RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although intravascular imaging (IVI) and invasive coronary physiology (ICP) are utilized in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with robust positive clinical evidence, their adoption in cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs) is still limited. AIMS: The aim of our survey was to assess the perspectives on the experiences of allied health professionals in CCLs' utility of IVI and ICP. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted through multiple channels, including the Cardiovascular Research Technologies (CRT) 2023 Nurses and Technologists Symposium, social media, Cath Lab Digest link, and field requests, leading to diverse representation of allied health professionals. RESULTS: A total of 101 CCL members participated in the survey. First, 59% of responders noted an increased use of IVI in their institutions over recent years. For those experiencing an increase, 49% credited training, 45% emerging evidence, and 34% attributed new CCL members. Barriers to IVI usage were perceived increased procedure time (58%), staff resistance (56%), procedural cost (48%), and difficulty interpreting findings (44%). Regarding ICP, 61% reported using it in approximately 25% to 75% of cases, while 10% utilized it in 75% to 100% of CCL procedures. Interpreting ICP results was mixed, with 56% confident in interpreting all ICP results and 6% unable to interpret any ICP results. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight opportunities for increasing routine utilization of IVI and ICP in the CCL through allied health professionals. By providing education and training, we can elevate familiarity with the equipment and subsequently build a CCL culture that advocates for both IVI and ICP.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The DANAMI-3 DEFER study demonstrated that deferring stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is safe, although not superior to immediate stenting. It is possible that an individualized revascularization strategy in STEMI, achieved through appropriate patient selection, could be feasible and effective. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized study included 198 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between October 2019 and November 2021. Patients were assigned to either the deferred stenting (DS) group (n = 19) or the control group (C) undergoing immediate stenting (n = 179) based on a multimodal approach integrating coronary angiography, intravascular imaging, physiological assessments, and clinical judgment. The primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: The DS group showed a significantly lower rate of stent implantation (10.5 % vs. 97.7 %, p < 0.001) and a higher use of thrombus aspiration (89.5 % vs. 30.7 %, p < 0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (31.6 % vs. 6.7 %, p < 0.001) compared to the C group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of all-cause mortality (5.3 % vs. 8.9 %, p = 0.59) or MACCE (10.5 % vs. 8.4 %, p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing individualized reperfusion strategies in STEMI within a real-world clinical setting. The findings, while limited by the study design, generate valuable hypotheses that warrant further investigation to refine patient selection criteria and optimize outcomes.
RESUMEN
Coronary function testing (CFT) plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis of coronary vascular dysfunction and in providing patients with tailored therapy. The Belgian registry on coronary function testing (BELmicro registry) is a prospective, observational, multicenter registry including 14 centers in Belgium. All patients undergoing clinically indicated CFT were included in the registry. Baseline characteristics, CFT data, and clinical outcomes were collected. The aims of the current analysis were to describe the baseline characteristics of a real-world population of patients undergoing CFT, to evaluate the prevalence of coronary vascular dysfunction and to assess the safety of CFT in daily clinical practice. Between October 2021 and September 2023, 449 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 65 ± 10 years, and 47.4% of patients were male. Fifty-nine percent of patients had hypertension, 18.7% diabetes, 69.5% hypercholesterolemia, and 40.1% smoking habit. Angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) were identified in 85.1% of patients. Microvascular physiology assessment was performed in 95.5% of patients, vasoreactivity test in 28.5%, and both in 24.0%. CMD was diagnosed in 23.4% of ANOCA patients, epicardial vasospasm in 26.3%, and microvascular spasm in 14.9%. Rates of major complications were 0.7% for microvascular physiology assessment and 0% for vasoreactivity test. In conclusion, participants in the BELmicro registry represented a real-world population of patients, characterized by a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Both CMD and coronary vasospasm were frequent in ANOCA patients. Performing CFT in daily clinical practice was feasible with a low rate of complications.
RESUMEN
Background. Despite technical advancements, patients with sequential or diffuse coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of cardiovascular events at follow-up. We aimed to analyze the utility of a SyncVision/iFR (S-iFR)-guided PCI strategy versus an angiography-guided strategy in patients with this type of lesions. Methods. Randomized, multicenter, controlled, and open-label trial to compare S-iFR versus angiography-guided PCI in patients with sequential or diffuse angiographic coronary stenosis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04283734). The primary endpoint was the implanted stent length. The main secondary endpoint was targeting vessel failure (TVF) at one year. Results. A total of 100 patients underwent randomization, with 49 patients assigned to the S-iFR group and 51 to the angiography-guided PCI group. There were no differences between groups regarding clinical and anatomical characteristics. The baseline iFR was 0.71 ± 0.16 vs. 0.67 ± 0.19 (p = 0.279) in the S-iFR and angiography group, respectively. The mean lesion length was 42.3 ± 12 mm and 39.8 ± 12 (p = 0.297). The implanted stent length was 32.7 ± 17.2 mm in the S-iFR group and 43.1 ± 14.9 mm in the angiography group (mean difference, -10.4 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.9 to -4.0; p = 0.002). At one year, target vessel failure (TVF) occurred in four patients: three (6.1%) in the S-iFR group vs. one (1.9%) in the angiography group (p = 0.319). Conclusions. Among patients with sequential or long diffuse coronary lesions, a S-iFR-guided PCI strategy resulted in a reduction of the total stent length compared to an angiography-guided PCI strategy. A nonsignificant increase in TVF was observed in the S-iFR group.
RESUMEN
Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a non-invasive technique to assess the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. The clinical applications of angiography-derived FFR span a wide range of scenarios, including assessing intermediate coronary lesions and guiding revascularization decisions. This review paper aims to provide an overview of angiography-derived FFR, including its principles, clinical applications, and evidence supporting its accuracy and utility. Lastly, the review discusses future directions and ongoing research in the field, including the integration of angiography-derived FFR into routine clinical practice.
RESUMEN
Identifying functional significance using physiological indexes is a standard approach in decision-making for treatment strategies in patients with coronary artery disease. Recently, coronary computed tomography angiography-based physiological assessments, such as computed tomography perfusion and fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR-CT), have emerged. These methods have provided incremental diagnostic values for ischemia-causing lesions over anatomical stenosis defined solely by coronary computed tomography angiography. Clinical data have demonstrated their prognostic value in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular events. Several randomized controlled studies have shown that clinical use of FFR-CT can reduce unnecessary invasive procedures compared to usual care. Recent studies have also expanded the role of FFR-CT in defining target lesions for revascularization by acquiring noninvasive lesion-specific hemodynamic indexes like ΔFFR-CT. This review encompasses the current evidence of the diagnostic and prognostic performance of computed tomography-based physiological assessment in defining ischemia-causing lesions and adverse cardiac events, its clinical impact on treatment decision-making, and implications for revascularization.
RESUMEN
Coronary physiology is widely used to assess epicardial coronary lesions in patients with stable angina. Based on the available evidence, physiology plays a crucial role in diagnosing and treating patients. There have been invasive methods for determining cardiac physiology, such as fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Still, new non-invasive approaches provide extra anatomical information, such as fractional flow reserve computed tomography (FFR-CT) based on computed tomography and physiology based on angiography. Even though FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is clinically beneficial, one-third of patients retain suboptimal FFR after the procedure, associated with severe adverse events, rendering PCI in diffuse coronary artery disease questionable. Using the pullback pressure gradient (PPG), we can analyze the magnitude and extent of pressure losses; a lower value may indicate diffuse disease, while a high value with an abrupt curve may indicate focal disease. Since PCI is not the best option for treating diffuse coronary disease, current strategies focus on conservatively using medical therapy or bypass surgery. It has been demonstrated that patients with diffuse disease of the left anterior descending (LAD) are at a greater risk of developing occlusion of the left internal mammary artery graft than those with focal disease and that maximal medical therapy may be the most effective treatment for these patients.
RESUMEN
Aims: Continuous infusion thermodilution is an established technique for the assessment of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance due to its proven accuracy and reproducibility. However, for this technique to yield reliable measurements, direct and homogenous mixing of injected saline and blood is mandatory. This study aimed to assess and compare the mixing properties of two different microcatheters, namely the Rayflow® (with sideholes for infusion) and the Finecross® catheter (single end-hole for infusion), which are commonly used in the catheterization laboratory. Methods and results: The study employed three different methods to evaluate the mixing properties of the catheters. Firstly, a qualitative assessment of mixing was performed using ink injections in an in vitro bench model of a coronary artery. Secondly, in analogy to the human catheterization laboratory, mixing properties over the length of the coronary artery were assessed semi-quantitatively by temperature measurements in the bench model. Lastly, a quantitative assessment was performed by 3D computational fluid dynamics, where the standard deviation and entropy ratio of the temperature over the cross-section in the coronary artery model were calculated for both catheters. Conclusion: All three evaluation methods demonstrated that the Rayflow catheter's specific design leads to a more optimal, homogeneous mixture of blood and saline over both the cross-section and length of a coronary vessel, as compared with the standard end-hole catheter.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Angiographic Microvascular Resistance (AMR), derived from a solitary angiographic view, has emerged as a viable substitute for the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR). However, the prognostic significance in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients is yet to be established. This research endeavors to explore the prognostic capabilities of AMR in patients diagnosed with STEMI. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study, 232 patients diagnosed with STEMI who received primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) were recruited from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Utilizing the maximally selected log-rank statistics analysis, participants were divided into two cohorts according to an AMR threshold of 2.55 mmHg*s/cm. The endpoint evaluated was a composite of all-cause mortality or hospital readmission due to heart failure. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 1.74 (1.07, 3.65) years, the composite endpoint event was observed in 28 patients within the higher AMR group and 8 patients within the lower AMR group. The higher AMR group showed a significantly higher risk for composite outcome compared to those within the low-AMR group (HRadj: 3.33; 95% CI 1.30â8.52; p = 0.03). AMR ≥ 2.55 mmHg*s/cm was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (HR = 2.33; 95% CI 1.04â5.21; p = 0.04). Furthermore, a nomogram containing age, sex, left ventricle ejection fraction, post-PCI Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR), and AMR was developed and indicated a poorer prognosis in the high-risk group for STEMI patients at 3 years. (HR=4.60; 95% CI 1.91â11.07; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AMR measured after PCI can predict the risk of all-cause death or readmission for heart failure in patients with STEMI. AMR-involved nomograms improved predictive performance over variables alone.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Microcirculación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Resistencia Vascular , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Anciano , Microcirculación/fisiología , Resistencia Vascular/fisiología , Factores de Riesgo , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is prognostically important and may also be a cause of persistent angina. The stent balloon inflation technique or material properties may influence the degree of CMD post-PCI. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with stable angina attending for elective PCI were randomized to either slow drug eluting stent (DES) implantation technique (DES slow group): +2 atm. every 5 s., maintained for a further 30 s or a standard stent implantation technique (DES std group): rapid inflation and deflation. PressureWire X with thermodilution at rest and hyperemia and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed pre- and post-PCI. Combined primary endpoints were changes in index of microvascular resistance (delta IMR) and coronary flow reserve (delta CFR) following PCI. The secondary endpoints included differences in cardiac troponin I (delta cTnI) at 6 h post-PCI, Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and OCT measures of stent results immediately post-PCI and at 3 months. RESULTS: Both groups were well matched, with similar baseline characteristics and OCT-defined plaque characteristics. Delta IMR was significantly better in the DES slow PCI arm with a median difference of -4.14 (95% CI -10.49, -0.39, p = 0.04). Delta CFR was also numerically higher with a median difference of 0.47 (95% CI -0.52, 1.31, p = 0.46). This did not translate to improved delta median cTnI (1.5 (34.8) vs. 0 (27.5) ng/L, p = 0.75) or median SAQ score at 3 months, (85 (20) vs. 95 (17.5), p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Slow stent implantation is associated with less CMD after elective PCI in patients with stable angina.
RESUMEN
Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is an increasingly recognized entity. It encompasses different pathophysiological subtypes (i.e., endotypes), including coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), vasospastic angina (VSA) and mixed entities resulting from the variable combination of both. Diagnosing INOCA and precisely characterizing the endotype allows for accurate medical treatment and has proven prognostic implications. A breadth of diagnostic technique is available, ranging from non-invasive approaches to invasive coronary angiography adjuvated by functional assessment and provocative tests. This review summarizes the strength and limitations of these methodologies and provides the rationale for the routine referral for invasive angiography and functional assessment in this subset of patients.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Vasoespasmo Coronario/fisiopatología , Vasoespasmo Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasoespasmo Coronario/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Revascularization of nonculprit arteries in patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is now recommended based on several trials. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy of nonculprit lesions remains unknown. Murray law-based Quantitative Flow Ratio (µQFR) is a novel, non-invasive, vasodilator-free method for evaluating the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis, which has potential applications for nonculprit lesion assessment in STEMI patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with STEMI who received staged PCI before hospital discharge were enrolled retrospectively. µQFR analyses of nonculprit vessels were performed based on both acute and staged angiography. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with 110 nonculprit arteries were included. The mean acute µQFR was 0.76 ± 0.18, and the mean staged µQFR was 0.75 ± 0.19. The average period between acute and staged evaluation was 8 days. There was a good correlation (r = 0.719, P < 0.001) between acute µQFR and staged µQFR. The classification agreement was 89.09%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for detecting staged µQFR ≤ 0.80 was 0.931. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to calculate the µQFR during the acute phase of STEMI patients. Acute µQFR and staged µQFR have a good correlation and agreement. The µQFR could be a valuable method for assessing functional significance of nonculprit arteries in STEMI patients.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Anciano , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Circulación Coronaria , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Velocidad del Flujo SanguíneoRESUMEN
Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease (LM-PCI) represents a high-risk yet life-saving procedure that has evolved significantly over the years. This review outlines the current state-of-the-art practices for LM-PCI in Japan in detail, emphasizing the integration of coronary physiology and intracoronary imaging alongside with evidence-based standardized technique using latest drug-eluting stents. These advancements enable precise lesion assessment, stent sizing, and optimal deployment, thereby enhancing procedural safety and efficacy. Despite discrepancies between current guidelines favoring coronary artery bypass grafting and real-world practice trends towards increased LM-PCI adoption, particularly in elderly populations with multiple comorbidities, careful patient selection and procedural planning are critical. Future perspectives include further refining LM-PCI through conducting randomized controlled trials integrating advanced techniques and addressing the issue of ostial left circumflex lesions and nationwide standardization of medical care for LM disease.
RESUMEN
Computer simulations of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on coronary imaging have emerged as an attractive alternative to invasive measurements. However, most methods are proprietary and employ non-physiological assumptions. Our aims were to develop and validate a physiologically realistic open-source simulation model for coronary flow, and to use this model to predict FFR based on intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) data in individual patients. We included patients undergoing elective coronary angiography with angiographic borderline coronary stenosis. Invasive measurements of coronary hyperemic pressure and absolute flow and OCT imaging were performed. A computer model of coronary flow incorporating pulsatile flow and the effect of left ventricular contraction was developed and calibrated, and patient-specific flow simulation was performed. Forty-eight coronary arteries from 41 patients were included in the analysis. Average FFR was 0.79 ± 0.14, and 50% had FFR ≤ 0.80. Correlation between simulated and measured FFR was high (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Average difference between simulated FFR and observed FFR in individual patients was - 0.009 ± 0.076. Overall diagnostic accuracy for simulated FFR ≤ 0.80 in predicting observed FFR ≤ 0.80 was 0.88 (0.75-0.95) with sensitivity 0.79 (0.58-0.93) and specificity 0.96 (0.79-1.00). The positive predictive value was 0.95 (0.75-1.00) and the negative predictive value was 0.82 (0.63-0.94). In conclusion, realistic simulations of whole-cycle coronary flow can be produced based on intracoronary OCT data with a new, computationally simple simulation model. Simulated FFR had moderate numerical agreement with observed FFR and a good diagnostic accuracy for predicting hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Modelación Específica para el Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Flujo Pulsátil , Hiperemia/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Simulación por ComputadorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 5%-25% of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients, coronary angiography reveals no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is a potential causal pathophysiological mechanism in these patients and can be diagnosed by continuous thermodilution assessment. Recently, the microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) has been introduced as a novel index to assess the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation. However, continuous thermodilution and MRR have never been investigated in the acute setting in MINOCA patients and invasive assessment of the microcirculation in these patients are currently lacking. AIMS: The objectives of the study were to investigate the incidence of CMD (MRR ≤ 2.7) in patients with MINOCA and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of continuous thermodilution-based assessment during index coronary angiography in the acute setting. METHODS: This study was a prospective, observational, pilot study investigating coronary physiology in the acute setting in MINOCA patients. Patients admitted with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 19 MINOCA patients were included in this analysis; the mean age was 70 ± 9 years, and 79% were females. CMD was present in 6 patients (32%). Qrest was significantly higher in the MRR ≤ 2.7 group compared to the MRR > 2.7 group (0.076 [0.057-0.100] vs. 0.049 [0.044-0.071] L/min, p = 0.03). Rµ,rest was significantly lower in the MRR ≤ 2.7 group compared to the MRR > 2.7 group (1083 [710-1510] vs. 1563 [1298-1970] WU, p = 0.04). No periprocedural complications or hemodynamic instability have occurred during continuous thermodilution assessment during the index coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: In patients admitted for MINOCA undergoing immediate coronary angiography, continuous thermodilution assessment and MRR are feasible and safe in the acute setting, and evidence of functional CMD could be observed in one-third of the MINOCA patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Angiografía Coronaria , Circulación Coronaria , Estudios de Factibilidad , Microcirculación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Termodilución , Resistencia Vascular , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/fisiopatología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Vasodilatación , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) affects more than 20 million adults in the United States. Although classically attributed to atherosclerosis of the epicardial coronary arteries, nearly half of patients with stable angina and IHD who undergo invasive coronary angiography do not have obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries is frequently caused by microvascular angina with underlying coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Greater understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of CMD holds promise to improve clinical outcomes of patients with ischemic heart disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Microcirculación , Humanos , Microcirculación/fisiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Circulación Coronaria/fisiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Angiografía Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the recommendation of coronary physiology to guide revascularization in angiographically intermediate stenoses without established correlation to ischemia, its uptake in clinical practice is slow. AIMS: This study aimed to analyze the use of coronary physiology in clinical practice. METHODS: Based on a multicenter registry (Fractional Flow Reserve Fax Registry, F(FR)2, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03055910), clinical use, consequences, and complications of coronary physiology were systematically analyzed. RESULTS: F(FR)2 enrolled 2,000 patients with 3,378 intracoronary pressure measurements. Most measurements (96.8%) were performed in angiographically intermediate stenoses. Out of 3,238 lesions in which coronary physiology was used to guide revascularization, revascularization was deferred in 2,643 (78.2%) cases. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was the most common pressure index used (87.6%), with hyperemia induced by an intracoronary bolus of adenosine in 2,556 lesions (86.4%) and intravenous adenosine used for 384 measurements (13.0%). The route of adenosine administration did not influence FFR results (change-in-estimate -3.1% for regression model predicting FFR from diameter stenosis). Agreement with the subsequent revascularization decision was 93.4% for intravenous and 95.0% for intracoronary adenosine (p = 0.261). Coronary artery occlusion caused by the pressure wire was reported in two cases (0.1%) and dissection in three cases (0.2%), which was fatal once (0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, intracoronary pressure measurements are mostly used to guide revascularization decisions in angiographically intermediate stenoses. Intracoronary and intravenous administration of adenosine seem equally suited. While the rate of serious complications of wire-based intracoronary pressure measurements in clinical practice seems to be low, it is not negligible.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Adenosina/administración & dosificación , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Despite guideline-based recommendation of the interchangeable use of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decision-making, iFR/FFR could demonstrate different physiological or clinical outcomes in some specific patient or lesion subsets. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of difference between iFR and FFR-guided revascularization decision-making on clinical outcomes in patients with left main disease (LMD). In this international multicenter registry of LMD with physiological interrogation, we identified 275 patients in whom physiological assessment was performed with both iFR/FFR. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for both iFR/FFR to predict MACE in respective patients in whom revascularization was deferred and performed. In 153 patients of revascularization deferral, MACE occurred in 17.0% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR to predict MACE were 0.88 (specificity:0.74; sensitivity:0.65) and 0.76 (specificity:0.81; sensitivity:0.46), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for iFR than FFR (0.74; 95%CI 0.62-0.85 vs. 0.62; 95%CI 0.48-0.75; p = 0.012). In 122 patients of coronary revascularization, MACE occurred in 13.1% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR were 0.92 (specificity:0.93; sensitivity:0.25) and 0.81 (specificity:0.047; sensitivity:1.00), respectively. The AUCs were not significantly different between iFR and FFR (0.57; 95%CI 0.40-0.73 vs. 0.46; 95%CI 0.31-0.61; p = 0.43). While neither baseline iFR nor FFR was predictive of MACE in patients in whom revascularization was performed, iFR-guided deferral seemed to be safer than FFR-guided deferral.