Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(7)2024 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39061314

RESUMEN

Substantial knowledge gaps exist concerning the varying durations of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placements that lead to either central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) or catheter colonization. We aimed to compare PICCs dwell time between patients who developed CLABSIs due to multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) and patients with catheter colonization by MDROs. Data from 86 patients admitted consecutively to a tertiary-care hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dwell time was 25.73 ± 16.19 days in the PICC-CLABSI group and 16.36 ± 10.28 days in the PICC-colonization group (p = 0.002). The mean dwell time was 17.38 ± 9.5 days in the PICC-MDRO group and 22.48 ± 15.64 days in the PICC-non-MDRO group (p = 0.005). Within the PICC-CLABSI group, the mean dwell time for CLABSIs caused by MDROs was 21.50 ± 12.31 days, compared to 27.73 ± 16.98 days for CLABSIs caused by non-MDROs (p = 0.417). Within the PICC-colonization group, the mean dwell time was 15.55 ± 7.73 days in PICCs colonized by MDROs and 16.92 ± 11.85 days in PICCs colonized by non-MDROs (p = 0.124). The findings of the present study suggest that CLABSIs caused by MDROs in PICCs are associated with a shorter mean catheter dwell time compared to those caused by non-MDROs, underscoring the importance of considering infections by MDROs when evaluating PICC dwell times.

2.
Am J Infect Control ; 2024 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944155

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungus associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections. In vitro efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) and CHX-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated (CHX-S) antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs) against C auris was investigated. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal CHX concentrations were determined against 19 C auris isolates. To assess extraluminal efficacy, segments from CVCs impregnated externally (CHX-S1) and both externally and internally (CHX-S2) were plasma-conditioned for 1- and 6-day, and to assess intraluminal efficacy, CHX-S2 CVCs were preconditioned with saline-lock for 6days, followed by 24-hour C auris inoculation and microbial adherence determination on impregnated and nonimpregnated CVCs. RESULTS: CHX inhibited all C auris isolates with minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations range of 8 to 128 µg/mL. C auris adherence was reduced on CHX-S1 and CHX-S2 extraluminally by 100% on day 1, 86.96% to 100% on day 7, and intraluminally on CHX-S2 by 56.86% to 90.52% on day 7. DISCUSSION: CHX and CHX-S CVC performance against C auris observed in this study is consistent with antimicrobial benefits observed in prior preclinical and randomized controlled clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: CHX showed strong inhibitory and cidal effects on C auris. CHX-S CVCs proved highly efficacious against this pathogen under in vitro conditions. Additional studies, however, are required to confirm clinical benefit.

3.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1379895, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38665376

RESUMEN

The predominant use of intravenous catheters as primary access type in the pediatric hemodialysis population is associated with an increased risk of catheter related blood stream infections. While strict adherence to catheter placement and long-term care guidelines have helped to decrease the incidence of these infections, blood stream infections remain an infection burden in pediatric patients with long term hemodialysis catheters. The formation of biofilms on the surfaces of these catheters has been shown to be a source of microbes causing blood stream infections. One of the strategies for preventing bacterial colonization, inhibiting microbial multiplication, and suppressing the seeding of these microbes from biofilms upon maturation, has been the use of antibiotic-based lock solutions in-between dialysis treatments. Although clinical guidelines for the use of antibiotic lock solutions are yet to be developed, available evidence suggests a beneficial role of antibiotic lock solutions in the management of catheter related blood stream infections. Additionally, a clear understanding of how biofilms are formed and their role in the pathogenesis of catheter related bloodstream infection will facilitate the development of solutions that can prevent biofilm formation and inhibit their multiplication, maturation and seeding into the bloodstream.

4.
J Vasc Access ; 24(1): 87-91, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148394

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Taurolidine lock is known to be effective in preventing catheter-related infections in a variety of venous access devices, including long term venous access devices for chemotherapy. Though, literature about the use of taurolidine for treating catheter colonization or catheter-related blood stream infection is scarce. METHOD: We have retrospectively reviewed the safety and efficacy of 2% taurolidine lock for treatment of catheter-colonization and of catheter-related bloodstream infection in cancer patients with totally implanted venous access devices. Diagnosis of colonization or catheter-related infection was based on paired peripheral and central blood cultures, according to the method of Delayed Time to Positivity. RESULTS: We recorded 24 cases of catheter-related infection and two cases of colonization. Taurolidine lock-associated with systemic antibiotic therapy-was successful in treating all cases of catheter-related infection, with disappearance of clinical symptoms, normalization of laboratory values, and eventually negative blood cultures. Taurolidine lock was also safe and effective in treating device colonization. No adverse effect was reported. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective analysis, 2% taurolidine lock was completely safe and highly effective in the treatment of both catheter-colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection in cancer patients with totally implanted venous access devices.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Neoplasias , Sepsis , Tiadiazinas , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Taurina , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos
5.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 42: 71-76, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36400647

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the biofilm formation of coagulase negative Staphylococcus species (CoNS) isolated from patients with catheter related blood stream infection (CRBSI) and colonized central venous catheters (CVC) and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns and in situ biofilm formation of CVC tips. METHODS: Eighty-two CoNS isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) patients with CRBSI (n â€‹= â€‹8) or colonized CVC (n â€‹= â€‹74) were included. Species identification and antibiotic susceptibility test were done. All isolates were screened for biofilm formation using crystal violet and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2-5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays and categorized as strong or moderate biofilm formers. CVC tips were subjected to crystal violet stain and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to detect in-situ biofilm formation. RESULTS: Staphylococcus haemolyticus (n â€‹= â€‹34; 41%) was the commonest to cause both CRBSI and CVC colonization. All 82 CoNS produced biofilms. Among them 77 (93.90%) were strong biofilm formers including all from CRBSI patients and 05 (6.10%) were moderate biofilm formers as detected by both methods. SEM showed bacteria adhered to surfaces of CVC tips with microbial-aggregates embedded in extracellular matrix. Mean crystal violet absorbance of CVC from CRBSI patients (0.6628) was significantly higher than colonized CVC (mean value 0.5592) (p â€‹= â€‹0.030). S. haemolyticus showed higher resistance to cloxacillin compared to other CoNS (p â€‹= â€‹0.039). CONCLUSION: Majority of CoNS isolated were strong biofilm formers. In-situ biofilm formation on CVC tips were significantly evident in CRBSI patients compared to CVC colonized patients. S. haemolyticus is the commonest to cause both CRBSI and CVC colonization and shows significantly higher cloxacillin resistance rate.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Humanos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Coagulasa , Violeta de Genciana , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Staphylococcus , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cloxacilina , Biopelículas
6.
Trials ; 23(1): 719, 2022 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36042488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Insertion of a central venous access device (CVAD) allows clinicians to easily access the circulation of a patient to administer life-saving interventions. Due to their invasive nature, CVADs are prone to complications such as bacterial biofilm production and colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection, occlusion, and catheter-related venous thrombosis. A CVAD is among the most common interventions for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), exposing this vulnerable population to the risk of nosocomial infection and catheter occlusion. The current standard of care involves the use of normal saline as a catheter locking solution for central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines, and a citrate lock for hemodialysis catheters. Saline offers little prophylactic measures against catheter complications. Four percent of tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) fluid (marketed as KiteLock Sterile Locking Solution™) is non-antibiotic, possesses antimicrobial, anti-biofilm, and anti-coagulant properties, and is approved by Health Canada as a catheter locking solution. As such, it may be a superior CVAD locking solution than the present standard of care lock in the ICU patient population. METHODS: Our team proposes to fill this knowledge gap by performing a multi-center, cluster-randomized, crossover trial evaluating the impact of 4% tetrasodium EDTA on a primary composite outcome of the incidence rate of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), catheter occlusion leading to removal, and use of alteplase to resolve catheter occlusion compared to the standard of care. The study will be performed at five critical care units. DISCUSSION: If successful, the results of this study can serve as evidence for a shift of standard of care practices to include EDTA locking fluid in routine CVAD locking procedures. Completion of this study has the potential to improve CVAD standard of care to become safer for patients, as well as provides an opportunity to decrease strain on healthcare budgets related to treating preventable CVAD complications. Success and subsequent implementation of this intervention in the ICU may also be extrapolated to other patient populations with heavy CVAD use including hemodialysis, oncology, parenteral nutrition, and pediatric patient populations. On a global scale, eradicating biofilm produced by antibiotic-resistant bacteria may serve to lessen the threat of "superbugs" and contribute to international initiatives supporting the termination of antibiotic overuse. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04548713, registered on September 9th, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Sepsis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Niño , Cuidados Críticos , Estudios Cruzados , Ácido Edético , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
7.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 40(4): 505-509, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36031499

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was designed to detect the prevalence of antibiotic and antiseptic resistance genes, mecA and qacA/B in coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) species isolated from intensive care unit patients with catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI) or colonized central venous catheters (CVC). METHODS: Consecutive CoNS isolates from ICU patients with CRBSI or colonized central venous catheters were speciated and antibiotic susceptibilities were determined. The mecA and qacA/B genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Eighty-two CoNS isolates from ICU patients with CRBSI (n â€‹= â€‹8) or colonized CVC (n â€‹= â€‹74) were included. The mecA gene was detected in 62 CoNS isolates (76%). The commonest species isolated was S. haemolyticus (n â€‹= â€‹34; 41%) and 30 of these possessed mecA which was significantly higher compared to other CoNS species (p â€‹= â€‹0.036). The qacA/B gene was detected in 13 (16%) isolates. Eleven (13%) CoNS had both genes. A significant association was seen with the presence of mecA and resistance to cloxacillin (p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and erythromycin (p â€‹= â€‹0.046). Presence of qacA/B (p â€‹= â€‹0.007) or both mecA and qacA/B (p â€‹= â€‹0.014) was associated with a higher resistance to clindamycin. CONCLUSION: A considerably high prevalence of mecA and qacA/B genes as well as co-existence of both genes is noted among the CoNS isolated from ICU patients. This indicates the need of taking prompt actions in hospital acquired infection prevention including continuous surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Clindamicina , Cloxacilina , Coagulasa/genética , Eritromicina , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus/genética
8.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg ; 25(2): 91-95, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to find out whether the reused catheters for clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) are colonized before insertion and its association with urinary tract infection (UTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a study conducted on 28 pediatric surgery patients who are on CIC via a Mitrofanoff port and who were reusing catheters, in a tertiary care private medical college hospital for 6-month period. Catheters to be used for the next catheterization were sent for culture along with urine culture. A questionnaire was utilized to assess CIC practice and UTI. RESULTS: Diseases of patients were: neurogenic bladder and exstrophy-epispadias and posterior urethral valve. Twenty-one of them had an augmented bladder. Hydronephrosis was present in ten and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in five. Their mean duration of CIC was 5.3 years. Of 28 catheter tip samples, 16 catheters were colonized with organism. Of the 28 urine culture samples, 17 cultures were positive and all were asymptomatic except one. Of the 16 positive catheter samples, only 9 had positive urine culture; four of them had grown different organisms and five of them had the same organism, and even in these five, single organism was seen only in three. Urine culture grew Gram-negative organism in 85%, but catheter grew Gram-positive organism in 46%. No difference was found in the variables between both groups such as hydronephrosis, VUR, and augmented bladder. CONCLUSION: Reused catheters were colonized in 57% of the study patients, but reused catheter may not be the cause of culture positivity or UTI in the study population.

9.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 38(3): 119-122, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668861

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the colonization rates of central venous catheter (CVC) and arterial catheter (ArtC) hubs fitted with two types of needleless connectors (NCs). METHODS: We designed a prospective randomized study to compare rates of catheter hub colonization of CVC and ArtC hubs fitted with two types of needleless connectors: neutral-pressure NCs (NP-NCs) and positive-pressure NCs (PP-NCs) in critically ill patients. All NCs were replaced every 7 days of use. RESULTS: We obtained 326 cultures from 146 catheters (81 CVC and 65 ArtC) in 70 patients. The total cumulative days of risk were 1250 catheter-days. Global swab cultures were positive in NP-NCs in 29/198 (14.6%) versus 17/128 (13.3%) in PP-NCs during catheter use. We did not observe any cases of CRBSI. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the use of PP-NCs did not result in significantly more frequent hub colonization with respect to NP-NCs.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Contaminación de Equipos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Manejo de Especímenes
10.
World J Urol ; 38(9): 2237-2245, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792577

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are a significant cause of morbidity worldwide, as they account for 40% of all hospital-associated infections. Microbial biofilm formation on urinary catheters (UCs) limits antibiotic efficacy, making CAUTI extremely difficult to treat. To gain insight into the spatiotemporal microbe interactions on the catheter surface we sought to determine how the presence or absence of bacteriuria prior to catheterization affects the organism that ultimately forms a biofilm on the UC and how long after catheterization they emerge. METHODS: Thirty UCs were collected from patients who received a urine culture prior to catheterization, a UC, and antibiotics as part of standard of care. Immunofluorescence imaging and scanning electron microscopy were used to visualize patient UCs. RESULTS: Most patients did not have bacteria in their urine (based on standard urinalysis) prior to catheterization, yet microbes were detected on the majority of UCs, even with dwell times of < 3 days. The most frequently identified microbes were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that despite patients having negative urine cultures and receiving antibiotics prior to catheter placement, microbes, including uropathogens associated with causing CAUTI, could be readily detected on UCs with short dwell times. This suggests that a potential microbial catheter reservoir can form soon after placement, even in the presence of antibiotics, which may serve to facilitate the development of CAUTI. Thus, removing and/or replacing UCs as soon as possible is of critical importance to reduce the risk of developing CAUTI.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteriuria/microbiología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Contaminación de Equipos , Catéteres Urinarios/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo
11.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-849697

RESUMEN

[Abstract] Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine catheters vs. conventional standard catheters in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections with bundles. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, CINAHL and Web of Science databases from construction to March 2019 for randomized controlled trials to compare the use of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine catheters and conventional standard catheters. Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to evaluate the included research, and the effective data was extracted. The set risk ratio (RR) was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI), and the rate of CRBSI per 1000 catheter-days and bacterial colonization rate were measured. The primary outcome was CRBSI thousand day rate and the secondary outcome was bacterial colonization rate. The meta analysis was performed by R3.4.1 software. Results Seventeen trials included 4892 patients who received chlorhexidine/sulfadiazine silver coated catheters and conventional standard catheters were included. Compared with conventional standard catheters, chlorhexidine/ silver sulfadiazine catheters were associated with a lower incidence of catheter colonization (RR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.45-0.68, P=0.02). In addition, the the difference of the rate of CRBSI per 1000 catheter-days was not significant (RR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.48-1.02, P=0.32). Conclusion Compared with conventional standard catheters, the use of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-catheters with bundles can further reduce the incidence of catheter colonization, but does not reduce the rate of CRBSI per 1000 catheter-days.

12.
Ann Intensive Care ; 8(1): 71, 2018 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29904809

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related blood-stream infections (CRBSIs) are the most common complication when using central venous catheters (CVCs). Whether coating CVCs under bundles could further reduce the incidence of CRBSIs is unclear. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of implementing the use of bundles with antimicrobial-coated CVCs for preventing catheter-related blood-stream infections. METHODS: In this systematic review and network meta-analyses, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library in addition to the EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases for studies published before July 2017. The primary outcome was the rate of CRBSIs per 1000 catheter-days, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of catheter colonization. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies revealed significant differences in the rate of CRBSIs per 1000 catheter-days between antimicrobial-impregnated and standard CVCs (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.91, p = 0.008). Thirty-three trials were included containing 10,464 patients who received one of four types of CVCs. Compared with a standard catheter, chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine- and antibiotic-coated catheters were associated with lower numbers of CRBSIs per 1000 catheter-days (ORs and 95% CrIs: 0.64 (0.40-0.955) and 0.53 (0.25-0.95), respectively) and a lower incidence of catheter colonization (ORs and 95% CrIs: 0.44 (0.34-0.56) and 0.30 (0.20-0.46), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are superior for catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine or other antibiotics than for standard catheters in preventing CRBSIs and catheter colonization under bundles. Compared with silver ion-impregnated CVCs, chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine antiseptic catheters resulted in fewer cases of microbial colonization of the catheter but did not reduce CRBSIs.

13.
J Microbiol Methods ; 143: 20-25, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28966069

RESUMEN

Adherent bacteria and biofilm frequently colonize central venous catheters (CVCs). CVC colonization is correlated to infections and particularly to bloodstream ones. The classical microbiological methods to determine of CVC colonization are not fully reliable and are time-consuming. BioTimer Assay (BTA) is a biological method already used to count bacteria adherent to abiotic surfaces and biofilm without sample manipulation. BTA employs specific reagents whose color changed according to bacterial metabolism. BTA is based on the principle that a metabolic reaction will be faster when more bacteria are present in the sample. Therefore, the time required for color changes of BTA reagents determines the number of bacteria present in the sample through a correlation line. Here, for the first time, we applied BTA and a specifically developed laboratory procedure to evaluate CVC colonization in comparison with the routine microbiological method (RMM). 125 CVCs removed from patients for suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) or at hospital discharge were examined. BTA was reliable in assessing sterility and CVC colonization (100% agreement with RMM) and in recognizing the presence of fermenting or non-fermenting bacteria (97.1% agreement with RMM) shortening the analytical time by between 2- and 3-fold. Moreover, the reliability of BTA as early alert of CRBSI was evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for BTA as an early alert of CRBSI were 100, 40.0, 88.8 and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, BTA and the related laboratory procedure should be incorporated into routine microbiological methods since it can be considered a reliable tool to evaluate CVC colonization in a very short time and a rapid alert for CRBSIs.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo
14.
mSphere ; 2(5)2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28959736

RESUMEN

Totally implanted venous access ports (TIVAPs) are commonly used catheters for the management of acute or chronic pathologies. Although these devices improve health care, repeated use of this type of device for venous access over long periods of time is also associated with risk of colonization and infection by pathogenic bacteria, often originating from skin. However, although the skin microbiota is composed of both pathogenic and nonpathogenic bacteria, the extent and the consequences of TIVAP colonization by nonpathogenic bacteria have rarely been studied. Here, we used culture-dependent and 16S rRNA gene-based culture-independent approaches to identify differences in bacterial colonization of TIVAPs obtained from two French hospitals. To explore the relationships between nonpathogenic organisms colonizing TIVAPs and the potential risk of infection, we analyzed the bacterial community parameters between TIVAPs suspected (symptomatic) or not (asymptomatic) of infection. Although we did not find a particular species assemblage or community marker to distinguish infection risk on an individual sample level, we identified differences in bacterial community composition, diversity, and structure between clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic TIVAPs that could be explored further. This study therefore provides a new view of bacterial communities and colonization patterns in intravascular TIVAPs and suggests that microbial ecology approaches could improve our understanding of device-associated infections and could be a prognostic tool to monitor the evolution of bacterial communities in implants and their potential susceptibility to infections. IMPORTANCE Totally implanted venous access ports (TIVAPs) are commonly used implants for the management of acute or chronic pathologies. Although their use improves the patient's health care and quality of life, they are associated with a risk of infection and subsequent clinical complications, often leading to implant removal. While all TIVAPs appear to be colonized, only a fraction become infected, and the relationship between nonpathogenic organisms colonizing TIVAPs and the potential risk of infection is unknown. We explored bacteria present on TIVAPs implanted in patients with or without signs of TIVAP infection and identified differences in phylum composition and community structure. Our data suggest that the microbial ecology of intravascular devices could be predictive of TIVAP infection status and that ultimately a microbial ecological signature could be identified as a tool to predict TIVAP infection susceptibility and improve clinical management.

15.
Int J Infect Dis ; 62: 72-76, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28743533

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The impact of antimicrobial therapy on the outcomes of patients with colonized catheters and no bacteraemia has not been assessed. This study assessed whether targeted antibiotic therapy is related to a poor outcome in patients with positive cultures of blood drawn through a non-tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) and without concomitant bacteraemia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult patients with positive blood cultures drawn through a CVC and negative peripheral vein blood cultures. Patients were classified into two groups: those with clinical improvement and those with a poor outcome. These two groups were compared. The outcome was considered poor in the presence of one or more of the following: death, bacteraemia or other infection due to the same microorganism, and evidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included (31 with a poor outcome). The only independent predictors of a poor outcome were a McCabe and Jackson score of 1-2 and a median APACHE score of 5. No association was found between the use of targeted antimicrobial therapy and a poor outcome when its effect was adjusted for the rest of the variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that antimicrobial therapy was not associated with a poor outcome in non-bacteraemic patients with positive blood cultures drawn through a CVC.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Anciano , Bacteriemia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(suppl_2): S131-S140, 2017 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475779

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antimicrobial central venous catheters (CVCs) remains questionable. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of antimicrobial CVC impregnations in reducing catheter-related infections in adults. METHODS: We searched 4 electronic databases (Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, CINAHL) and internet sources for randomized controlled trials, ongoing clinical trials, and unpublished studies up to August 2016. Studies that assessed CVCs with antimicrobial impregnation with nonimpregnated catheters or catheters with another impregnation were included. Primary outcomes were clinically diagnosed sepsis, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and all-cause mortality. We performed a network meta-analysis to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Sixty studies with 17255 catheters were included. The effects of 14 impregnations were investigated. Both CRBSI and catheter colonization were the most commonly evaluated outcomes. Silver-impregnated CVCs significantly reduced clinically diagnosed sepsis compared with silver-impregnated cuffs (RR, 0.54 [95% CI, .29-.99]). When compared to no impregnation, significant CRBSI reduction was associated with minocycline-rifampicin (RR, 0.29 [95% CI, .16-.52]) and silver (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, .38-.86]) impregnations. No impregnations significantly reduced all-cause mortality. For catheter colonization, significant decreases were shown by miconazole-rifampicin (RR, 0.14 [95% CI, .05-.36]), 5-fluorouracil (RR, 0.34 [95% CI, .14-.82]), and chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, .50-.72]) impregnations compared with no impregnation. None of the studies evaluated antibiotic/antiseptic resistance as the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that the minocycline-rifampicin-impregnated CVC appears to be the most effective in preventing CRBSI. However, its overall benefits in reducing clinical sepsis and mortality remain uncertain. Surveillance for antibiotic resistance attributed to the routine use of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs should be emphasized in future trials.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Rifampin/administración & dosificación , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Plata/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Microbiol Methods ; 128: 10-12, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27354011

RESUMEN

We analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS 80 catheter tips after 6h and 12h of incubation and the sensitivity of each incubation period for the identification of colonization and C-RBSI was, respectively, 9.5%-NA and 42.9%-28.6%. Despite MALDI-TOF MS cannot be used to predict catheter colonization, it may rule out C-RBSI.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Catéteres/microbiología , Contaminación de Equipos , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Bacteriemia/sangre , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Humanos
18.
Crit Care ; 20(1): 166, 2016 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27234944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Superficial culture has a high negative predictive value in the assessment of catheter tip colonization (CC) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI). However, the process of hub culture requires the hubs to be swabbed, and this carries a risk of dislodging the biofilm. At present, most catheter hubs are closed by needleless connectors (NCs) that are periodically replaced. Our objective was to compare the yield of SC (skin + hub culture) with that of skin + NC culture in the assessment of CC and C-RBSI. METHODS: During 5 months, we included the patients on the Major Heart Surgery ICU when a central venous catheter (CVC) remained in place ≥7 days after insertion. SCs were taken simultaneously when the NC was withdrawn and processed by the semi-quantitative method, even when the catheter was not removed. All catheter tips were cultured. All NCs belonging to a single catheter lumen were individually flushed with 100 µl of brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth. We considered the lumen to be colonized when ≥1 NC culture from the lumen flush was positive. We collected a total of 60 catheters. RESULTS: The overall CC rate was 15.0 %, and we confirmed two episodes of C-RBSI. The validity values after the comparison of SCs with skin + NC culture for prediction of CC were the following: sensitivity 66.7 % vs. 77.8 %, and negative predictive value 93.6 % vs. 93.1 %. The sensitivity and negative predictive value for prediction of C-RBSI was 100 % for both SC and skin + NC culture. CONCLUSION: The combination of skin and flushed NC culture can be an alternative to conventional SC for ruling out CC and C-RBSI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Femenino , Rubor/mortalidad , Rubor/enfermería , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sepsis/prevención & control
19.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(8): 895-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26026829

RESUMEN

We evaluated the colonization of stickers used to identify intravenous access lines in a clinical practice setting. We isolated the same microorganisms in colonized catheters and on the stickers in 77.8% of cases. Therefore, stickers could be a portal of entry of microorganisms through the catheter. Alternative methods for labeling intravenous lines are required.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Cateterismo/métodos , Catéteres/microbiología , Piel/microbiología , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
20.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(11): 1182-7, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25248485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the use of surveillance cultures (SCs) to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in asymptomatic hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: In 2011-2012, we conducted a prospective study of HD patients with tunneled cuffed central venous catheters (TCCs). Colonization of the catheter lumen was assessed every 15 days by inoculating ~5 mL endoluminal blood into aerobic culture bottles. Individual patients were triaged based on SC results: group 1 (negative); group 2 (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus [CoNS] with time-to-positivity (TTP) >14 hours); group 3 (CoNS with TTP ≤14 hours); and group 4 (any microorganism other than CoNS and any TTP). RESULTS: We studied 104 patients (129 TCCs). Median follow-up was 262.5 days (interquartile range [IR], 135.0-365.0). A total of 1,734 SCs were collected (median, 18 per patient; IR, 10.0-24.0), of which 1,634 (94.2%) were negative (group 1) and 100 (5.8%) were positive (group 2: 79; group 3: 12, group 4: 9). In groups 2 and 3, 19 TCCs required antibiotic lock therapy (ALT). In group 4, all patients received intravenous therapy and ALT. Under this protocol, there were 0.27 episodes of CRBSI per 1,000 catheter days compared with 1.65 (P < .001) prior to its implementation. CONCLUSION: SCs based on easily accessible samples proved useful in triaging HD patients at a high risk of infection.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA