RESUMEN
This is a case series of three patients who presented with complex anorectal fistulas. Each patient underwent repair of complex anorectal fistulas with biologic mesh. We will discuss each case and our institution's experience with this relatively new technique. This case series demonstrates the use of biologic mesh for the repair of complex anorectal fistulas. Three patients are discussed who underwent repair of perianal fistulas using ACell mesh by two separate surgeons. We will discuss the rationale for offering this treatment, as well as the advantages and disadvantages. The use of biologic mesh in perianal fistulas is a relatively new topic that needs further investigation. Perianal fistulas can be difficult to manage for both patients and surgeons. There are many options for repair, ranging from simple to complex. Biologic mesh for complex fistulas may be a useful option to avoid the morbidity of more complex repairs, such as flaps.
RESUMEN
Spigelian hernias are an uncommon type of primary ventral hernia and are defined as a defect in the Spigelian aponeurosis (fascia). Herein, we present an uncommon case of Spigelian hernia to highlight the potential complications of these hernias and the need for surgical management. This is a case report of an 86-year-old gentleman presenting post-fall with an acute rib fracture and an incidental Spigelian hernia seen on a CT trauma pan scan. The Spigelian hernia surgical treatment was planned for elective management due to the anesthetic risks associated with an elderly patient and acute rib fractures. Ultimately, the patient developed a large bowel obstruction secondary to the Spigelian hernia and required emergency operative management to relieve the obstruction. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery following his emergency surgery. This case report highlights the importance of assessing anesthetic risks versus surgical risks when it comes to surgical planning. Clinicians should recognize occult hernias and continue ongoing clinical reviews with a high index of suspicion, as symptoms of Spigelian hernia obstruction might be non-specific.
RESUMEN
AIM: The role of colorectal surgeons in the management of acute obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is an ongoing debate. Their expertise in operating in the anorectal region lends itself to assisting in OASI repair. The aim of this study was to establish the current involvement and recommended management of acute OASI by colorectal surgeons. METHOD: An online survey of consultant colorectal surgeons was sent to members of the Pelvic Floor Society to assess current involvement in acute OASI management and repair. RESULTS: Forty completed surveys were collated and analysed. Sixty-five per cent of respondents had seen an acute OASI since being a consultant and 50% stated they were involved in the repair of OASI less than once per year. 37.5% felt that a de-functioning stoma was still necessary sometimes. Many agreed with current guidelines for OASI repair in terms of antibiotics, laxatives and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgeons have varied opinions on the management of OASI. We suggest that multidisciplinary training of obstetricians and colorectal surgeons could lead to more collaboration regarding the management of women with acute OASI.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Incontinencia Fecal , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Cirujanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Canal Anal/cirugía , Canal Anal/lesiones , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Fecal/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/cirugía , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The current literature suggests that serious complications after intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) insertion are rare. We present a rare case of a migrated IUCD into the rectosigmoid colon. A 33-year-old woman (parity one) presented to the emergency department with a three-day history of flank pain, upper urinary tract infection symptoms, and a low-grade fever. Differentials initially included renal colic or pyelonephritis. However, subsequent computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT-KUB) and magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis (MRI-pelvis) showed a migrated IUCD posterior to the uterine body, with both ends closely abutting onto the adjacent proximal rectum. During further history-taking, she reported a past surgical history of an emergency caesarean section five years ago and the insertion of a copper-IUCD six weeks postnatally. She was subsequently referred to the gynaecologists. In view of the involvement of the bowels, the colorectal surgeons were consulted, and the patient was managed by a multidisciplinary team. The patient subsequently underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, diagnostic laparoscopy, removal of impacted IUCD, and repair of the rectum. Intraoperatively, her hysteroscopy noted a normal uterus with an intact cavity. Flexible sigmoidoscopy noted the horizontal arm of the IUCD abutting into the lumen of the rectosigmoid region; however, attempted removal with traction was unsuccessful. A partial rectotomy was done eventually to remove the IUCD. Migration of an IUCD is rare, with uterine perforation rates ranging from 0.04% to 0.2%. Albeit a rare complication, this case highlights the need for clinicians to be cognizant of complications arising from IUCD insertion, as symptoms are often non-specific and mild. This case also highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary discussion in the management of a migrated IUCD, which may include gynaecologists, colorectal surgeons, radiologists, and more. Many innovative ways were also discussed regarding the assessment of it, which includes preoperative imaging or endoscopic evaluation. Novel methods of removal of migrated IUCD in the rectosigmoid colon have also been proposed, including manual traction, proctoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, and removal via a snare. They provide an alternative to the traditional diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy, thus reducing the need for general anaesthesia or operative intervention. Looking forward, long-term studies can be done to evaluate the need for intervention for asymptomatic patients where the risk of surgery may outweigh the benefits.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Despite numerous studies on the optimal treatments for oligometastatic disease (OMD), there is no established interdisciplinary consensus on its diagnosis or classification. This survey-based study aimed to analyze the differential opinions of colorectal surgeons and radiation oncologists regarding the definition and treatment of OMD from the colorectal primary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 141 participants were included in this study, consisting of 63 radiation oncologists (44.7%) and 78 colorectal surgeons (55.3%). The survey consisted of 19 questions related to OMD, and the responses were analyzed using the chi-square test to determine statistical differences between the specialties. RESULTS: The radiation oncologists chose "bone" more frequently compared to the colorectal surgeons (19.2% vs. 36.5%, p=0.022), while colorectal surgeons favored "peritoneal seeding" (26.9% vs. 9.5%, p=0.009). Regarding the number of metastatic tumors, 48.3% of colorectal surgeons responded that "irrelevant, if all metastatic lesions are amendable to local therapy", while only 21.8% of radiation oncologist chose same answer. When asked about molecular diagnosis, most surgeons (74.8%) said it was important, but only 35.8% of radiation oncologists agreed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons agreed on a majority of aspects such as diagnostic imaging, biomarker, systemic therapy, and optimal timing of OMD, they also had quite different perspectives on several aspects of OMD. Understanding these differences is crucial to achieving multidisciplinary consensus on the definition and optimal management of OMD.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Consenso , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , República de CoreaRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) symptoms are increasingly reported as the presenting symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). These symptoms vary from diarrhea to severe colitis or bleeding. This paper reports a rare case of pancolitis as a consequence of GIT involvement secondary to active COVID-19 in a previously healthy 52-year-old lady. The diagnosis was confirmed by a CT scan of the abdomen and the patient was hospitalized and treated conservatively and discharged home after three days of hospital admission. She was followed up in the outpatient surgical clinic in two weeks with no more gastrointestinal symptoms and a normal physical examination. Careful consideration of gastrointestinal symptoms in the context of COVID-19 and a prompt diagnosis will facilitate early recognition and management and avoid any sinister complications.
RESUMEN
Introduction The first confirmed case of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom (UK) was reported on 29 January 2020. The country saw the peak of infection between March and May of 2020. The result was a change in the practice of how we treat most surgical conditions including cancer. We continued providing service to our colorectal cancer patients at a District General Hospital. The aim of this study was to compare our provision of colorectal cancer service during the peak of the pandemic to that of the pre-COVID time in our hospital. Methods We collected data of all colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery between 1 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 in our hospital. The comparative data were collected for similar patients during the same time frame in 2019. A detailed data set was compiled on Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Washington) and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Released 2012. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Results The two groups were comparable in demographics including age, BMI, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index. Time from decision- to-treat to surgery, post-operative HDU/ITU stay, and overall length of stay was shorter in the COVID group than the Pre-COVID group without any significant statistical difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in Calvien-Dindo complications grade 1 and 2. No mortality was reported due to direct or indirect consequences of COVID-19 infection. More open procedures were performed in our department during the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK compared to Pre-COVID time. Conclusions Despite the challenges we faced during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, we managed to provide standard care to our colorectal cancer patients with comparable post-operative surgical and oncological outcomes.
RESUMEN
La cirugía del colon supone un importante trabajo en cualquier servicio de cirugía digestiva. Como cualquier cirugía mayor puede presentar complicaciones posoperatorias, tanto quirúrgicas como médicas, muchas de ellas pueden ser graves o incluso fatales. En este trabajo revisamos las complicaciones quirúrgicas posoperatorias más frecuentes: sepsis de origen abdominal, íleo posquirúrgico, hemorragia, fístula, evisceración, lesión ureteral, problemas con la colostomía y lesión de grandes vasos mesentéricos superiores. Todo cirujano digestivo debe conocer las posibles complicaciones de la cirugía colónica para conseguir un diagnóstico precoz y un manejo adecuado de las mismas.
Colon surgery comprises a high number of patients treated in a gastrointestinal surgery department. Like any major surgery, it may present diverse surgical and medical postoperative complications. In this article we review the most frequent surgical complications of colon surgery: abdominal sepsis, postoperative ileus, bleeding, fistula, evisceration, ureteral lesion, colostomy problems and damage to upper mesenteric vessels. Every colorectal surgeon must know all the possible complications of colon surgery to achieve an early diagnosis and correct management.