RESUMEN

Cilofexor, an oral farnesoid X receptor agonist, and firsocostat, an oral, liver-targeted inhibitor of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase, are being investigated in combination with semaglutide for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (previously known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NCT04971785). The pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of cilofexor (100 mg) and firsocostat (20 mg) were separately investigated in two phase 1 studies, each of which included healthy Japanese participants (n = 20 in the cilofexor study and n = 21 in the firsocostat study) and non-Japanese participants (n = 20 in the cilofexor study and n = 21 in the firsocostat study). Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over 96 h following a single-dose administration of the study drug. Safety was monitored throughout the study. In total, 39 participants completed each study. The plasma exposures of cilofexor and firsocostat (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] calculated from time 0 to infinity [AUCinf]) in Japanese participants were 1.24-fold and 1.98-fold, respectively, of those in non-Japanese participants. Both study drugs were well tolerated with no clear differences in adverse events or laboratory abnormalities between Japanese and non-Japanese participants. The approximate 2-fold exposure difference of firsocostat between Japanese and non-Japanese participants at the 20 mg dose does not warrant dose reduction given the previously established safety and tolerability of once-daily doses of firsocostat up to 200 mg.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Up to 40% of Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients have a suboptimal response to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Close to half of such patients show a remarkable improvement when additionally treated with Obeticholic acid (OCA) but have a dose-dependent increase of pruritus. This relative success of OCA, a first-in-class Farnesoid receptor (FXR) agonist, has positioned FXR as an attractive target for drug development. Novel candidates have since emerged, providing hope for this subgroup of patients who lack effective and safe treatments. AREAS COVERED: We discussed the role of bile acids in PBC pathogenesis and how the FXR agonists provide therapeutic value by affecting bile acid synthesis and transport. Novel FXR agonists undergoing pre-clinical and clinical trials for PBC were enlisted via literature search by including the terms 'FXR agonists,' 'FXR PBC,' 'PBC clinical trials' on PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, and Clinicaltrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION: Novel FXR agonists currently under investigation for PBC improve the disease surrogate markers in early trials. However, as with OCA, pruritus remains a concern with the newer drugs despite targeted chemical modifications to increase FXR specificity. Directing future resources toward studying the molecular mechanisms behind pruritus may lead to better drug design and efficacious yet safer drugs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: A remarkably sensitive, accurate, and efficient ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) approach was developed as a facile and expeditious method for measuring cilofexor concentration in beagle dogs, the herb-drug interactions between silybinin and cilofexor was explored based on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The plasma sample protein of the beagles were rapidly sedimented with acetonitrile, and cilofexor and tropifexor (internal standard, ISTD) were separated by gradient elution using a 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and acetonitrile as the mobile phase. The concentrations were detected using positive ion multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Mass transfer pairs were m/z 587.91→267.91 for cilofexor and m/z 604.08→228.03 for ISTD, respectively. A two-period self-controlled experimental design was adopted for the HDIs experiment. In the first period (Group A), six beagle dogs were orally administered cilofexor at a dose of 1 mg/kg. In the second period (Group B), silybinin (3 mg/kg) was orally administered to the six beagle dogs twice a day for seven consecutive days, after which cilofexor was orally administered. The cilofexor concentration in beagle dogs was determined, and HDIs were evaluated based on their pharmacokinetics. Results: The accuracy and precision of cilofexor were both less than 15%, and the recoveries, matrix effects, and stability met the relevant requirements. The Cmax of cilofexor in group B was 49.62% higher than that in group A, whereas the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) of cilofexor in group B were 47.85% and 48.52% higher, respectively, than those in group A. Meanwhile, the t1/2 extended from 7.84 h to 9.45 h, CL and Vz decreased in Group B. Conclusion: A novel UPLC-MS/MS approach was successfully applied for the measurement of cilofexor in beagle dog plasma. Silybinin can alter the pharmacokinetics of cilofexor in beagle dogs, thereby increasing plasma exposure to cilofexor.

RESUMEN

Background & Aims: Intestine-restricted inhibitors of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT, or ileal bile acid transporter) are approved as treatment for several inheritable forms of cholestasis but are also associated with abdominal complaints and diarrhoea. Furthermore, blocking ASBT as a single therapeutic approach may be less effective in moderate to severe cholestasis. We hypothesised that interventions that lower hepatic bile salt synthesis in addition to intestinal bile salt uptake inhibition provide added therapeutic benefit in the treatment of cholestatic disorders. Here, we test combination therapies of intestinal ASBT inhibition together with obeticholic acid (OCA), cilofexor, and the non-tumorigenic fibroblast growth factor 15 (Fgf15)/fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) analogue aldafermin in a mouse model of cholestasis. Methods: Wild-type male C57Bl6J/OlaHsd mice were fed a 0.05% 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC) diet and received daily oral gavage with 10 mg/kg OCA, 30 mg/kg cilofexor, 10 mg/kg ASBT inhibitor (Linerixibat; ASBTi), or a combination. Alternatively, wild-type male C57Bl6J/OlaHsd mice were injected with adeno-associated virus vector serotype 8 (AAV8) to express aldafermin, to repress bile salt synthesis, or to control AAV8. During a 3-week 0.05% DDC diet, mice received daily oral gavage with 10 mg/kg ASBTi or placebo control. Results: Combination therapy of OCA, cilofexor, or aldafermin with ASBTi effectively reduced faecal bile salt excretion. Compared with ASBTi monotherapy, aldafermin + ASBTi further lowered plasma bile salt levels. Cilofexor + ASBTi and aldafermin + ASBTi treatment reduced plasma alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase levels and fibrotic liver immunohistochemistry stainings. The reduction in inflammation and fibrogenesis in mice treated with cilofexor + ASBTi or aldafermin + ASBTi was confirmed by gene expression analysis. Conclusions: Combining pharmacological intestinal bile salt uptake inhibition with repression of bile salt synthesis may form an effective treatment strategy to reduce liver injury while dampening the ASBTi-induced colonic bile salt load. Impact and Implications: Combined treatment of intestinal ASBT inhibition with repression of bile salt synthesis by farnesoid X receptor agonism (using either obeticholic acid or cilofexor) or by expression of aldafermin ameliorates liver damage in cholestatic mice. In addition, compared with ASBT inhibitor monotherapy, combination treatments lower colonic bile salt load.

RESUMEN

Cilofexor is a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor agonist in clinical development for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This work characterized the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of cilofexor in participants with normal hepatic function or hepatic impairment (HI). Participants with stable mild, moderate, or severe HI (Child-Pugh [CP] A, B, or C, respectively, [n = 10/group]) and healthy matched controls with normal hepatic function received a single oral dose of cilofexor (30 mg for CP-A or B; 10 mg for CP-C) with a standardized meal. Overall, 56 participants received cilofexor and completed the study. Cilofexor area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 76%, 2.5-fold, and 6.3-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI, respectively, relative to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in matched participants with normal hepatic function. Cilofexor unbound fraction was 38%, 2-fold, and 3.16-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, relative to participants with normal hepatic function. Moderate correlations were identified between cilofexor exposure and CP score or laboratory tests components of CP score. Serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one and plasma fibroblast growth factor 19 were similar in participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI and participants with normal hepatic function. Cilofexor was generally well tolerated; all cilofexor-related adverse events were mild in severity. Cilofexor can be administered to patients with mild HI without dose adjustment. Caution and dose modification are warranted when administering cilofexor to patients with moderate or severe HI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Firsocostat, a liver-targeted acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor, and cilofexor, a nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor agonist, are being developed in combination for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This phase 1 study evaluated firsocostat and cilofexor pharmacokinetics and tolerability in participants with severe renal impairment (SRI) and healthy matched controls (HMCs). Ten participants with SRI (estimated glomerular filtration rate by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ), and 10 HMCs received single oral doses of firsocostat (20 mg) on day 1 and cilofexor (100 mg) on day 7 in a fasted state. Plasma concentrations of firsocostat (and nonactive metabolite GS-834773) and cilofexor (and nonactive metabolites GS-716070 and GS-1056756) were collected over 96 hours and quantified; plasma exposures (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] and peak concentration [Cmax ]) and plasma protein binding were characterized. Firsocostat AUC was ≈40% higher in SRI versus HMC, while Cmax was 8% lower. Observed exposures of the firsocostat metabolite were ≈4.6-fold higher in SRI participants versus HMC. Exposures (AUC and Cmax ) of cilofexor and metabolites and percentages of protein binding of all analytes were similar between SRI and HMC groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild and not considered related to study drug. A <50% increase in firsocostat exposure was observed among SRI participants but was deemed not clinically relevant. There was no apparent effect of SRI on cilofexor exposure. Based on this trial, firsocostat and cilofexor dosing are not expected to require modification in patients who are renally impaired.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with increased risk of liver-related and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Given the complex pathophysiology of NASH, combining therapies with complementary mechanisms may be beneficial. This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, alone and in combination with the farnesoid X receptor agonist cilofexor and/or the acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor firsocostat in patients with NASH. METHODS: This was a phase II, open-label, proof-of-concept trial in which patients with NASH (F2-F3 on biopsy, or MRI-proton density fat fraction [MRI-PDFF] ≥10% and liver stiffness by transient elastography ≥7 kPa) were randomised to 24 weeks' treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly as monotherapy or combined with once-daily cilofexor (30 or 100 mg) and/or once-daily firsocostat 20 mg. The primary endpoint was safety. All efficacy endpoints were exploratory. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were randomised to semaglutide (n = 21), semaglutide plus cilofexor 30 mg (n = 22), semaglutide plus cilofexor 100 mg (n = 22), semaglutide plus firsocostat (n = 22) or semaglutide, cilofexor 30 mg and firsocostat (n = 21). Treatments were well tolerated - the incidence of adverse events was similar across groups (73-90%) and most events were gastrointestinal in nature. Despite similar weight loss (7-10%), compared with semaglutide monotherapy, combinations resulted in greater improvements in liver steatosis measured by MRI-PDFF (least-squares mean of absolute changes: -9.8 to -11.0% vs. -8.0%), liver biochemistry, and non-invasive tests of fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate fibrosis due to NASH, semaglutide with firsocostat and/or cilofexor was generally well tolerated. In exploratory efficacy analyses, treatment resulted in additional improvements in liver steatosis and biochemistry vs. semaglutide alone. Given this was a small-scale open-label trial, double-blind placebo-controlled trials with adequate patient numbers are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of these combinations in NASH. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03987074. LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its more severe form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are serious liver conditions that worsen over time if untreated. The reasons people develop NASH are complex and combining therapies that target different aspects of the disease may be more helpful than using single treatments. This trial showed that the use of 3 different types of drugs, namely semaglutide, cilofexor and firsocostat, in combination was safe and may offer additional benefits over treatment with semaglutide alone.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a bile acid-related nuclear receptor and is considered a promising target to treat several liver disorders. Cilofexor is a selective FXR agonist and has already entered phase III trials in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Pruritis caused by cilofexor treatment is dose dependent. The binding characteristics of cilofexor with FXR and its pruritogenic mechanism remain unclear. In our research, the affinity of cilofexor bound to FXR was detected using an isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) assay. The binding mechanism between cilofexor and FXR-LBD is explained by the cocrystal structure of the FXR/cilofexor complex. Structural models indicate the possibility that cilofexor activates Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X4 (MRGPRX4) or G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1), leading to pruritus. In summary, our analyses provide a molecular mechanism of cilofexor binding to FXR and provide a possible explanation for the dose-dependent pruritis of cilofexor.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The farnesoid-x-receptor (FXR) is a ubiquitously expressed nuclear receptor selectively activated by primary bile acids. AREA COVERED: FXR is a validated pharmacological target. Herein, the authors review preclinical and clinical data supporting the development of FXR agonists in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. EXPERT OPINION: Development of systemic FXR agonists to treat the metabolic liver disease has been proven challenging because the side effects associated with these agents including increased levels of cholesterol and LDL-c and reduced HDL-c raising concerns over their long-term cardiovascular safety. Additionally, pruritus has emerged as a common, although poorly explained, dose-related side effect with all FXR ligands, but is especially common with OCA. FXR agonists that are currently undergoing phase 2/3 trials are cilofexor, tropifexor, nidufexor and MET409. Some of these agents are currently being developed as combination therapies with other agents including cenicriviroc, a CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor, or firsocostat an acetyl CoA carboxylase inhibitor. Additional investigations are needed to evaluate the beneficial effects of combination of these agents with statins. It is expected that in the coming years, FXR agonists will be developed as a combination therapy to minimize side effects and increase likelihood of success by targeting different metabolic pathways.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) influences hepatic metabolism, inflammation and liver fibrosis as key components of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We studied the effects of the non-steroidal FXR agonist cilofexor (formerly GS-9674) on portal pressure and fibrosis in experimental NASH. METHODS: NASH was induced in Wistar rats using a choline-deficient high-fat diet plus intraperitoneal sodium nitrite injections. First, a dose-finding study was performed with 10 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg of cilofexor, focusing on histological readouts. Liver fibrosis was assessed by Picro-Sirius-Red, desmin staining and hepatic hydroxyproline content. Gene expression was determined by RT-PCR. In a subsequent hemodynamic study, rats received 30 mg/kg cilofexor with or without propranolol (25 mg/kg). Portal pressure, systemic hemodynamics and splanchnic blood flow were measured. RESULTS: Cilofexor dose-dependently induced FXR target genes shp, cyp7a1 and fgf15 in hepatic and ileal tissues, paralleled by a dose-dependent reduction in liver fibrosis area (Picro-Sirius-Red) of -41% (10 mg/kg) and -69% (30 mg/kg), respectively. The 30 mg/kg cilofexor dose significantly reduced hepatic hydroxyproline content (-41%), expression of col1a1 (-37%) and pdgfr-ß (-36%), as well as desmin area (-42%) in NASH rats. Importantly, cilofexor decreased portal pressure (11.9 ± 2.1 vs. 8.9 ± 2.2 mmHg; p = 0.020) without affecting splanchnic blood-flow or systemic hemodynamics. The addition of propranolol to cilofexor additionally reduced splanchnic inflow (-28%) but also mean arterial pressure (-25%) and heart rate (-37%). CONCLUSION: The non-steroidal FXR agonist cilofexor decreased portal hypertension and reduced liver fibrosis in NASH rats. While cilofexor seems to primarily decrease sinusoidal resistance in cirrhotic portal hypertension, the combination with propranolol additionally reduced mesenteric hyperperfusion.

RESUMEN

FXR agonists have demonstrated very promising clinical results in the treatment of liver disorders such as primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH, in particular, is one of the last uncharted white territories in the pharma landscape, and there is a huge medical need and a large potential pharmaceutical market for a NASH pharmacotherapy. Clinical efficacy superior to most other treatment options was shown by FXR agonists such as obeticholic acid (OCA) as they improved various metabolic features including liver steatosis as well as liver inflammation and fibrosis. But OCA's clinical success comes with some major liabilities such as pruritus, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) lowering, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) increase, and a potential for drug-induced liver toxicity. Some of these effects can be attributed to on-target effects exerted by FXR, but with others it is not clear whether it is FXR- or OCA-related. Therefore a quest for novel, proprietary FXR agonists is ongoing with the aim to increase FXR potency and selectivity over other proteins and to overcome at least some of the OCA-associated clinical side effects through an improved pharmacology. In this chapter we will discuss the historical and ongoing efforts in the identification and development of nonsteroidal, which largely means non-bile acid-type, FXR agonists for clinical use.

Asunto(s)