RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: How is the acquisition and testing of theoretical and practical knowledge in Clinical Embryology and the licensing of ART laboratory personnel carried out in European countries? SUMMARY ANSWER: Twelve out of 31 European countries have established some kind of verification of laboratory competency and skills in ART: in 7 countries, this was related to licensing, but where organized education for Clinical Embryologists existed, there were vast differences in the way these processes were undertaken. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In 2015, a report by the ESHRE Embryology Certification Committee concluded that regardless of the large number of people working in IVF laboratories, Clinical Embryology was only recognized as an official profession in 3 out of 27 European national health systems. In most countries, Clinical Embryologists needed to be officially registered under an alternative profession and there were limited opportunities for organized education in this specialist field. Five years after this report, the ESHRE Working Group on Embryologist Training Analysis conducted a survey to collect detailed information about how Clinical Embryologists from different European countries are acquiring their theoretical knowledge and practical skills in ART, and how their level of education and competence in Clinical Embryology is verified. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Two questionnaires about the possibilities for acquiring the education and training needed to work in ART and verification of this knowledge were prepared by the ESHRE Working Group on Embryologist Training Analysis. The first was sent in 2020 to a panel of invited lead European Embryologists who attended an Expert Meeting held in Rome, Italy. In order to have a more comprehensive and updated picture, in 2021 the same survey was also sent to the ESHRE Committee of National Representatives (CNRs). At the end of 2021, the second survey with specific questions, more focused on Clinical Embryologists' training and licencing, was sent to the CNRs who reported on verification of education in Clinical Embryology. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: The first survey consisted of 17 questions. It was initially submitted to 14 lead Embryologists and then resubmitted to the 34 ESHRE CNRs. Representatives from 31 countries responded. A second survey with 23 questions was sent to the 12 ESHRE CNRs who reported an established national system of verification of education in Clinical Embryology, with specific questions focused on the training of Clinical Embryologists. All 12 CNRs responded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Analysis showed that European national education programmes in Clinical Embryology could be split into 4 categories: non-existent (13 countries), recommended (5 countries), simple compulsory (9 countries), and complex compulsory (4 countries). A national document stating the minimum education requirements for staff to work in an IVF laboratory was reported by 19 respondents. The requirement to follow a prescribed theoretical and laboratory training programme in ART was compulsory in 9 and 10 countries, respectively. Some form of verification of laboratory skills, theoretical knowledge in ART, and continuing professional development was required in 12, 10, and 9 countries, respectively. A national trainee's logbook format was reported by seven respondents and a national tutorial system was available in six countries. Only seven countries had official licensing of ART laboratory staff. The title of Clinical Embryologist was not recognized in 13 countries and in 6 countries, it was used only by professional bodies, while in 12 countries the profession was at least cited in governmental regulations. The ESHRE Clinical Embryologist Certificate was officially recognized in eight countries. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The survey took place in two steps and the results were then combined to provide a representative picture for most of the European countries sampled. The vast majority, but not all, of the CNRs answered the request to participate in the survey. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The professional recognition of Clinical Embryology within Europe is steadily evolving. However, it remains a concern that many countries continue to not recognize Clinical Embryology as a profession, with a vast difference in the reported organization of educational and training programmes and verification of skills. It is recommended that a training programme for Clinical Embryology and ART in Europe should be standardized and relevant issues should be addressed by competent authorities and European Union institutions. ESHRE is best placed to take a leading role in this educational process. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The Working Group members who are the authors of this article did not receive payments for the completion of this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
RESUMEN
Clinical embryologists are highly trained laboratory professionals with multiple roles, including laboratory, clinical, biobanking and quality system management. In most European countries, clinical embryologists are trained to work in Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) centres without a specifically dedicated educational path. The criteria required for employment vary according to the educational structure and the public or private nature of the centre. We have herein described the educational profile required by Italian clinical embryologists to work in MAR centres of the National Health System (NHS). Public centres currently represent 36% of all the Italian MAR clinics. According to the Italian law, a future clinical embryologist must achieve a 3-4 year unpaid post-graduate specialization in a different field, choosing from Genetics, Microbiology, Clinical Pathology or Nutrition. Accesses to the above-mentioned post-graduate courses are themselves very limited. Clinical embryologists are basically trained by senior colleagues. This situation makes inevitably difficult to recruit laboratory staff in NHS centres. Moreover, it represents an emblematic example of the need for an equal training curriculum, possibly ensuring a comparable education quality, mobility of trainees and dissemination of skills for clinical embryologists all over Europe.
RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: What is the recognition of clinical embryology and the current status of clinical embryologists in European countries, regarding educational levels, responsibilities and workload, and need for a formal education in assisted reproductive technology (ART)? SUMMARY ANSWER: It is striking that the profession of clinical embryology, almost 40 years after the introduction of IVF, is still not officially recognized in most European countries. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Reproductive medicine has developed into a sophisticated multidisciplinary medical branch since the birth of Louise Brown 37 years ago. The European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) has recognized reproductive medicine as a subspeciality and has developed a subspeciality training for gynaecologists in collaboration with the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). However, nothing similar exists for the field of clinical embryology or for clinical embryologists. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A questionnaire about the situation in clinical embryology in the period of 2012-2013 in the respective European country was sent to ESHRE National representatives (basic scientists only) in December 2013. At this time, 28 European countries had at least one basic scientist in the ESHRE Committee of National Representatives. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The survey consisted of 46 numeric, dichotomous (yes/no) or descriptive questions. Answers were obtained from 27 out of 28 countries and the data were tabulated. Data about the numbers of 'ESHRE Certified Embryologists' were taken from the ESHRE Steering Committee for Embryologist Certification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In 2012, more than 7000 laboratory staff from 1349 IVF clinics in 27 European countries performed over 700 000 fresh and frozen ART cycles. Despite this, clinical embryology is only recognized as an official profession in 3 out of 27 national health systems. In most countries clinical embryologists need to be registered under another profession, and have limited possibilities for organized education in clinical embryology. Mostly they are trained for practical work by senior colleagues. ESHRE embryologist certification so far constitutes the only internationally recognized qualification; however this cannot be considered a subspecialization. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data were obtained through different methods, by involving national embryologist societies and cycle registers, collecting information from centre to centre, and in some cases by individual assessment of the situation. For these reasons, the results should be interpreted with caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This paper presents the current status of clinical embryology and clinical embryologists in Europe and is an important step towards implementation of clinical embryology as an officially recognized profession. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: No.