RESUMEN
Os adesivos que unem braquetes (BQTs) ao esmalte dentário atendem às necessidades clínicas, pois resistem às forças mastigatórias bem como às forças da mecânica ortodôntica. No entanto, estes devem possibilitar sua remoção sem causar maiores danos ao esmalte. Resíduos do sistema adesivo (SA) ou pequenos defeitos no esmalte após remoção do BQT favorecem a adesão de biofilme e alteram a refração da luz, culminando em problemas estéticos. Embora existam muitos métodos de remoção, não há consenso na literatura quanto a indicação deles. Objetivou-se comparar a eficiência de dois métodos de remoção de adesivo: broca multilaminada de Zircônia (Z) e inserto ultrassônico com crescimento de diamante por deposição química de vapor (CVD). BQTs foram cimentados na face vestibular de 26 dentes incisivos bovinos, sendo removidos utilizando alicate ortodôntico. Em seguida, os dentes foram divididos em dois grupos para remoção do SA remanescente: grupo Z (broca de Zircônia multilaminada) e grupo D (inserto ultrassônico CVD). Todas as amostras passaram por etapa de polimento final. Os dados foram coletados através de escaneamento digital e moldagem com silicone de adição em ambos os grupos para avaliação em cada uma das etapas: inicial, após remoção do BQT, após remoção do adesivo e após polimento. Em seguida, os moldes obtidos foram vertidos em modelos de resina epóxi que, posteriormente, foram metalizadas para análise em microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV) e em estereomicroscopia. Os dados foram tabulados no software Microsoft Excel ® versão 2010 e submetidos à análise estatística no software JASP (Universidade de Amsterdã, â² = 0,05), versão 0.15, ambiente Windows, sendo realizado o teste "T de Student". Observou-se que a remoção do SA acarreta danos à superfície do esmalte, corroborando a literatura encontrada. Houve diferenças na rugosidade da superfície do esmalte, havendo maior rugosidade no grupo Z. No entanto, após polimento, não houve diferença estatística entre os dois grupos. As pontas CVD apresentaram maior tempo para desgaste do SA residual, mas menor potencial de danos às estruturas dentárias sadias, revelando-se promissoras na preservação da superfície dentária. (AU)
Adhesives that bond brackets (BQTs) to tooth enamel meet clinical needs, as they resist to chewing forces as well as to the forces of orthodontic mechanics. However, these must allow for removal without causing further damage to the enamel. Residues from the adhesive system (AS) or small defects in the enamel after BQT removal favor biofilm adhesion and alter light refraction, resulting in aesthetic problems. Although there are many removal methods, there is no consensus in the literature regarding their indication. The objective was to compare the efficiency of two adhesive removal methods: multilaminate zirconia drill (Z) and ultrasonic insert with diamond growth by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). BQTs were cemented on the buccal surface of 26 bovine incisor teeth and removed using orthodontic pliers. Then, the teeth were divided into two groups to remove the remaining adhesive system: group Z (multilaminate zirconia bur) and group D (CVD ultrasonic insert). All samples went through the final polishing stage. Data were collected through digital scanning and molding with added silicone in both groups for evaluation at each stage: initial, after removal of the BQT, after removal of the adhesive, and after polishing. Then, the molds obtained were poured into epoxy resin models that were subsequently metalized for analysis under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and stereomicroscopy. The data were tabulated in the Microsoft Excel ® software version 2010 and subjected to statistical analysis in the JASP software (University of Amsterdam, â² = 0.05), version 0.15, Windows environment, using the "Student's T" test. It was observed that removing the AS causes damage to the enamel surface, corroborating the literature found. There were differences in the roughness of the enamel surface, with greater roughness in group Z. However, the two groups had no statistical difference after polishing. The CVD insert showed a longer time for wear of residual SA, but a lower potential for damage to healthy dental structures, proving to be promising in preserving the tooth surface(AU)
Asunto(s)
Soportes Ortodóncicos , Desconsolidación Dental , Esmalte Dental , Materiales DentalesRESUMEN
Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the shear bond strength of rebonded CAD/CAM laminates made of lithium disilicate or feldspathic ceramics after debonding using Er,Cr:YSGG lasers. Material and Methods:Eighty bovine teeth (N=80) were used as a bonding substrate, which were divided into four main groups (20 each) according to the ceramic material and cement-curing mode used as follows: Group AL: lithium disilicate (IPS E.max) with light-cured resin cement, Group AD: lithium disilicate (IPS E.max) with dual-cured resin cement, Group BL: feldspathic porcelain (VITA MARK II) with light-cured resin cement, and Group BD: feldspathic porcelain (VITA MARK II) with dual-cured resin cement. Half the number of each subgroup (n=10/subdivisions) were tested for their shear bond strength without debonding, while the other half of the specimens were tested after Er,Cr:YSGG laser debonding and rebonding. A three-way ANOVA test was used to study the effect of ceramic and curing on shear bond strength. Bonferroni's post-hoc test was used for pairwise comparisons when the ANOVA test was significant. Results: After rebonding and using the light-cure mode, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean shear bond strength of the two ceramics (P-value = 0.065). However, after rebonding and using the dual-cured mode, E.max showed significantly lower shear bond strength than VITA (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Ceramic type, the cement's curing mode, and rebonding after laser irradiation all had a significant effect on the mean shear bond strength (AU)
Objetivo: Identificar a resistência de cisalhamento de laminados CAD/CAM recolados, feitos de cerâmica de disilicato de lítio ou feldspática, após descolamento utilizando lasers Er,Cr:YSGG. Material e Métodos: Oitenta dentes bovinos (N=80) foram utilizados como substrato de colagem, divididos em quatro grupos principais (20 cada) de acordo com o material cerâmico e o modo de cura do cimento utilizado da seguinte forma: Grupo AL: disilicato de lítio (IPS E.max) com cimento resinoso fotopolimerizável, Grupo AD: disilicato de lítio (IPS E.max) com cimento resinoso de dupla cura, Grupo BL: porcelana feldspática (VITA MARK II) com cimento resinoso fotopolimerizável, e Grupo BD: porcelana feldspática (VITA MARK II) com cimento resinoso de dupla cura. Metade do número de cada subgrupo (n=10/subdivisões) foi testada quanto à resistência de cisalhamento sem descolamento, enquanto a outra metade dos espécimes foi testada após descolamento e recolagem a laser Er,Cr:YSGG. Um teste ANOVA de três vias foi usado para estudar o efeito da cerâmica e da cura na resistência de cisalhamento. O teste post-hoc de Bonferroni foi usado para comparações pareadas quando o teste ANOVA foi significativo. Resultados: Após a recolagem e usando o modo de fotopolimerização, não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre a resistência de cisalhamento média das duas cerâmicas (valor de P = 0,065). No entanto, após a recolagem e usando o modo de dupla cura, o E.max apresentou resistência de cisalhamento significativamente menor que o VITA (valor de P < 0,001). Conclusão: O tipo de cerâmica, o modo de cura do cimento e a recolagem após irradiação a laser tiveram efeito significativo na resistência de cisalhamento média (AU)
Asunto(s)
Animales , Bovinos , Desconsolidación Dental , Coronas con Frente Estético , Rayos LáserRESUMEN
Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the bond strength between metallic brackets and two different glass ceramics and to evaluate the ceramic surface roughness after different finishing protocols. Methods: The surface roughness of lithium disilicate and resin matrix ceramic samples was measured (initial). All samples were treated with hydrofluoric acid and silane and bonded to metallic brackets with orthodontic cement adhesive. Shear bond strength tests were performed using a universal testing machine (n=12). The surface roughness was measured again (intermediate, n=6) after removing the remaining cement adhesive from the ceramic surfaces with a diamond or 24-blade bur after polishing the ceramic surfaces (final, n=6). Results: The resin matrix ceramic had the highest bond strength. The rotatory instrument used for the removal of cement adhesive did not affect the surface roughness of the resin matrix ceramic or lithium disilicate (p=0.985 and p=0.504, respectively), but did affect the evaluation time (p<0.001) for both restorative materials. The intermediate roughness was the highest. For the resin matrix ceramic, polishing promoted a final surface roughness similar to the initial condition; however, changes in the surface shape of this ceramic could be visibly observed when using a 24-blade bur. Conclusion: The bond strength of metallic brackets bonded on resin-matrix ceramics is higher than bonding on lithium disilicate. The use of diamond burs for the removal of the remaining adhesive from the resin matrix ceramics is highly recommended.
RESUMEN
Considerando o uso de brocas para remoção da resina residual após descolagem do braquete e a possibilidade de injúrias à superfície do esmalte após o uso dessas brocas, este trabalho teve como objetivo realizar um estudo experimental, para avaliar a variação do aspecto superficial do esmalte de forma qualitativa, por meio da avaliação com imagens topográficas do esmalte dentário, utilizando-se a Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV), a qual permitiu ilustrar e avaliar a superfície do esmalte após a fase de polimento final, realizada por dois métodos: taça de borracha ou escova Robinson. Foram utilizados 25 dentes pré-molares humanos, obtidos a partir de exodontias em pacientes que procuraram voluntariamente o curso de Residência em Cirurgia da Clínica Odontológica Universitária da Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Os dentes foram divididos em quatro grupos: A, B, C e D, contendo 6 dentes cada, de acordo com as brocas utilizadas para a remoção do remanescente adesivo e o polimento escolhido, além de um dente como "controle". Foi avaliada a rugosidade superficial do esmalte após a remoção da resina e a superfície do esmalte após o polimento com as duas opções apresentadas. Os resultados mostraram que, por observação e inspeção, as brocas removeram a resina residual de todos os dentes, porém, causaram riscos e ranhuras, como evidenciado nas imagens em MEV. Concluiu-se que não houve diferença estatística entre os métodos de polimento e que ambos foram importantes para a redução das marcas abrasivas, proporcionando uma superfície mais lisa do esmalte.
Considering the use of specific burs to remove residual resin after bracket debonding and the possibility of injuries to the dental enamel after using these burs, this study aimed to verify the variation in the enamel surface appearance in a qualitative way and evaluation with topographic images of the dental enamel. The use of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) allowed to illustrate and evaluate the enamel surface after the final polishing phase using two methods: rubber cup or Robinson brush. Twenty-five human premolar teeth were obtained from extractions in patients who voluntarily sought the Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Residency at the Dental School from the State University of Londrina; the teeth were divided into four groups A, B, C and D containing 6 teeth each according to the burs used to remove the remaining adhesive and the chosen polishing, in addition to one tooth as a "control". Dental enamel surface roughness was evaluated after resin removal and enamel surface after polishing with the two methods presented. The results showed that by observation and inspection, the burs removed residual resin from all teeth, however, caused scratches and grooves as evidenced in the SEM images. Based on the results, there was no statistical difference between the polishing methods, and both were important for the reduction of abrasive marks and provided a smoother enamel surface.
RESUMEN
Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) as an Additive Manufacturing (AM) method for Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has established a promising future for medical applications so far, however interlayer delamination as a failure mechanism for FFF implants has raised critical concerns. A one-dimensional (1D) heat transfer model (HTM) was developed to compute the layer and interlayer temperatures by considering the nature of 3D printing for FFF PEEK builds. The HTM was then coupled with a non-isothermal healing model to predict the interlayer strength through thickness of a FFF PEEK part. We then conducted a parametric study of the primary temperature effects of the FFF system, including the print bed, nozzle, and chamber temperatures, on layer healing. The heat transfer component of the model for the FFF PEEK layer healing assessment was validated separately. An idealized PEEK cube design (10x10x10 mm3) was used for model development and 3D printed in commercially available industrial and medical FFF machines. During the printing and cooling processes of FFF, thermal videos were recorded in both printers using a calibrated infrared camera. Thermal images were then processed to obtain time-dependent layer temperature profiles of FFF PEEK prints. Both the theoretical model and experiments confirmed that the upper layers in reference to the print bed exhibited higher temperatures, thus higher healing degrees than the lower layers. Increasing the print bed temperature increased the healing of the layers allowing more layers to heal 100%. The nozzle temperature showed the most significant effect on the layer healing, and under certain nozzle temperature, none of the layers healed adequately. Although environment temperature had less impact on the lower layers closer to the print bed, 100% healed layer number increased when the chamber temperature increased. The model predictions were in good agreement with the experimental data, particularly for the mid-part of FFF PEEK cubes printed in both FFF machines.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of three methods of adhesive remnant removal (carbide bur and low speed handpiece, carbide bur and high speed handpiece, and zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite bur), after orthodontic bracket debonding, on tooth color and enamel surface roughness. Methods: Ninety sound premolar teeth were selected. The baseline tooth color was assessed using Vita spectrophotometer. The teeth were subjected to bracket bonding processes and then randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group, composite remnant was removed by one of the three methods of adhesive removal, and the teeth were then subjected to color assessment again. To measure the surface roughness, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with x400 magnification was used. Results: ANOVA showed that the effect of the three methods of adhesive remnant removal on ∆L, ∆b and ∆E was statistically significant (p=0.01), but without significant effect on ∆a. Comparison of the means showed that composite bur and high speed carbide bur yielded the highest ∆E (p=0.05), and had a significant difference when compared to carbide bur and low speed handpiece. The highest ∆L and ∆b values belonged to samples approached with composite bur and carbide bur with high speed handpiece, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the composite bur created a very smooth surface, compared to the other two methods. Conclusion: Zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite created the smoothest enamel surface and highest color change, when compared to the other two methods.
RESUMO Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos de três métodos de remoção de adesivo remanescente (broca carbide e peça de mão em baixa rotação, broca carbide e peça de mão em alta rotação, e broca de compósito reforçado com fibra de vidro rica em zircônia), após a descolagem de braquetes ortodônticos, sobre a cor dos dentes e rugosidade superficial do esmalte. Métodos: Noventa pré-molares hígidos foram selecionados. A cor inicial dos dentes foi avaliada usando um espectrofotômetro Vita. Os dentes foram submetidos à etapa de colagem dos braquetes e, então, divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos. Em cada grupo, o adesivo remanescente foi removido usando um dos três métodos de remoção, e os dentes foram novamente submetidos à avaliação de cor. Para medir a rugosidade superficial dos dentes, foi usado um microscópio eletrônico de varredura (MEV) com aumento de 400x. Resultados: A ANOVA mostrou que os três métodos de remoção do adesivo remanescente tiveram efeito estatisticamente significativo (p=0,01) em ∆L, ∆b e ∆E, mas sem efeito significativo em ∆a. A comparação das médias mostrou que a broca de compósito e a broca carbide em alta rotação produziram o maior ∆E (p=0,05) e tiveram uma diferença significativa quando comparadas com a broca carbide e a peça de mão em baixa rotação. Os maiores valores de ∆L e ∆b foram encontrados, respectivamente, nos grupos com broca de compósito e broca carbide usando peça de mão em alta rotação. A análise MEV mostrou que o uso da broca de compósito resultou em uma superfície muito lisa, em comparação com os outros dois métodos. Conclusão: Em comparação aos outros métodos, a broca de compósito reforçado com fibra de vidro rica em zircônia criou a superfície de esmalte mais lisa e resultou em uma maior mudança de cor.
RESUMEN
Background: The debonding of crowns and ceramic veneers with laser is already a reality in the clinic. It presents benefits in comparison to traditional removal with the use of a rotating instrument; however, there is still no consolidated protocol and many professionals use it without the necessary scientific basis. Objective: The aim of this work was to perform a literature review on the debonding of indirect ceramic restorations using the Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers to provide clinical professionals and the scientific community a careful analysis, and also to guiding the use of irradiation at laser for such procedures. Methods: Bibliographic searches were performed in the following databases: Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. According to the inclusion criteria adopted, twenty-seven clinical and in vitro studies were selected in the period from 2007 to 2021. In the present work, the composition of the crowns and facets, as well as the types of cement and the laser irradiation protocols adopted in the selected studies is detailed. Conclusions: It was concluded that the use of erbium lasers for debonding of indirect ceramic restorations proved to be more selective and conservative when compared to removal with a rotary diamond instrument. Furthermore, it was shown to be in more efficient in debonding different types of ceramics. However, there are great variations in the "debonding" protocols, which emphasizes the need for further studies that seek to standardize the irradiation protocols considering the different clinical situations (AU)
Antecedentes: A remoção de coroas e facetas cerâmicas com laser já é uma realidade clínica e apresenta benefícios em relação à remoção tradicional com uso de instrumento rotatório diamantado; entretanto, ainda não existe um protocolo consolidado e muitos profissionais o utilizam sem o embasamento científico necessário. Objetivos: O objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar uma revisão da literatura sobre a remoção de restaurações cerâmicas indiretas utilizando os lasers Er:YAG e Er,Cr:YSGG para fornecer uma análise cuidadosa aos profissionais clínicos e à comunidade científica, além de orientar o uso da irradiação a laser para tal aplicação. Métodos: As buscas bibliográficas foram realizadas, nas seguintes bases de dados: Pubmed, Web of Science e Google Scholar. De acordo com os critérios de inclusão adotados, foram selecionados vinte e sete estudos clínicos e in vitro no período de 2007 a 2021. No presente trabalho, a composição das coroas e facetas, bem como os tipos de cimento e os protocolos de irradiação laser adotados nos estudos selecionados foram detalhados. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que o uso dos lasers de érbio para remoção de restaurações cerâmicas indiretas mostrou-se mais seletivo e conservador quando comparado à remoção com instrumento rotatório diamantado, além de ser eficiente na remoção de diferentes tipos de cerâmicas. No entanto, existem grandes variações nos protocolos de "debonding", o que enfatiza a necessidade de novos estudos que busquem uma padronização dos protocolos de irradiação considerando as diferentes situações clínicas.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Elevación , Coronas , Coronas con Frente Estético , Láseres de Estado SólidoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The most used product for surface acid conditioning for enamel is 37-40% phosphoric acid, which promotes greater mechanical retention. AIM: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of brackets bonded to bovine enamel with different acid conditioning protocols and to analyze the surface morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 169 teeth (n = 13) were divided into 4 groups: control group without conditioning (G1), Dental Gel 37% phosphoric acid (Dentsply) (G2), Ultra Etch 35% (Ultradent) (G3) and Attaque gel 37% (Biodinâmica) (G4). Groups G2, G3 and G4 were subdivided according to the conditioning time into: 10 s (a), 15 s (b), 30 s (c) and 60 s (d). The superficial enamel morphology (n = 3) was analyzed using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyze the depth of the microporosities. The samples were submitted to the shear test (SBS) with the aid of a universal testing machine (INSTRON) with a speed of 1 mm/min. The enamel after debonding was analyzed to determine the adhesive remnant index (ARI) in a stereoscopic magnifying glass. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The SBS data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. ARI data were analyzed using generalized linear models and SEM measurements were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests. The 95% significance level was used. RESULTS: The SBS within G2, G3 and G4 ranged from 11.11 to 12.66 MPa. ARI score 3 was observed in 35% of the samples. The samples analyzed in the SEM showed microporosity depth rangingfrom 1.28 to 2.48 µm. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between the acids and times evaluated for SBS. The ARI analysis showed that the studied acids provide protection to the enamel surface, keeping the adhesive attached to the buccal surface after debonding. The increase in conditioning time is directly proportional to the deterioration of the prismatic and interprismatic content.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: This study aims to determine shear debonding strength of metal and ceramic brackets, and the degree of enamel crack healing. Material and Methods: Extracted human maxillary premolars were flattened on the buccal surface, and randomly separated into five groups (n = 15). In control groups (groups 1 and 2), metal and ceramic brackets were bonded on flat polished enamel, while in experimental groups (groups 3 and 4), metal and ceramic brackets were bonded on the surface with boundary where corner cracks were created. Additionally, fifteen specimens (group 5) were also prepared for an indentation procedure with no bracket installation. The degree of crack healing was measured. All brackets were detached with a universal testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also identified. Healing degree and apparent fracture toughness were then calculated. Results: Between groups with similar bracket types, there was no statistically significant difference in debonding strength. Regarding bracket types, ceramic brackets provided significantly higher debonding strength than metal brackets. There was a significant difference in ARI scores between metal and ceramic brackets. The corner cracks showed signs of healing in both horizontal and vertical directions. No statistically significant difference in the healing rates among the groups was found and the apparent fracture toughness increased from the initial to the final measurement. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, even though ceramic brackets required significantly higher debonding force compared to metal brackets, debonding stress was limited to the bonding site and did not affect the surrounding cracks on enamel.
RESUMO Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo determinar a resistência ao cisalhamento de braquetes metálicos e cerâmicos, e o grau de reparo de fraturas no esmalte. Métodos: Pré-molares superiores, extraídos de humanos, foram aplainados na face vestibular e aleatoriamente divididos em cinco grupos (n = 15). Nos grupos controle (Grupos 1 e 2), os braquetes metálicos e cerâmicos foram colados em esmalte liso e polido; enquanto nos grupos experimentais (Grupos 3 e 4), os braquetes metálicos e cerâmicos foram colados em superfície delimitada, em cujos cantos foram criadas fissuras. Adicionalmente, foram também preparados 15 espécimes (Grupo 5) para um teste com indentação, sem a instalação de braquetes. O grau de reparo das fraturas foi avaliado. Todos os braquetes foram descolados usando uma máquina universal de testes, e o índice de adesivo remanescente (ARI) também foi avaliado. O grau de reparo e a tenacidade à fratura aparente foram então calculados. Resultados: Entre os grupos com o mesmo tipo de braquetes, não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na força de descolagem. Com relação aos tipos de braquetes, os cerâmicos apresentaram uma força de descolagem significativamente maior do que os metálicos. Houve uma diferença significativa nos escores ARI entre os braquetes metálicos e os cerâmicos. As fraturas de canto mostraram sinais de reparo nos sentidos horizontal e vertical. Não foi detectada diferença estatisticamente significativa no grau de reparo entre os grupos, e a tenacidade à fratura aparente aumentou da mensuração inicial para a final. Conclusão: Considerando-se as limitações desse estudo, apesar de os braquetes cerâmicos necessitarem de força de descolagem significativamente maior do que os braquetes metálicos, a tensão de descolagem foi limitada ao sítio de colagem, não afetando as fraturas de esmalte ao redor.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Propiedades de Superficie , Ensayo de Materiales , Cerámica , Desconsolidación Dental , Cementos Dentales , Esmalte Dental , Resistencia al Corte , Análisis del Estrés DentalRESUMEN
Abstract Objective: Pain is a problem during bracket removal, and more comfortable treatment is needed. This study examined the association of pain with the removal force required for ceramic brackets, compared with metal and plastic brackets, to determine which removal method resulted in less pain and discomfort. Methodology: 81 subjects (mean age, 25.1 years; 25 males and 56 females) were enrolled, from whom 1,235 brackets (407 ceramic, 432 plastic, and 396 metal) were removed. Measured teeth were distinguished at six segments. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the removal of each bracket. An additional grip was placed on the grips of debonding pliers with right-angled beaks; a mini loading cell sensor pinched by the grips was used to measure removal force during debonding. VAS and force values were statistically analyzed. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were performed for multiple comparisons; multiple regression analysis was also performed. Results: Forces in the upper and lower anterior segments were significantly smaller (p<0.05) than those in the other segments. Pain tended to be greater in the upper and lower anterior segments than in the posterior segments. In all segments, the removal force was greater for metal brackets than for plastic or ceramic brackets. Ceramic brackets caused significantly greater pain than plastic brackets for the upper and lower anterior segments. Debonding force was involved in the brackets, following adjustments for pain, upper left segment, age, and sex. Conclusions Pain and discomfort are likely to occur during bracket debonding.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Animales , Adulto , Soportes Ortodóncicos/efectos adversos , Desconsolidación Dental/efectos adversos , Dolor , CerámicaRESUMEN
The aim of this in vitro study was to present a method using confocal laser scanning microscopy for three-dimensional analysis of human dental enamel subjected to ceramic bracket debonding. The labial enamel surfaces of three upper central incisors were prepared and mounted in the form of standardized specimens. A sample repositioning protocol was established to enable surface measurement and analysis before and after bracket debonding. Observations were made of representative areas measuring 1,280 × 1,280 µm2, in the center of the enamel samples, as well as of the total topography (2,500 × 3,500 µm) of the bonding areas provided by the equipment software. Noncontact three-dimensional high-resolution image analyses revealed the capabilities of the employed technique and methodology to permit the examination of specific characteristics and alterations on the surfaces, before and after the debonding and finishing procedures. The new protocol was effective to provide qualitative and quantitative assessments of changes on the same dental surfaces at different trial times. The methodology constitutes a feasible tool for revealing the effects of debonding of ceramic brackets on sound and previously injured dental enamel surfaces.
Asunto(s)
Cerámica/química , Desconsolidación Dental/métodos , Esmalte Dental/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Esmalte Dental/patología , Humanos , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagen , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Proyectos Piloto , Propiedades de SuperficieRESUMEN
Background: New applications in laser technology in aesthetic restorative dentistry merit further research. This study compares the debonding strength and failure mode of feldspathic ceramic veneers using either Er,Cr:YSGG (erbium,chromium:ytrrium-scandium-gallium-garnet) laser at two levels of fluency or no laser (control group). Methods: An in vitro comparative study was carried out using bovine teeth that were randomly distributed into 3 groups of 21 specimens each: (a) experimental group 1 (EG1): irradiated with Er,Cr:YSGG (Waterlase iPlus®; Biolase, Irvine) at an energy density per pulse of 4 J/cm2, using a handpiece (Turbo; Biolase) with a sapphire tip (MX7) and applying the beam perpendicular to the specimen at a distance of 4 mm for 60 sec; (b) experimental group 2 (EG2): irradiated as in EG1, but at 2.7 J/cm2; and (c) control group (CG): debonding without laser irradiation. Results: The stress required for veneer debonding was 8.19 MPa in CG, 0.91 MPa in EG1, and 0.48 MPa in EG2. The difference between the control and both experimental groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The percentages of adhesive failure were 40%, 61.9%, and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: Using the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 4 or 2.7 J/cm2 requires significantly less force to debond ceramic veneers. The percentage of adhesive failures in the two experimental protocols was higher than in the control group. Application of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser using the parameters in this study may be useful in removing feldspathic ceramic veneers, avoiding damaging them and protecting the enamel.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Animales , Bovinos , Cerámica , Porcelana DentalRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this randomized in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of carbide, fibreglass and polymer burs on resinous remnant removal after bracket debonding, by the evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology. The secondary objective was to compare the time dispended on the procedures. METHODS: The buccal surfaces of 28 bovine incisors were analysed by a profilometer to initial roughness measurement (Ra-T1). Brackets were bonded with a light-cured resin and debonded with a debonding plier. The samples were randomly divided into four groups, according to the bur used (n=7): A-Tungsten carbide; B-Fibreglass; C-Polymer; D-Polymer with 75% ethanol pre-treatment. The second roughness measurements were made after resin removal (Ra-T2). Time for removal procedures was also recorded. The third measurements were made after polishing (Ra-T3). Scanning Electronic Microscopy was performed in two samples of each group: after resin removal and after polishing. Results of roughness and time measurements were statically analysed by analysis of variance with post-hoc Bonferroni. RESULTS: After polishing, tungsten carbide (P=0.1555) and fibreglass burs provided final surface roughness statistically similar to the baseline condition (P=1.0000). Yet, polymer burs, associated (P<0.0001) or not to alcohol (P<0.0001), provided surface roughness significantly higher when compared to baseline values. Polymer burs were more time-consuming on resinous remnant removal than tungsten carbide and fibreglass burs (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Polymer burs were less effective and more time-consuming to remove the remaining resin than tungsten carbide and fibreglass burs. The polishing step created smoother surfaces regardless of the burs used for resin removal.
Asunto(s)
Cementos Dentales/química , Desconsolidación Dental/métodos , Esmalte Dental/patología , Pulido Dental/métodos , Polímeros/química , Grabado Ácido Dental , Animales , Bovinos , Vidrio , Humanos , Incisivo , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Cementos de Resina , Propiedades de Superficie , Tungsteno , Compuestos de TungstenoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare different techniques for resin remnant removal (RRR) after orthodontic bracket debonding and to evaluate alterations on the dental enamel caused by these methods. The null hypothesis tested was that there is no difference between RRR techniques in relationship the changes caused on the dental enamel. METHODS: A total of 75 bovine mandibular permanent incisors were used in the study. Brackets were bonded and debonded in each tooth in two experimental regions. Five RRR techniques were used in the experimental groups (n=15): Group 1-diamond bur (6-bladed), Group 2-diamond bur (12-bladed), Group 3-diamond bur (30-bladed), Group 4-aluminum oxide sandblasting (AOS), and Group 5-Er:YAG laser. Enamel surface was evaluated using profilometry, and surface roughness analysis was performed at three time intervals: before bracket bonding, after RRR techniques, and after final polishing. Qualitative analyses of the enamel surfaces were performed using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Multiblade burs showed the best results, and the 30-bladed bur created a less irregular enamel surface. AOS caused greater enamel wear, and Er:YAG laser caused more surface irregularity. CONCLUSION: The null hypothesis was rejected. The multiblade burs were the least harmful than the other techniques. Enamel surface roughness after using the 30-blade bur was similar to the original enamel. These results indicate that the type of bur tested (30-bladed) can be indicated to remove resin remnants after bracket debonding.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fluorescent agents are added to orthodontic adhesives with the aim of making them visible under ultraviolet (UV) light, which ensures the complete, safe removal of remnants after orthodontic treatment. However, it is necessary to evaluate if the mechanical strength of these materials is maintained. Therefore, this study evaluated whether the addition of fluorescent agents influences the shear bond strength and clinical performance of a UV light-sensitive adhesive system. METHODS: This study consisted of two stages: (1) In vitro phase: 40 human teeth were selected, divided at random into 2 groups (n = 20), according to the adhesive system used: UV group-adhesive with fluorescent agent, and control group-conventional adhesive. A shear bond strength test was performed using a DL 2000 universal testing machine, at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The accessories were removed and an evaluation of the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was carried out. (2) Clinical phase: 8 patients were selected and had their appliances bonded using the split-mouth design (160 teeth) with the same tested adhesive systems (UV, n = 80; control, n = 80). The patients were monitored for bonding failure for a period of 24 months. Statistical analysis was performed using the Independent t test, chi-squared tests, and Mann-Whitney test, at a level of significance of 5% and confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: Regarding the in vitro phase, the shear bond strength test yielded similar results in the two groups (p > 0.05) and the ARI showed statistically significant differences between the groups with a score of 1 being the most frequent ARI for both groups (70%). In addition, there was no clinical difference in terms of bonding failure between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of fluorescent elements does not alter the mechanical strength and performance of the orthodontic adhesive and represents a viable alternative for clinical application.
Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Cementos Dentales , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Colorantes Fluorescentes , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Cementos de Resina , Resistencia al Corte , Estrés MecánicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A reliable adhesion between fixed devices and dental surfaces is a key factor for the clinical success of any orthodontic treatment. Adhesion preparation is associated with damages related to abrasive cleaning, enamel structure defacing caused by etching, enamel loss when removing resin remnants at orthodontic treatment finishing stage or when conditioning surface for adhesive failure and fractures at bracket removal. AIM: The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to enamel adhered with a novel non-damaging and remineralizing material for enamel versus the traditional 37% phosphoric acid etching. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 75 Premolars collected from 15- to 40-years old healthy donors requiring extraction were collected. The teeth were then randomly divided into three groups (nâ¯=â¯25). One group was used for the experimental new method (EX), the second for the conventional phosphoric acid etching (PA) method and the third group was left without any treatment (NT). The metallic brackets were fixed with Transbond® XT adhesive and composite resin polymerized for 40â¯s with a halogen photocuring lamp. The shear bond strength was quantified by means of a universal testing machine at 1â¯mm/min crosshead speed and a load cell of 1 kN. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Tests of normality, adjustment of the data to a root square, a one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were performed. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the NT (1.4 MPa), PA (32.1 MPa) and EX (9.7 MPa) groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental material for conditioning human enamel induces calcium phosphates crystals on the enamel surface and improves the bond strength in comparison to the NT group.
RESUMEN
A descolagem de bráquetes ortodônticos são frequentes na prática clínica. O conhecimento dos fatores associados à descolagem é relevante para maior efetividade clínica na movimentação dentária. Este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar a ocorrência de descolagem de bráquetes e fatores associados em pacientes que concluíram tratamento ortodôntico. Foram avaliados os prontuários de 205 pacientes de uma clínica privada tratados ortodonticamente por um único operador entre 2000 e 2013, nos quais foram utilizados o mesmo tipo de bráquete e sistema adesivo para a colagem. Para a análise univariada foram utilizadas tabelas de frequências e médias de tendência central e dispersão. Na análise bivariada foram utilizadas tabelas de dupla entrada e teste Qui-quadrado ou Exato de Fisher. Em 45,9% dos pacientes não ocorreu descolagem de bráquetes durante todo o tratamento ortodôntico. Dos 54,1% pacientes que descolaram bráquetes, 46,3% descolaram de um a cinco bráquetes. Houve associação entre a descolagem e o tempo de tratamento. O dente que apresentou maior frequência de descolagem de bráquete foi o pré-molar inferior (44,7%). Descolagens ocorreram em 54,1% dos pacientes ao longo de todo o tratamento ortodôntico e houve associação entre descolagem e tempo de tratamento. (AU)
Introduction: Orthodontic brackets debonding is common in clinical practice. The knowledge of the factors associated to bracket debonding is relevant for greater clinical effectiveness in tooth movement. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of brackets debonding and associated factors in patients who completed orthodontic treatment. Material and Methods: The records of 205 orthodontic patients from a private clinic treated by a single operator between 2000 and 2013 were analysed, the same type of bracket and adhesive system were used for the bonding. For univariate analysis, tables of frequency and average of central tendency and dispersion were used. In the bivariate analysis were used double-entry tables and Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Results: There was no bonding failure of brackets in 45.9% of the patients during the entire orthodontic treatment. Of the 54.1% patients with bonding failure, 46.3% occurred in one to five brackets. There was an association between debonding and treatment time. The tooth with the highest bracket debonding frequency was the lower premolar (44.7%). Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets bonding failure occurred in 54.1% of patients throughout the orthodontic treatment and was associated with treatment time. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Aparatos Ortodóncicos , Ortodoncia , Desconsolidación DentalRESUMEN
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether recently developed fiber reinforced composite burs provided better results by comparing tooth discoloration after debonding of orthodontic brackets. Material and Methods: A split-mouth, randomized controlled trial was carried out in one orthodontic office; including 23 patients with intact, vital and caries-free four upper incisors aged 12 to 30 years who completed their fixed orthodontic treatment. For each patient, upper central and lateral incisors on each side of the mouth were randomly selected to remove the adhesive with either a tungsten carbide bur (TC) (n = 46) or a fiber-reinforced composite bur (FC) (n=46). Color evaluation of each tooth was conducted at two time points: immediately after finishing and polishing procedure and two months afterwards. The primary outcome would be the amount of color change in each group during the post treatment phase. The participants, the person assessing the color change and the statistician were blinded to TC group assignment. Color changes in each group were analyzed with the Paired T-test. The color change corresponding to the resin removal method was also statistically analyzed with the Independent T-test at α=0.05 as the level of significance. Results: 86 teeth, 43 in each group, were analyzed. The ΔE value was 3.713±1.161, for teeth finished TC and 2.114±0.514 for teeth finished with FC (p<0.01). Conclusion: Adhesive removal with FC bur results in a more color-resistant tooth surface in comparison with tungsten carbide bur. (AU)
Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar se as brocas de material compósito reforçadas com fibras, recentemente desenvolvidas, proporcionam melhores resultados, pela comparação da descoloração dentária após a remoção de braquetes ortodônticos. Material e Métodos: Um ensaio clínico controlado randomizado com boca dividida foi realizado em um consultório ortodôntico, incluindo 23 pacientes, com idade entre 12 e 30 anos, com incisivos superiores intactos, vitais e livres de cárie, que completaram o tratamento ortodôntico com aparelho fixo. Para cada paciente, incisivos centrais e laterais superiores de cada lado da boca foram selecionados aleatoriamente para remover o adesivo ortodôntico com uma broca carbide de tungstênio (TC) (n = 46) ou uma broca de compósito reforçada com fibra (FC) (n = 46). A avaliação da cor de cada dente foi realizada em dois momentos: imediatamente após o acabamento e polimento e dois meses após. O resultado primário foi a quantidade de mudança de cor em cada grupo durante a fase pós-tratamento. Os participantes, a pessoa que avaliou a mudança de cor e o estatístico não tinham conhecimento da atribuição ao grupo TC. As mudanças de cor em cada grupo foram analisadas com o teste-t pareado. A mudança de cor correspondente ao método de remoção da resina também foi analisada estatisticamente com o teste-t independente considerando um nível de significância α = 0,05. Resultados: foram analisados 86 dentes, 43 em cada grupo. O valor de ΔE foi 3,713 ± 1,161, para dentes finalizados com broca TC e 2,114 ± 0,514 para dentes finalizados com broca FC (p <0,01). Conclusão: A remoção do adesivo com broca FC resulta em uma superfície de dente mais resistente à cor em comparação com a broca carbide de tungstênio (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adulto , Decoloración de Dientes , Desconsolidación Dental , Aparatos Ortodóncicos FijosRESUMEN
Purpose: De-bonding strength of ceramic veneers by laser use needs to be evaluated in detail. The aim of this study, is to determine the contribution of ceramic thickness and cementing agents to the de-bonding strength of ceramic veneers using Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Methods: A total of 120 maxillary central incisors specimens were randomly divided into twelve groups on the basis of disc thickness, cementing agent, and Er,Cr:YSGG laser use. Under laboratory conditions, 120 IPS Empress II system discs 0.5mm, 1mm, and 2mm in thickness were applied to the tooth surfaces, for laser use. An Er,Cr:YSGG laser system was applied to the central surface of the IPS Empress II discs on specimens in all laser groups (Groups 1,3,5,7,9,11). Then the shear bond strength (SBS) for all specimens were tested with a testing machine at a speed of 0.5mm/min. The SBS values were considered as the de-bonding strength. Results: The mean de-bonding strength values for Groups 9 and 11 (0,5 mm disc thickness + laser application) have the lowest median load (0.000 N), while Group 4 (2mm disc thickness + no laser) has the highest median load (573.885 N). The de-bonding strengths of all the groups without laser application were higher than those of all groups with laser use. When laser is applied, the mean de-bonding strength decreases with decreasing disc thickness, and it reaches zero at 0.5mm thickness of discs cemented by self- or total-etch adhesives. Conclusions: The de-bonding strength decreases with laser use, and decreasing disc thickness. In the absence of laser, the mean de-bonding values of discs cemented by a total etch adhesive system are always higher than those of discs cemented with a self-etch adhesive system. Without any extra load, all 0.5mm thick discs were dislodged from teeth while applying or testing the laser.
Propósito: La resistencia de desunión de las carillas de cerámica mediante el uso del láser debe evaluarse en detalle. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la contribución del espesor de la cerámica y los agentes de cementación a la resistencia de desunión de las carillas de cerámica utilizando el láser Er, Cr: YSGG. Métodos: Un total de 120 incisivos centrales maxilares se dividieron al azar en doce grupos según el grosor del disco, el agente de cementación y el uso del láser Er, Cr: YSGG. En condiciones de laboratorio, se aplicaron en las superficies de los dientes 120 discos del sistema IPS Empress II de 0,5mm, 1mm y 2mm de grosor, para uso con láser. Se aplicó un sistema láser Er, Cr: YSGG a la superficie central de los discos IPS Empress II en muestras de todos los grupos de láser (Grupos 1,3,5,7,9,11). Luego, la resistencia de la unión al cizallamiento (SBS) para todas las muestras se probó con una máquina de prueba a una velocidad de 0.5mm/min. Los valores de SBS se consideraron como la fuerza de desunión. Resultados: Los valores medios de resistencia de desunión para los Grupos 9 y 11 (espesor de disco de 0,5mm + aplicación de láser) demostró la carga media más baja (0,000 N), mientras que el Grupo 4 (espesor de disco de 2 mm + sin láser) tuvo la carga media más alta (573.885 N). Las fuerzas de desunión de todos los grupos sin aplicación de láser fueron superiores a las de todos los grupos con uso de láser. Cuando se aplica el láser, la fuerza media de desunión disminuye al disminuir el grosor del disco, y llega a cero con el grosor de 0,5mm de los discos cementados, para ambos adhesivos de grabado. Conclusiones: la fuerza de desunión disminuye con el uso del láser y disminuye con el grosor del disco. En ausencia de láser, los valores medios de desunión de los discos cementados con un sistema de adhesivo de grabado total son siempre más altos que los de los discos cementados con un sistema de adhesivo de autograbado. Sin ninguna carga adicional, todos los discos de 0,5mm de grosor se desprendieron de los dientes al aplicar el láser.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Cerámica/uso terapéutico , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Resistencia al Corte , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Esmalte Dental/efectos de la radiación , Materiales Dentales/química , Coronas con Frente EstéticoRESUMEN
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' pain levels during four different debonding procedures. The null hypothesis was that the pain perception of the patients undergoing four different debonding applications was not statistically significant different. Material and Methods One hundred and twenty orthodontic patients who underwent orthodontic debonding were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups according to technique used in the patients. Debonding groups were as follows: Group 1) Conventional debonding group, Group 2) Medication group (acetaminophen was given 1 hour before debonding), Group 3) Soft bite wax group, and Group 4) Soft acrylic bite wafer group. The patients' levels of anxiety and fear of pain were evaluated before debonding, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was applied to evaluate their pain perception during debonding. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate non-normally distributed data. Categorical data analysis were carried by chi-square and McNemar tests. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results Anxiety scores of the patients were not statistically significant between both genders and debonding groups. In the quadrants in which the patients were perceived, the highest pain level was in the left side of the mandible. The teeth in which the highest pain level was perceived were the lower left and upper right lateral incisors. Although there was no statistically significant difference among the pain scores of the patients in each group, quadrant scores of female patients showed significant differences, being the lowest scores in the soft bite wax group. Conclusions Majority of the patients had no fear of pain before debonding. Pain levels of the patients in the conventional debonding group were not significantly different from those of the other groups, except quadrant scores of females in the soft bite wax group. The null hypothesis was accepted.