RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of a mandibular first molar with different endodontic cavity designs and increasing sizes of root canal preparations using finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: The experimental finite element models were designed with 3 different endodontic access cavities and 2 sizes of canal preparations: traditional access cavity, conservative access cavity, and truss access cavity and #30/.04 and #40/.04 of root canal preparations. Vertical and oblique loads were applied with a 250-N static force to simulate masticatory forces. Mathematical analysis was performed to evaluate the stress distribution patterns. Maximum von Mises (VM) stresses were assessed at the occlusal surface; cervical line; and 1 , 3, 5, and 7 mm from the root apices. RESULTS: Decreasing the size of the access cavity was associated with a higher magnitude of cervical stresses. The magnitude of VM stresses was maximum at the 7-mm level and was minimum at the 1-mm level from the root apex. Increasing the size of the access cavity was associated with the transmission of stresses to a further apical direction regardless of the extent of root canal enlargement. The root canal enlargement from #30 to #40 increased radicular VM stresses within all models. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, conservative and truss access designs preserved a significant volume of tooth structure. The extent of root canal enlargement should be as small as practical without jeopardizing the biologic objectives of root canal treatment.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de los Dientes , Diente no Vital , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Diente Molar , Preparación del Conducto RadicularRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using the XP-endo Finisher (XPF; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux de Fonds, Switzerland) in teeth that have a traditional access cavity (TEC) and a contracted access cavity (CEC) design on the amount of decrease in the number of Enterococcus faecalis bacteria within the root canal system. METHODS: Eighty mandibular first molar teeth were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: TEC and CEC (n = 40/group). After access cavity preparation in the 2 groups, 80 mesiobuccal root canals were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis for 4 weeks. After the first sampling (S1), in order to perform root canal instrumentation, the TEC and CEC groups were further divided into 4 subgroups (10 teeth/group): Reciproc (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) with or without XPF. Bacterial sampling from the root canals was performed with sterile paper points before (S1) and after (S2) instrumentation to determine the bacterial load. The bacterial reduction was counted as colony-forming units/mL and analyzed statistically by 3-factor repeated measures analysis of variance. Multiple comparisons of the main factor effect were performed using the Bonferroni correction (α < .05), all at 5% significance. RESULTS: The number of E. faecalis bacteria in all the samples with different cavity designs were significantly reduced after instrumentation. The lowest value of bacterial decrease percentage was observed in the CEC-Reciproc-XPF (82.8%) group. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial reduction counts of E. faecalis were a similar level in the TEC and CEC cavities, and the use of XPF did not show significant differences between groups.