RESUMEN

Objective: A new approach called the loop technique has been proven safe and effective for repeated intraoperative transvenous left ventricular (LV) lead dislocations during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in a 3-year follow-up. This study aimed to report on the 5-year safety and effectiveness of the loop technique. Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study. Forty-four patients who underwent CRT device implantation at the Cardiology Department of Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital between January 2013 and June 2019 were included. Data on patient demographics, medical history, laboratory test results, and echocardiography images at admission were collected. The loop technique was performed with repeated intraoperative dislocations of the LV lead. The intraoperative CRT parameters were also recorded. All patients were followed for 5 years. Several auxiliary examinations were performed during follow-up. Results: The 44 patients were divided into the traditional operation group (n=36, 81.8%) and loop technique group (n=8, 18.2%). The baseline patient characteristics were almost balanced. During the 5-year follow-up, 8 (22.2%) patients in the traditional operation group and 2 (25.0%) patients in the loop technique group died. No lead dislocation or other complications related to CRT were observed. There were no significant differences in mortality rate (P=0.87), cardiac function (P=0.56), echocardiographic indices, threshold (P=0.58), or impedance (P=0.22) of the LV lead. There were no significant differences in the threshold and impedance between postoperative, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups in the loop technique group (P=0.53). Conclusion: The loop technique is an ideal solution for repeated intraoperative LV lead dislocation during CRT implantation.

RESUMEN

AIMS: In cardiac device implantation, having both surgical skills and ability to manipulate catheter/lead/wire is crucial. Few cardiologists, however, receive formal surgical training prior to implanting. Skills are mostly acquired directly on-the-job and surgical technique varies across institutions; suboptimal approaches may increase complications. We investigated how novel proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation training impacts the surgical quality of implantations, compared to traditional simulation (SIM) training. METHODS: In this international prospective study, novice implanters were randomized (blinded) 1:1 to participate in a simulation-based procedure training curriculum, with proficiency demonstration requirements for advancing (PBP approach) or without (SIM). Ultimately, trainees performed the surgical tasks of an implant on a porcine tissue which was video-recorded and then scored by two independent assessors (blinded to group), using previously validated performance metrics. Primary outcomes were the number of procedural Steps Completed, Critical Errors, Errors (non-critical) and All Errors Combined. RESULTS: Thirty novice implanters from 10 countries participated. Baseline experiences were similar between groups. Compared to SIM-trained, the PBP-trained group completed on average 11% more procedural Steps (p<0.001) and made 61.2% fewer Critical Errors (p<0.001), 57.1% fewer Errors (p=0.140), 60.7% fewer All Errors Combined (p=0.001); 11/15 (73%) PBP-trainees demonstrated the predefined target performance level vs 3/15 SIM-trainees (20%) in the video-recorded performance. CONCLUSIONS: PBP training produces superior objectively assessed novice operators' surgical performance in device implantation compared with traditional (simulation) training. Systematic PBP incorporation into formal academic surgical skills training is recommended before in-vivo device practice. Future studies will quantify PBP training's effect on surgery-related device complications.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated an obesity paradox, where obese patients with cardiovascular disease have a better outcome compared to those with normal weight. However, the effect of obesity and body mass index (BMI) on the outcome of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices remains unclear. The current study aims to investigate this relationship using all available published data. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies from Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to January 2024. Eligible studies must investigate the association between BMI status and all-cause mortality in individuals with CRT devices. Relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CIs were retrieved from each study and combined using the generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: A total of 12 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that overweight and obesity patients had lower all-cause mortality compared to those with normal body weight with the pooled risk ratios (RR) for overweight of 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.87, I2 47%) and for obesity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.97, I2 59%). Conversely, the underweight exhibited higher all-cause mortality than the group with normal weight, with a pooled RR of 1.37 (95% CI 1.14-1.64, I2 0%). Additionally, higher BMI as continuous data was associated with decreased all-cause mortality, with a pooled HR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.98, I2 72%). CONCLUSIONS: The pooled analyses observed an obesity paradox in patients with CRT, where overweight and obesity were associated with reduced all-cause mortality, while underweight individuals exhibited higher all-cause mortality. Further research is necessary to investigate the underlying mechanisms and their implications for clinical practice.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Targeting the maximal ventricular resynchronization, with the shortest QRS duration (QRSd), is commonly implemented after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE: We compared optimization of ventricular resynchronization with optimization of left ventricular (LV) filling during CRT by measuring their acute hemodynamic effects. METHODS: Patients with standard CRT indications, recruited from two centers, underwent biventricular pacing (BVP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). We performed a within-patient comparison of acute hemodynamic response of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at the atrioventricular delay (AVD) with the shortest QRSd against the AVD with the most efficient LV filling. In a validation sub-study, we also performed electrical assessment using QRS area (QRSa) and hemodynamic assessment with the maximum rate of LV pressure rise (dP/dtmax). RESULTS: Thirty patients (age 65 ± 10, 53% male) were recruited. The AVD producing maximal ventricular resynchronization was associated with a significantly shorter QRSd (difference 15 ± 12 ms for BVP and 18 ± 13 ms for LBBP, both P < 0.01) and a significantly smaller improvement in SBP (difference 3 ± 4 mmHg for BVP, and 2 ± 2 mmHg for LBBP, both P < 0.01) compared with the AVD that optimized filling. Similar findings were observed in the sub-study, with a significantly smaller improvement in dP/dtmax assessed with QRSd and QRSa (difference 9 ± 7% and 6 ± 4% during BVP, and 5 ± 6% and 3 ± 3% during LBBP, all P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Targeting the maximal ventricular resynchronization results in suboptimal acute hemodynamic performance with both BVP and LBBP as CRT. These findings support prioritizing LV filling when programming AVD for CRT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paced QRS morphology may vary during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) as per the pacing location. It remains unclear whether electrocardiographic changes observed during LBBAP can predict clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess correlation between characteristics of paced QRS on electrocardiogram and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Of 79 consecutive HF patients receiving LBBAP, 59 patients were included in this prospective study after exclusions. LBBAP was performed using Medtronic 3830 lead. Patients were categorized into various groups based on paced QRS morphology in lead V1 (qR and Qr), QRS axis (normal, left or right) and V6 R wave peak time (RWPT, ≤80 or >80 ms) to compare echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: RWPT was significantly shorter (75.7±17.5 vs 85.3±11.3 ms, P=0.014), transition during threshold test more commonly observed (81.5% vs 53%, P=0.02) and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly greater in qR group (21.4±6.4 vs 16.4±8.3%, P=0.013) compared to Qr group. RWPT or LVEF did not differ in patients with different paced QRS axis (P>0.05). While qR morphology and presence of transition during threshold test independently predicted LVEF improvement, RWPT lacked predictive value. Non-responders had greater incidence of loss of 'R' prime (P=0.009) and prolonged RWPT (P=0.003) on follow up compared to average and super-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Paced qR morphology and transition during threshold test predicted greater improvement in LVEF while RWPT lacked predictive value. Loss of terminal 'R' in lead V1 and prolongation of RWPT on follow up prognosticated non-response to LBBAP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lead-related venous stenosis and occlusion can complicate the insertion or replacement of transvenous leads in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). A possible solution is to tunnel the lead from the contralateral vasculature to the ipsilateral generator. Procedural complications and long term outcomes remain unclear with this technique. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess outcomes of tunneled transvenous leads. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent transvenous CIED lead tunneling to a contralateral pocket at our institution between 2014 and 2024. Clinical characteristics, indications for lead implant, post-operative complications and long-term outcomes were collected. RESULTS: We identified 27 patients underwent transvenous lead tunneling at our institution. Most patients were males (74%) with an average age of 68.8 ± 18.3 years old. Most patients had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (59%) with an average ejection fraction of 29.3 ± 11.3 %. The tunneled leads were coronary sinus leads (20), followed by defibrillator leads (5) and RV pacing leads (2). Implants were primarily for device upgrade (18), lead revisions (8), or de-novo lead placement (1). No post-operative complications were seen. Patients were followed for an average of 2.2 ± 1.4 years. One tunneled defibrillator lead (3.7%) had low shock impedance 3 years after implant which was monitored and did not require an intervention. CONCLUSION: In patients with ipsilateral venous occlusion, contralateral lead tunneling appears to be an effective and safe approach to manage CIED patients with occluded ipsilateral subclavian veins.

RESUMEN

Background: Leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an emerging heart failure treatment. An implanted electrode delivers lateral or septal endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing (LVP) upon detection of a right ventricular (RV) pacing stimulus from a coimplanted device, thus generating biventricular pacing (BiVP). Electrical efficacy data regarding this therapy, particularly leadless LV septal pacing (LVSP) for potential conduction system capture, are limited. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute performance of leadless CRT using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) and assess the optimal pacing modality (OPM) of LVSP on the basis of RV and LV activation. Methods: Ten WiSE-CRT recipients underwent an ECGi study testing: RV pacing, BiVP, LVP only, and LVP with an optimized atrioventricular delay (LV-OPT). BiV, LV, and RV activation times (shortest time taken to activate 90% of the ventricles [BIVAT-90], shortest time taken to activate 95% of the LV, and shortest time taken to activate 90% of the RV) plus LV and BiV dyssynchrony index (standard deviation of LV activation times and standard deviation of all activation times) were calculated from reconstructed epicardial electrograms. The individual OPM yielding the greatest improvement from baseline was determined. Results: BiVP generated a 23.7% improvement in BiVAT-90 (P = .002). An improvement of 43.3% was observed at the OPM (P = .0001), primarily through reductions in shortest time taken to activate 90% of the RV. At the OPM, BiVAT-90 improved in patients with lateral (43.3%; P = .0001; n = 5) and septal (42.4%; P = .009; n = 5) LV implants. The OPM varied by individual. LVP and LV-OPT were mostly superior in patients with LVSP, and in those with sinus rhythm and left bundle branch block (n = 4). Conclusion: Leadless CRT significantly improves acute ECGi-derived activation and dyssynchrony metrics. Using an individualized OPM improves efficacy in selected patients. Effective LVSP is feasible, with fusion pacing at LV-OPT mitigating the potential deleterious effects on RV activation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The fibrosis-5 (FIB-5) index is a noninvasive marker for assessing the progression of liver fibrosis and predictor in patients with heart failure (HF). This study investigated the association between the FIB-5 index and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and evaluated its predictive value for prognosis. METHODS: In total, 203 patients who underwent CRT/CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation were retrospectively included. The FIB-5 index was calculated using blood samples obtained before and after CRT/CRT-D. Response to CRT was defined as a relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥15% 6 months after CRT/CRT-D. We compared the prognosis after CRT/CRT-D between the groups according to the FIB-5 index. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three patients (61%) responded to CRT. The responder group demonstrated a significantly higher FIB-5 index than the nonresponder group (-2.76 ± 3.85 vs. -4.67 ± 3.29, p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve of the FIB-5 index was 0.660 with a cutoff value of -4.00 for responders. In multivariate analysis, FIB-5 index ≥ -4.00 was an independent predictor for CRT response (odds ratio: 3.665, p = 0.003), in addition to QRS duration ≥ 150 ms and echocardiographic dysynchrony. The FIB-5 index increased significantly after 6 months in the responder group but not in the nonresponder group. The FIB-5 index ≥ -4.00 group showed a significantly better prognosis for cardiac death, HF hospitalization, and composite endpoint than the FIB-5 index < -4.00 group. CONCLUSION: The FIB-5 index in addition to classical predictors may be a useful marker for predicting response to CRT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The feasibility of the conduction system pacing (CSP) upgrade as an alternative modality to the traditional biventricular pacing (BiVP) upgrade in patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) remains uncertain. This study sought to compare two modalities of CSP (His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)) with BiVP and no upgrades in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Methods: This retrospective analysis comprised consecutive patients who underwent either BiVP or CSP upgrade for PICM at the cardiac department from 2017 to 2021. Patients with a follow-up period exceeding 12 months were considered for the final analysis. Results: The final group of patients who underwent upgrades included 48 individuals: 11 with BiVP upgrades, 24 with HBP upgrades, and 13 with LBBP upgrades. Compared to the baseline data, there were significant improvements in cardiac performance at the last follow-up. After the upgrade, the QRS duration (127.81 ± 31.89 vs 177.08 ± 34.35 ms, p < 0.001), NYHA class (2.28 ± 0.70 vs 3.04 ± 0.54, p < 0.05), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (54.08 ± 4.80 vs 57.50 ± 4.85 mm, p < 0.05), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (44.46% ± 6.39% vs 33.15% ± 5.25%, p < 0.001) were improved. There was a noticeable improvement in LVEF in the CSP group (32.15% ± 3.22% vs 44.95% ± 3.99% (p < 0.001)) and the BiVP group (33.90% ± 3.09% vs 40.83% ± 2.99% (p < 0.001)). The changes in QRS duration were more evident in CSP than in BiVP (56.65 ± 11.71 vs 34.67 ± 13.32, p < 0.001). Similarly, the changes in LVEF (12.8 ± 3.66 vs 6.93 ± 3.04, p < 0.001) and LVEDD (5.80 ± 1.71 vs 3.16 ± 1.35, p < 0.001) were greater in CSP than in BiVP. The changes in LVEDD (p = 0.549) and LVEF (p = 0.570) were similar in the LBBP and HBP groups. The threshold in LBBP was also lower than that in HBP (1.01 ± 0.43 vs 1.33 ± 0.32 V, p = 0.019). Conclusion: The improvement of clinical outcomes in CSP was more significant than in BiVP. CSP may be an alternative therapy to CRT for patients with PICM. LBBP would be a better choice than HBP due to its lower thresholds.

RESUMEN

In this study, we present a computational framework designed to evaluate virtual scenarios of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and compare their effectiveness based on relevant clinical biomarkers. Our approach involves electro-mechanical numerical simulations personalized, for patients with left bundle branch block, by means of a calibration obtained using data from Electro-Anatomical Mapping System (EAMS) measures acquired by cardiologists during the CRT procedure, as well as ventricular pressures and volumes, both obtained pre-implantation. We validate the calibration by using EAMS data coming from right pacing conditions. Three patients with fibrosis and three without are considered to explore various conditions. Our virtual scenarios consist of personalized numerical experiments, incorporating different positions of the left electrode along reconstructed epicardial veins; different locations of the right electrode; different ventriculo-ventricular delays. The aim is to offer a comprehensive tool capable of optimizing CRT efficiency for individual patients. We provide preliminary answers on optimal electrode placement and delay, by computing some relevant biomarkers such as d P / d t max , ejection fraction, stroke work. From our numerical experiments, we found that the latest activated segment during sinus rhythm is an effective choice for the non-fibrotic cases for the location of the left electrode. Also, our results showed that the activation of the right electrode before the left one seems to improve the CRT performance for the non-fibrotic cases. Last, we found that the CRT performance seems to improve by positioning the right electrode halfway between the base and the apex. This work is on the line of computational works for the study of CRT and introduces new features in the field, such as the presence of the epicardial veins and the movement of the right electrode. All these studies from the different research groups can in future synergistically flow together in the development of a tool which clinicians could use during the procedure to have quantitative information about the patient's propagation in different scenarios.

RESUMEN

Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, there is limited experience with CSP using implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) leads. The achievement of CSP with an ICD lead may yield comparable results to cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy using fewer leads. We implanted the Biotronik Linox DX "VDD"-programmable ICD lead in a swine model to investigate the feasibility of "single-lead" CRT-D implantation. With the lead embedded in the basal right ventricular septum, morphologic criteria for CSP were achieved, and successful defibrillation was performed while maintaining atrial sensing. Future work may assure reproducibility of these findings and further determine the feasibility of a single-lead CRT-D.

RESUMEN

The efficacy of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been reported, but LBBP may not always improve conduction disturbance in the left ventricle (LV). To evaluate LV electrical conduction delay during LBBP, we measured conduction time from the pacing at left bundle branch to LV lead sensing (LBBP-LV) in two patients in whom left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) was attempted. Case 1 was a 77-year-old female with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and left bundle branch block. The QRS duration during LBBP was 160 ms and the interval between the stimulus artifact and peak of the R wave in lead V6 (Stim-V6RWPT) was 74 ms. LBBP-LV at the LV mid-lateral wall and LV mid-posterolateral wall were 112 ms and 102 ms, respectively. Case 2 was a 75-year-old female with DCM and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. The QRS duration during LBBP was 156 ms and Stim-V6RWPT was 66 ms. LBBP-LV at the LV mid-anterolateral wall, LV mid-lateral wall, and LV mid-posterolateral wall were 96 ms, 107 ms, and 121 ms, respectively. In conclusion, LBBP-LV at the LV mid-lateral area was relatively long. If LBBP does not improve LV conduction disturbances, LOT-CRT may be more effective. Learning objective: The efficacy of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been reported. However, if the conduction time from pacing to the left ventricular (LV) lateral area during LBBP is long, LBBP may not improve LV conduction disturbance, resulting in ineffective CRT. In such cases, more effective CRT would be expected with LV lead implantation at the area of the LV conduction delay during LBBP.

RESUMEN

Background: When compared to biventricular pacing, fusion CRT pacing was linked to a decreased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). There is a gap in the knowledge regarding exclusive fusion CRT without interference with RV pacing, and all the current data are based on populations of patients with intermittent fusion pacing. Purpose: To assess left atrium remodeling and AF incidence in a real-life population of permanent fusion CRT-P. Methods: Retrospective data were analyzed from a cohort of patients with exclusive fusion CRT-P. Device interrogation, exercise testing, transthoracic echocardiography (TE), and customized medication optimization were all part of the six-monthly individual follow-up. Results: Study population: 73 patients (38 males) with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy aged 63.7 ± 9.3 y.o. Baseline characteristic: QRS 159.8 ± 18.2 ms; EF 27.9 ± 5.1%; mitral regurgitation was severe in 38% of patients, moderate in 47% of patients, and mild in 15% of patients; 43% had type III diastolic dysfunction (DD), 49% had type II DD, 8% had type I DD. Average follow-up was 6.4 years ± 27 months: 93% of patients were responders (including 31% super-responders); EF increased to 40.4 ± 8.5%; mitral regurgitation decreased in 69% of patients; diastolic profile improved in 64% of patients. Paroxysmal and persistent AF incidence was 11%, with only 2% of patients developing permanent AF. Regarding LA volume, statistically significant LA reverse remodeling was observed. Conclusions: Exclusive fusion CRT-P was associated with important LA reverse remodeling and a low incidence of AF.

RESUMEN

Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a challenging healthcare issue necessitating innovative therapies like cardiac resynchronization-defibrillation therapy (CRT-D). However, the definition of a CRT-D response lacks uniformity, impeding effective clinical evaluation. This study explores diverse CRT-D responder definitions encompassing functional, echocardiographic and laboratory criteria. Materials & Methods: A single-center study involving 132 CRT-D patients scrutinized responder criteria including NYHA stage, LVEF increase and proBNP decrease. Statistical analyses such as Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox hazard regression were employed to evaluate responder characteristics and survival outcomes. Results: Responder rates varied across criteria, revealing nuanced patient profiles. CRT-D responders defined by NYHA decrease, LVEF increase or proBNP decrease exhibit improved survival rates after 2 and 3 years (p < 0.050). Young age, absence of recent myocardial infarction and normal right ventricular echocardiographic parameters emerge as predictors for positive response. In part, drug-based HF therapy correlates with increased responder rates. Cox regression identified LVEF ≥ 5% and proBNP decrease ≥ 25% as independent predictors of extended survival. Conclusions: CRT-D responder definitions exhibit considerable variability, emphasizing the need for a nuanced patient-centered approach. Factors like right ventricular function, drug therapy, atrial fibrillation and renal function influence responses. This study enriches our understanding of CRT-D response and contributes to the foundation for personalized HF management.

RESUMEN

Background: Previous studies have indicated that despite adhering to current patient selection guidelines, there remains a 30% to 40% subset of patients who do not experience improvement in heart failure (HF) after receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aim to utilize echocardiographic myocardial work parameters to serve as predictors of responsiveness to CRT in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: We prospectively recruited patients who underwent CRT at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from June 2019 to September 2022. Comprehensive preoperative information, clinical laboratory data, conventional echocardiographic parameters and myocardial work were collected for all participants, as well as follow-up data 6 months after CRT. Results: Twenty-five patients (67.6%) showed response to CRT treatment, while twelve patients (32.4%) had no response. Compared with the non-response group, the response group had larger region constructive work [RCW: the sum of constructive work (CW) in the 9 segments of the basal, mid, and apical segments of the anterior, lateral, and posterior walls], region wasted work [RWW: the sum of wasted work (WW) in the 6 segments of the basal and mid segments of the anterior septum, posterior septum and anterior walls], and the combination of RCW and RWW (RCW + RWW) in baseline (RCW: 9,695.68±2,955.40 vs. 5,219.50±2,207.68 mmHg%, P<0.001; RWW: 3,612.08±1,723.80 vs. 1,674.33±995.23 mmHg%, P=0.001; RCW + RWW: 13,307.76±3,857.71 vs. 6,893.83±2,592.83 mmHg%, P<0.001). Furthermore, global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), GCW + GWW, RCW, RWW, and RCW + RWW had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.870, 0.770, 0.860, 0.890, 0.870, and 0.910, respectively, for predicting CRT responsiveness. Conclusions: The global and regional myocardial work parameters are associated with CRT response in CRT candidates. Particularly regional myocardial work parameters appear to be promising parameters to improve selection for CRT of patients with HFrEF.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Suboptimal response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be improved by optimization of device parameters using echocardiography. For this purpose, the aortic velocity-time integral (aVTI) has been used as a target metric to define optimal velocity timings for each ventricle. dP/dt is a parameter used for the assessment of myocardial contractility. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Doppler-derived dP/dt in optimization by assessing the possible correlation between aVTI and dP/dt. METHODS: Patients with CRT admitted for routine follow-up were included in the study. Aortic VTI and dP/dt measurements were recorded in four different standard pacing configurations during reprogramming. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were included in the final analysis. No correlation was found between the aVTI and the delta dP/dt value in the two configurations where the change in dP/dt was maximum (p = 0.894). In the two configurations where the change in aVTI was maximum, there was also no correlation between the delta dP/dt and the delta aVTI (p = 0.715). When patients were dichotomized according to the median value of dP/dt, there were no differences in aVTI, NYHA classes, LVEF, and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity (p = 0.4; p = 0.5; p = 0.7; p = 0.3; respectively). The change in both dP/dt and aVTI was statistically significant when switching from RV-only to QRS width-targeted configuration (p = 0.001; p = 0.041; respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, aVTI recorded at different pacing configurations did not correlate with dP/dt during interventricular optimization. However, both parameters consistently showed a positive effect of biventricular pacing on contractile synchronization and stroke volume.