RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this long-term cohort study in periodontally compromised patients with implants was to analyze the correlation between gingival phenotype and peri-implant crestal bone loss, and between clinical measures and gingival phenotype. METHODS: Implant-supported single crowns and bridges were used to rehabilitate 162 implants in 57 patients. Patients were examined over a 2 to 20-year period on a recall schedule of 3 to 6 months. In addition to recording clinical parameters, intraoral radiographs were taken at baseline (immediately after superstructure insertion) and at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. Patients were differentiated into phenotype 1 with thin, scalloped gingiva and narrow attached gingiva (n = 19), phenotype 2 with thick, flat gingiva and wide attached gingiva (n = 23), or phenotyp 3 with thick, scalloped gingiva and narrow attached gingiva (n = 15). RESULTS: The mean peri-implant crestal bone loss during the first 12 months was 1.3 ± 0.7 mm. Patients with gingival phenotype 1 had a significantly greater rate of increased crestal bone loss at implants (p = 0.016). No significant differences were present in subsequent years. The prevalence of mucositis at all implants was 27.2%, and the prevalence of peri-implantitis 9.3%. Univariate analyses indicated a significantly higher peri-implantitis risk in patients with gingival phenotype 2 (p-OR = 0.001; p-OR = 0.020). The implants of patients with phenotype 2 had significantly greater probing depths (1st year p < 0.001; 3rd year p = 0.016; 10th year p = 0.027; 15th year p < 0.001). Patients with gingival phenotype 3 showed no significantly increased probing depths, signs of inflammation and crestal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a gingival phenotype 1 have greater crestal bone loss at implants during the first year of functional loading. Patients with gingival phenotype 2 had significantly greater probing depth at implants and risk of peri-implantitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the peri-implant clinicoradiographic status and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples collected from individuals with cement-retained and crew-retained implants. METHODS: In this observational study, participants with cement-retained and screw-retained implants were enrolled. A questionnaire was utilized to gather demographic information and assess the educational background of the participants. Peri-implant modified plaque and bleeding indices, probing depth, and crestal bone loss were measured. Subsequently, PISF samples were collected, and corresponding volumes were recorded. Commercial kits employing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were employed to quantify PGE2 levels. The sample size was determined, and group comparisons were conducted using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the correlation between PGE2 levels and clinicoradiographic and demographics. The predefined level of significance was established at P < .05. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants, consisting of 33 with cement-retained implants and 34 with screw-retained implants, were included in the study. The mean ages for individuals with cement and screw-retained implants were 54.2 ± 8.7 and 58.7 ± 7.4 years, respectively. The majority of participants had completed university-level education. Reportedly, 87.9% and 82.4% of individuals with cement and screw-retained implants, respectively brushed teeth twice daily. No significant differences were observed in clinicoradiographic parameters, PGE2 volume, and levels between cement-retained and screw-retained implants. There was no correlation between PGE2 levels and peri-implant clinicoradiographic parameters among individuals with either cement-retained or screw-retained implants. CONCLUSIONS: Cement-retained and screw-retained implants exhibit a consistent peri-implant clinicoradiographic status, accompanied by stable levels of PGE2 in PISF provided oral hygiene maintenance regimens are stringently followed.

RESUMEN

Reducing crestal bone loss (CBL) around implants allows for soft tissue stability and long-term success. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the extent of CBL in implants placed with the implant shoulder at the equi-crestal level and 2 mm below the alveolar ridge at 2, 12, 36, and 60 months. A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted by selecting subjects with Kennedy Class IV partial edentulism of the lower jaw. Two implants were inserted, of equal length and diameter, one equi-crestal and the other sub-crestal, in the site corresponding to the lateral incisor. Intraoral periapical radiographs with Rinn centering devices were performed at the time of implant insertion (T0), at 2 (T1), 12 (T2), 36 (T3), and 60 months (T4). Descriptive statistics and the T-test were used, setting the significance to P⩽ 0.05. Twenty-five subjects were recruited, with a mean age of 65 years (SD 9.88, range 42-82). No subject dropped out. A total of 50 implants were inserted, 25 at crestal and 25 sub-crest level. At the 60-month follow-up, no implant or prosthetic failure was recorded. An average loss of -0.81 mm was recorded in the crestal implant group (n.25; SD: 0.40; max-min: -1.6 - -0.1) while in the implants positioned below the crest the average CBL was -0.87mm (n.25; SD: 0.41; max-min: -2 - -0.2); however, the higher CBL in the sub-crestal implant group was not statistically significant (P=0.65). Comparing the mean CBL values of the two groups at the various follow-ups, a greater crestal bone resorption was recorded in sub-crest implants between T0 and T1 (-0.25 vs -0.1) and between T1 and T2 (-0.39 vs -0.23), while in subsequent follow-ups a greater, statistically significant (P=0.01), crestal bone loss was recorded in ridge implants between T3 and T4 (-0.05 vs -0.18). Over time, therefore, the extent of CBL seems to be reduced in implants placed below the crest, with bone retention above the implant shoulder. Ultimately, although the position of the implant shoulder relative to the crestal ridge doesn't affect the CBL, sub-crestal placement is recommended in order to reduce the risk of exposure of the rough surface of the implant.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study answers the PECO question: "In adults with dental implants (P), do subjects suffering from type-2 diabetes or prediabetes (E) have worse peri-implant conditions (O) than subjects without type-2 diabetes and prediabetes (C)?". Prediabetes (5.7-6.4 % HbA1c), and the different qualities of glycemic control in type-2 diabetes; well-controlled (>8 % HbA1c), and poorly controlled (>8 % HbA1c) individuals; were classified according to the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association. DATA: Predefined search keys were used with search terms including: Dental implant, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control and HbA1c. SOURCES: An electronic search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries were conducted without any filters or language restrictions. Additionally, manual search of the reference lists were carried out to identify all relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria were cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies that answerd our PECO question with at least 1 year of follow-up. From a total of 2660 records, 35 articles (1761 individuals) were included in the analysis. Meta-analytic difference in means for crestal bone loss was 1.2 mm [95 % CI=0.4; 2.1] in patients with prediabetes, 1.8 mm [CI=1.0; 2.7] in poorly controlled patients, whereas 0.4 mm [CI=-0.3; 1.1] in well-controlled individuals. Meta-regression showed that 1 % increase in HbA1c increased crestal bone loss by 0.24 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, patients with poorly controlled type-2 diabetes or prediabetes may have worse peri-implant conditions compared to patients without diabetes and well-controlled type-2 diabetes. Well-controlled type-2 diabetes is not a risk indicator for peri-implant diseases. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should measure blood HbA1c levels when planning implant-supported restorations, thus patients with undiagnosed or poorly controlled type-2 diabetes can be identified, that allows for glycemic level adjustment prior to dental implant surgery, ensuring peri-implant health. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (CRD42022375263).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: To evaluate the loss of crestal bone height around dental implants placed in various tissue biotypes. Materials and Methods: 20 patients with single edentulous sites were allocated randomly, with 10 samples in each into Group I (implants were placed in thick tissue biotype) and Group II (implants were placed in thin tissue biotype). Baseline cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed after implant placement in both groups, and follow-up CBCT was taken at the time of cementation prior to occlusal loading to assess the crestal bone loss around the mesial and distal side of implants in both groups. Result: A significant loss of crestal bone at both the distal and mesial sides of the implants at the time of cementation was observed in both groups but Group II showed more crestal bone loss as compared to Group I. Conclusion: Mean crestal bone loss was more in Group II (thin tissue biotype) in comparison to Group I (thick tissue biotype). The thick biotype causes less crestal bone changes than the thin biotype, which evokes more loss of crestal bone during the period of peri-implant healing.

RESUMEN

Objectives: Interleukin 1 (IL-1) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) gene polymorphisms have been suggested to be responsible for diminished bone mineral density (BMD) and high crestal bone loss (CBL) in some individuals. However, the effects of systemic BMD on variations in peri-implant CBL are unclear. Hence, this study was aimed at investigating the association of IL-1 and IL-6 gene polymorphisms with systemic BMD and CBL around dental implants. Methods: A total of 190 participants undergoing dental implantation in the mandibular posterior region were selected according to predetermined selection criteria and divided into a normal BMD group (NBD, 93 participants, T-score ≥ -1) and low BMD group (LBD, including both osteoporosis and osteopenia, 97 participants, T-score < -1 standard deviation) according to the BMD of the right femoral neck, measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Dental implants were placed through the standard surgical protocol, and CBL was calculated after 6 months with cone beam computed tomography scans before second-stage surgery. Genotyping was performed on all participants for IL-1A-889 A/G, IL-1B-511G/A, IL-1B+3954, and IL-6-572 C/G gene polymorphisms. Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants in both groups were compared with t-test and chi-square test (χ2). The associations of NBD and LBD with the different genotypes and CBL was determined with odds ratios, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The frequency of IL-1B-511AA and IL-6-572 GG genotypes was significantly higher in LBD than in NBD (p < 0.05). In LBD, the IL-1B-511 AA (AA vs GA + GG; p ≤ 0.001) and IL-6-572 GG (GG vs CC + GC; p = 0.001) genotypes were significantly associated with higher peri-implant CBL. Conclusions: Individuals with the IL-1B-511 AA or IL-6-572 GG genotype had elevated risk of osteoporosis/osteopenia and were more susceptible to CBL around dental implants.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lithium disilicate can be reliable when restoring implants in the esthetic zone. However, it has a high elastic modulus. This might increase the amount of forces transmitted to the crestal bone. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the crestal bone loss and peri-implant periodontal parameters of polymer infiltrated ceramic network compared to lithium disilicate implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns after 12 months of follow-up. METHODOLOGY: 44 patients were enrolled. They were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 22). The first group received 22 implants restored with polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Vitaenamic) hybrid abutment crowns. The second group received 22 implants restored with lithium disilicate (e.max) hybrid abutment crowns over immediately placed implants in the esthetic zone. Periapical radiographs were taken immediately after prosthetic placement and 1 year later utilizing a parallel technique, to assess crestal bone loss. Periodontal parameters were assessed after 1 year. RESULTS: Regarding crestal bone loss, a comparison between group I (Vitaenamic) and group II (e.max) was made by using an Independent t-test, which showed an insignificant difference between them (p > 0.05). A comparison between groups I and II revealed insignificant differences regarding periodontal parameters (probing depth, bleeding on probing, visible plaque, and suppuration). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding bone stability and periodontal parameters, polymer infiltrated ceramic network and lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns showed comparable results. Both materials showed clinically acceptable hard and soft tissue responses.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aim: The study was aimed to evaluate circumferential crestal bone level after one year of implant placement with flapless versus flap surgery using surgical template after immediate loading in the posterior mandibular region using CBCT. Setting and Design: The study was designed as a Randomized controlled trial. Material and Methods: 32 implants were placed in single edentulous spaces in the mandibular posterior region after random allocation into two groups: Flap surgery (Group A) and Flapless surgery (Group B). Virtual implant planning was performed using Blue Sky Bio software, and static CBCT guided 3D printed surgical templates were fabricated for all participants of both the groups. Immediate non-functional temporization was performed. Circumferential crestal bone levels were assessed after surgery and one-year follow-up using CBCT and XELIS software. Vertical bone loss (VBL) and horizontal bone loss (HBL) was assessed on four sides: buccal, lingual, mesial and distal. Statistical Analysis Used: Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences IBM Corp. Released 2017, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and Graph Pad Prism 7.0 version. The level of significance was chosen <0.05. Chi square test was performed to assess the difference in the age in the two groups. Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare the two groups for outcome measure. Graphically, quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot was made using mean and standard deviation for normality verification of data. Results: 100% survival rate and patient compliance was observed along the one-year follow-up duration. By using Mann-Whitney U test, statistically significant difference was found in the vertical bone loss among participants of Flap surgery (Group A) and Flapless surgery (Group B) on all the four sides after one year of implant placement. However, significant results were not obtained for the difference in the horizontal bone level. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, vertical bone loss measured circumferentially was more positively correlated with the implants placed with flap surgery compared to flapless surgery after immediate loading in the posterior mandibular region after one year.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study, which included a 5-year follow-up, was to compare peri-implant soft tissue health, crestal bone loss (CBL), and buccal bone thickness (BBT) around triangular cross-section neck (TN) or round neck (RN) implants, using cone-beam computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was initially designed as a prospective 1-year randomized controlled study and then extended with a 5-year retrospective evaluation of clinical and radiographic records. In the initial 1-year study, a total of 20edentulous patients receiving 40 implants with similar diameters were randomly assigned to the RN or TN groups using a split-mouth design. Pocket probing depths (PPD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at postoperative month 12. CBL and BBT at three levels (0, -2, and -4 mm) were evaluated 1 year after insertion. Five years after insertion, PPD, PI, GI, CBL, and BBT were recorded as patients were recalled for clinical and radiographic monitoring. RESULTS: Nineteen patients completed the study. After 5 years, no significant differences in PPD, PI, and GI scores and BBT values between the two groups (p > .05). The mean ± SD CBL values at the final follow-up visit were -0.71 ± 0.69 mm for TN and -1.03 ± 0.86 mm for RN (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest better crestal bone preservation using implants with TN when compared to RN after a 5-year follow-up. However, TN showed similar results to RN regarding peri-implant soft tissue health and BBT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the bone level changes in a new implant design (fully tapered with platform switching) with the one-abutment one-time protocol after 1 year of loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients received 1 or 2 implants (6-, 8-, or 10-mm length and 3.5-, 3.75-, or 4.5-mm diameter, bone-level design) to replace one or multiple edentulous sites. Only the mesial implant was assessed. Radiographic, clinical, and esthetic results and the survival and success rates were evaluated 1 year after final loading. RESULTS: At 1 year, no peri-implant bone loss was seen in any of the cases. Mean marginal crestal bone loss between surgery and crown placement was 0.19 ± 0.17 mm (P < .0001). Between surgery and the 1-year follow-up, the mean marginal crestal bone loss was 0.25 ± 0.24 mm (P < .0001). The difference in the modified Plaque Index between 1 year of follow-up and crown placement was significant for in the mesial (0.33 ± 0.54 mm; P = .003) and distal surfaces (0.5 ± 0.73 mm; P = .001). The probing pocket depth was statistically significantly deeper at 1 year than at crown placement at the mesial and distal aspects (average depth = 0.75 mm; P < .0005). No statistically significant differences were found for any other clinical or esthetic parameters. The overall survival and success rates after 1 year were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The fully tapered, deep-thread, platform-switched implant design placed with the one-abutment one-time protocol demonstrated minimal marginal crestal bone loss and crestal bone stability at 1 year of follow-up.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: To present the outcomes of immediately loaded single implants placed in the anterior region compared to conventional protocol. Methodology: 10 patients requiring single anterior tooth extraction was randomised either into immediate or delayed loaded group. Implants were positioned immediately after extraction and prosthesis was providing for the immediately loaded group. The cases were followed up for a period of 9 months at regular 3-month interval after the placement of definitive crowns. The parameters taken were probing depth, pain score and crestal marginal bone loss. Results: A total of 10 AD1N-Touareg Spiral tapered Implant with spiral tap, 5 immediately loaded and 5 delayed loaded were evaluated. For immediate loaded cases, there was 0.93 ± 0.04 mm bone lost after 3 months, 1.26 ± 0.21 mm after 6 months and 1.72 ± 0.13 mm after 9 months. For delayed loading, there was 0.90 ± 0.02 mm bone lost after 3 months, 1.26 ± 0.15 mm after 6 months and 1.80 ± 0.07 mm after 9 months. Pain and probing depth showed gradual reduction in both the groups during the course of treatment. Conclusion: In the present study, the success rate and radiographic results of immediate loading of implants in freshly extracted sockets in the anterior region where comparable to those obtained from delayed groups.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The correlation between crestal bone loss at teeth and probing pocket depth (PPD) has been established. Whether these findings can also be applied to implants is not known. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between crestal bone loss and PPD at teeth and implants. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one periodontitis-susceptible patients were rehabilitated with fixed implant-supported single crowns and fixed partial dentures. Each patient was examined over a 5- to 20-year period in a 3- to 6-month strict recall program. At each session, periodontal clinical parameters were recorded at teeth and implants. In addition, standardized periapical radiographs were taken after superstructure insertion (baseline) and then at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. RESULTS: The survival rate of implants (94.0%) and teeth (97.3%) did not significantly differ in all patients after 20 years (P = .68). Almost all patients had a PPD ≥ 5 mm at implants and teeth throughout the observation period. The crestal bone loss at implants and teeth increased continuously, especially in patients with advanced periodontitis, without a correlation with PPD. A few patients (n = 5) had a PPD ≥ 5 mm and annual bone loss ≥ 0.2 mm at one implant, with a correlation between bone loss and PPD. CONCLUSION: In healthy implants and teeth, moderate crestal bone loss is present without correlation with PPD. A few patients showed progressive crestal bone loss at only one implant, with a correlation with PPD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A patient's ability to maintain a healthy bone-implant interface seems to be a major predictor of implant longevity over the long term. The implant surface is protected from the oral environment, the bone, and the implant itself by the peri-implant tissues. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been shown to help in the regeneration of bone and other connective tissues. Since there has been inadequate information on the role of PRF in maintaining soft tissue integrity and crestal bone changes, the present study aimed to evaluate these challenges clinically and radiographically in human patients who had dental implants placed with PRF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were a total of 15 patients who were recalled for the analysis, and they were split into two groups. PRF was used to complete the implant procedure in the experimental group, but PRF was not used in the control group. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to evaluate the amount of alveolar bone prior to dental implant placement and intra-oral periapical radiograph (IOPAR) for postoperative assessment. Gingival index, plaque index, probing depths, papilla bleeding index, and crestal bone changes were used to document clinical limits. IOPAR using a similar approach was used to evaluate the crestal bone level alterations. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for changes in the peri-implant soft tissue and crestal bone during implant placement, six and nine months postoperatively. RESULTS: From baseline (p=0.02) to six months (p=0.04) and nine months (p=0.04), both groups showed changes in crestal bone loss and soft tissue although the changes in the test group were smaller. Soft tissue changes showed significant differences for probing depth and papilla index score at baseline and at the end of the six and nine months (p<0.05), whereas no significant difference was noted with bleeding index and plaque index score during the follow-up (p>0.05). CONCLUSION:  To conclude, the provided data demonstrated that the local injection of PRF during implant placement has the potential to favorably stimulate bone formation, and may be used as a therapeutic adjuvant in the clinical setting of implant placement.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare peri-implant clinical and radiographic status and levels of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) in waterpipe users and cigarette smokers. METHODS: Waterpipe users, cigarette smokers, and never smokers were included. Demographic details were collected using a questionnaire. Characteristics of implants (dimensions, jaw location, depth of placement, insertion torque, and duration in function) were recorded. Peri-implant modified plaque and gingival indices (mPI and mGI), probing depth (PD), and crestal bone loss (CBL) were recorded in all groups. Volume of PISF and levels of AGEs were determined using standard techniques. Sample-size estimation was done on data from a pilot investigation, and correlation between clinicoradiographic and immunoinflammatory parameters was assessed using logistic regression models. Probability values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In all, 25, 25, and 24 cigarette smokers, never smokers, and waterpipe users, respectively, were examined. All participants were male and had comparable mean ages. Cigarette smokers and waterpipe users had a smoking history of 20.2 ± 3.5 years and 18.8 ± 0.6 years, respectively. The mPI (P < .01), CBL (P < .01), PD (P < 0.01), and mGI (P < .01) were significantly higher in cigarette smokers and waterpipe users than never smokers. There was no significant difference in clinicoradiographic status and AGE concentrations in waterpipe users and cigarette smokers. A statistically significant correlation was recorded between AGEs and PD in cigarette smokers (P < .01) and waterpipe users (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Waterpipe usage is not less hazardous to peri-implant tissue health than conventional cigarette smoking. It is imperative to caution patients with dental implants about the detrimental effects of tobacco products on oral health.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present study compared interleukin 1-beta (IL-1ß) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activation factor receptor (suPAR) levels in peri-implant sulcular fluid of patients with cement-retained and screw-retained implants. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients with cement-retained and screw-retained implants were included. Demographic data were collected, and implant-related characteristics (geometry, insertion torque, loading and retention protocol, arch location, duration in function, and depth of insertion) were retrieved from records. Modified Plaque Index, crestal bone loss, probing depth, and modified Bleeding Index were measured. suPAR and IL-1ß levels were assessed in peri-implant sulcular fluid. Statistical comparisons were done and correlation between clinicoradiographic parameters and peri-implant sulcular fluid IL-1ß and suPAR were assessed. Statistical significance was judged at P < .05. RESULTS: Clinical and radiographic parameters showed no difference among screw-retained and cement-retained implants. There was no difference peri-implant sulcular fluid volume among patients with cement-retained (0.22 ± 0.00 µL) and screw-retained (0.19 ± 0.005 µL) implants. Levels of IL-1ß and suPAR in patients with cement-retained and screw-retained implants were 50.08 ± 0.6 ng/mL and 44.6 ± 0.08 ng/mL, and 0.28 ± 0.05 ng/mL and 0.22 ± 0.006 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implants with cement-retained or screw-retained restorations are comparable to one another in terms of clinicoradiographic status and demonstrate IL-1ß and suPAR levels within the normal range in the peri-implant sulcular fluid provided oral hygiene is stringently maintained.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aim: The study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bone volume, density, and crestal bone levels in conventionally placed dental implants with and without local application of 1% metformin (MF) gel using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at 9 months. Materials and Methods: Twenty implants were placed in 18 individuals, randomly divided into 2 groups where Group A received a local application of 1% MF gel along with implant placement. In contrast, Group B received implant placement alone. After thorough clinical examination and preoperative CBCTs, implants were placed under aseptic conditions. Patients were recalled at 3 and 9 months after surgery. Implants were functionally loaded by the end of 3rd month. Soft-tissue parameters such as modified plaque index and modified sulcular bleeding index were recorded along with CBCT evaluation to assess the crestal bone loss, bone density measurement, and bone volume, postoperatively. Fisher's extract test, independent and paired t-test, and Bonferroni analysis were used to determine statistical significance with P ≤ 0.05. Results: There was no discernible difference between the groups regarding soft-tissue parameters, bone density, and crestal bone levels. However, comparing bone volume between the test and control groups at 9 months was statistically significant. The test group with 1% MF gel showed increased bone volume around the implant. Conclusion: The data obtained were strong enough to suggest that 1% MF gel administered locally can increase peri-implant bone volume, possibly due to its additional property favoring osteoblastic stimulation and proliferation.

RESUMEN

Los implantes extra-cortos son cada vez más utili-zados en la práctica clínica diaria. La utilización de estos implantes con carga inmediata supone un reto añadido. Clásicamente se ha postulado que la carga inmediata debe realizarse después de 24 horas de la cirugía. En la siguiente serie de casos analizamos diferentes tiempos a la hora de realizar la carga in-mediata y su posible repercusión. Fueron recolec-tados de forma retrospectiva datos sobre casos de implantes extra-cortos (5,5 y 6,5 mm) en los que fue realizada una carga inmediata en sectores poste-riores. El implante fue la unidad de análisis para la estadística descriptiva en cuanto a la localización, dimensiones del implante, y mediciones radiográ-ficas. El paciente fue la unidad de medida para el análisis de la edad, sexo y la historia clínica. La prin-cipal variable estudiada fue la supervivencia de los implantes extra-cortos con carga inmediata en tres períodos de tiempo determinados: 24 hs, 48 hs y 7 días y como variables secundarias se han estudiado, la estabilidad del hueso crestal en general y en los tres períodos de carga anteriormente mencionados, las complicaciones protésicas y la supervivencia de las prótesis. Fueron reclutados 74 pacientes en los que se insertaron 146 implantes que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Todos los implantes fueron cargados mediante carga inmediata en tres perío-dos determinados de tiempo: 24 hs (40 implantes), 48 hs (42 implantes) y 7 días (42 implantes). Todos los implantes fueron ferulizados a otros implantes ge-nerándose puentes de dos o más unidades, con di-ferente longitud. En el grupo de implantes con carga inmediata en 24 hs la media de la pérdida ósea distal de todos los implantes fue de 0,21 mm (+/-0,84) y la media de la pérdida ósea mesial en este grupo fue de 0,33 mm (+/- 0,53). En el grupo de carga inmediata en 48 hs, la media de la pérdida ósea distal de todos los implantes fue de 0,20 mm (+/- 0,82) y la media de la pérdida ósea mesial fue de 0,22 mm (+/- 0,81). En el grupo de carga de 7 días, la pérdida ósea me-sial del grupo fue de 0,28 mm (+/- 0,51) y la media de la pérdida ósea distal fue de 0,17 mm (+/- 0,81). Cuando comparamos las medias de pérdida ósea me-sial y distal entre los tres grupos, no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (mesial p=0,062, distal p=0,067). En conclusión, no se obser-varon diferencias significativas en la pérdida ósea crestal ni en la supervivencia de los implantes cortos entre los 3 tiempos estudiados de aplicación de car-ga inmediata. Por ello, utilizar cualquiera de los tres protocolos puede ser adecuado, mientras se realice un correcto análisis de la situación clínica de cada paciente (AU)

Extra-short implants are increasingly used in daily clinical practice. The use of these implants with immediate loading poses an added challenge. Classically it has been postulated that immediate loading should be performed 24 hrs after surgery. In the following case series, we analyze different times of immediate loading and their possible repercussions. We retrospectively collected data on cases of extra-short implants (5.5 and 6.5 mm) in which immediate loading was performed in posterior sectors. The implant was the unit of analysis for descriptive statistics in terms of location, implant dimensions, and radiographic measurements. The patient was the unit of measurement for the analysis of age, sex and medical history. The main variable studied was the survival of immediately loaded extra-short implants in three specific time periods: 24 hrs, 48 hrs and 7 days. Secondary variables studied were crestal bone stability in general and in the three loading periods mentioned above, prosthetic complications and prosthesis survival. Seventy-four patients were recruited and 146 implants that met the inclusion criteria were inserted. All implants were loaded by immediate loading in three specific time periods: 24 hrs (40 implants), 48 hrs (42 implants) and 7 days (42 implants). All implants were splinted to other implants generating bridges of two or more units, with different lengths. In the 24-hr immediate loading group the mean distal bone loss of all implants was 0.21 mm (+/- 0.84) and the mean mesial bone loss in this group was 0.33 mm (+/- 0.53). In the 48-hr immediate loading group, the mean distal bone loss for all implants was 0.20 mm (+/- 0.82) and the mean mesial bone loss was 0,22 mm (+/- 0,81). In the 7-day loading group, the mesial bone loss of the group was 0.28 mm (+/- 0.51) and the mean distal bone loss was 0.17 mm (+/- 0.81). When we compared the mean mesial and distal bone loss between the three groups there were no statistically significant differences (mesial p=0.062, distal p=0.067). In conclusion, no significant differences were observed in crestal bone loss or in the survival of short implants between the 3 immediate load application times studied. Therefore, using any of the three protocols can be appropriate, as long as a correct analysis of the clinical situation of each patient is performed (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Statement of the problem: Narrow implants have been recommended in high esthetic demand regions to ensure greater buccal bone thickness (BBT) and minimize soft-tissue recession due to insufficient bone support. However, a limited area of bone-implant interface can increase the risk of peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. Purpose: This article encourages the use of evidence-based finite element analysis to optimize the aesthetic outcomes in maxillary lateral incisor single-supported implant crown by accurate biomechanical planning. This study aimed to analyze the best implant dimensions that would preserve the maximum BBT and avoid peri-implant bone resorption due to occlusal forces. Materials and methods: A maxilla segment was constructed based on anthropological measurements. Four implant diameters (Ø = 3.25; 3.50; 3.75 or 4.00 mm) and two lengths (L = 10 or 13 mm) were simulated. The occlusal force parameters were defined to simulate clinical conditions. The bone resorption risk analysis was based on Frost's mechanostat theory altering the strain output to strain energy density (SED). The peri-implant bone resorption risk indexes (PIBRri) were calculated by dividing the average of the top ten SED elements of the cortical and trabecular buccal wall by the pathologic resorption limit for each bone. Results: For trabecular bone, only the model Ø4.00L13 exhibited a low PIBRri. For cortical bone, all models presented a low PIBRri, except for models Ø3.25. Conclusion: The selection of a 3.25 mm dental implant to preserve a 2 mm BBT should be avoided since it generates a high peri-implant bone resorption risk induced by occlusal overload.

RESUMEN

AIM: The study aims at using the level/depth of implant placement (equicrestal or cretsal) as the key parameter in measuring the vertical crestal bone loss (CBL) mesially and distally, using periapical radiographs (IOPARs) taken at 1-, 3-, and 6-months interval, postprosthetic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 40; 18-65 years), with edentulous space anteriorly or posteriorly, were randomly divided into two groups, namely, group I (equicrestal) and group II (subcrestal) with 20 patients in each group. Implants were placed at an edentulous site (delayed implants), after obtaining cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. Prosthetic loading (following osseointegration) was done within 3 months of implant placement. The patients were followed up and IOPAR were taken to measure CBL at 1-, 3-, and 6-months interval, postloading. The CBL between the two groups was compared using IOPARs. The data obtained was compiled and unpaired Student's t-test was done for statistical analysis. RESULTS: After the statistical analysis of the data obtained during follow-up, CBL was measured radiographically. Mesial and distal vertical bone loss was charted and compared between the two groups. The mean bone loss on the mesial aspect for group I implants is 0.39 mm and for group II implants, it is 0.27 mm, 6 months postloading, determined radiographically. CONCLUSION: Subcrestally placed implants are conducive to the overall oral rehabilitation, as it has been seen to preserve marginal peri-implant bone for longer durations than their equicrestally placed counterparts, within the limitations of the current study. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The study prospectively relates the level of implant shoulder with respect to alveolar crestal bone, postloading. Following radiographic comparison between the two groups, significant clinical findings indicated that better esthetics and stability were seen in the subcrestally placed implants. This proves that implant placement level directly influences crestal bone levels; hence, indirectly affects esthetics and function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aim: To assess clinical and radiographic parameters including bleeding on probing (BoP); probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) and crestal bone loss (CBL) around short tuberosity implants (STI) supporting fixed partial dentures in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and non-diabetics. Material and Methods: Participants with T2DM and without T2DM with at least one STI (6 mm) posteriorly restored with a fixed partial denture splinting premolar implant were included. A questionnaire collected demographic details including gender, age, duration of diabetes, habits of brushing, the total number of dental implants and location, implant loading after placement, restoration type, and family history of DM. Clinical and radiographic assessment of peri-implant parameters, i.e., bleeding on probing (BoP), probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and crestal bone loss (CBL) was performed. The restorative success of STI was determined by no sensation of the foreign body, lack of pain and dysesthesia, lack of infection, no radiolucency around the implant, and no mobility. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-five T2DM (19 males and 6 females) and 25 non-diabetic (18 males and 7 females) participants were included. The number of STIs in T2DM was 41, whereas in non-diabetic it was 38. At 1 year follow-up, mean PI% in T2DM participants was 18.9% (19.2-21.4%) and in non-diabetics it was 17.6% (16.3-18.5%). The mean PD was recorded in diabetics (1.3 ± 5.0 mm) and non-diabetics (1.1 ± 3.2 mm). The BoP value in diabetics was 44.9% (39.8-46.4%) and 28.2% in non-diabetics (17.2-24.6%). At 5 years of follow-up, the mean PI% range in T2DM participants was 26.18% (25.4-29.1%) and 24.42% in non-diabetic (20.1-25.5%). The mean PD in millimeters around STI in T2DM was observed to be 2.3 ± 4.8 mm and 1.4 ± 3.4 mm in non-diabetics. In addition, BoP in diabetic participants was 39.54% (27.7-42.1%) and 24.42% in non-diabetics (20.1-25.5%). A total of six STIs failed, i.e., two in the non-diabetic and four in the T2DM group. Conclusions: Patients with T2DM have poor periodontal (BoP, PD, CBL) and restorative peri-implant parameters around STIs when compared to healthy (non-diabetic) participants at five years of follow-up. For long-term stability, glycemic control is pivotal along with following good plaque control.

Asunto(s)