RESUMEN
Objetivo: Describir los resultados tempranos de la cirugía resectiva colorrectal por Endometriosis Infiltrante Profunda (EIP) en mujeres intervenidas en centro clínico privado, durante los últimos 6 años. Material y Método Estudio transversal que muestra la evolución clínica de pacientes intervenidas quirúrgicamente con resecciones colorrectales por diagnóstico de (EIP), entre los años 2016-2022 en Clínica Indisa. Se agruparon en resecciones discoidales (Grupo I) y segmentarias (Grupo II) Resultados: De los pacientes operados por (EIP) entre los años 2016 al 2022, 160 pacientes fueron sometidas a resecciones colorrectales, 56 en el Grupo I y 104 en el grupo II. Las características demográficas de ambos grupos fueron similares, con excepción del hábito tabáquico que mostró un predominio en el Grupo II. El análisis de las variables quirúrgicas (tipo de abordaje, tasa de conversión, altura de la anastomosis y ostomía de protección) mostró una distribución similar en ambos grupos. En relación a la evolución postoperatoria, el Grupo I presentó una disminución significativa en el tiempo de realimentación con sólidos de 2 vs 3 días (p = 0,001). El inicio del tránsito intestinal, días de hospitalización y presencia de complicaciones Clavien-Dindo > = 3, no presentó diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos. Discusión: La endometriosis afecta, significativamente, a mujeres en todo el mundo, existiendo escasa evidencia que reporte los resultados de las cirugías colorrectales que comparen ambas técnicas, demostrando que el manejo en centros especializados tiene mejores resultados. Conclusión: Al comparar estas dos técnicas de resección colorrectal en DIE, concluimos que los pacientes operados por resección discoidal tienen una realimentación más temprana sin diferencias significativas en el resto de las variables estudiadas.
Objective: To describe the early outcomes of resective colorectal surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE) in women treated at private center over the past 6 years. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study presents the clinical evolution of surgically treated patients with colorectal resections for DIE diagnosis between 2016 and 2022 at Clínica INDISA. They were grouped into discoid resections (Group I) and segmental resections (Group II). Results: Of patients operated for DIE between 2016 and 2022, 160 underwent colorectal resections, with 56 in Group I and 104 in Group II. The demographic characteristics of both groups were similar, except for smoking habits, which showed a predominance in Group II. The analysis of surgical variables (approach type, conversion rate, anastomotic height, and protective ostomy) showed a similar distribution in both groups. Regarding postoperative outcomes, Group I showed a significant decrease in solid food resumption time, 2 vs 3 days (p = 0.001). The initiation of intestinal transit, hospitalization days, and presence of Clavien-Dindo complications >= 3 did not present significant differences between both groups. Discussion: Endometriosis significantly affects women worldwide, with limited evidence reporting colorectal surgery outcomes comparing both techniques, demonstrating that management in specialized centers yields better results. Conclusion: When comparing these two techniques of colorectal resection in DIE, we conclude that patients undergoing discoid resection have an earlier resumption of solid food intake without significant differences in the remaining studied variables.
RESUMEN
Abstract Introduction: For several reasons, a patient may be taken to a colostomy for closure as soon as possible. However, their treatment may vary, and predicting adequate continence after colostomy closure can be difficult. The objective is to characterize preoperative manometry because, in Colombia, few cases describe its usefulness. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study of adult patients treated in two gastroenterology centers in Colombia between 2018 and 2020. Results: Of 316 patients, 13 were indicated manometry before colostomy closure, predominantly women (69%), with an average age of 51.69 years (standard deviation: 24.18). When evaluating the basal pressures of the anal sphincter, we noted 68% hypotonia, 16% hypertonia, and 16% normal pressures. The voluntary contraction test was abnormal in 25%, and a pattern of dyssynergic defecation was observed in 30%, all with type III patterns. The inhibitory rectoanal reflex was present in 92%, with an abnormal balloon expulsion test in 100% of patients. More than 70% of patients persisted with the colostomy in situ after the first year of construction and 30% beyond 36 months. Conclusions: The present study posits questions about the cost-effectiveness of anorectal manometry before colostomy closure, which requires corroboration by studies with more patients and more robust methodological designs.
Resumen Introducción: Hay varias razones por las que un paciente puede ser llevado a una colostomía con el objetivo de cerrarla lo antes posible, pero su tratamiento puede variar, y predecir una adecuada continencia posterior al cierre de la colostomía puede ser difícil. Se plantea como objetivo realizar una caracterización de la manometría prequirúrgica debido a que en Colombia hay pocos casos que describan su utilidad. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo de corte transversal en pacientes adultos atendidos en dos centros de gastroenterología en Colombia entre el 2018 y el 2020. Resultados: De 316 pacientes, 13 tenían indicación de manometría previo a cierre de colostomía, predominantemente mujeres (69%), con una edad promedio de 51,69 años (desviación estándar: 24,18). Al evaluar las presiones basales del esfínter anal, se evidenció 68% de hipotonía, 16% de hipertonía y 16% de presiones normales. La prueba de contracción voluntaria fue anormal en el 25%, se observó un patrón de disinergia defecatoria en el 30%, todas con patrón tipo III. El reflejo rectoanal inhibitorio estuvo presente en el 92%, con prueba de expulsión de balón anormal en el 100% de los pacientes. Más del 70% de los pacientes persistían con la colostomía in situ después del primer año de su construcción y 30% más allá de 36 meses. Conclusiones: El presente estudio genera cuestionamientos acerca la costo-efectividad de la manometría anorrectal previa al cierre de colostomía, lo cual requiere ser corroborado por estudios con una mayor cantidad de pacientes y diseños metodológicos más robustos.
RESUMEN
Introducción. La resección segmentaria del intestino y su derivación temporal o definitiva es un procedimiento frecuente en la práctica quirúrgica, que implica la construcción de un estoma. La enfermedad que lleva a la cirugía, las condiciones clínicas del paciente y los aspectos técnicos en la construcción de la ostomía son puntos claves en la evolución posoperatoria. Métodos. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura identificando las complicaciones asociadas a la construcción de estomas, con el objetivo de ofrecer herramientas de tratamiento y toma de decisiones al personal médico involucrado en la atención de estos pacientes. Resultados. La cirugía de urgencia, la inmunosupresión, la obesidad y la técnica en la apertura del orificio en la pared abdominal, favorecen la aparición de complicaciones tempranas que requieren manejo médico o reintervención quirúrgica. Conclusiones. Todo paciente con estoma debe ser valorado minuciosamente por el cirujano y la terapista enterostomal en las primeras 72 horas luego de la cirugía.
Introduction. Segmental resection of the intestine and its temporary or permanent bypass is a frequent procedure in surgical practice, which involves the construction of a stoma. The disease that leads to surgery, the clinical conditions of the patient and the technical aspects in the construction of the ostomy are key points in the postoperative evolution. Methods. A review of the literature was performed, identifying the complications associated with the construction of stomas, with the aim of offering treatment and decision-making tools to the medical personnel involved in the care of these patients. Results. Emergency surgery, immunosuppression, obesity, and the technique used to open the orifice in the abdominal wall favor the appearance of early complications that require medical management or surgical reintervention. Conclusions. Every patient with a stoma must be carefully evaluated by the surgeon and the enterostomal therapist in the first 72 hours after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Colostomía , Ileostomía , Diagnóstico ClínicoRESUMEN
To determine if preoperative-intraoperative factors such as age, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI), and severity of peritonitis affect the rate of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing a primary anastomosis (PA) or Hartmann Procedure (HP) for perforated diverticulitis. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA, with an electronic search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. The search retrieved 614 studies, of which 11 were included. Preoperative-Intraoperative factors including age, ASA classification, BMI, severity of peritonitis, and comorbidities were collected. Primary endpoints were mortality and postoperative complications including sepsis, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, hemorrhage, postoperative ileus, stoma complications, anastomotic leak, and stump leakage. 133,304 patients were included, of whom 126,504 (94.9%) underwent a HP and 6800 (5.1%) underwent a PA. There was no difference between the groups with regards to comorbidities (p = 0.32), BMI (p = 0.28), or severity of peritonitis (p = 0.09). There was no difference in mortality [RR 0.76 (0.44-1.33); p = 0.33]; [RR 0.66 (0.33-1.35); p = 0.25]. More non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the HP group (p = 0.02). There was a significant association in the HP group between the severity of peritonitis and mortality (p = 0.01), and surgical site infection (p = 0.01). In patients with perforated diverticulitis, PA can be chosen. Age, comorbidities, and BMI do not influence postoperative outcomes. The severity of peritonitis should be taken into account as a predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Perforación Intestinal , Peritonitis , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Peritonitis/mortalidad , Peritonitis/cirugía , Peritonitis/etiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Periodo Preoperatorio , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Diverticulitis/complicaciones , Diverticulitis/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Edad , Comorbilidad , Periodo Intraoperatorio , MorbilidadRESUMEN
Introduction: Returning to work is an important cancer recovery milestone. Permanent colostomy can be required for rectal cancer treatment and can significantly impact well-being. We aimed to evaluate the impact of permanent colostomy on health-related quality of life and return to work in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study on 23 employed patients receiving curative surgery for rectal cancer requiring permanent colostomy. Demographic and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires (the Colostomy Impact Score (CIS), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, and the EORTC QLQ-CR29) were posted to eligible patients. Results: On average, patients (10 female, 13 male, mean age 61.8 years) were 5.0 ± 3.5 years post-surgery. At the time of questioning, 73.9% had returned to work (21.7% changed their type of work), while 17.4% never returned to work. Of those that returned to work, 11.8% returned within 1 month of surgery, while 23.5% had not returned after 12 months. Comparison of CIS between patients that returned to the same work (14.6 ± 0.93), changed their work (13.0 ± 0.74), and did not return to work (14.3 ± 2.3) revealed no significant differences (p = 0.36). CIS did not correlate with days worked on return, or time to return to work (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Returning to work following rectal cancer treatment with permanent colostomy is challenging, with 17.4% never returning to work. Of those who returned to work, 23.5% required more than 12 months. This was not associated with CIS in our study. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Reinserción al Trabajo , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Introduction and Objective: In most cases, due to the failure of nonsurgical methods in the treatment of diseases related to the colon, it is necessary to perform colostomy as the main treatment method. However, this surgery can cause a wide range of physical, social, and psychological problems in patients. Therefore, in order to prevent and treat the complications of colostomy, it is necessary to adopt measures in the field of self-care and continuous education for patients to control the complications of the disease, seek treatment, and experience improvements in their quality of life. Additionally, considering the role of mobile health (mHealth) applications in facilitating continuous and effective training, and improving self-care for these patients, the aim of the present study was to design and evaluate an mHealth application for self-care of colostomy patients. Materials and Methods: In the present applied research, first the functional requirements of the software were determined considering the self-care requirements of colostomy patients. Then, the software was designed based on object-oriented analysis, and according to it, the application was coded in Java and developed in the Android Studio environment. Finally, to evaluate the software, the opinions and comments of 5 gastroenterologists and 10 adult colostomy patients in the age range between 27 and 64 years who had at least a high school diploma were used as the basis of judgment at this stage. The instruments used in the evaluation included a checklist, derived from three standard questionnaires (the System Usability Scale [SUS], the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire [MAUQ], and the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale [uMARS]) to measure the user-friendliness indicator, and a researcher-made checklist to measure the performance indicator of the various services provided. Results The services of the software developed include the provision of medical information and self-care instructions regarding colostomy surgery, as well as alerts for the user to schedule an appointment with a doctor and the time to take medications. Based on the results of the evaluation stage, the users were generally satisfied with the interface, services, and general features of the software. In general, the software was evaluated at the "acceptable" level, with a rate of 85%. Discussion and Conclusion Based on the findings of the current research, thesoftware developed can be significantly effective in facilitating the education of colostomy patients and improving their self-care. Proper and continuous self-care and education for colostomy patients is necessary to prevent and control complications resulting from surgery and to improve their quality of life. Therefore, in addition to patients, all health care staff, organizations, and associations which support colostomy patients can also use this software to educate patients and improve the care provided to them. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autocuidado , Colostomía , Aplicaciones Móviles , Educación del Paciente como AsuntoRESUMEN
Abstract An elderly patient was admitted to the hospital due to an enterovesical fistula and a terminal colostomy was proposed. The patient had a high anesthetic risk and thus a quadratus lumborum block was chosen as the sole anesthetic technique. This block has been described to provide both somatic and visceral analgesia to the abdomen. In fact, it yielded good anesthetic conditions to perform the procedure and allowed the patient to be hemodynamically stable and comfortable throughout the case. The postoperative period was uneventful.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anciano , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Músculos Abdominales , Anestésicos LocalesRESUMEN
Objetivo:Identificar o perfil biossociodemográfico e digital das pessoas com colostomia e dos cuidadores que participaram da intervenção educativa online sobre colostomia. Método: Estudo transversal realizado com 20 pessoas com colostomia e 32 cuidadores, no período de setembro/novembro de 2020, em um centro integrado de saúde de Teresina, Piauí. Utilizaram-se instrumentos de caracterização sociodemográfica e clínica, acesso ao computador e à internet e proficiência digital básica, todos submetidos à análise estatística. Resultados: Das pessoas com colostomia e cuidadores, 60% eram do sexo masculino e 75% do feminino. Predominou a colostomia temporária (55%) de cor vermelho vivo e formato regular (80%). A maioria dos cuidadores tinha ocupação laboral (46,9%), e 8 horas/semanais eram dedicadas ao cuidado. O grau de proficiência digital foi baixo (76,9%). Conclusão: A identificação do perfil biossociodemográfico e digital dos participantes pode contribuir na adoção de estratégias educativas conforme a maturidade digital ou a necessidade de suporte para o uso de tecnologias, para otimização do cuidado em saúde e qualificação da assistência prestada.
Objective:To identify the biosociodemographic and digital profile of people with colostomy and caregivers who participated in the online educational intervention on colostomy. Method: Cross-sectional study carried out with 20 people with colostomy and 32 caregivers, in the period of September/November 2020, in an integrated health center in Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. Sociodemographic and clinical characterization instruments, computer and internet access, and basic digital proficiency submitted to statistical analysis were used. Results: Among people with colostomy and caregivers, 60% were male and 75% female. Temporary colostomy (55%) with bright red color and regular shape (80%) predominated. Most caregivers had a job (46.9%), and 8 hours/week were dedicated to care. The degree of digital proficiency was low (76.9%). Conclusion: The identification of the biosociodemographic and digital profile of the participants can contribute to the adoption of educational strategies according to digital maturity or the need for support for the use of technologies, to optimize health care and qualify the assistance provided.
Objetivo:Identificar el perfil biosociodemográfico y digital de personas con colostomía y cuidadores que participarían de la intervención educativa en línea sobre colostomía. Método: Estudio transversal, realizado con 20 personas con colostomía y 32 cuidadores, en el período de septiembre/noviembre de 2020, en un Centro Integrado de Salud de Teresina, Piauí. Se utilizaron instrumentos de caracterización sociodemográfica y clínica, acceso a computador e internet y competencia digital básica sometidos a análisis estadístico. Resultados: La mayoría de las personas con colostomía y cuidadores eran hombres (60%) y mujeres (75%), respectivamente. Predominó la colostomía temporal (55%) de color rojo vivo y forma regular (80%). La mayoría de los cuidadores tenían trabajo (46,9%), y se dedicaban al cuidado 8 horas/semana. El grado de competencia digital fue bajo (76,9%). Conclusión: La identificación del perfil biosociodemográfico y digital de los participantes puede contribuir para la adopción de estrategias educativas de acuerdo con la madurez digital o la necesidad de apoyo para el uso de tecnologías, para optimizar la atención en salud y calificar la asistencia brindada
Asunto(s)
Colostomía/educación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Cuidadores/educación , Intervención basada en la Internet , Perfil de SaludRESUMEN
Objetivos:Identificar o custo direto de um serviço especializado com o uso de equipamentos coletores e adjuvantes e compará-lo com o custo simulado da autoirrigação intestinal em pessoas com colostomia definitiva. Método: Estudo descritivo-exploratório conduzido por meio da abordagem quantitativa nos moldes de estudo de casos múltiplos. A amostra por conveniência foi composta de 22 participantes cadastrados em um serviço especializado do norte de Minas Gerais. A coleta de dados foi realizada em prontuários do período de janeiro de 2019 a janeiro de 2020. Resultados: Dos participantes, 59,1% apresentaram complicações relacionadas à estomia e pele periestomia. Em relação aos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes, o custo variou de 2.340,00 a R$ 5.535,00, custo médio de R$ 4.050,01 e desvio padrão amostral de R$ 770,31. O custo direto médio com autoirrigação de colostomia foi de R$ 3.793,44. Conclusão: O custo direto médio dos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes foi superior ao da autoirrigação de colostomia, impactado pela presença de complicações e pelo valor do protetor de colostomia.
Objectives:To identify the direct cost of a specialized service with the use of collection equipment and adjuvants and to compare it with the simulated cost of intestinal self-irrigation in people with permanent colostomy. Method: Descriptive-exploratory study conducted through a quantitative approach in the form of multiple-case studies. The convenience sample consisted of 22 participants registered in a specialized service in the north of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Data collection was carried out in medical records from January 2019 to January 2020. Results: Among the participants, 59.1% had complications related to the ostomy and peristomal skin. Regarding collector/adjuvant equipment, the cost ranged from R$ 2,340.00 to R$ 5,535.00, average cost of R$ 4,050.01, and sample standard deviation of R$ 770.31. The average direct cost with colostomy self-irrigation was R$ 3,793.44. Conclusion: The average direct cost of collection/adjuvant equipment was higher than that of colostomy self-irrigation, impacted by the presence of complications and the value of the colostomy protector.
Objetivos:Identificar o custo direto de um serviço especializado com o uso de equipamentos coletores e adjuvantes e compará-lo com o custo simulado da autoirrigação intestinal em pessoas com colostomia definitiva. Método: Estudo descritivo-exploratório conduzido por meio da abordagem quantitativa nos moldes de estudo de casos múltiplos. A amostra por conveniência foi composta de 22 participantes cadastrados em um serviço especializado do norte de Minas Gerais. A coleta de dados foi realizada em prontuários do período de janeiro de 2019 a janeiro de 2020. Resultados: Dos participantes, 59,1% apresentaram complicações relacionadas à estomia e pele periestomia. Em relação aos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes, o custo variou de 2.340,00 a R$ 5.535,00, custo médio de R$ 4.050,01 e desvio padrão amostral de R$ 770,31. O custo direto médio com autoirrigação de colostomia foi de R$ 3.793,44. Conclusão: O custo direto médio dos equipamentos coletores/adjuvantes foi superior ao da autoirrigação de colostomia, impactado pela presença de complicações e pelo valor do protetor de colostomia.
Asunto(s)
Estomía , Colostomía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Estomaterapia , Irrigación TerapéuticaRESUMEN
Objetivo: descrever os cuidados de enfermagem na assistência prestada ao paciente com estomia intestinal apresentados na literatura. Método: revisão integrativa da literatura baseada em obras secundárias, publicadas no período de 2017 a 2022. Foi realizado o levantamento em ambiente virtual na Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS), as bases: Lilacs, Medline, BDENF. no Portal de Periódicos CAPES as bases: Cinahl e em uma busca livre de textos completos na Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo) Resultados: foram selecionados 14 artigos para a síntese. E esses estudos foram expostos com as informações: autores, ano de publicação e país; objetivo; método, tamanho e tipo de estudo; principais achados; conclusão. Discussão: se tratando da atuação da enfermagem frente a estomia, pode-se afirmar que o enfermeiro possui uma grande responsabilidade. Um dos cuidados com grande importância é o olhar humano e holístico para esse indivíduo ostomizado. focando na pessoa ostomizada, afirma que o enfermeiro deve focar no autocuidado. Tendo em vista que é um conceito amplo, o mesmo está ligado a vários fatores que o indivíduo se relaciona em vida, como: bem-estar, saúde, sobrevivência, autoaprendizagem. o cuidado de educar a pessoa desde a confirmação da confecção do estoma é necessário, dessa forma, o enfermeiro deve planejar seu cuidado desde a confirmação da confecção do estoma até a alta hospitalar. Conclusão: este estudo conseguiu evidenciar os principais cuidados de enfermagem descrito na literatura para serem realizados em pessoas com ostomia. adequado a sua finalidade e útil para a assistência de enfermagem ao paciente internado estomizado.
Objective: to describe the nursing care provided to patients with intestinal ostomy presented in the literature. Method: integrative literature review based on secondary works, published from 2017 to 2022. The survey was carried out in a virtual environment in the Virtual Health Library (BVS), the bases: Lilacs, Medline, BDENF. in the CAPES Periodicals Portal the bases: Cinahl and in a free search of full texts in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo) Results: 14 articles were selected for the synthesis. And these studies were exposed with the information: authors, year of publication and country; objective; method, size and type of study; main findings; conclusion. Discussion: when it comes to the role of nursing in the face of ostomy, it can be said that the nurse has a great responsibility. One of the most important care is the human and holistic look for this ostomized individual. focusing on the ostomized person, states that nurses should focus on selfcare. Considering that it is a broad concept, it is linked to several factors that the individual relates to in life, such as: well-being, health, survival, self-learning. the care of educating the person from the confirmation of the stoma construction is necessary, in this way, the nurse must plan their care from the confirmation of the stoma construction until hospital discharge. Conclusion: this study was able to highlight the main nursing care described in the literature to be performed in people with ostomy. suitable for its purpose and useful for nursing care for inpatients with a stoma.
RESUMEN
Introduction: The Deloyers procedure is a valuable technique used in reconstructing bowel transit following an extended left colectomy, a Hartmann-type colostomy, or repeated colon resections. It enables the creation of a tension-free colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Case presentation: A 60-year-old female patient presented for consultation regarding the closure of a colostomy. Her medical history included segmental colectomy of the sigmoid and descending colon, resulting in a Hartmann-type colostomy due to complicated diverticulitis. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery, during which a segment of the transverse colon with a short mesocolon was identified. Due to the complete release of the colon, a colorectal anastomosis could not be performed. As an alternative to preserving the ileocecal valve and achieving a tension-free colorectal anastomosis, the patient underwent the Deloyers procedure. Discussion: The Deloyers procedure involves tension-free anastomosis between the right colon and the rectum or anus. It includes complete mobilization and a 180° counterclockwise rotation of the hepatic angle and the right colon. The right and middle colic vessels are divided, while preserving the ileocolic pedicle and the ileocecal valve, thus avoiding the need for total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis, which may yield unsatisfactory functional outcomes. Conclusion: The Deloyers procedure represents a viable alternative to ileorectal or ileoanal anastomosis, offering satisfactory functional outcomes.
Introducción: el procedimiento de Deloyers es una técnica útil en la reconstrucción del tránsito intestinal posterior a una colectomía izquierda ampliada, colostomía tipo Hartmann o resecciones colónicas iterativas, pues asegura una anastomosis colorrectal o coloanal sin tensión. Presentación del caso: una mujer de 60 años acudió a consulta para el cierre de una colostomía, con antecedente de colectomía segmentaria del sigmoides y colon descendente derivada con colostomía tipo Hartmann por diverticulitis complicada. Fue llevada a cirugía laparoscópica, en la que se encontró un segmento de colon transverso con meso corto y al liberarse completamente no se logró realizar la anastomosis colorrectal, por lo que se decidió realizar el procedimiento de Deloyers como alternativa para conservar la válvula ileocecal y obtener la anastomosis colorrectal libre de tensión. Discusión: el procedimiento de Deloyers consiste en la unión del colon derecho y recto o ano libre de tensión después de realizar la movilización completa y rotación de 180° en sentido antihorario del ángulo hepático y el colon derecho, en el que se seccionan los vasos cólicos derecho y medio, con preservación del pedículo ileocólico y la válvula ileocecal, para evitar la necesidad de una colectomía total y una anastomosis ileorrectal, para la cual los resultados funcionales pueden ser insatisfactorios. Conclusión: el procedimiento de Deloyers es una alternativa viable a la anastomosis ileorrectal o ileoanal con resultados funcionales satisfactorios.
RESUMEN
RESUMEN Antecedentes: la cirugía de restitución del tránsito intestinal presenta complicaciones posoperatorias tales como infección de sitio quirúrgico, asociado a percepción de pobre resultado cosmético por parte de los pacientes. Objetivo: describir la técnica quirúrgica de incisión y cierre de piel en "punto de mira" para la reversión de estoma y los resultados posoperatorios. Material y métodos: entre noviembre de 2020 y mayo de 2021 se realizó esta técnica a 15 pacientes con estatus de colostomía e ileostomía. Se analizaron los resultados transoperatorios y posoperatorios. Resultados: edad promedio: 38±2,5 años, índice de masa corporal: 28±1,5 kg/m2, tiempo de estadía hospitalaria: 4±2 días. La técnica presentó buena exposición de tejidos y ningún paciente presentó infección de sitio quirúrgico. A los 30 días del alta, el 100% de los pacientes expresaron alta satisfacción por el resultado estético evidenciado mediante la escala Likert 3. Conclusión: la utilización de este procedimiento ofrece ventajas técnicas, y alta satisfacción de los pacientes.
ABSTRACT Background: Stoma reversal has postoperative complications such as surgical site infection associated with patients' perception of a poor cosmetic outcome. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the gunsight skin incision and closure technique for stoma reversal and the postoperative results. Material and methods: Between November 2020 and May 2021, this technique was performed on 15 patients with colostomy and ileostomy. The intraoperative and postoperative results were analyzed. Results: Mean age was 38 ± 2.5 years, body mass index was 28±1.5 kg/m2, and length of hospital stay was 4 ± 2 days. The technique provided good tissue exposure and no patients presented surgical site infection. Thirty days after discharge 100% of patients reported high satisfaction with the cosmetic result as evidenced by the 3-point Likert scale. Conclusion: This procedure offers technical advantages and high patient satisfaction.
RESUMEN
An elderly patient was admitted to the hospital due to an enterovesical fistula and a terminal colostomy was proposed. The patient had a high anesthetic risk and thus a quadratus lumborum block was chosen as the sole anesthetic technique. This block has been described to provide both somatic and visceral analgesia to the abdomen. In fact, it yielded good anesthetic conditions to perform the procedure and allowed the patient to be hemodynamically stable and comfortable throughout the case. The postoperative period was uneventful.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Anciano , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Músculos Abdominales , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Anestésicos LocalesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: to assess the quality of life of individuals with intestinal ostomies and its association with sociodemographic and clinical factors. Method: a cross-sectional and correlational study conducted between August 2019 and December 2021, involving individuals with intestinal ostomies registered at the Orthotics and Prosthetics Service of the Municipal Health Department of São Luís-Maranhão. The questionnaires used included a sociodemographic one, a clinical one, and the City Of Hope - Quality Of Life - Ostomy Questionnaire (COH-QOL-OQ). The statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS Statistics 20.1 software for Windows, with a 5% significance level. Normality was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the correlations between independent and dependent variables were assessed using paired t-tests. Results: the sample consisted of 154 participants, mostly men (62.6%), with a mean age of 49.94 years old and Incomplete Elementary School (35%). The majority had colostomies (81.2%), temporary (61%), and cancer as etiology (47.4%). In terms of quality of life, the mean scores for the spiritual well-being domain (8.45) stood out, followed by the physical (4.05), psychological (5.85) and social (6.33) domains. The association between sociodemographic/clinical factors, and quality of life was statistically significant (p≤0.05) for religion, schooling, type and characteristics of the household, ostomy permanence and complications, post-ostomy employment, presence of spouse, physical activity, and access to health services. Etiology of the ostomy was found to be significantly associated with the physical (p=0.03), psychological (p=0.01) and social (p=0.01) domains, as well as overall (p=0.05). Conclusion: the study revealed a significant association for the physical, psychological, social and spiritual domains, impacting the quality of life and care practices for individuals with ostomies and their families.
RESUMEN Objetivo: evaluar la calidad de vida de personas con estomas intestinales y la asociación con factores sociodemográficos y clínicos. Métodos: estudio transversal y correlacional realizado entre agosto de 2019 y diciembre de 2021 con personas ostomizadas registradas en el Servicio de Órtesis y Prótesis de la Secretaría Municipal de Salud de São Luís-Maranhão. Se utilizó un cuestionario sociodemográfico, uno clínico y el City Of Hope - Quality Of Life - Ostomy Questionnary (COH-QOL-OQ). Los análisis estadísticos se procesaron en el programa de software SPSS Statistics 20.1 para Windows, con nivel de significancia del 5%. En la prueba de Shapiro-Wilk se verificó la normalidad y, con la prueba t pareada, las correlaciones de las variables independientes y dependientes. Resultados: la muestra estuvo compuesta por 154 participantes, con mayoría de hombres (62,6%), media de edad de 49,94 años, con estudios primarios incompletos (35%), colostomías (81,2%), temporarias (61%) y cáncer como etiología (47,4%). En relación con la calidad de vida, se destacaron los valores medios correspondientes a los dominios de bienestar espiritual (8,45), físico (4,05), psicológico (5,85) y social (6,33). La asociación entre factores sociodemográficos/clínicos y calidad de vida presentó significancia estadística (p ≤ 0,05) para religión, nivel de estudios, tipo y característica del hogar, permanencia del estoma y complicaciones, trabajar después del estoma, presencia de cónyuge, actividad física y acceso a servicios de salud. Se verificó que la mayor significancia de la etiología del estoma correspondió a los dominios físico (p=0,03), psicológico (p=0,01), social (p=0,01) y general (p=0,05). Conclusión: el estudio demostró una asociación significativa para los dominios físico, psicológico, social y espiritual, con efecto sobre la calidad de vida y en las prácticas de atención a personas con estomas y sus familiares.
RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a qualidade de vida das pessoas com estomias intestinais e associação com fatores sociodemográficos e clínicos. Método: estudo transversal e correlacional realizado entre agosto de 2019 e dezembro de 2021, com pessoas estomizadas cadastradas no Serviço de Órtese e Prótese da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de São Luís-Maranhão. Utilizou-se questionários sociodemográfico, clínico e City OF Hope - Quality Of Life - Ostomy Questionnary (COH-QOL-OQ). As análises estatísticas foram processadas pelo Software SPSS Statistics 20.1 para Windows, nível de significância 5%. No teste Shapiro-Wilk verificou-se a normalidade e no teste-t pareado as correlações das variáveis independentes e dependente. Resultados: amostra composta por 154 participantes, maioria homens (62,6%), idade média 49,94 anos, com ensino fundamental incompleto (35%), colostomia (81,2%), temporária (61%) e câncer como etiologia (47,4%). Em relação à qualidade de vida, destacaram-se as médias para os domínios bem-estar espiritual (8,45), físico (4,05), psicológico (5,85) e social (6,33). A associação entre fatores sociodemográficos, clínicos e qualidade de vida foi estatisticamente significante (p ≤ 0,05) para religião, escolaridade, tipo e característica do domicílio, permanência da estomia e complicações, trabalho pós-estomia, presença de cônjuge, atividade física e acesso ao serviço de saúde. Verificou-se a maior significância da etiologia da estomia para domínios físico (p=0,03), psicológico (p=0,01), social (p=0,01) e geral (p=0,05). Conclusão: o estudo mostrou associação significante para os domínios físico, psicológico, social e espiritual, com impacto a qualidade de vida e nas práticas de cuidado às pessoas com estomias e seus familiares.
RESUMEN
Resumen Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados perioperatorios del abordaje abierto (AA) con el abordaje laparoscópico (AL) para la reconstitución de tránsito (RT), y determinar factores de riesgo asociados a morbilidad posoperatoria. Material y Métodos: Se estudiaron pacientes consecutivos sometidos a RT entre enero de 2007 y diciembre de 2016 en nuestro centro. Se excluyeron aquellos con grandes hernias incisionales que requirieran reparación abierta simultánea. Se consignaron variables demográficas y perioperatorias, y se compararon ambos grupos. Además, se realizó una regresión logística para la identificación de factores de riesgo asociados a morbilidad posoperatoria en la serie. Resultados: Se realizaron 101 RT en el período. Se excluyeron 14 casos por hernia incisional, por lo que se analizaron 87 casos (46 AA y 41 AL). Diez pacientes en el grupo AL (24,4%) requirieron conversión, principalmente por adherencias. La morbilidad total de la serie fue de 36,8%, siendo mayor en el AA (50% vs 21,9%, p = 0,007). Hubo una filtración anastomótica en cada grupo. La estadía posoperatoria fue de 5 (3-52) días para el AL y 7 (4-36) días para el AA (p < 0,001). En la regresión logística, sólo el AA fue un factor de riesgo independientemente asociado a morbilidad posoperatoria (OR 2,89, IC 95% 1,11-7,49; p = 0,029). Conclusión: El abordaje laparoscópico se asocia a menor morbilidad y estadía posoperatoria que el abordaje abierto para la reconstitución del tránsito pos-Hartmann. En nuestra serie, el abordaje abierto fue el único factor independientemente asociado a morbilidad posoperatoria.
Introduction: Hartmann's reversal (HR) is considered a technically demanding procedure and is associated with high morbidity rates. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative results of the open approach (OA) with the laparoscopic approach (LA) for HR, and to determine the risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity. Material and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing HR between January 2007 and December 2016 at a university hospital were included. Patients with large incisional hernias that required an open approach a priori were excluded from the analysis. Demographic and perioperative variables were recorded. Analytical statistics were carried out to compare both groups, and a logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity in the series. Results: A hundred and one HR were performed during the study period. Fourteen cases were excluded due to large incisional hernias, so 87 cases (46 OA and 41 LA) were analyzed. Ten patients in the LA group (24.4%) required conversion, mainly due to adhesions. The total morbidity of the series was 36.8%, being higher in the OA group (50% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.007). There was one case of anastomotic leakage in each group. The length of stay was 5 (3-52) days for LA and 7 (4-36) days for OA (p < 0.001). In the logistic regression, the OA was the only independent risk factor associated with postoperative morbidity in HR (OR 2.89, IC 95% 1.11-7.49; p = 0.029). Conclusion: A laparoscopic approach is associated with less morbidity and a shorter length of stay compared to the open approach for Hartmann's reversal. An open approach was the only factor independently associated with postoperative morbidity in our series.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Laparotomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Análisis de Supervivencia , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Laparotomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) have comprised less than 30% of patients enrolled in phase III clinical trials of curative-intent definitive chemoradiation. We aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes of these patients according to dose-intensity of chemoradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of patients with T2N0 SCCA, with the primary endpoint to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with full definitive chemoradiotherapy (f-CRT, CRT with 2 drugs) versus a nonstandard treatment (NST; radiotherapy only or CRT with 1 drug). Secondary outcomes were rates of complete response (CR), salvage surgery, and colostomy. PFS time was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in survival outcomes were assessed using the log-rank test and adjusted for prognostic covariates using a multivariable Cox regression model RESULTS: From March 2006 to January 2020, 74 patients were included. Most patients (n = 58; 78.4%) received f-CRT. In a median follow up time of 66.1 months, the unadjusted median PFS was 128.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 105.5-151.1) for f-CRT versus 74.1 months for NST (95% CI 45.8-102.4; P = .067). CR was achieved by 51 (87.9%) versus 11 (68.9%; P = .065) patients treated with f-CRT or an NST, respectively. Comparing f-CRT versus NST, the colostomy rates were higher for those treated with an NST: 5 (32.8%) versus 5 (9.5%; P = .019) CONCLUSION: For patients with T2N0 SCCA, f-CRT remains the standard treatment, offering higher CR and less likelihood of colostomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Canal Anal/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT), which enables tumor eradication while preserving the anal sphincter. Patients with locally advanced tumors, however, may experience complications that preclude treatment before stoma creation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reversal rate of pretreatment stomas and the risk factors associated with nonreversal. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study using a prospective database included patients diagnosed with anal SCC from January 2008 to December 2020 who required a stoma before curative CRT. RESULTS: In total, 651 patients were identified; 65 required a stoma before chemoradiation due to obstruction (43.1%), rectovaginal fistula (20%), and perianal sepsis (36.9%). The stoma was reversed in nine patients after a mean follow-up of 35.8 months. Risk factors associated with a permanent stoma were perianal sepsis (p = 0.010), interruptions during radiotherapy for more than 7 days (p = 0.010), male sex (p = 0.013), poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] ≥ 2) (p = 0.023), large tumors (p = 0.045), and cisplatin-based chemotherapy (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment stomas are unlikely to be reversed, and risk factors for a permanent stoma are perianal sepsis, interruptions during radiotherapy for more than 7 days, male sex, poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 2), large tumors, and cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Sepsis , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Cisplatino , Colostomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer in the United States and it is found in 17% of patients thought to have complicated diverticular disease. However, primary adenocarcinoma rarely occur in the colostomy site and the risk of developing malignancy is similar to that of any other colonic segment. Polyps found in CRC screenings can be divided into the following types: hyperplastic polyps, polyps with no malignant potential, adenomatous polyps, polyps with malignant potential, and malignancies. Local complications of the colostomy can appear in the immediate, early, or late postoperative period, with an incidence ranging from 15 to 30%; neoplasia is even less common. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias del Colon , Prolapso , Pólipos del Colon , Colon/patología , Enfermedades DiverticularesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Type of ostomy closure has connection with some complications and also cosmetic effects. AIMS: This study aimed to compare result of colostomy closure using purse-string method versus linear method in terms of surgical site infection, surgical time, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In this study, 50 patients who underwent purse-string ostomy closure and 50 patients who underwent linear closure were included. Two groups were compared for surgical time, wound infection, patient satisfaction, scar length. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Wound infection was not reported among purse-string group compared to 10% in linear group (p=0.022). Scar length was 24.09±0.1 mm in purse string and 52.15±1.0 mm in linear group (p=0.033). Duration of hospital admission was significantly shorter in purse-string group (6.4±1.1 days) compared to linear (15.5±4.6 days, p=0.0001). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scale for observer (p=0.038) and parents (p=0.045) was more favorable among purse-string group compared to linear. CONCLUSION: Purse-string technique has the less frequent surgical site infection, shorter duration of hospital admission, less scar length, and more favorable cosmetic outcome, compared to linear technique.
RESUMO RACIONAL: A técnica de fechamento da ostomia tem relação com algumas complicações e também efeitos estéticos. OBJETIVOS: Comparar o resultado do fechamento da colostomia pelo método em bolsa versus método linear, em termos de infecção do sítio cirúrgico, tempo cirúrgico e satisfação do paciente. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 50 pacientes que não realizaram o fechamento da estomia em bolsa e 50 pacientes que foram submetidos ao fechamento linear. Os dois grupos foram comparados quanto ao tempo cirúrgico, infecção da ferida, satisfação do paciente, comprimento da cicatriz. Valor de p menor que 0,05 foi considerado significativo. RESULTADOS: A infecção da ferida não foi registrado no grupo de bolsa, em comparação com 10% no grupo linear (p=0,022). O comprimento da cicatriz foi de 24,09±0,1 mm no grupo de bolsa e 52,15±1,0 mm no grupo linear (p=0,033). O tempo de hospitalização foi significativamente menor no grupo em bolsa (6,4±1,1 dias) em comparação ao linear (15,5±4,6 dias, p=0,0001). A escala Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale para observador (p=0,038) e pais (p=0,045) foi mais favorável entre o grupo em bolsa, em relação ao linear. CONCLUSÕES: A técnica em bolsa apresentou infecção do sítio cirúrgico menos frequente, menor tempo de internação, menor comprimento da cicatriz e resultado cosmético mais favorável, em comparação com a técnica linear.