RESUMEN

AIM: The number of severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been decreasing since the emergence of the Omicron variant at the end of 2021. COVID-19 has become a common infectious disease in Japan and was downgraded to a category five infectious disease on May 8, 2023. This study aimed to compare the impact of diabetes mellitus on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients since COVID-19 became a common infectious disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from an advanced critical care center in Osaka, Japan. The study included 1,381 patients of COVID-19 admitted to the center between March 1, 2020, and May 7, 2023, before COVID-19 became a category five infectious disease in Japan. Individuals younger than 18 years and pregnant women were excluded. We divided the patients into two groups: pre- and post-Omicron epidemic groups. The primary endpoint of the study was the in-hospital mortality, and the prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus was compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier curve showed a significantly lower rate of in-hospital mortality in the post-Omicron epidemic group than in the pre-Omicron epidemic group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.36-2.50; p < 0.0001). Patients with diabetes mellitus had higher in-hospital mortality in both the pre- and post-Omicron epidemic groups; their HRs were 1.39 (95% CI, 1.21-1.59; p < 0.0001) and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.15-1.83; p = 0.0012), respectively. Diabetes mellitus had no significant interaction effect on the association between the post-Omicron epidemic and in-hospital mortality (p for interaction = 0.2154). CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus may continue contributing to COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in the future, as the Omicron sub-strain may still be prevalent.

RESUMEN

Rationale and objectives: To analyze morphological changes in patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia over time, a nonrigid registration technique is required that reduces differences in respiratory phase and imaging position and does not excessively deform the lesion region. A nonrigid registration method using deep learning was applied for lung field alignment, and its practicality was verified through quantitative evaluation, such as image similarity of whole lung region and image similarity of lesion region, as well as visual evaluation by a physician. Materials and methods: First, the lung field positions and sizes of the first and second CT images were roughly matched using a classical registration method based on iterative calculations as a preprocessing step. Then, voxel-by-voxel transformation was performed using VoxelMorph, a nonrigid deep learning registration method. As an objective evaluation, the similarity of the images was calculated. To evaluate the invariance of image features in the lesion site, primary statistics and 3D shape features were calculated and statistically analyzed. Furthermore, as a subjective evaluation, the similarity of images and whether nonrigid transformation caused unnatural changes in the shape and size of the lesion region were visually evaluated by a pulmonologist. Results: The proposed method was applied to 509 patient data points with high image similarity. The variances in histogram characteristics before and after image deformation were confirmed. Visual evaluation confirmed the agreement between the shape and internal structure of the lung field and the natural deformation of the lesion region. Conclusion: The developed nonrigid registration method was shown to be effective for quantitative time series analysis of the lungs.

RESUMEN

Background: Spontaneous regression (SR) of cancer remains a rare phenomenon, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), where limited literature exists. This case report emphasizes the significance of SR in advanced HCC, shedding light on the proposed mechanisms and addressing the scarcity of documented cases in current medical literature. Case Description: We present the case of a 67-year-old female with a history of localized HCC who underwent right hepatectomy. Surveillance imaging 4 months later revealed tumor recurrence with tumor thrombus in the main portal vein. Radioembolization was deemed unsuitable, leading to the recommendation of systemic therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Prior to receiving any treatment, the patient tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), having previously received both the messenger RNA (mRNA)-1273 vaccine series and a booster. Surprisingly, subsequent imaging 10 months after initial diagnosis showed SR of the previously identified lesions, suggesting a potential link between viral exposure, vaccination, and the observed regression. The patient eventually received treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab and has sustained disease control to date, 12 months after initiating treatment. Conclusions: This unique case highlights SR of advanced HCC following COVID-19 infection, raising intriguing questions about the interplay between viral infections, vaccinations, and cancer outcomes. The patient's response in the absence of systemic therapy further underscores the complexity of HCC management and prompts further investigation into the potential immunomodulatory effects of viral infections and vaccinations on cancer regression. Understanding these interactions could have implications for tailoring treatment approaches and improving outcomes in patients with advanced HCC.

RESUMEN

Epigenetic changes have long-lasting impacts, which influence the epigenome and are maintained during cell division. Thus, human genome changes have required a very long timescale to become a major contributor to the current obesity pandemic. Whereas bidirectional effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and obesity pandemics have given the opportunity to explore, how the viral microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) use the human's transcriptional machinery that regulate gene expression at a posttranscriptional level. Obesity and its related comorbidity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and new-onset diabetes due to severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are additional risk factors, which increase the severity of COVID-19 and its related mortality. The higher mortality rate of these patients is dependent on severe cytokine storm, which is the sum of the additional cytokine production by concomitant comorbidities and own cytokine synthesis of COVID-19. Patients with obesity facilitate the SARS-CoV-2 entry to host cell via increasing the host's cell receptor expression and modifying the host cell proteases. After entering the host cells, the SARS-CoV-2 genome directly functions as a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and encodes a set of nonstructural proteins via processing by the own proteases, main protease (Mpro), and papain-like protease (PLpro) to initiate viral genome replication and transcription. Following viral invasion, SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces insulin secretion via either inducing ß-cell apoptosis or reducing intensity of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors and leads to new-onset diabetes. Since both T2D and severity of COVID-19 are associated with the increased serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, high glucose levels in T2D aggravate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Elevated neopterin (NPT) value due to persistent interferon gamma (IFN-γ)-mediated monocyte-macrophage activation is an indicator of hyperactivated pro-inflammatory phenotype M1 macrophages. Thus, NPT could be a reliable biomarker for the simultaneously occurring COVID-19-, obesity- and T2D-induced cytokine storm. While host miRNAs attack viral RNAs, viral miRNAs target host transcripts. Eventually, the expression rate and type of miRNAs also are different in COVID-19 patients with different viral loads. It is concluded that specific miRNA signatures in macrophage activation phase may provide an opportunity to become aware of the severity of COVID-19 in patients with obesity and obesity-related T2D.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A normal pressure extubation technique (no lung inflation before extubation), proposed by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists to prevent droplet infection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, could theoretically increase postoperative pneumonia incidence compared with a positive pressure extubation technique (lung inflation before extubation). However, the normal pressure extubation technique has not been adequately evaluated. This study compared postoperative pneumonia incidence between positive and normal pressure extubation techniques using a dataset from the University of Tsukuba Hospital. METHODS: In our hospital, the extubation methods changed from positive to normal pressure extubation techniques on March 3, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, we compared the risk of postoperative pneumonia between the positive (April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019) and normal pressure extubation techniques (March 3, 2020 to March 31, 2022) using propensity score analyses. Postoperative pneumonia was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition (ICD-10) codes (J13-J18), and we reviewed the medical records of patients flagged with these ICD-10 codes (preoperative pneumonia and ICD-10 codes for prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions for pneumonia). RESULTS: We identified 20,011 surgeries, including 11,920 in the positive pressure extubation group (mean age 48.2 years, standard deviation [SD] 25.2 years) and 8,091 in the normal pressure extubation group (mean age 47.8 years, SD 25.8 years). The postoperative pneumonia incidences were 0.19% (23/11,920) and 0.17% (14/8,091) in the positive and normal pressure extubation groups, respectively. The propensity score analysis using inverse probability weighting revealed no significant difference in postoperative pneumonia incidence between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 1.91, P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated no increased risk of postoperative pneumonia associated with the normal pressure extubation technique compared with the positive pressure extubation technique. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Clinical trial number: UMIN000048589 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000055364.

RESUMEN

Background: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the UK resulting in 21% of all cancer deaths. In 2016, local lung cancer surgery services required improvement due to under-representation in cancer resections and resource scarcity during the pandemic, which affected critical care bed availability and extended postoperative stays. The aim of this service improvement was to increase the number of lung cancer resection; develop minimally invasive techniques and reduce the use of Critical Care Unit beds by 35% (a subsequent goal). Methods: A five-year plan, guided by Kotter's 8-step change model, was initiated to address these issues. This model promotes sustainable change by setting clear goals, effective communication, and stakeholder involvement. Initial changes included hiring a thoracic surgeon experienced in uniportal video assisted thoracoscopy and enhanced recovery protocols. The team grew to three thoracic surgeons by 2020. The service increased operating theatre days and adopted new postoperative practices to reduce complications and hospital stays. Lung Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings were consistently covered by thoracic surgeons, ensuring comprehensive care. Data on surgical activity were collected from departmental databases and national audits, with internal audits conducted regularly. Statistical significance was tested using chi-square tests with P values <0.05. Results: The number of surgical procedures more than doubled, with primary lung cancer resections increasing nearly three-fold from 12.8% to 29.8% over six years. Postoperative complications and mortality rates remained low. Critical care bed usage dropped significantly during the pandemic, with new protocols enabling safe recovery in general surgical areas. Conclusions: The successful expansion of thoracic surgical services was attributed to the dedicated minimally invasive surgeons, enhanced recovery measures, and skilled staff. The change model facilitated efficient and dynamic progress. With the introduction of lung cancer screening programs, the demand for surgical services is expected to rise. The effective change model will be re-applied to meet this demand. The organizational change model, focused on patients and staff, achieved sustained quality improvement in lung cancer care despite challenging conditions like the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

RESUMEN

Background: The outbreak of the novel coronavirus 19 has led to unprecedented clinical challenges globally. Various therapeutic and pharmacologic interventions have been proposed, yet evidence of their long-term efficacy remains limited. Corticosteroids (CS) have shown efficacy in the sub-acute phase of the pandemic. This study aims to evaluate the long-term effects on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in patients treated with CS during acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from February 2020 to March 2021. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records of patients attending the post-COVID outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Institute of Soroka University Medical Center. A multivariate linear mixed effects model was employed to obtain adjusted estimates for the impact over time. Results: The study included 405 patients, of whom 155 (38.3%) received CS treatment. Approximately 60% completed two or more follow-up visits. PFTs [forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC)] returned to baseline more rapidly (0.9% and 0.85% per month, respectively) in patients treated with CS. This accelerated recovery was observed across all patients, including those with a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2 and those with known chronic lung disease. Conclusions: Systemic CS treatment during acute COVID-19 infection was associated with a faster recovery of PFTs during long-term follow-up, even among subgroups at higher risk of long-term pulmonary damage.

RESUMEN

The global COVID-19 pandemic presented a period of considerable stress for healthcare professionals on a global scale. The strain on healthcare facilities nationwide has resulted in profound implications for the well-being of numerous healthcare practitioners. A heightened demand for extended working hours emerged, potentially amplifying the workload for these professionals. This study aims to scrutinize the workload levels experienced by healthcare professionals specializing in family medicine at a tertiary medical center. Our findings reveal a persistent escalation in workload over the course of the study. Notably, the overall mean workload index score exhibited a substantial increase from phase one to phase two (48.07 compared to 66.36). Recognizing the impact of workload variations according to professional roles is crucial for devising effective solutions. Consequently, comprehending the nuances of workload distribution among healthcare professionals is imperative for the successful implementation of targeted interventions.

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased germ aversion, an aversive affective response to a high likelihood of pathogen transmission. While psychological factors are associated with chronic pain, the relationship between germ aversion and chronic pain remains unexplored. This study aimed to examine the relationship between germ aversion and new-onset and prognosis of chronic pain using longitudinal data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted web-based surveys of full-time workers at baseline and after three months. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, psychological factors, and chronic pain. Germ aversion was assessed using a modified Perceived Vulnerability to Disease scale. We analyzed responses from 1265 panelists who completed the survey twice. The prevalence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic neck and shoulder pain (CNSP) was associated with sex, short sleep duration, psychological distress, loneliness, and germ aversion. Stratified analyses showed that germ aversion was a risk factor for CLBP at three months in both individuals with and without CLBP at baseline, and for CNSP at three months in those with CNSP at baseline, even after adjustment for confounders. In conclusion, this preliminary study suggests that high germ aversion is a risk factor for CLBP and CNSP in young and middle-aged workers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

On December 7, 2022, China switched from dynamic zeroing strategy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to reopening. A nationwide SARS-CoV-2 epidemic emerged rapidly. The effect of smoking on SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. We aimed to retrospectively investigate the relationship between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using a community-based cohort of smokers and non-smokers. We included participants from a pre-pandemic cohort with a prolonged follow-up period. Data on smoking status, body mass index, and history of other diseases were collected from health examination and consultation clinic records. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between groups and SARS-CoV-2 infection over time. We analysed 218 male patients with varied smoking statuses (46.3% current or ex-smokers; average age 68.63 ± 9.81 years). Two peaks in the epidemic were observed following the December 2022 outbreak. At the end of the second peak, non-smokers, current smokers, and ex-smokers had primary infection rates increase to 88.0%, 65.1%, and 81.0%, respectively, with a significant difference between the groups. Current smoking significantly protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR 0.625, 95% CI 0.402-0.970, p = 0.036). Further analyses showed that the prevalence of pneumonia in the unvaccinated, older, diabetic, and non-smoking groups was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p < 0.05). Our study suggests a potential association between smoking and a reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pneumonia. This indicates that nicotine and ACE2 play important roles in preventing COVID-19 and its progression. We suggest smokers use nicotine replacement therapy during hospitalization for COVID-19.

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: The change in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) care continuum during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains unknown at a national level in the United States. We sought to determine the impact of the pandemic on incident HCC cases, clinical characteristics, and treatment in the United States. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed incident HCC cases from 2010 to 2020. The incidence rate was calculated using the population data for each year from the census bureau. Joinpoint regression analysis was applied for trend analysis, and a polynomial regression model estimated the number of projected HCC cases in 2020 according to the trend of rates from 2010 to 2019. The distribution of cancer stage and treatment modality were assessed. Results: The pandemic led to a significant reduction in reported HCC cases, from 19,597 in 2019 to 16,188 in 2020. The projected number of HCC for 2020 was 19,011, corresponding to a 14.8% reduction in 2020. Extent of reduction in the number of incident HCC cases relative to estimated cases remains consistent in racial and ethnic subgroups. Despite underdiagnosis of HCC in 2020, proportion of patients with early tumor stage (30.5% for Tumour, Node, Metastasis stage 1) and curative treatment receipt (9.1% for surgical resection, 13% for ablation, 4.2% for liver transplant) for HCC remained stable in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: There was a significant reduction in HCC cases in 2020 compared to pre-COVID years. While tumor stage and proportion of patients receiving curative treatment remained stable, continued follow-up is needed to assess potential changes during subsequent years.

RESUMEN

Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) therapy is being increasingly used as respiratory support for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the long-term outcome of VV-ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation in COVID-19-associated ARDS remains unclear, hence the purpose of this study aimed to evaluate its long-term outcome, safety, and feasibility. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from an institutional lung transplantation database between June 2020 and June 2022. Data on demographics, pre-transplantation laboratory values, postoperative outcomes, preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography findings, and survival rates were collected. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, Kaplan-Meier, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for analysis. Results: Twenty-five patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS underwent lung transplant surgery with VV-ECMO bridge. Unfortunately, six patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS using VV-ECMO died while waiting for transplantation during the same study period. Patients with VV-ECMO bridge were a more severe cohort than 16 patients without VV-ECMO bridge (lung allocation score: 88.1 vs. 74.9, P<0.001). These patients had longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively) and a higher incidence of complications after lung transplantation. The one-year survival rate of patients with VV-ECMO bridge was lower than that of patients without (78.3% vs. 100.0%, P=0.06), but comparable to that of patients with other lung transplant indications (84.2%, P=0.95). Echocardiography showed a decrease in the right ventricular systolic pressure (P=0.01), confirming that lung transplantation improved right heart function. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that VV-ECMO can be used to safely bridge patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS with right heart failure.

RESUMEN

Background: Recent reports have suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection can cause pneumonitis even in the absence of clinical symptoms and COVID-19 associated pulmonary inflammation can persist resulting in long-term fibrosis. This single-center study utilized standardized immunological testing to determine whether lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, indicative of past COVID-19 infection, can be safely used for clinical transplantation. Methods: The study included 90 consecutive lung transplant procedures incorporating donor serological testing for past COVID-19 infection. Donors were negative for active COVID-19 infection and met institutional criteria to be used for lung transplantation. The outcomes of lung transplant recipients were compared between donors with and without serological evidence of past COVID-19 infection. Results: No significant difference was found in post-transplant survival rates between recipients of lungs obtained from donors with serological evidence compared to those without. Additionally, there were no significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 rates or other post-transplant clinical parameters, such as operative time, ischemic time, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, but not active COVID-19 infection are safe and feasible for transplantation, yielding comparable post-transplant outcomes to donors who are negative COVID-19 antibodies. This study supports the utilization of lungs from donors with historic COVID-19 infection as long as they meet current transplant criteria, potentially addressing the concerns related to the use of such organs.

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and various complications have been reported. Furthermore, there have been increasing reports of endocrinopathy related to COVID-19 following the pandemic. We report a 49-year-old healthy woman who developed rapid onset of polydipsia and polyuria three weeks after COVID-19. Laboratory tests indicated low urine osmolarity and increased serum osmolarity, and antidiuretic hormone (ADH) was undetectable. Urine osmolality remained low with water deprivation. Similarly, plasma ADH responses to hypertonic-saline infusion were blunted and urine osmolality increased in response to desmopressin. There was no clear evidence of anterior pituitary dysfunction. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed pituitary stalk thickening and absence of posterior pituitary bright signal spots, suggesting the presence of hypophysitis. Based on these results, we made a probable diagnosis of lymphocytic infundibulo-neurohypophysitis (LINH) which have caused central diabetes insipidus. Positive findings for serum anti-rabphilin-3A antibodies, reported as a potential diagnostic marker for LINH, were also noted. Following oral desmopressin administration, polydipsia and polyuria were quickly improved, though treatment with desmopressin was still required over four months. This is the first report of a patient with a probable diagnosis of LINH after COVID-19 who tested positive for anti-rabphilin-3A antibodies. Positive findings for those antibodies suggest that pituitary dysfunction associated with COVID-19 is hypophysitis involving an abnormal immune mechanism. The presence of anti-rabphilin-3A antibodies may be useful as a non-invasive diagnostic marker of LINH and potentially serve as a valuable diagnostic aid in cases of LINH associated with COVID-19.

RESUMEN

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with COVID-19 manifested symptoms mainly related to the respiratory system, but also the musculoskeletal system can be involved. COVID-19 has been described as a possible cause of knee osteonecrosis (ON). A systematic review was performed to investigate the hypothetical correlation between COVID-19 and knee ON. Methods: Inclusion criteria were all articles reporting cases of knee ON after a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Considering that COVID-19 is an emerging disease, all levels of evidence studies were included. Results: Finally, two case series and three case reports were included. We extracted data regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, details of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), use of corticosteroids (CCS), temporal correlation between ON and COVID-19, treatment of the lesion and its outcomes. A total of seven cases of post-COVID knee ON have been described. Knee pain arose on average 11 weeks after the diagnosis of COVID-19. All patients had knee MRI showing ON. CCS were used to treat COVID-19-related symptoms in four cases. Conservative treatment was successful in five patients. Conclusions: The correlation between COVID-19 and ON remains unclear. Probably post-COVID-19 ON has a multifactorial origin in which factors related to the patient, consequences of COVID-19 and CCS therapy add up to cause a reduction of blood supply and bone vitality until ON is triggered. A greater number of patients is needed to clarify the role of COVID-19 in the etiopathogenesis of knee ON.

RESUMEN

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) novel severe acute respiratory syndrome affected the world population with an infectious condition for which therapeutic forms are limited and vascular sequelae are major challenges. Pregnant women are physiologically immunocompromised and can be more affected by the pandemic than the general population. Extra precaution measures against COVID-19 during and after the outbreak are essential to ensure the safety of the newborn. The aim of the present study was to report the cesarean birth of a female child with Klippel-Trenaunay of a mother currently infected by COVID-19. Case Description: A newborn of a 21-year-old mother with COVID-19 in the final stage of the disease was born through a cesarean section at full term. The physical examination at birth revealed substantial edema of the left lower limb associated with port-wine stains on the limb and left torso. The ultrasound revealed venous-lymphatic malformation affecting the entire left lower limb, suprapubic region and ipsilateral abdominal region. Two evaluations for COVID-19 were performed and both were negative. Infants of mothers with active COVID-19 infection during the birth period have a low probability of being positive for the disease, but precautions should be taken. Conclusions: The association with malformations, such as the rare Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS), constitutes another challenge regarding the diagnosis and proper conduct to be taken with these children.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many individuals experience long COVID after SARS-CoV-2 infection. As microbiota can influence health, it may change with COVID-19. This study investigated differences in oral microbiota between COVID-19 patients with and without long COVID. METHODS: Based on a prospective follow-up investigation, this nested case-control study evaluated the differences in oral microbiota in individuals with and without long COVID (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic groups), which were assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing on tongue coating samples. A predictive model was established using machine learning based on specific differential microbial communities. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-eight patients were included (n=54 Symptomatic group). The Symptomatic group had higher Alpha diversity indices (observed_otus, Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices), differences in microbial composition (Beta diversity), and microbial dysbiosis with increased diversity and relative abundance of pathogenic bacteria. Marker bacteria (c__Campylobacterota, o__Coriobacteriales, o__Pseudomonadales, and o__Campylobacterales) were associated with long COVID by linear discriminant analysis effect size and receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC 0.821). CONCLUSION: There were distinct variations in oral microbiota between COVID-19 patients with and without long COVID. Changes in oral microbiota may indicate long COVID.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the prognosis of COVID-19 patients infected with the Omicron variant. The primary objective was to determine if COVID-19 patients with COPD had higher mortality rates compared to those without COPD. Secondary objectives included assessing the risk of respiratory failure, hospital stay length, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and oxygen requirements in COPD patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 2761 COVID-19 patients admitted to the Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, between January 1 and June 30, 2022. Among them, 7.4% (n = 205) had COPD. Demographic and clinical data, including vaccination status and comorbidities, were collected. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included respiratory support requirement, hospital stay length, and ICU admission. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: COPD did not independently increase the risk of COVID-19 mortality after adjusting for confounders. Instead, older age, male sex, incomplete vaccination, long-term oxygen therapy use, and specific comorbidities were identified as significant predictors of 30-day mortality. COPD patients were more likely to require oxygen and noninvasive ventilation, but there were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes compared to non-COPD patients. CONCLUSION: COPD itself was not an independent risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Age, sex, vaccination status, comorbidities, and long-term oxygen therapy use were important predictors of mortality. These findings underscore the importance of considering multiple factors when assessing the impact of COPD on COVID-19 prognosis, particularly with the Omicron variant.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the category atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) at the authors' institution based on the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. METHODS: All AUS cases diagnosed at Fimlab Laboratories between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, were included. Histologic verifications were checked until May 31, 2023. The upper-bound and lower-bound risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm were calculated. The timelines between the pathology laboratory workflow and patient management were also calculated. RESULTS: From 1157 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs), 162 (14.0%) AUS cases were diagnosed in 146 patients, with an average ± standard deviation age of 66.1 ± 14.9 years. There was variation in the AUS percentages, with higher values during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic years (15% and 17.5% in 2020 and 2021, respectively). Seventy-five cases (46.3%) had histologic follow-up: 16 were malignant neoplasms, and 36 were benign neoplasms. The upper and the lower bounds of the-risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm were 21.3% and 69.3% and 9.9% and 32.1%, respectively. The average time from the first FNA with an AUS diagnosis to surgical resection ranged from 6 to 682 days, and the time to the first repeat FNA ranged from 10 to 691 days. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated higher percentages of AUS cases compared with the reference value, which may be attributed to the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The risk of malignancy calculated in this study was closer to the reference value from the first edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology compared with the second edition.