RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The oral route of drug delivery is the most widespread and preferred route of administration, but it has several limitations, including variable pharmacokinetics (PK), reduced dissolution and absorption, and gastrointestinal irritation. Further, many compounds have low aqueous solubility, which also limits intestinal absorption. METHODS: For this narrative review, we conducted a literature search of PubMed until August 2022, focusing on emulsions, microemulsions, nanoemulsions, and self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. RESULTS: The self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) overcomes these limitations of hydrophobic compounds to enhance their bioavailability. A SMEDDS formulation is a clear, thermodynamically stable, oil-in-water emulsion of lipid, solubilized drug, and two surfactants, which spontaneously forms droplets < 100 nm in diameter. These components help deliver presolubilized drugs to the gastrointestinal tract, while protecting them from degradation in gastric acid or first-pass hepatic metabolism. SMEDDS formulations have improved oral drug delivery in the treatment of cancer (paclitaxel), viral infections (ritonavir), and migraine headache (ibuprofen and celecoxib oral solution). The American Headache Society recently updated their consensus statement for the acute treatment of migraine and included a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor formulated in SMEDDS, celecoxib oral solution. This SMEDDS formulation showed pronounced improvement in bioavailability compared with celecoxib capsules, allowing for a low dose of celecoxib in the oral solution to provide safe and effective acute migraine treatment. Here, we will focus on SMEDDS formulations, what differentiates them from other analogous emulsions as vehicles for poorly soluble drugs, and their clinical application in the acute treatment of migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Oral drugs reformulated in SMEDDS have shown accelerated times to peak plasma drug concentrations and increased maximum plasma concentrations, compared with capsules, tablets, or suspensions. SMEDDS technology increases both drug absorption and bioavailability of lipophilic drugs, compared with other formulations. Clinically, this allows the use of lower doses with improved PK profiles without compromising efficacy, as shown with celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine.

RESUMEN

We report on two patients with secondary cough headache who responded to the cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor etoricoxib and showed an independent temporal course. This case report shows that secondary cough headache can also respond to medical treatment and can respond to a COX-2 inhibitor, not previously reported. As is seen in primary cough headache, the headache disorder can go into natural remission (case 1) while the secondary pathology progresses and conversely, persist once the secondary pathology has resolved (case 2). The course of the headache and that of the secondary pathology do not necessarily correlate. It is, therefore, proposed that any treatment of the secondary pathology is independent to that of the headache. In NSAID-intolerant cases a COX-2 inhibitor can be trialled first line.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Indomethacin-responsive headaches encompass a group of disorders which include a subset of the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias and other paroxysmal, often precipitated primary headaches. Many patients show a rapid therapeutic response to indomethacin, which is limited by intolerability. Etoricoxib and celecoxib, selective inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2), spare gastroduodenal COX-1 activity and are less likely to cause gastrointestinal adverse effects than indomethacin. We report a case series of eight patients, seven who responded to etoricoxib and one patient who responded to celecoxib.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the prescription patterns and safety profiles of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in three Chinese hospitals. METHODS: The study analyzed the data of 50,732 patients who were prescribed oral NSAIDs from July 1, 2012 to August 31, 2019. The characteristics of these patients, the prescription patterns of NSAIDs, and the drug-related safety profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: Oral NSAIDs were prescribed to patients of all ages. Of the patients, 81.88% were prescribed NSAIDs on only one occasion, and 91.64% were prescribed one type of NSAID only. The combination of different NSAIDs accounted for 2,360 person-times. Orthopedic departments most commonly used selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, while emergency departments most commonly used traditional NSAIDs. The incidences of gastrointestinal (GI) complications, cardiovascular (CV) events, and newonset hypertension were lower in patients treated with selective COX-2 inhibitors than those treated with traditional NSAIDs and NSAID combinations (P<0.05). In relation to selective COX-2 inhibitors, incidences of new-onset hypertension were lower in patients treated with imrecoxib than those treated with other types of selective COX-2 inhibitors (P=0.0102). CONCLUSIONS: In respect of the at-risk patients (i.e., those with related disease, such as GI complications, CV events or other risks), the patterns with which oral NSAIDs were prescribed was not standardized. In terms of adverse effects, selective COX-2 inhibitors represent a better choice than traditional NSAIDs and NSAID combinations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Prior meta-analyses have shown a higher gastrointestinal risk of nonselective NSAIDs versus placebo and a lower gastrointestinal risk of coxibs versus nonselective NSAIDs. However, the available data about gastrointestinal risk for coxibs versus placebo are scarce. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence on the use of coxibs and to evaluate the risk of gastrointestinal adverse outcomes (GAO) associated with coxibs versus nonexposed. Search was conducted on PubMed and Embase databases. We selected cohort observational, case-control, nested case-control and case-crossover studies that reported the risk of GAO associated with coxibs versus nonexposed as relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR) or incidence rate ratio (IRR). It was estimated the pooled RR and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for coxibs both individually and as a whole by the DerSimonian and Laird method. Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, coxibs were associated with a significant increment in the risk of GAO [RR 1.64 (95% CI 1.44-1.86)]. The analysis by individual drugs showed that etoricoxib [RR 4.85 (95% CI 2.64-8.93)] presented the highest gastrointestinal risk, followed by rofecoxib [RR 2.02 (95% CI 1.56-2.61)] and celecoxib [RR 1.53 (95% CI 1.19-1.97)]. Gastrointestinal risk was also high for the subgroups aged <65 years and low-dose coxibs. The use of coxibs is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of GAO, which would be high even for low-dose coxibs and <65-year-old subgroups. The risk would be higher for etoricoxib than for celecoxib and rofecoxib.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Which is better, Tramadol or Celecoxib, in reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Both Tramadol and Celecoxib are effective in reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy but Celecoxib may be better tolerated. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Pain is the most common cause of failure of outpatient hysteroscopy. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that local anaesthetics were effective in reducing pain associated with hysteroscopy but there was insufficient evidence to support the use of oral analgesics, opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to reduce hysteroscopy-associated pain and further studies were recommended. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with balanced randomization (allocation ratio 1:1:1) conducted in a university hospital from May 2014 to November 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Two hundred and ten women who had diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy were randomly divided into three equal groups: Group 1 received oral Tramadol 100 mg, group 2 received Celecoxib 200 mg and group 3 received an oral placebo. All the drugs were given 1 h before the procedure. A patient's perception of pain was assessed during the procedure, immediately afterwards and 30 min after the procedure with the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was a significant difference in the pain scores among the groups during the procedure, immediately afterwards and 30 min after the procedure (P< 0.001, 0.001, <0.001 respectively). Tramadol had significantly lower pain scores when compared with the placebo during the procedure (mean difference = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.86, 2.22), P < 0.001), immediately after the procedure (mean difference = 1.09; 95% CI (0.5, 1.68), P < 0.001) and 30 min later (mean difference = 0.95, 95% CI (0.48, 1.41), P < 0.001). Celecoxib administration also led to significantly lower pain scores than the placebo during the procedure (mean difference = 1.28, 95% CI (0.62, 1.94), P < 0.001), immediately after the procedure (mean difference = 0.72; 95% CI (0.13, 1.32), P = 0.016) and 30 min later (mean difference = 0.77, 95% CI (0.3, 1.24), P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in pain scores between Tramadol and Celecoxib at any time. Time until no pain differed significantly among the groups (P = 0.01); it was shorter with both Tramadol and Celecoxib groups when compared with placebo (P = 0.002 and 0.046, respectively). The procedure failed to be completed in one patient in the placebo group but no failure to complete the procedure occurred in Tramadol and Celecoxib groups. Four women in the Tramadol group reported nausea but no side effects were reported with Celecoxib group and no complications were reported in any group of patients. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: All results were based on the subjective perception of pain, which varies among individuals and is related to the individuals' previous pain experience and level of anxiety. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Tramadol and Celecoxib are effective in reducing pain in outpatient hysteroscopy. Celecoxib may be better tolerated as no side effects were reported in the study, however further research on a larger sample size is required before drawing firm conclusions about lack of side effects. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector. All authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov - NCT02071303.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The incidence, frequency of complications and mortality of gastric ulcer disease are increased four-fold in the elderly taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). There is controversy as to whether this reflects increased usage of NSAID or specific vulnerability associated with age. We have investigated two possible mechanisms for this increase in gastrointestinal effects in the elderly: (i) increased susceptibility to acute gastrotoxicity; and (ii) reduced adaptation to NSAID, in a model of young (2 month), mature (12 month) and aged (24 month) rats. Aspirin damaged 7.7% of the volume of gastric mucosa in the young rat. In mature and aged rats, this increased to 11.3% (P < 0.002 compared to control) and 21.9% (P < 0.005 compared to control), respectively. Thus, aspirin caused a three-fold increase in the severity of acute gastric mucosal injury in aged animals. However, indomethacin, ibuprofen and L745 337 did not produce any significant acute gastric mucosal damage in 2-, 12- or 24-month-old rats. Significant gastric adaptation to diclofenac treatment occurred in both aged and young rats as measured by gastric mucosal damage. The aged gastric mucosa adapted equally as well as the young gastric mucosa to diclofenac. The findings of this study provide only modest support to the hypothesis of increased vulnerability of the stomach in the aged. Aspirin was associated with greater damage in the aged. Adaptation to diclofenac-induced damage was not reduced in the aged and there was not an increased susceptibility to damage by the non-aspirin NSAID tested. The selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, L745 337, was the least toxic agent and may represent a group of NSAID which cause fewer gastrointestinal complications in the elderly.