RESUMEN
Background: Reference measurement procedures are an essential element in the standardization and comparability of analytical measurement results in laboratory medicine. No LC-MS/MS-based reference measurement procedure for cefepime in serum has been published previously. Materials and methods: An isotope-dilution based two-dimensional LC-MS/MS reference measurement procedure for cefepime concentrations in human serum was developed and tested. The value assignment of unknown samples is based on a defined measurement series validation. Six unknown samples can be measured per series. Pass criteria for the run and the samples were determined empirically based on a performance evaluation. For this purpose, a between-run determination of five runs of the defined measurement series with six cefepime samples was carried out and evaluated. The goal was to define rigorous, realistic target limits and minimize measurement uncertainty. The final defined target limits are used for series-based validation and value assignment. The results for the six unknown samples are provided with the associated measurement uncertainty for this series. Results: The developed and extensively studied measurement procedure for the quantification of cefepime in serum was found to be practicable and fit for its purpose. The between-run mean imprecision of the six cefepime samples was ≤ 2.0 %, for the QCs it was ≤ 2.3 % and the between-run mean inaccuracy of the QCs was within ± 1.1 %. Conclusion: The novel isotope-dilution-LC-MS/MS measurement procedure in accordance to ISO 15193 can be recommended as candidate reference measurement procedure for the value assignment of cefepime concentrations in human serum.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several novel agents are in advanced stages of clinical development, potentially expanding our treatment options against third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including those pathogens for which the current number of effective treatments is limited. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on agents that have completed or ongoing phase-3 studies. A PubMed search was conducted up to 31 May 2024. EXPERT OPINION: Novel agents in late-stage clinical development belong to the ß-lactam or ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations class and display variable antimicrobial activity depending on the specific ß-lactamases expressed by GNB, particularly carbapenemases. While many of these novel agents demonstrate in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant GNB, their efficacy has mainly been evaluated in phase-3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) for infections caused by carbapenem-susceptible GNB. Although evidence from real-world observational studies is generally less robust than that from RCT, it could be crucial for updating clinical guidelines on treating carbapenem-resistant GNB with these new agents in the absence of dedicated RCT.
RESUMEN
The genomic comparison of two Klebsiella michiganensis clinical isolates recovered from the same patient, one resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam and intermediate to cefotaxime, the other resistant to ceftazidime but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, revealed one mutation in the blaOXY-1-24 gene accounting for a L169M substitution in the Ω loop. Cloning experiment in Escherichia coli demonstrated the contribution of this mutation to the hydrolysis spectrum extension towards ceftazidime and cefepime, whereas the resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was reduced. To the best of our knowledge, this study shows for the first time that ceftazidime resistance can occur in vivo from OXY-1 precursor by structural alteration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elevated cefepime blood concentrations can cause neurotoxicity in adults. The consequences of elevated cefepime concentrations among pediatric patients are unknown. Future exploration of such effects requires first identifying patients at risk for elevated cefepime exposure. We investigated the role of acute kidney injury as a risk factor for increased cefepime concentrations in critically ill children. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis at a single pediatric intensive care unit. Analyzed patients received at least 24 h of cefepime and had at least two opportunistic samples collected for total cefepime concentration measurement. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles during treatment courses were reconstructed using Bayesian estimation with an established population PK model. Elevated trough concentration (Cmin) was defined as ≥ 30 mg/L based on adult toxicity studies. The effect of kidney dysfunction on cefepime PK profiles was interrogated using a mixed-effect model. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, of which 13 (14.9%) had at least one estimated Cmin ≥ 30 mg/L. Patients with elevated Cmin were more likely to have acute kidney injury (AKI) during their critical illness (92% vs. 57%, p = 0.015 for any AKI; 62% vs. 26%, p = 0.019 for severe AKI). Patients who had AKI during critical illness had significantly higher cefepime exposure, as quantified by the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC24h) and Cmin. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill children, AKI is associated with elevated cefepime concentrations. Identifying these high-risk patients is the first step toward evaluating the clinical consequences of such exposures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maximal skin testing (ST) nonirritant concentrations (NICs) are consistent for penicillin and aminopenicillin among guidelines. However, there is variability among guidelines for maximal ST NICs of cephalosporins. OBJECTIVE: To determine maximal immediate and delayed ST NICs of 15 ß-lactams in ß-lactam-tolerant and ß-lactam-naïve participants. METHODS: We performed a single-center, nonrandomized prospective study between September 2019 and January 2022 in adult participants. Participants received skin prick testing (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) injections at 6 increasing concentrations of 1 or more ß-lactams. A concentration was considered irritant when more than 5% of participants had a positive test. A positive test was defined as a wheal ≥3 mm compared with negative control accompanied by a ≥5 mm flare for SPT/IDT and induration ≥5 mm with associated erythema at 48 hours for delayed readings (dIDT). Sensitivity analyses using 3 alternative IDT positive criteria were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 747 participants with a median age of 64 (interquartile range: 54-72) years (52% male, 85% White, and 92% non-Hispanic) underwent 20,858 skin tests. All undiluted SPT concentrations were nonirritant. We found the following maximal IDT/dIDT NICs (mg/mL): ampicillin (41.6/125), ampicillin-sulbactam (93.8/187.5), aztreonam (6.3/25), cefazolin (55/165), cefepime (35/140), cefoxitin (45/90), ceftaroline (7.5/15), ceftriaxone (58.3/175), cefuroxime (55/110), ertapenem (16.6/50), imipenem-cilastin (6.3/25), meropenem (8.3/25), nafcillin (31.3/62.5), oxacillin (20.9/83.5), and piperacillin-tazobactam (112.5/225). dIDTs were almost all completely nonirritant close to or at undiluted concentrations. There were no differences when we applied 3 IDT positivity criteria to our raw data. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SPTs with undiluted stock ß-lactam antibiotic concentrations are nonirritant. Compared with previously published nonirritant concentrations, we propose a 2- to 50-fold increase to the maximal IDT and dIDT NICs of 15 ß-lactam antibiotics. When performing dIDTs, a higher concentration should be used rather than the same IDT concentration.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To define the in vitro pharmacodynamics of taniborbactam against Enterobacterales with CTXM-15, KPC, AmpC, and OXA-48 ß-lactamases. METHODS: An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate serum concentrations associated with cefepime 2G by 1 h infusion 8 h. Taniborbactam was given in exposure ranging and fractionation simulations. Reduction in viable count at 24 h (Δ 24) was the primary end point and four strains were used: Escherichia coli expressing CTXM-15 or AmpC and Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing KPC or OXA-48 enzymes. RESULTS: Taniborbactam was administered as continuous infusions; ≥4 log kill was attained with taniborbactam concentrations of ≥0.01 mg/L against CTXM-15 E. coli, ≥0.5 mg/L against KPC- and OXA-48 K. pneumoniae, and ≥4 mg/L against AmpC E. coli. Analyses were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic/dynamic driver for each strain. For E. coli (CTXM-15) and E. coli (AmpC), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was best related to change in viable count (R20.74 and 0.72, respectively). For K. pneumoniae (KPC) AUC and T > 0.25 mg/L were equally related to bacterial clearance (R20.72 for both), and for K. pneumoniae (OXA-48) T > 0.25 mg/L was the best predictor (R20.94). The taniborbactam AUC range to produce a 1-log10 reduction in viable count was 4.4-11.2 mg·h/L. Analysis of data from all strains indicated T > MIC divided by 4 was best related to change in viable count; however, curve fit was poor R2 < 0.49. CONCLUSIONS: Taniborbactam was effective in combination with cefepime in producing bacterial clearance for B lactam resistant Enterobacterales. The primary pharmacodynamic driver was AUC or time > threshold, both being closely related to antibacterial effect.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Efficacy for prolonged infusion beta-lactam dosing schemes has been previously described, but there has been less focus on the safety of standard vs. prolonged infusion protocols of beta-lactams. This study explored differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for beta-lactams between each of these infusion protocols. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE literature databases via PubMed was conducted and references were reviewed. Articles were compiled and assessed with specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. We included randomised and nonrandomised, prospective, and retrospective cohort studies that reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to either standard (30-60 mins) or prolonged (≥3 h) infusions of beta-lactam infusions. Total ADRs between strategies were analysed by infusion methodology. The most consistently reported ADRs were subject to meta-analysis across studies. RESULTS: 12 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria with data for 4163 patients. There was insufficient data to systematically analyse neurotoxicity or cytopenias. Seven studies reported on nephrotoxicity outcomes with no significant difference in event rates between standard (n = 434/2258,19.2%) vs. prolonged infusion (n = 266/1271, 20.9%) of beta-lactams (OR = 1.08, 95% CI [0.91, 1.29]). Six studies observed diarrhoea in a total of 759 patients with no significant difference in patients of standard (n = 18/399, 4.5%) vs. prolonged (n = 19/360, 5.3%) infusion of beta-lactams (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [0.59,2.20]). CONCLUSION: Prolonged and standard infusion schemes for beta-lactams demonstrated similar adverse event rates. Future research should focus on improved standardisation of adverse effect definitions and a priori aim to study neurotoxicity and cytopenias. Consistent recording of ADRs and standardised definitions of these reactions will be paramount to further study of this subject.
RESUMEN
Background: Cefepime is used for the treatment of nosocomial infections and serves as a carbapenem-sparing agent for treating AmpC inducible bacteria. Cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is a well-documented adverse effect, although data describing the risk of CIN in patients with a history of seizures (HOS) remains limited. Objectives: The primary and secondary objectives were to compare the rates of CIN in patients with and without HOS and identify risk factors associated with CIN, respectively. Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study of patients admitted to University Hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 that were initiated on cefepime with and without a baseline HOS. Patients were matched at a rate of 1:1 by age (+/- 5 years), sex, and month of admission (+/- 1 month). Results: A total of 150 patients were included, 75 in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in CIN between the two groups (9 vs 7, P = 0.7923). The only risk factors associated with CIN were age >65 (OR, 5.8 [95% CI, 1.194-27.996]), acute kidney injury (AKI) during cefepime administration (OR, 13.8 [95% CI, 2.528-75.206]), and an intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR, 8.6 [95% CI, 1.735-42.624]). Conclusion: There was no increased risk of CIN observed in patients with HOS. Patients age >65, AKI while receiving cefepime and those admitted to the ICU were 5.8, 13.8, and 8.6 times more likely to experience CIN. These results suggest that it may be safe to administer cefepime to patients with HOS in the appropriate clinical setting.
RESUMEN
Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin antibiotic administered intravenously used to treat various bacterial infections, including urinary tract infections. Administering cefepime to patients should be done with caution, understanding both potential risks and side effects. A 74-year-old female presented to the family medicine clinic with abdominal pain and a history of urinary tract infections. The workup included a CT scan that showed bowel obstruction and bladder wall thickening. Due to a history of urinary tract infections, three days following the presentation, the patient underwent an explorative laparotomy. Following the laparotomy, the patient was started on cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin antibiotic. Five days following the initial presentation, the patient became confused and was nonverbal. An encephalopathy workup showed a negative MRI, but an EEG was consistent with encephalopathy. Cefepime was discontinued. Forty-eight hours after cefepime was discontinued, the patient returned to baseline with normal cognitive function. It is crucial that clinicians understand the different classifications of antibiotics, as well as the drugs and potential side effects of prescriptions. Cefepime can be used in gram-negative infections with resistance to more generic antibiotics. It has the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, making it effective in treating meningitis. It has also been shown to cause encephalopathy as a side effect. It is important that clinicians understand the different generations of cephalosporins, as well as the cross-reactions and potential side effects of prescriptions. These factors must be considered when prescribing broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as cefepime.
RESUMEN
Taniborbactam, a bicyclic boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase (VIM), New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM), extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), OXA-48, and AmpC ß-lactamases, is under clinical development in combination with cefepime. Susceptibility of 200 previously characterized carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and 197 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa to cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators was determined by broth microdilution. For K. pneumoniae (192 KPC; 7 OXA-48-related), MIC90 values of ß-lactam components for cefepime-taniborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were 2, 2, and 1 mg/L, respectively. For cefepime-taniborbactam, 100% and 99.5% of isolates of K. pneumoniae were inhibited at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively, while 98.0% and 95.5% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, respectively. For P. aeruginosa, MIC90 values of ß-lactam components of cefepime-taniborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were 16, >8, >8, and >4 mg/L, respectively. Of 89 carbapenem-susceptible isolates, 100% were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam at ≤8 mg/L. Of 73 carbapenem-intermediate/resistant P. aeruginosa isolates without carbapenemases, 87.7% were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, 79.5% to ceftazidime-avibactam, and 95.9% and 83.6% to cefepime-taniborbactam at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively. Cefepime-taniborbactam at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively, was active against 73.3% and 46.7% of 15 VIM- and 60.0% and 35.0% of 20 KPC-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Of all 108 carbapenem-intermediate/resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, cefepime-taniborbactam was active against 86.1% and 69.4% at ≤16 mg/L and ≤8 mg/L, respectively, compared to 59.3% for ceftolozane-tazobactam and 63.0% for ceftazidime-avibactam. Cefepime-taniborbactam had in vitro activity comparable to ceftazidime-avibactam and greater than meropenem-vaborbactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-intermediate/resistant MDR P. aeruginosa.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas , Cefepima/farmacología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Humanos , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Ácidos Borónicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Ácidos Borínicos/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Ácidos CarboxílicosRESUMEN
Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with extended antimicrobial coverage. Concerns have been raised about the side effects of cefepime including myoclonus, encephalopathy, and seizures, especially when renal impairment is present. There have been reports of cases of adverse neurological consequences despite appropriate renal adjustment. Here, we present a case of a 69-year-old patient initially diagnosed with pneumonia and treated with cefepime. The patient later developed altered mental status, leading to differential diagnoses including stroke, drug overdose, or non-convulsive seizures. Following a comprehensive workup, it was determined that she had cefepime-induced encephalopathy, despite having normal kidney function, which resolved completely after discontinuing the medication. In addition, we include similar cases retrieved from PubMed up to the present date, to the best of our knowledge.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Encefalopatías , Cefepima , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad , Humanos , Cefepima/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Encefalopatías/inducido químicamente , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/administración & dosificación , Cefepima/efectos adversos , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-|resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-|97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-|92.1% vs 0%-|88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and ß-|lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-|20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-|56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-ß-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in ß-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved ß-lac|tam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. IMPORTANCE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.
RESUMEN
Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam are antimicrobials recommended by IDSA/ATS guidelines for the empirical management of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Concerns have been raised about which should be used in clinical practice. This study aims to compare the effect of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill CAP patients through a targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). A total of 2026 ICU-admitted patients with CAP were included. Among them, (47%) presented respiratory failure, and (27%) developed septic shock. A total of (68%) received cefepime and (32%) piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatment. After running the TMLE, we found that cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatments have comparable 28-day, hospital, and ICU mortality. Additionally, age, PTT, serum potassium and temperature were associated with preferring cefepime over piperacillin/tazobactam (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.01-1.27], p = 0.03), (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.03-1.26], p = 0.009), (OR 1.1 95% CI [1.01-1.22], p = 0.039) and (OR 1.13 95% CI [1.03-1.24], p = 0.014)]. Our study found a similar mortality rate among ICU-admitted CAP patients treated with cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians may consider factors such as availability and safety profiles when making treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Humanos , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/mortalidad , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/mortalidad , Piperacilina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The antibiotic cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with extended-spectrum coverage against both gram-positive and negative bacteria. It is commonly used in the inpatient setting to treat community-acquired pneumonia or urinary tract infection and has side effects, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, headache, and, more rarely, hypersensitivity reactions or neurotoxicity. The current report is about an 88-year-old female patient who was brought to the hospital by her daughter due to an acute change in mental status resulting from a urinary tract infection. The patient received intravenous cefepime and subsequently developed a low-frequency tremor after one day of treatment. Cefepime was discontinued with a resolution of tremor in three days. Though neurotoxicity has been documented as a serious adverse event with cefepime, tremor is not one of the known neurotoxic manifestations. This patient is the first reported to develop a tremor as a neurotoxic side effect from taking cefepime. Healthcare providers should be aware of this potential side effect and may consider discontinuing treatment with cefepime if their patient develops a new tremor within days of initiating treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to overcome challenges posed by cefepime excessive elimination rate and poor patient compliance by developing transdermal delivery system using nano-transfersomes based chitosan gel. METHODS: Rotary evaporation-sonication method and the Box-Behnken model were used to prepare cefepime loaded nano-transfersomes (CPE-NTFs). The physiochemical characterization of CPE-NTFs were analyzed including DLS, deformability index, DSC and antimicrobial study. Optimized CPE-NTFs loaded into chitosan gel and appropriately characterized. In vitro release, ex vivo and in vivo studies were performed. RESULTS: The CPE-NTFs were physically stable with particle size 222.6 ± 1.8 nm, polydispersity index 0.163 ± 0.02, zeta potential -20.8 ± 0.1 mv, entrapment efficiency 81.4 ± 1.1% and deformability index 71 ± 0.2. DSC analysis confirmed successful drug loading and thermal stability. FTIR analysis showed no chemical interaction among the excipients of CPE-NTFs gel. The antibacterial activity demonstrated a remarkable reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentration of cefepime when incorporated into nano-transfersomes. CPE-NTFs based chitosan gel (CPE-NTFs gel) showed significant physicochemical properties. In vitro release studies exhibited sustained release behavior over 24 h, and ex vivo studies indicated enhanced permeation and retention compared to conventional cefepime gel. In vivo skin irritation studies confirmed CPE-NTFs gel was nonirritating and biocompatible for transdermal delivery. CONCLUSION: This research showed nano-transfersomes based chitosan gel is a promising approach for cefepime transdermal delivery and provides sustained release of cefepime.
Asunto(s)
Administración Cutánea , Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Quitosano , Geles , Tamaño de la Partícula , Absorción Cutánea , Piel , Quitosano/química , Cefepima/administración & dosificación , Cefepima/farmacocinética , Cefepima/química , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Geles/química , Animales , Absorción Cutánea/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/metabolismo , Ratas , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Liberación de Fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Masculino , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Nanopartículas/química , Ratas WistarRESUMEN
There are increasing reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that test as cefepime-susceptible (S) or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD). However, there are no data to compare the cefepime testing performance of BD Phoenix automated susceptibility system (BD Phoenix) and disk diffusion (DD) relative to reference broth microdilution (BMD) against carbapenemase-producing (CPblaKPC-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP CRE) isolates. Cefepime susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI M100Ed32. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (miEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for BD Phoenix (NMIC-306 Gram-negative panel) and DD relative to BMD. Correlates were also analyzed by the error rate-bounded method. EA and CA for CPblaKPC-CRE isolates (n = 64) were <90% with BD Phoenix while among non-CP CRE isolates (n = 58), EA and CA were 96.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. CA was <90% with DD for both cohorts. No ME or VME was observed for either isolate cohort; however, miEs were >10% for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 ranges for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix. Regarding disk diffusion, miEs were unacceptable for all MIC ranges among CPblaKPC-CRE. For non-CP CRE isolates, only IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 range was acceptable at 37.2%. Using this challenge set of genotypic-phenotypic discordant CRE, the BD Phoenix MICs and DD susceptibility results trended higher (toward SDD and resistant phenotypes) relative to reference BMD results yielding lower CA. These results were more prominent among CPblaKPC-CRE than non-CP CRE.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Cefepima , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Cefepima/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Humanos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas Antimicrobianas de Difusión por Disco/métodos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Cefalosporinas/farmacologíaRESUMEN
CERTAIN-1 was a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study of the efficacy and safety of cefepime-taniborbactam versus meropenem in the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis. We determined susceptibility of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa baseline pathogens to cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators and characterized ß-lactam resistance mechanisms. Microbiologic response and clinical response were assessed in patient subsets defined by baseline pathogens that were of cefepime-, multidrug-, or carbapenem-resistant phenotype or that carried ß-lactamase genes. Among Enterobacterales baseline pathogens, 26.8%, 4.1%, and 3.0% carried genes for extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, and carbapenemases, respectively. Within each treatment group, while composite success rates at Test of Cure in resistant subsets by pathogen species were similar to those by pathogen overall, composite success rates in meropenem patients were numerically lower for cefepime-resistant Escherichia coli (9/19; 47.4%) and ESBL E. coli (13/25; 52.0%) compared with E. coli overall (62/100; 62.0%). Cefepime-taniborbactam achieved composite success in 7/8 (87.5%) patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and 8/9 (88.9%) patients with Enterobacterales with a carbapenemase gene (5 OXA-48-group; 2 KPC-3; 2 NDM-1). Cefepime-taniborbactam also achieved composite success in 8/16 (50.0%) patients and clinical success in 13/16 (81.3%) patients with P. aeruginosa; corresponding rates were 4/7 (57.1%) and 6/7 (85.7%) for meropenem. Cefepime-taniborbactam demonstrated efficacy in adult cUTI patients with cefepime-, multidrug-, and carbapenem-resistant pathogens including pathogens with ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase genes. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03840148.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Urinarias , beta-Lactamasas , Humanos , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Meropenem/farmacología , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Genotipo , Fenotipo , Anciano , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácidos Borínicos , Ácidos CarboxílicosRESUMEN
The world population is rapidly aging. Societal aging poses many challenges for individuals, families, nations, and the global healthcare system. Therefore, geriatric care is a crucial issue that demands our attention. In this case report, we describe a woman in her early 70s with multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and renal insufficiency who developed cefepime-induced encephalopathy with moderate to severe cerebral dysfunction during treatment of a urinary tract infection. The patient's consciousness level gradually improved, and no further seizures were observed following the discontinuation of cefepime for several days. This case report underscores the fact that polypharmacy and medication safety are significant concerns that are often overlooked when caring for older patients. The report also highlights the increased susceptibility of older individuals to antibiotic-associated adverse reactions during the management of infectious diseases. Therefore, optimization of antibiotic therapy for older patients is a critical issue that requires thorough investigation and consideration in geriatric care.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Encefalopatías , Cefepima , Polifarmacia , Insuficiencia Renal , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Cefepima/efectos adversos , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Anciano , Encefalopatías/inducido químicamente , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to investigate the penetration of cefepime into rat peritoneal fluid by microdialysis and to determine the relationship between unbound drug plasma and tissue concentration in healthy animals and in a sepsis model established through cecal ligation and puncture-induced peritonitis. Probe recovery was performed by dialysis and retrodialysis. Cefepime was administered at a dose of 110 mg/kg intravenously. Samples were collected for about 4 h, and concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-QTOF MS. Tissue penetration was also determined. Probe recovery in vivo was 38.78% ± 3.31% and 38.83% ± 2.74% in the control and peritonitis groups, respectively. Cefepime was rapidly distributed in the peritoneal fluid in both groups. The peritoneal fluid/plasma cefepime ratio was 0.38 and 0.32 for the control and peritonitis groups, respectively. Cefepime concentrations were above the MIC of 4 mg/L for the main enterobacteria. The infection model that was used had no apparent effect on the pharmacokinetics of cefepime in rats. This was the first study to determine free cefepime concentrations in the peritoneal fluid of healthy rats and rats with experimental peritonitis.