RESUMEN
Hospital-acquired infections, including central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), are an ongoing source of cost, morbidity, and mortality worldwide. This article presents a summary of the impact of the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on CLABSI incidence, an overview of current standard-of-care practices for reduction of CLABSI, and a look toward future changes in bacteremia metrics and challenges in prevention.
RESUMEN
Pediatric chronic intestinal failure (PIF) is a rare and heterogeneous condition characterized by the inability of the patient's intestine to adequately absorb the required fluids and/or nutrients for growth and homeostasis. As a result, patients will become dependent on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). A MEDLINE search was performed in May 2024 with keywords "intestinal failure", "parenteral nutrition" and "pediatric". Different underlying conditions which may result in PIF include short bowel syndrome, intestinal neuromuscular motility disorders and congenital enteropathies. Most common complications associated with HPN are catheter-related bloodstream infections, catheter-related thrombosis, intestinal failure-associated liver disease, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, metabolic bone disease and renal impairment. Treatment for children with PIF has markedly improved with a great reduction in morbidity and mortality. Centralization of care in specialist centers and international collaboration between centers is paramount to further improve care for this vulnerable patient group. A recently promising medical therapy has become available for children with short bowel syndrome which includes glucagon-like peptide 2, a naturally occurring hormone which is known to delay gastric emptying and induce epithelial proliferation. Despite advances in curative and supportive treatment, further research is necessary to improve nutritional, pharmacological and surgical care and prevention of complications associated with parenteral nutrition use.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Intestinal , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Síndrome del Intestino Corto , Humanos , Niño , Insuficiencia Intestinal/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/terapia , Preescolar , Lactante , Péptido 2 Similar al GlucagónRESUMEN
Background Patients undergoing hemodialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) are at risk for Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections (CRBSIs). This study evaluates the incidence, risk factors, organism types, and outcomes of CRBSI in adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis at King Faisal Hospital, Rwanda. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis via central venous hemodialysis catheters at King Faisal Hospital, Rwanda. Upon receiving the IRB approval, 81 eligible patients, women, and men aged between 19 and 74, were enrolled. Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST) analysis evaluated the risk factors for CRBSI. The statistical significance was determined using p-values, with a cut-off of 0.05. Results The incidence of CRBSI was found to be 0.78 episodes per 1,000 catheter-days. Acute hemodialysis catheter type and anemia were associated with increased risk for CRBSI, with a P-value less than 0.05. In addition, all CRBSI cases were due to bacteria, with 52.63% gram-negative and 47.37% gram-positive. Out of 19 CRBSI events, nine cases (47.37%) required hospitalization with a median duration of seven days. Approximately half of the CRBSIs required catheter removal. No metastatic infection or death was noted. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that our hemodialysis unit has an incidence of 0.78 episodes per 1,000 catheter-days. Catheter type and anemia were significantly associated with CRBSI.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) require long-term parenteral nutrition using central venous catheters (CVCs), which often require replacement. We adopted a less fallible guidewire replacement (GWR) method and verified its effectiveness and validity. METHODS: We enrolled 108 cases that underwent a CVC replacement with "GWR" method with IF at our department between 2013 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients' clinical details with tunneled CVC (Hickman/Broviac catheter). For the analysis, we compared for the same time period the catheter exchange method "Primary placement"; newly inserted catheter by venipuncture. RESULTS: The success rate of catheter replacement using GWR was 94.4%. There were six unsuccessful cases. A log-rank test showed no significant difference in catheter survival between primary placement and the GWR, and the time to first infection was significantly longer in the GWR (p = 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two methods until the first infection, when the exchange indication was limited to infections. In the same way, when the indication was restricted to catheter-related bloodstream infection, there was no significant difference in catheter survival between the two approaches. CONCLUSION: Our GWR procedure was easy to perform and stable, with a high success rate and almost no complications. Moreover, using a guidewire did not increase the frequency of catheter replacement and the infection rate.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Insuficiencia Intestinal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Insuficiencia Intestinal/terapia , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Nutrición Parenteral/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , AdolescenteRESUMEN
In extracorporeal circulation, inflammatory mediators are eliminated through inflammatory cytokine adsorption. By interacting with inflammatory cytokines and removing them from the bloodstream, the adsorber's adsorbent lowers levels of inflammatory mediators and the inflammatory response. We present the case of a 67-year-old Chinese man diagnosed with sepsis due to a bloodstream infection from a catheter. We promptly utilized a cytokine adsorption column in conjunction with continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), resulting in a decrease in interleukin-6 levels and complete removal of bascteria from the bloodstream. A critical turning point in illness management is reached as the levels of inflammatory cytokines drop and the dosage of patients' vasoactive medications improves significantly. In hemodialysis patients with secondary septic shock in the context of catheter-associated bacteremia, the combination of CVVHDF with cytokine adsorption therapy in hemodialysis may be clinically useful and improve or accelerate the patient's improvement.
RESUMEN
Background: Mycobacterium cosmeticum is an emerging rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) species that has been rarely reported to cause human disease. RGM catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are often challenging to treat given the need for line removal, variable species-dependent antimicrobial susceptibility, combination antimicrobial treatment, and historically longer courses of antibiotics. Case presentation: We present a case of an immunocompetent pediatric patient with severe hemophilia B and M. cosmeticum CRBSI. While the patient's hemophilia B precluded a standard line holiday, he successfully cleared his infection with two line exchanges followed by two weeks of antibiotics. Conclusions: RGM, including emerging species M. cosmeticum, may be considered in patients with an indolent presentation of CRBSI. Our case suggests source control with shorter courses of antimicrobials can be successful.
RESUMEN
Background: Catheter-related candidemia (CRC) is a serious catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) caused by Candida spp., with higher mortality than CRBSIs caused by other organisms. Objective: To identify the risk factors for Candida CRBSI. The clinical characteristics of 297 patients with CRBSI in a local hospital from January 2007 to June 2015 were collected, including 33 Candida CRBSI and 264 non-Candida CRBSI. Method: The associations of Candida CRBSI with the clinical variables were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that glucocorticoid use (odds ratio [OR] = 10.313, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.032-52.330, P = 0.005) and parenteral nutrition (OR = 5.400, 95% CI = 0.472-61.752, P = 0.0175) were independent risk factors for Candida CRBSI. The most prevalent species were Candida tropicalis (42.4%) and Candida albicans (36.36%). Of the 33 Candida CRBSI cases, 31 (93.93%) had indwelling central venous catheters (CVC) for ≥14 d. The mortality of Candida CRBSI was remarkably higher than that of bacteria CRBSI. Patients with timely catheter removal and appropriate antifungal treatment had dramatically increased 28-d survival compared with those with untimely catheter removal + inappropriate antifungal treatment (88.89% vs. 0, P = 0.006). Conclusion: The study identified glucocorticoid use and parenteral nutrition as independent risk factors for Candida CRBSI. The outcome of candidemia was associated with the duration of CVC indwelling and antifungal treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the main drawbacks of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) is catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) can be combined with systemic antibiotics to achieve catheter salvage. Our objectives are to describe cases of CRBSI and our experience with ALT in a pediatric oncology-hematology ward. METHODS: a retrospective descriptive study of pediatric CRBSI cases in a Spanish oncology-hematology unit from 2007 to 2017 was conducted. We collected demographic, clinical, and microbiological data from all patients. RESULTS: fifty-eight CRBSIs were diagnosed in thirty-nine patients; 72.9% of these patients were male, with a median age of 42.1 months. The main underlying diseases were leukemia/lymphoma (51.7%) and solid tumors (32.7%). Thirty-five (60.3%) CRBSIs were caused by Gram-positive cocci, of which 70.6% were coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and sixteen (27.6%) were caused by Gram-negative bacilli. We treated 41/58 (71%) cases with ALT. A total of 12/17 (71%) CVCs that were not treated with adjunctive ALT were removed, compared with 13/41 (32%) that were treated with ALT (relative risk (RR), 0.449; confidence interval (CI), 95%: 0.259-0.778, p = 0.004). Major reasons to remove the CVC in the CRBSI-ALT group were local insertion/pocket site infection (23%), persistent symptoms (23%), and infectious' relapses (15%). CONCLUSIONS: ALT was shown to be an effective approach to keeping the CVC in place, with no added adverse effects.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Vascular access devices (VADs), namely peripheral VADs (PVADs) and central venous VADs (CVADs), are crucial in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings. However, VAD placement carries risks, notably catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Candida spp. is a common pathogen in CRBSIs, yet its clinical and microbiological characteristics, especially in non-ICU settings, are underexplored. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective observational study at Luigi Sacco Hospital from 1 May 2021 to 1 September 2023. We reviewed medical records of non-ICU adult patients with CVADs and PVADs. Data on demographics, clinical and laboratory results, VAD placement, and CRBSI occurrences were collected. Statistical analysis compared Candida spp. CRBSI and bacterial CRBSI groups. RESULTS: Out of 1802 VAD placements in 1518 patients, 54 cases of CRBSI were identified, and Candida spp. was isolated in 30.9% of episodes. The prevalence of CRBSI was 3.05%, with Candida spp. accounting for 0.94%. Incidence rates were 2.35 per 1000 catheter days for CRBSI, with Candida albicans and Candida non-albicans at 0.47 and 0.26 per 1000 catheter days, respectively-patients with Candida spp. CRBSI had more frequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 pneumonia, and hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Candida spp. was a notable cause of CRBSIs in our center, underscoring the importance of considering Candida spp. in suspected CRBSI cases, including those in non-ICU settings and in those with PVADs.
RESUMEN
Midline catheters (MCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are essential for reliable vascular access in patients. Despite their prevalent use, comparative risk assessments of these catheters, particularly from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), remain scarce. This meta-analysis primarily focuses on RCTs to evaluate and compare the incidence of complications associated with MCs and PICCs. We conducted a comprehensive search of databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus and ProQuest, up to April 2024. The primary outcomes analysed were total complications and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), while secondary outcomes included catheter dwell time and thrombosis incidence. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Of 831 initially identified articles, five trials involving 608 patients met the inclusion criteria. MCs exhibited a significantly higher rate of total complications compared with PICCs (relative risk = 1.95, 95% confidence interval = 1.23-3.08, P=0.005, I2= 0%). MCs also had shorter dwell times and a higher incidence of premature removal. However, no significant differences were observed in the rates of CRBSIs or thrombosis between MCs and PICCs. PICCs are associated with fewer total complications and longer dwell times compared with MCs, which tend to be more often removed prematurely. Thrombosis rates were similar between the two catheter types, underscoring the need for careful catheter selection based on specific patient conditions and treatment duration. Further research, particularly additional RCTs, is necessary to confirm these findings and guide optimal catheter selection in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Periférico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , AdultoRESUMEN
Introduction: Compared to other cancers, research on bloodstream infection in head and neck cancer is scarce, lacking comparative studies on persistent versus transient bacteremia outcomes. Methods: This retrospective survey examined patients with head and neck cancer undergoing blood culture at our center from June 2009 to May 2023. Blood culture-positive cases suspected of infection were divided into persistent bacteremia and transient bacteremia groups. We investigated their clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological features, including risk factors for persistent bacteremia and mortality. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Results: In this 97-patient cohort, 14 (14%) cases were assigned to the persistent bacteremia group. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were the leading cause of infection in both groups, consistently contributing to a high proportion of overall bloodstream infections. The mortality rate was generally higher in the persistent bacteremia group than in the transient bacteremia group (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-11.1), particularly in the non-clearance subgroup (OR, 9; 95% CI, 0.5-155.2). Pyogenic spondylitis was a key risk factor for persistent bacteremia, while hypoalbuminemia increased mortality. Conclusion: In patients with bacteremia and head and neck cancer, persistent bacteremia was associated with higher mortality than was transient bacteremia. Adittionally, bacteremia clearance in persistent bacteremia is thus crucial for prognostic improvement.
RESUMEN
Candida auris is an evolving and concerning global threat. Of particular concern are bloodstream infections related to central venous catheters. We evaluated the activity of taurolidine, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial in catheter lock solutions, against 106 C. auris isolates. Taurolidine was highly active with a MIC50/MIC90 of 512/512 mg/L, over 20-fold lower than lock solution concentrations of ≥13,500 mg/L. Our data demonstrate a theoretical basis for taurolidine-based lock solutions for prevention of C. auris catheter-associated infections.
Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos , Candida auris , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Taurina , Tiadiazinas , Tiadiazinas/farmacología , Taurina/análogos & derivados , Taurina/farmacología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Humanos , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida auris/efectos de los fármacos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Candidiasis/microbiología , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidemia/microbiología , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although widely used in clinical practice, long peripheral (LPCs) and midline catheters (MCs) are often misclassified because of their similar characteristics. Comparative studies on these devices are lacking. This study aimed to explore complications risks in polyurethane LPCs and MCs. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Catheter-failure within 30days was the primary outcome, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI), thrombosis, and fibroblastic sleeve were secondary outcomes. The average number of drugs infused per day was computed to measure the overall intensity of catheters' use. RESULTS: The catheter-failure incidence was 5.7 and 3.4/1,000 catheter-days for LPCs and MCs, respectively. MCs were associated with an adjusted lower risk of catheter-failure (hazard ratio 0.311, 95% confidence interval 0.106-0.917, P = .034). The daily number of drugs infused was higher for MCs (P < .001) and was associated with a greater risk catheter-failure risk (P = .021). Sensitivity analysis showed a decreased catheter-failure risk for MCs starting from day-10 from positioning. The incidence of CR-BSI (0.9 vs 0.0/1,000 catheter-days), thrombosis (8.7 vs 3.5/1,000 catheter-days), and fibroblastic sleeve (14.0 vs 8.1/1,000 catheters-days) was higher for LPC catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more intensive drug administration, MCs were associated with a longer uncomplicated indwelling time.
RESUMEN
Background: Catheter-related bloodstream infection is a well-known, severe complication of central venous catheter insertion. Studies that have evaluated the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic's influence on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in intensive care units are limited. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study on catheter-related bloodstream infection in coronavirus disease 2019 intensive care unit with previously documented low incidence rates to evaluate the pandemic's impact. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on catheter-related bloodstream infection incidence in the intensive care unit. Methods: All central venous catheter-inserted patients aged ⩾18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, and the secondary outcome was the detection of catheter-related bloodstream infection-causative microorganisms. Results: During the pandemic's first year, 124 patients were admitted, and 203 central venous catheters were inserted. Two patients developed catheter-related bloodstream infection. The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.79/1000 catheter days. The microorganisms responsible for catheter-related bloodstream infection were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. Conclusion: This study revealed a low incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in the coronavirus disease 2019-intensive care unit, thus suggesting that coronavirus disease 2019 is not a risk factor for catheter-related bloodstream infection and indicating the high resilience of well-established routines aimed at catheter-related bloodstream infection prevention.
RESUMEN
In the healthcare sector, the implementation of standardized procedures, such as those commonly employed in franchises to ensure consistent quality, remains underprioritized. Within this framework, we focus on the importance of standardized central venous catheter (CVC) insertion procedures to prevent healthcare-associated outbreaks. While antimicrobial resistance (AMR) may still not be the most prevalent problem in some institutions, its increasing significance certainly underlines the urgency of infection prevention.We aim to highlight this issue by describing and discussing an outbreak scenario of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas fluorescens bloodstream infections resulting from a deviation from the standardized CVC insertion procedure. This outbreak led to six episodes of catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in patients with hematologic malignancies, delaying their primary treatment. Nineteen patients were exposed, leading to an attack rate of 31.6%.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Pseudomonas fluorescens , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Brotes de Enfermedades , Estándares de ReferenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children with chronic IF require long-term home parenteral nutrition (HPN), administered through a central venous catheter. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) with Staphylococcus aureus is known to be a serious infection with a high mortality rate and risk of complications. A standardized protocol on the management of S aureus CRBSIs in children receiving HPN is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the current management in an HPN expertise center in the Netherlands. METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive cohort study between 2013 and 2022 on children 0-18 years of age with chronic IF requiring long-term HPN. Our primary outcomes were the incidence of S aureus CRBSI per 1000 catheter days, catheter salvage attempt rate, and successful catheter salvage rate. Our secondary outcomes included complications and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (39 male; 53%) were included, covering 327.8 catheter years. Twenty-eight patients (38%) had a total of 52 S aureus CRBSIs, with an incidence rate of 0.4 per 1000 catheter days. The catheter salvage attempt rate was 44% (23/52). The successful catheter salvage rate was 100%. No relapse occurred, and no removal was needed after catheter salvage. All complications that occurred were already present at admission before the decision to remove the catheter or not. No patients died because of an S aureus CRBSI. CONCLUSION: Catheter salvage in S aureus CRBSIs in children receiving HPN can be attempted after careful consideration by a multidisciplinary team in an HPN expertise center.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Insuficiencia Intestinal , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Taurina/análogos & derivados , Tiadiazinas , Humanos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/métodos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Masculino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Países Bajos , Insuficiencia Intestinal/terapia , Recién Nacido , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Incidencia , Remoción de Dispositivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiologíaRESUMEN
Staphylococcus caprae (S. caprae) is a gram positive, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) that occurs as a commensal pathogen on the human skin. It recently has been recognized in causing nosocomial infections involving the bloodstream, urinary tract, heart, bone, and joints, particularly in immunosuppressed patients or individuals with prosthetic devices. Previously, S. caprae was underreported as it was difficult to identify in the clinical microbiology laboratory; however, due to advances in molecular identification methods and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), more clinical cases are being identified in human isolates and appropriately treated. S. caprae osteoarticular infections are usually associated with polymicrobial infections and presence of orthopedic prostheses in immunocompromised adults. This pathogen has an even rarer presentation of bone and joint infections (BJIs) in immunocompetent individuals without orthopedic devices. Our case is of a 65-year-old immunocompetent male with diet-controlled diabetes mellitus type 2 and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis who presented with worsening mid-thoracic pain after a ground-level fall and was diagnosed with biopsy-proven S. caprae thoracic discitis/osteomyelitis, associated with recurrent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). It illustrates the importance of recognizing S. caprae as an emerging human pathogen, even in immunocompetent individuals without orthopedic hardware, requiring prompt targeted treatment of native BJIs to prevent unfavorable outcomes.
RESUMEN
Catheter-related suppurative thrombophlebitis (CRST) is a complication of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The microbiology of CRST is similar with the microbiology of CRBSI, but Clostridium perfringens that causes gas gangrene is a rare pathogen of CRBSI and CRST. We present a case of catheter-related gas-forming suppurative thrombophlebitis due to Clostridium perfringens infection. Gas-forming thrombus around the catheter can be useful findings for the early diagnosis of catheter-related clostridial thrombophlebitis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Continuous surveillance for healthcare-associated infections such as central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CVC-BSI) is crucial for prevention. However, traditional surveillance methods are resource-intensive and prone to bias. This study aimed to develop and validate fully-automated surveillance algorithms for CVC-BSI. METHODS: Two algorithms were developed using electronic health record data from 1000 admissions with a positive blood culture (BCx) at Karolinska University Hospital from 2017: (1) Combining microbiological findings in BCx and CVC cultures with BSI symptoms; (2) Only using microbiological findings. These algorithms were validated in 5170 potential CVC-BSI-episodes from all admissions in 2018-2019, and results extrapolated to all potential CVC-BSI-episodes within this period (n = 181,354). The reference standard was manual record review according to ECDC's definition of microbiologically confirmed CVC-BSI (CRI3-CVC). RESULTS: In the potential CVC-BSI-episodes, 51 fulfilled ECDC's definition and the algorithms identified 47 and 49 episodes as CVC-BSI, respectively. Both algorithms performed well in assessing CVC-BSI. Overall, algorithm 2 performed slightly better with in the total period a sensitivity of 0.880 (95%-CI 0.783-0.959), specificity of 1.000 (95%-CI 0.999-1.000), PPV of 0.918 (95%-CI 0.833-0.981) and NPV of 1.000 (95%-CI 0.999-1.000). Incidence according to the reference and algorithm 2 was 0.33 and 0.31 per 1000 in-patient hospital-days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both fully-automated surveillance algorithms for CVC-BSI performed well and could effectively replace manual surveillance. The simpler algorithm, using only microbiology data, is suitable when BCx testing adheres to recommendations, otherwise the algorithm using symptom data might be required. Further validation in other settings is necessary to assess the algorithms' generalisability.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Infección Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Humanos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Sepsis/microbiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Long peripheral catheters (LPCs) and midline catheters (MCs) are indiscriminately labelled with different names, leading to misclassifications both in primary and secondary studies. The available studies used different methods to report the incidence of catheter-related complications, affecting the possibility of properly comparing the catheter outcomes. The aim of this review was to explore the complications related to LPCs and MCs after reclassifying according to their length. METHODS: Systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, conducted on PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL databases. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Data regarding LPCs and MCs were compared. Catheter outcomes were classified into major and minor complications, recomputed and reported as cases/1000 catheter-days. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. Over-half of the devices were correctly labelled by the authors, misclassifications affected particularly LPCs improperly labelled MCs. The cumulative incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections was 0.3 and 0.4/1000 catheter-days, that of symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis was 0.9 and 1.8/1000 catheter-days for MCs and LPCs, respectively. Minor complications and catheter failure were higher for LPCs. CONCLUSIONS: A misclassification exists in the labelling of MCs and LPCs. A widespread heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria adopted to classify the catheters' outcomes was found, exposing the risk of misestimating the incidence of complications and undermining the possibility of effectively comparing results of the published research. We proposed a list of definitions and relevant variables as a first step toward the development of standardized criteria to be adopted for research purposes.