' gestation for monochorionic and dichorionic twins receiving intensive antenatal fetal surveillance. The secondary objective was to calculate the incidence of prematurity-related neonatal morbidity/mortality rates that have been stratified by gestational week and chorionicity. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of all twins at ≥34 weeks' gestation who were delivered at the Medical University of South Carolina (1987-2010) was performed. Twins were cared for in a longstanding Twin Clinic with standardized treatment and surveillance protocols and supervised by a consistent Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialist. Gestational age-specific fetal/neonatal mortality rates and composite neonatal morbidity rates were compared by chorionicity. A generalized linear mixed model was used to identify variables that were associated with increased composite neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: Among 768 twin gestations (601 dichorionic and 167 monochorionic), only 1 dichorionic IUFD occurred. The prospective risk of IUFD at ≥34 weeks' gestation was 0.17% for dichorionic twins and 0% for monochorionic twins. Composite neonatal morbidity decreased with each gestational week (P < .0001). Morbidity was increased by white race, gestational diabetes mellitus, and elective indication for delivery. The nadir of composite neonatal morbidity occurred at 36/0-36/6 weeks' gestation for monochorionic twins and 37/0-37/6 weeks' gestation for dichorionic twins. CONCLUSION: Our data do not support concern for an increased risk of stillbirth in uncomplicated intensively monitored monochorionic twins at ≥34 weeks' gestation. However, our data do show significantly increased rates of neonatal morbidity in late preterm monochorionic twins that cannot be justified by a corresponding reduction in the risk of stillbirth. We believe that our data support delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic twins at 37 weeks' gestation.


Asunto(s)
Corion/fisiopatología , Muerte Fetal/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Enfermedades del Prematuro/epidemiología , Embarazo Gemelar/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortinato/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Masculino , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA