RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate amniotic fluid volume with Doppler parameters and its association with composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPOs) in fetal growth restriction (FGR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted prospectively in a tertiary referral center between 2023 and 2024 on pregnant women diagnosed with early- and late-onset FGR. Fetal ultrasonographic measurements, including deepest vertical pocket (DVP) for amniotic fluid, and Doppler parameters including uterine artery (UtA) systolic/diastolic (S/D) and pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) S/D and PI, and umbilical artery (UA) S/D and PI, were conducted following fetal biometry. The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), cerebral ratio, cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), and amniotic-umbilical-to-cerebral ratio (AUCR) were all calculated. Pregnant women diagnosed with FGR were planned to give birth after 37 weeks' gestation, unless a pregnancy complication requiring earlier delivery occurred. We assessed perinatal outcomes subsequent to delivery, with CAPOs defined as the presence of at least one adverse outcome: 5th minute APGAR score <7, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), umbilical cord blood pH <7.2, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. RESULTS: The study included 132 participants, divided into early- (n = 32) and late-onset FGR (n = 100) groups. AUCR was significantly lower in fetuses with late-onset FGR who experienced CAPOs. Multivariate analysis showed gestational age at birth and birth weight were significant predictors of CAPOs in early-onset FGR, while gestational age, birth weight, and AUCR were significant predictors in late-onset FGR. CPR, UCR, and CPUR did not show significance in predicting CAPOs in both early- and late-onset FGR on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: AUCR is a potential reliable marker for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in late-onset FGR.

RESUMEN

Despite the fact that labor depends on too many interacting factors and no parameter can fully predict its outcome, fetal cerebral Doppler has emerged as the most reliable tool for prediction, in contrast with fetal weight, which performs significantly worse in the last weeks of pregnancy. The importance of the cerebral Doppler follows the inverse pathway of fetal weight increasing its performance in the last weeks of pregnancy and reaching its highest ability prior to labor. A combination of cerebral flow, fetal weight, and selected clinical information may obtain moderate predictions of labor outcome, provided the interval to labor is not long.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPO) in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, case-control study was conducted at a tertiary hospital with 110 cases of PIH, including 70 patients with preeclampsia and 40 with gestational hypertension, and 110 healthy controls. The middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) were measured, and the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR=MCA-PI/UA-PI) and CPUR (CPR/UtA-PI) were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The role of CPUR in predicting CAPO in preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. RESULTS: The CPR and CPUR values were lower in the PIH group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). CAPO had a negative correlation with CPR and CPUR (p < 0.001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of CAPO was increased four times by a low CPR value and six times by a low CPUR value. In the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value of CPR in predicting CAPO was 1.33 with 74 % sensitivity and 66 % specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.778; p < 0.001) in PIH. For CPUR, the optimal cut-off value was 1.32, at which 82 % sensitivity and 79 % specificity in predicting CAPO (AUC=0.826; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CPUR was determined to be successful with high sensitivity in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of PIH. In addition, CPUR was more effective in predicting CAPO in patients with preeclampsia compared to gestational hypertension. CPUR can be used to predict adverse outcomes in patients with PIH.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To elucidate the association between arterial and venous Doppler ultrasound parameters and the risk of secondary cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) and neonatal acidosis in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, blinded, cohort study included singleton pregnancies with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 10th centile above 36 gestational weeks. Upon study inclusion, all women underwent Doppler ultrasound, including umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, fetal aortic isthmus (AoI) PI, umbilical vein blood flow (UVBF), and modified myocardial performance index (mod-MPI). Primary outcome was defined as secondary cesarean section due to IFC. RESULTS: In total, 87 SGA pregnancies were included, 16% of which required a cesarean section for IFC. Those fetuses revealed lower UVBF corrected for abdominal circumference (AC) (5.2 (4.5-6.3) vs 7.2 (5.5-8.3), p = 0.001). There was no difference when comparing AoI PI, UA PI, ACM PI, or mod-MPI. No association was found for neonatal acidosis. After multivariate logistic regression, UVBF/AC remained independently associated with cesarean section due to IFC (aOR 0.61 [0.37; 0.91], p = 0.03) and yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89). A cut-off value set at the 50th centile of UVBF/AC reached a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 58% for the occurrence of cesarean section due to IFC (OR 8.1; 95% CI, 1.7-37.8, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Low levels of umbilical vein blood flow (UVBF/AC) were associated with an increased risk among SGA fetuses to be delivered by cesarean section for IFC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study will evaluate whether fetal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) can predict perinatal adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies with mild and moderate idiopathic polyhydramnios (IP). METHOD: This study was designed as a prospective case-control study between January 2023 and November 2023. Pregnant women diagnosed with mild-to-moderate IP and low-risk singleton pregnancies were included in the study. In all cases, umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility indices (PIs) were measured at 36-40 weeks of gestation, and CPR was calculated. The group with polyhydramnios was divided into two parts according to whether the CPR value was below 1.08 or 1.08 and above. Perinatal outcomes of all groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included in the study. Seventy of these were IP cases, and 70 were low-risk pregnant women. UA PI in the IP group was not statistically different from that in the low-risk group, but MCA PI and CPR were significantly lower in the IP group (P = 0.07, P = 0.001, and P = 0.004, respectively). IP cases were divided into a low group (<1.08, n = 18) and a normal group (≥1.08, n = 52) according to the CPR value. Cesarean section rates due to fetal distress were significantly higher in the low-CPR group (n = 8 [44.4%] vs 5 [9.6%], P = 0.001). In the low-CPR group, 5-min Apgar <7, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission rates were significantly higher (P = 0.045 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: It is encouraging that in cases with mild-to-moderate IP, low CPR predicts emergency delivery due to fetal distress, a low Apgar score at 5 min, and NICU admission.

RESUMEN

Background: This systematic review aimed to clarify the association between the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and emergency cesarean sections (CSs) due to intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC). Methods: Datasets of PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published up to January 2024 regarding the relationship between the CPR and the rate of CS for IFC, as well as the predictive value of the CPR. Results: The search identified 582 articles, of which 16 observational studies were finally included, most of them with a prospective design. A total of 14,823 patients were involved. A low CPR was associated with a higher risk of CS for IFC. The predictive value of the CPR was very different among the studies due to substantial heterogeneity regarding the group of patients included and the time interval from CPR evaluation to delivery. Conclusions: A low CPR is associated with a higher risk of CS for IFC, although with a poor predictive value. The CPR could be calculated prior to labor in all patients to stratify the risk of CS due to IFC.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of the umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) with adverse perinatal outcome in late preterm small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses and to investigate the effect on perinatal outcomes of immediate delivery. DESIGN: Multicentre cohort study with nested randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Nineteen secondary and tertiary care centres. POPULATION: Singleton SGA pregnancies (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or fetal abdominal circumference [FAC] <10th centile) from 32 to 36+6 weeks. METHODS: Women were classified: (1) RCT-eligible: abnormal UCR twice consecutive and EFW below the 3rd centile at/or below 35 weeks or below the 10th centile at 36 weeks; (2) abnormal UCR once or intermittent; (3) never abnormal UCR. Consenting RCT-eligible patients were randomised for immediate delivery from 34 weeks or expectant management until 37 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAPO), defined as perinatal death, birth asphyxia or major neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 690 women. The study was halted prematurely for low RCT-inclusion rates (n = 40). In the RCT-eligible group, gestational age at delivery, birthweight and birthweight multiple of the median (MoM) (0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.72) were significantly lower and the CAPO (n = 50, 44%, p < 0.05) was more frequent. Among patients randomised for immediate delivery there was a near-significant lower birthweight (p = 0.05) and higher CAPO (p = 0.07). EFW MoM, pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension and Doppler classification were independently associated with the CAPO (area under the curve 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal risk was effectively identified by low EFW MoM and UCR. Early delivery of SGA fetuses with an abnormal UCR at 34-36 weeks should only be performed in the context of clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evidence-based management of human labor includes the antepartum identification of patients at risk for intrapartum hypoxia. However, available evidence has shown that most of the hypoxic-related complications occur among pregnancies classified at low-risk for intrapartum hypoxia, thus suggesting that the current strategy to identify the pregnancies at risk for intrapartum fetal hypoxia has limited accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the combined assessment of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and uterine arteries (UtA) Doppler in the prediction of obstetric intervention (OI) for suspected intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) within a cohort of low-risk singleton term pregnancies in early labor. METHODS: Prospective multicentre observational study conducted across four tertiary Maternity Units between January 2016 and September 2019. Low-risk term pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labor were included. A two-step multivariable model was developed to assess the risk of OI for suspected IFC. The baseline model included antenatal and intrapartum characteristics, while the combined model included antenatal and intrapartum characteristics plus Doppler anomalies such as CPR MoM < 10th percentile and mean UtA Doppler PI MoM ≥ 95th percentile. Predictive performance was determined by receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis. RESULTS: 804 women were included. At logistic regression analysis, CPR MoM < 10th percentile (aOR 1.269, 95 % CI 1.188-1.356, P < 0.001), mean UtA PI MoM ≥ 95th percentile (aOR 1.012, 95 % CI 1.001-1.022, P = 0.04) were independently associated with OI for suspected IFC. At ROC curve analysis, the combined model including antenatal characteristics plus abnormal CPR and mean UtA PI yielded an AUC of 0.78, 95 %CI(0.71-0.85), p < 0.001, which was significantly higher than the baseline model (AUC 0.61, 95 %CI(0.54-0.69), p = 0.007) (p < 0.001). The combined model was associated with a 0.78 (95 % CI 0.67-0.89) sensitivity, 0.68 (95 % CI 0.65-0.72) specificity, 0.15 (95 % CI 0.11-0.19) PPV, and 0.98 (0.96-0.99) NPV, 2.48 (95 % CI 2.07-2.97) LR + and 0.32 (95 % CI 0.19-0.53) LR- for OI due to suspected IFC. CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model including antenatal and intrapartum characteristics combined with abnormal CPR and mean UtA PI has a good capacity to rule out and a moderate capacity to rule in OI due to IFC, albeit with poor predictive value.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the role of the brain-sparing effect (BSE) on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 127 pregnant women were divided into two groups considering the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR): FGR with abnormal CPR group (n = 74) and the appropriate for gestational age with normal Doppler group (n = 53). CPR was computed using the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) to quantitate the waveforms [middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI/umbilical artery (UA) PI and MCA RI/UA RI: a result <1 was taken into account as abnormal]. ROP screening results of newborns were recorded from electronic files. RESULTS: After adjusting for co-variants, BSE was not related to ROP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-4.95). Gestational age at delivery <30 weeks (aOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.04-6.93) and birth weight <1500 g (aOR, 5.15; 95% CI, 1.15-25.2) were independently associated with ROP. Preeclampsia, emergency cesarean section birth, or 48 h completion after the first steroid administration were not associated with ROP. CONCLUSIONS: Gestational age at delivery <30 weeks and birth weight <1500 g are independent risk factors for ROP in FGR whereas the BSE is not a risk factor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze perinatal risks associated with three distinct scenarios of fetal growth trajectory in the latter half of pregnancy compared with a reference group. METHODS: This cohort study included women with a singleton pregnancy that delivered between 32 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks' gestation and had two or more ultrasound scans, at least 4 weeks apart, from 18 + 0 weeks. We evaluated three different scenarios of fetal growth against a reference group, which comprised appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses with appropriate forward-growth trajectory. The comparator growth trajectories were categorized as: Group 1, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses (estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) persistently < 10th centile) with appropriate forward growth; Group 2, fetuses with decreased growth trajectory (decrease of ≥ 50 centiles) and EFW or AC ≥ 10th centile (i.e. non-SGA) at their final ultrasound scan; and Group 3, fetuses with decreased growth trajectory and EFW or AC < 10th centile (i.e. SGA) at their final scan. The primary outcome was overall perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death). Secondary outcomes included stillbirth, delivery of a SGA infant, preterm birth, emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status and composite severe neonatal morbidity. Associations were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 5319 pregnancies. Compared to the reference group, the adjusted odds of perinatal mortality were increased significantly in Group 2 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.00 (95% CI, 1.36-11.22)) and Group 3 (aOR, 7.71 (95% CI, 2.39-24.91)). Only Group 3 had increased odds of stillbirth (aOR, 5.69 (95% CI, 1.55-20.93)). In contrast, infants in Group 1 did not have significantly increased odds of demise. The odds of a SGA infant at birth were increased in all three groups compared with the reference group, but was highest in Group 1 (aOR, 111.86 (95% CI, 62.58-199.95)) and Group 3 (aOR, 40.63 (95% CI, 29.01-56.92)). In both groups, more than 80% of infants were born SGA and nearly half had a birth weight < 3rd centile. Likewise, the odds of preterm birth were increased in all three groups compared with the reference group, being highest in Group 3, with an aOR of 4.27 (95% CI, 3.23-5.64). Lastly, the odds of composite severe neonatal morbidity were increased in Groups 1 and 3, whereas the odds of emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status were increased only in Group 3. CONCLUSION: Assessing the fetal growth trajectory in the latter half of pregnancy can help identify infants at increased risk of perinatal mortality and birth weight < 3rd centile for gestation. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The cerebroplacental ratio is a sonographic tool used to predict poor pregnancy outcomes. Data are insufficient regarding its use in postdate pregnancy. We evaluated the cerebroplacental ratio's prediction of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes in women at 40-42 weeks gestation with normal amniotic fluid index. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 101 women with low-risk singleton pregnancy and gestational age > 40 weeks who delivered in a university affiliated hospital during 2020-2021. The middle cerebral artery pulsatility index, the umbilical artery pulsatility index, and the cerebroplacental ratio, which is their quotient, were compared between women with favorable and unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. The latter included: meconium-stained amniotic fluid, cesarean or vacuum-assisted delivery due to pathological cardiotocography (category 2 or 3), 5-min Apgar score < 7, umbilical cord pH < 7.1, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal death. RESULTS: Fetal Doppler, performed at a median gestational age of 40.3 (40.0-41.6), did not differ between 75 (74.3%) women with favorable obstetrical outcomes and 26 (25.7%) with unfavorable outcomes. In multivariate analysis, advanced maternal age and a history of a cesarean section were correlated with unfavorable outcomes, while Doppler indices were not found to be predictive. Among women at 41-42 weeks' gestation, for those with intrapartum fetal monitor category 2-3 vs. category 1, the mean umbilical artery pulsatility index was higher: 0.92 ± 0.34 vs. 0.71 ± 0.11 (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: According to the study results, fetal Doppler indices, including the cerebroplacental ratio, are not predictive of unfavorable outcome in women with pregnancies exceeding 40 weeks. Larger prospective studies are needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective Doppler velocimetry provides a sensitive, non-invasive, and safe method of surveillance of fetal hemodynamics and fetomaternal circulation. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is an indicator of placental function and fetal maladaptation to placental insufficiency. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is becoming a significant indicator of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, which has implications for the assessment of fetal well-being. This study aimed to determine the cut-off value of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses in high-risk mothers to predict adverse perinatal outcomes. We also compared the efficacy of CPR, umbilical artery pulsatility index (UmA PI), and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI) for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Design and setting This was a prospective observational study conducted at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. Methods A total of 100 women with singleton high-risk pregnancies were included in this prospective observational study. Obstetric ultrasound was performed at the time of recruitment, and fetal weight and CPR were noted. Based on fetal weight, patients were divided into AGA and fetal growth restriction (FGR) groups; CPR was measured; patients were followed up fortnightly; and outcomes were noted. Main outcome The effectiveness of CPR, UmA PI, and MCA PI for predicting poor perinatal outcomes and identifying the cut-off value of CPR in appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses in high-risk mothers was assessed. Result The values of MCA PI, UmA PI, and CPR were statistically significant between AGA and FGR (p-value =.023, .002 and .0001), respectively. The cut-off value for CPR-detecting adverse outcomes in AGA was 1.49. It has sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 67.5%, 68%, 71.69%, and 70.21%, respectively. Conclusion Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) reflects both circulatory insufficiency of the placenta and adaptive changes of the middle cerebral artery, indicating an important non-invasive surveillance modality.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has been shown to be an independent predictor of adverse perinatal outcome at term and a marker of failure to reach the growth potential (FRGP) regardless of fetal size, being abnormal in compromised fetuses with birthweight above the 10th centile. The main aim of this study was to propose a risk-based approach for the management of pregnancies with normal estimated fetal weight (EFW) and abnormal CPR near term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 943 pregnancies, that underwent an ultrasound evaluation of EFW and CPR at or beyond 34 weeks. CPR values were converted into multiples of the median (MoM) and EFW into centiles according to local references. Pregnancies were then divided into four groups: normal fetuses (defined as EFW ≥10th centile and CPR ≥0.6765 MoM), small for gestational age (EFW <10th centile and CPR ≥0.6765 MoM), fetal growth restriction (EFW <10th centile and CPR <0.6765 MoM), and fetuses with apparent normal growth (EFW ≥10th centile) and abnormal CPR (<0.6765 MoM), that present FRGP. Intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) was defined as an abnormal intrapartum cardiotocogram or pH requiring cesarean delivery. Risk comparisons were performed among the four groups, based on the different frequencies of IFC. The risks of IFC were subsequently extrapolated into a gestational age scale, defining the optimal gestation to plan the birth for each of the four groups. RESULTS: Fetal growth restriction was the group with the highest frequency of IFC followed by FRGP, small for gestational age, and normal groups. The "a priori" risks of the fetal growth restriction and normal groups were used to determine the limits of two scales. One defining the IFC risk and the other defining the appropriate gestational age for delivery. Extrapolation of the risk between both scales placed the optimal gestational age for delivery at 39 weeks of gestation in the case of FRGP and at 40 weeks in the case of small for gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses near term may be evaluated according to the CPR and EFW defining four groups that present a progressive risk of IFC. Fetuses in pregnancies complicated by FRGP are likely to benefit from being delivered at 39 weeks of gestation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate the strength of association and diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in predicting the outcome of pregnancies complicated by pre- and gestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were pregnancies complicated by gestational or pregestational diabetes undergoing ultrasound assessment of CPR. The primary outcome was a composite score of perinatal mortality and morbidity as defined by the original publication. The secondary outcomes included preterm birth gestational age (GA) at birth, mode of delivery, fetal growth restriction (FGR) or small for GA (SGA) newborn, neonatal birthweight, perinatal death (PND), Apgar score <7 at 5 min, abnormal acid-base status, neonatal hypoglycemia, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Furthermore, we aimed to perform a number of sub-group analyses according to the type of diabetes (gestational and pregestational), management adopted (diet insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents), metabolic control (controlled vs. non-controlled diabetes), and fetal weight (FGR, normally grown, and large for GA fetuses). Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to directly compare the risk of each of the explored outcomes. For those outcomes found to be significant, computation of diagnostic performance of CPR was assessed using bivariate model. RESULTS: Six studies (2,743 pregnancies) were included. The association between low CPR and adverse composite perinatal outcome was not statistically significant (p = 0.096). This result did not change when stratifying the analysis using CPR cut-off below 10th (p = 0.079) and 5th (p = 0.545) centiles. In pregnancies complicated by GDM, fetuses with a low CPR had a significantly higher risk of birthweight <10th percentile (OR: 5.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98-17.12) and this association remains significant when using a CPR <10th centile (p < 0.001). Fetuses with low CPR had also a significantly higher risk of PND (OR: 6.15, 95% CI 1.01-37.23, p < 0.001) and admission to NICU (OR 3.32, 95% CI 2.21-4.49, p < 0.001), but not of respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.752), Apgar score <7 at 5 min (p = 0.920), abnormal acid-base status (p = 0.522), or neonatal hypoglycemia (p = 0.005). These results were confirmed when stratifying the analysis including only studies with CPR <10th centile as a cut-off to define abnormal CPR. However, CPR showed a low diagnostic accuracy for detecting perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: CPR is associated but not predictive of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. The findings from this systematic review do not support the use of CPR as a universal screening for pregnancy complication in women with diabetes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Criteria for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction differ widely according to national and international guidelines, and further heterogeneity arises from the use of different biometric and Doppler reference charts, making the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction highly variable. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare fetal growth restriction definitions between Delphi consensus and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definitions, using different standards/charts for fetal biometry and different reference ranges for Doppler velocimetry parameters. STUDY DESIGN: From the TRUFFLE 2 feasibility study (856 women with singleton pregnancy at 32+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation and at risk of fetal growth restriction), we selected 564 women with available mid-pregnancy biometry. For the comparison, we used standards/charts for estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference from Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, and GROW and Chitty. Percentiles for umbilical artery pulsatility index and its ratios with middle cerebral artery pulsatility index were calculated using Arduini and Ebbing reference charts. Sensitivity and specificity for low birthweight and adverse perinatal outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Different combinations of definitions and reference charts identified substantially different proportions of fetuses within our population as having fetal growth restriction, varying from 38% (with Delphi consensus definition, INTERGROWTH-21st biometric standards, and Arduini Doppler reference ranges) to 93% (with Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition and Hadlock biometric standards). None of the different combinations tested appeared effective, with relative risk for birthweight <10th percentile between 1.4 and 2.1. Birthweight <10th percentile was observed most frequently when selection was made with the GROW/Chitty charts, slightly less with the Hadlock standard, and least frequently with the INTERGROWTH-21st standard. Using the Ebbing Doppler reference ranges resulted in a far higher proportion identified as having fetal growth restriction compared with the Arduini Doppler reference ranges, whereas Delphi consensus definition with Ebbing Doppler reference ranges produced similar results to those of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition. Application of Delphi consensus definition with Arduini Doppler reference ranges was significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome, with any biometric standards/charts. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition could not accurately detect adverse perinatal outcome irrespective of estimated fetal weight standard/chart used. CONCLUSION: Different combinations of fetal growth restriction definitions, biometry standards/charts, and Doppler reference ranges identify different proportions of fetuses with fetal growth restriction. The difference in adverse perinatal outcome may be modest, but can have a significant impact in terms of rate of intervention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes using the cerebroplacental (CPR) and umbilicocerebral (UCR) ratios in different cohorts of singleton pregnancies. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we established our own Multiple of Median (MoM) for CPR and UCR. The predictive value for both ratios was studied in the following outcome parameters: emergency cesarean delivery, operative intervention (OI), OI due to fetal distress, 5-min Apgar < 7, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and composite adverse perinatal outcome. The performance of the ratios was assessed in the following cohorts: total cohort (delivery ≥ 37 + 0 weeks gestation, all birth weight centiles), low-risk cohort (delivery ≥ 37 + 0 weeks gestation, birth weight ≥ 10. centile), prolonged pregnancy cohort (delivery ≥ 41 + 0 weeks gestation, birth weight ≥ 10. centile) and small-for-gestational-age fetuses (delivery ≥ 37 + 0 weeks gestation, birth weight < 10. centile). The underlying reference values for MoM were estimated using quantile regression depending on gestational age. Prediction performance was evaluated using logistic regression models assessing the corresponding Brier score, combining discriminatory power and calibration. Results: Overall, 3326 cases were included. Across all cohorts, in the case of a significant association between a studied outcome parameter and CPR, there was an association with UCR, respectively. The Brier score showed only minimal differences for both ratios. Conclusions: Our study provides further evidence regarding predictive values of CPR and UCR. The results of our study suggest that reversal of CPR to UCR does not improve the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the prognostic accuracies of Doppler ultrasound measures in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes for pregnancies complicated with preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus. DATA SOURCES: An online database search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Emcare from inception to April 2022 was conducted. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting singleton, nonanomalous fetuses of women with either preexisting (type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus) or gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy were included. In addition, the included studies assessed cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery and/or umbilical artery pulsatility index in the prediction of either: preterm birth, cesarean delivery for fetal distress, APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission (>24 hours), acute respiratory distress syndrome, jaundice, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, or neonatal death. METHODS: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed and 610 articles were identified, of which 15 were included. Two authors independently extracted prognostic data from each article and assessed the study applicability and risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) scoring criteria. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were included in the review and comprised prospective (n=10; 66%) and retrospective (n=5; 33%) cohorts. Sensitivity and positive predictive values varied widely across each Doppler measurement. Umbilical artery sensitivities were higher than those of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery for hypoglycemia, jaundice, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress, and preterm birth. Cerebroplacental ratio was the most reported index test; however, prognostic accuracy was worse than that of umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Doppler across all adverse perinatal outcomes. Significant risk of bias was present in 14 (94%) studies, with substantial heterogeneity observed across studies in terms of study design and outcomes assessed. CONCLUSION: Abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index may be of more clinical value in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes compared with cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index in diabetic pregnancies. Further evaluation of umbilical artery Doppler measurements in diabetic pregnancies using standardized variables across studies is required for broader clinical application. The significant association between abnormal Doppler measurement and hypoglycemia may warrant further investigation.

RESUMEN

Background: Gestures are linked to developmental and neurological development. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has proven to be a good predictor of neurological damage within the growth-restricted fetuses’ population. However, its usefulness in the general population has not been studied for this purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of CPR as a predictor of gesture acquisition. Method: A prospective cohort of 35 singleton pregnancies with normally grown fetuses was recruited. Doppler indices for the umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) at 36–40 weeks of gestation were recorded. MacArthur-Bates I Communication Skills Development Questionnaires (SCDI) at 12 (±1) months of age were applied. Based on their gesture performance, they were divided into Normal Scores (NS), and Low Scores (LS). Results: The independent samples t-test analysis revealed a significant difference between the NS group and LS in terms of CPRz scores (t=2.706, p=.011). CPR z-scores values showed a positive correlation with early gesture centiles (R2=0.145, p=.029) and late gesture centiles (R2=0.178, p=.014). Conclusion: CPR within the last weeks of pregnancy could be of potential utility to predict gesture acquisition.(AU)

Antecedentes: Los gestos están relacionados con el desarrollo y el neurodesarrollo. El índice cerebroplacentario (ICP) ha demostrado ser un buen predictor de daño neurológico en la población de fetos con restricción de crecimiento. Sin embargo, su utilidad en la población general no ha sido estudiada con este propósito. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la utilidad del ICP como predictor de la adquisición de gestos. Método: Se reclutó una cohorte prospectiva de 35 embarazos únicos con fetos de crecimiento normal. Se registraron los índices Doppler de la arteria umbilical (UA), la arteria cerebral media (ACM) y el ICP a las 36-40 semanas de gestación. Se aplicaron los Cuestionarios de Desarrollo de Habilidades de Comunicación MacArthur-Bates I (SCDI) a los 12 (+/−1) meses de edad. Con base en el desempeño en gestos, se dividieron en puntajes normales (NS) y puntajes bajos (LS). Resultados: El análisis de prueba t de muestras independientes reveló una diferencia significativa entre el grupo NS y LS en términos de puntajes ICPz (t=2.706, p=.011). Los valores de las puntuaciones z del ICP mostraron una correlación positiva con los percentiles de gestos tempranos (R2=.145, p=.029) y percentiles de gestos tardíos (R2=.178, p=.014). Conclusión: El ICP en las últimas semanas de embarazo podría tener una utilidad potencial para predecir la adquisición de gestos.(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to compare the accuracy of the ductus venosus pulsatility index (DV PI) with that of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at two gestational ages: <34 and ≥34 weeks' gestation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 169 high-risk pregnancies (72 < 34 and 97 ≥ 34 weeks) that underwent an ultrasound examination of CPR, DV Doppler and estimated fetal weight at 22-40 weeks. The CPR and DV PI were converted into multiples of the median, and the estimated fetal weight into centiles according to local references. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as a composite of abnormal cardiotocogram, intrapartum pH requiring cesarean delivery, 5' Apgar score <7, neonatal pH <7.10 and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Values were plotted according to the interval to labor to evaluate progression of abnormal Doppler values, and their accuracy was evaluated at both gestational periods, alone and combined with clinical data, by means of univariable and multivariable models, using the Akaike information criteria (AIC) and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Prior to 34 weeks' gestation, DV PI was the latest parameter to become abnormal. However, it was a poor predictor of adverse perinatal outcome (AUC 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71, AIC 76.2, p > 0.05), and did not improve the predictive accuracy of CPR for adverse perinatal outcome (AUC 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97, AIC 52.9, p < 0.0001). After 34 weeks' gestation, the chronology of the DV PI and CPR anomalies overlapped, but again DV PI was a poor predictor for adverse perinatal outcome (AUC 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49-0.74, AIC 120.6, p > 0.05), that did not improve the CPR ability to predict adverse perinatal outcome (AUC 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92, AIC 106.8, p < 0.0001). The predictive accuracy of CPR prior to 34 weeks persisted when the gestational age at delivery was included in the model (AUC 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81-1.00, AIC 46.3, p < 0.0001, vs AUC 0.86, 95% CI: 0.72-1, AIC 56.1, p < 0.0001), and therefore was not determined by prematurity. CONCLUSIONS: CPR predicts adverse perinatal outcome better than DV PI, regardless of gestational age. Larger prospective studies are needed to delineate the role of ultrasound tools of fetal wellbeing assessment in predicting and preventing adverse perinatal outcome.

Asunto(s)