RESUMEN

Canal wall down mastoidectomy is performed when demanded by the extent of disease: presence of a large labyrinthine fistula, extensive erosion of posterior auditory canal wall, prior failed intact canal wall surgery, a contracted, sclerotic mastoid with extensive disease, or need for exteriorization due to inadequate exposure or inability to remove disease safely with a canal wall up approach.

RESUMEN

Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma requires a highly individualized approach, balancing disease eradication with hearing preservation, and necessitates thorough patient counseling on expected auditory outcomes and options for rehabilitation. The choice between canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy can influence hearing outcomes. Hearing rehabilitation options following cholesteatoma surgery include air- and bone-conduction devices and are individualized for the patient. Assistive listening devices such as frequency modulation systems, hearing loops, and Bluetooth technology are critical for enhancing speech understanding in noisy environments for patients who employ various hearing rehabilitation methods and require further advanced solutions.

RESUMEN

Surgery remains the mainstay of cholesteatoma management. Through advancement in technique and technology, the available surgical approaches have expanded to include not only the traditional procedures, but also endoscopic procedures, canal wall reconstruction procedures, mastoid obliteration, and retrograde mastoidotomy. Selection of management technique will depend on disease characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon preference.

RESUMEN

Surgery for cholesteatoma should be tailored to individual patients, considering demographic and disease factors, to obtain a dry, safe, and functional ear. The EAONO/JOS classification and staging system provide a valuable framework for data collection and outcome assessment. Canal wall-up and canal wall-down surgical approaches each have their advantages and disadvantages, though it is not definitive that one approach is clearly more advantageous than the other. Mastoid obliteration techniques show promise in reducing recidivistic disease rates but require further research and standardization. Endoscopic ear surgery further augments our surgical capabilities to visualize and eradicate cholesteatoma.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient. METHODS: Using the "ChOLE" classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes. RESULTS: Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b & 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 & 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB). CONCLUSION: The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.

RESUMEN

Background: Chronic otitis media affects approximately 2% of the global population, causing significant hearing loss and diminishing the quality of life. However, there is a lack of studies focusing on outcome prediction for otitis media patients undergoing canal-wall-down mastoidectomy. Methods: This study proposes a recovery prediction model for chronic otitis media patients undergoing canal-wall-down mastoidectomy, utilizing data from 298 patients treated at Korea University Ansan Hospital between March 2007 and August 2020. Various machine learning techniques, including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (light GBM), were employed. Results: The light GBM model achieved a predictive value (PPV) of 0.6945, the decision tree algorithm showed a sensitivity of 0.7574 and an F1 score of 0.6751, and the light GBM algorithm demonstrated the highest AUC-ROC values of 0.7749 for each model. XGBoost had the most efficient PR-AUC curve, with a value of 0.7196. Conclusions: This study presents the first predictive model for chronic otitis media patients undergoing canal-wall-down mastoidectomy. The findings underscore the potential of machine learning techniques in predicting hearing recovery outcomes in this population, offering valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies and improving patient care.

RESUMEN

There is no global consensus on the surgical technique of cochlear implantation (CI) in ears with an open cavity after canal wall-down (CWD) mastoidectomy. Here, we report CI surgery with an endaural incision for the ears after CWD mastoidectomy. The endaural incision was extended upward to obliterate the open cavity of the temporal fascial flap. The endaural incision was extended downward to close the open cavity inlet. After inserting the implanted electrode, the open cavity was obliterated using a temporal fascial flap, and the cavity was closed at the inlet. We performed this type of CI surgery in four ears in three patients. This extended endaural incision provided an excellent view for pedicling the temporal fascial flap with the superficial temporal artery and for open cavity closure without any serious complications. This technique allowed us to opt for CI surgery of the ears after CWD mastoidectomy.

RESUMEN

A cholesteatoma is an expansion of keratinizing squamous epithelium that enters the middle ear cleft from the outer layer of the tympanic membrane or ear canal. Choleatomas are always treated surgically. Recurrence of the illness presents another challenge for the patient and the surgeon, though. There have been reports of recurrence rates as high as 30% in adults and as high as 70% in children. Here, we describe a case of persistent recurrent otorrhea following revision surgery, along with acquired recurrent cholesteatoma following canal wall down surgery. A 38-year -male with underlying Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension presented with left scanty and foul-smelling ear discharge for 2 years and left reduced hearing. He was diagnosed with left chronic active otitis media with cholesteatoma for which he underwent left modified radical mastoidectomy, meatoplasty and tympanoplasty in 2017. Five months post operatively, he presented with left otorrhea. However, he defaulted followed up and presented in April 2018 for similar complaints. Otoscopy examination revealed left tympanic membrane perforation at poster superior quadrant of pars tensa and bluish discoloration behind pars flacida. He was diagnosed as recurrent left cholesteatoma and subsequently he underwent left mastoid exploration under general anesthesia in June 2018. Postsurgery, he developed recurrent ear discharge which was treated with topical antibiotics and ear toileting. We report a case of recurrent Cholesteatoma despite canal wall down procedure requiring a second redo procedure and with persistent recurrent otorrhea after the redo procedure.However, this case demonstrates the need for regular follow ups even after a canal wall down procedure for detecting recurrence of disease. Moreover, this case denotes some of the patient factors and surgeon factors involved in disease recurrence. Furthermore, importance of opting for an imaging study in case of high suspicion of the disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While mastoid obliteration techniques have received much attention in decreasing the disadvantages associated with the resultant mastoid cavity from canal wall down procedures, techniques for an anatomically normal looking ear canal reconstruction to increase the feasibility of hearing aid fitting are less commonly discussed as an alternative. METHODS: Our mastoidoplasty technique basically utilises an inferiorly based periosteal flap with or without temporalis muscles and fascia to obliterate the epitympanum and reconstruct the external auditory canal (EAC). Stay sutures are used to keep them in place. For larger cavities, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is used to obliterate the mastoid cavity and support the neo-EAC. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of our mastoidoplasty potentially provides a very useful alternative in recreating a near normal ear canal anatomy avoiding cavity problems as well as facilitating hearing aid fitting with canal type hearing aids after canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of two different methods of meatoplasty following Canal Wall-Down tympanomastoidectomy. METHODS: A retrospective case review study of 48 patients with non-complicated unsafe chronic suppurative otitis media candidate for post-auricular canal wall-down tympanomastoidectomy via a post-auricular approach at Otolaryngology department, Benha university hospitals from January 2021 to January 2023, all were operated for the first time, and divided into 2 groups each of 24 patients. Group A submitted for classic 'Fisch', and group B 'Corner-Tag' meatoplasty. RESULTS: The mean age was 28.88 ± 13.26 years in group A and 33.33 ± 16.04 years in group B. Only one patient (4.2 %) in each group developed wound infection and none in both groups developed perichondritis. Two patients (8.3 %) in group B compared to only one patient (4.2 %) in group A had granulations on the meatal incision. One patient (4.2 % of group A) needed revision meatoplasty. Group B needed more time for epithelization (mean 7.33 ± 0.96 weeks) than group A (mean 6.5 ± 0.88 weeks; P = 0.003*) also resulted in wider mean new meatus in group B (mean 10.50 ± 1.02 mm) than in group A (mean 9.63 ± 1.41 mm; P = 0.02*). CONCLUSION: Both techniques had comparable post-operative complications. 'Corner-Tag' technique needed more time for healing and epithelization but gave a wider new meatal diameter than 'Fisch' meatoplasty after one year of follow-up.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The primary objective of mastoid obliteration is the eradication of the disease and prevention of its recurrence. We intend to evaluate the impact of mastoid obliteration using autologous materials on the achievement of a dry mastoid bowl and frequency of maintenance care and hearing outcome of the operated ear. This was a hospital-based, non - randomized, prospective study. The study was performed over a period of 2 years. The study was performed in the Department of ENT of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients of chronic otitis media - squamosal type underwent canal wall down mastoidectomy and patients were divided into 2 groups of obliterated and non-obliterated. The canal wall obliterated patients were further compared in 3 groups based on the technique of mastoid obliteration used - bone dust, musculo-periosteal flap and cartilage graft. 6 months post-operative mastoid cavity epithelisation based on oto-microscopy and hearing outcome based on pure tone audiometry findings were compared. Majority of patients at 6-months follow-up found that epithelization was most common status of mastoid cavity with musculoperiosteal flap and discharge was commonest with cartilage graft. Mastoid obliteration with autologous materials is a safe and effective method to achieve a dry, safe and useful ear. In this study, musculo-periosteal flap being significantly better in terms of a well epithelized cavity and hearing outcome.

RESUMEN

Objectives: The study's primary objective was to compare the quality of life (QoL) and external auditory canal (EAC) hygiene among patients who underwent bony mastoid obliteration or meatoplasty after canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy. Methods: A prospective, observational, controlled cohort study was conducted at our tertiary referral university hospital. Twenty-eight patients older than 16 years of age with chronic otitis media who underwent CWD mastoidectomy were included. Two cohorts were followed: CWD mastoidectomy followed by mastoid obliteration (Group 1, n = 14) and CWD mastoidectomy followed by meatoplasty (Group 2, n = 14). The main outcome measures of total COMBI score (postoperative 6-month QoL) and EAC hygiene were compared between the groups. Results: The average age of the patients was 36.14 (12. 22) years; 15 (53.6%) were female and 13 (46.4%) were male. There were no differences in demographic variables, preoperative findings, or COMQ-12 (preoperative QoL) scores between groups. The average COMBI score of Group 1 (49.0 [8.66]) was not significantly different from Group 2 (46.79 [7.76]) (p = .482). Poor EAC hygiene was observed in eight (57.1%) patients in Group 2 and three (21.4%) patients in Group 1 (p = .06). In Group 1, no resorption of graft material was observed in 10 (71.4%) patients, minor resorption was observed in three (21.4%) patients, and significant resorption was observed in one (7.1%) patient. There were no significant differences in audiological findings between groups (p > .05). Conclusion: There were no significant differences regarding short-term postoperative QoL, EAC hygiene, or hearing outcomes between patients who underwent bony mastoid obliteration or meatoplasty after CWD mastoidectomy. Level of Evidence: 1b (individual prospective cohort study).

RESUMEN

Chronic Otitis Media-Squamosal type is an erosive process, which when confined to ossicular chain causes varying degrees of hearing impairment. As the disease progresses to involve surrounding vital structures, it causes various complications like facial palsy, vertigo, mastoid abscess, which are more common than the other intracranial complications, and require a definitive surgical intervention i.e., mastoidectomy at the earliest. A retrospective study on 60 patients who had been operated for squamosal type were analysed for the demographics, symptomatology, intraoperative extent of cholesteatoma, type of mastoidectomy done, various graft materials used for reconstruction, post operatively for graft uptake, hearing improvement and the results were analysed using ChOLE classification of cholesteatoma. Although Intact Canal Wall mastoidectomy had improved post op PTA values, there was no significant difference in the Air-Bone gap closure when Intact Canal Wall mastoidectomy was compared to Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

RESUMEN

Sigmoid sinus and transverse sinus thrombosis may occur as intracranial complications of chronic otitis media. Central venous sinus thrombosis typically presents with picket fence fever along with otalgia, otorrhea, and altered mental status. CT and MRI are investigations of choice for diagnosis. Once diagnosed, one should be started on empiric antibiotics. The use of anticoagulants has been debatable. From a surgical point of view, the current trend is to perform a mastoidectomy with the removal of inflammatory tissue from the sinus walls.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) and conchal cartilage for ossiculoplasty on hearing results in single-stage canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy surgery with type II tympanoplasty in patients with cholesteatoma. METHODS: The patients were performed surgeries for the first time by a senior otosurgeon from 2009 to 2022 and were performed CWD mastoidectomy with type II tympanoplasty in one stage were enrolled. Patients who could not be followed up were excluded. Titanium PORP or conchal cartilage was used for ossiculoplasty. When the stapes head was intact, a cartilage 1.2-1.5 mm thick was attached directly to the stapes; when the head of the stapes was eroded, a 1 mm high PORP and cartilage of .2-.5 mm thick were placed on the stapes simultaneously. RESULTS: 148 patients were included in the study in total. The titanium PORP and conchal cartilage groups showed no statistically significant differences at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz considering the number of decibels of closure of the air-bone gap (ABG) (P > .05) and pure-tone average ABG (PTA-ABG) (P > .05). Meanwhile, the closure of PTA-ABG between the 2 groups showed no statistically significant differences in the overall distribution (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with cholesteatoma and mobile stapes who underwent CWD mastoidectomy with type II tympanoplasty in one stage, either PORP or conchal cartilage is a satisfactory material for ossiculoplasty.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate safety and efficacy of mastoid obliteration in canal-wall-down tympanoplasty performed for cholesteatoma using bioactive glass (BAG). The authors routinely adopt CWD tympanoplasty in case of massive cholesteatoma or revision surgery, performing obliteration with BAG to reduce the mastoid cavity and related disadvantages. We assessed anatomical results, infection control and cholesteatoma recurrence in obliterative mastoidectomy using BAG. METHODS: The authors evaluated 66 patients treated with obliterative mastoidectomy using BAG during the period 2010-2021. 48.5% of the cases had first diagnosis of cholesteatoma, 48.5% had cholesteatoma recidivisms, and two patients underwent obliteration to improve clinical outcome. BAG granules were always moistened with venous blood to enhance their adhesion and reduce the risk of dispersion. Anatomical results were evaluated in otomicroscopy and infection control was assessed during follow-up visits. Periodical otomicroscopy was performed to check recurrent cholesteatoma. MRI-DWI was indicated only in case of clinical suspect of cholesteatoma. RESULTS: Authors followed 66 patients during a mean of 23 months. No post-operative wound infections occured. The mean re-epithelialization time was 45 days. At the last visit, control of infection was achieved in 97% of patients and a clinical stable anatomical cavity in all patients. No clinical suspect for recurrent cholesteatoma was found. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bioactive glass is safe and effective as obliteration material in cholesteatoma surgery. Authors pay a particular attention to obliterate only patients without suspect of epithelial residual, to correctly calibrate the ear canal and to completely cover the granules with graft.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous methods for meatoplasty and conchoplasty have been introduced, but no clear V/S(the meatal cavity volume to the cross-sectional) was given and many patients have complained about poor cosmesis on follow-up. AIMS: To explore the proper size, and cosmetic shape of the external auditory meatus and auditory canal for canal wall-down tympnomastoidectomy (CWD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this observational case series study 36 patients undergone CWD with C-conchoplasty that uses a C-shape skin incision on the concha were reviewed. S and V/S of the preoperative, postoperative and contralateral normal ears were observed. We analyzed the relationship between the epithelialization time and postoperative V/S. Long-term efficacy observation and the shape of the meatus after the operation were observed. RESULTS: C-conchoplasty could effectively enlarge S and reduce V/S. The postoperative V/S were closer to the normal ear than that if we didn't do C-conchoplasty. The greater difference of V/S between the post-operative ears and the contralateral normal ears, the longer the epithelialization time will be. C-conchoplasty produced an excellent cosmetic result. No other complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The C-conchoplasty, which is a novel and easy technique in CWD, offers good functional and excellent cosmetic results with minimal risk of complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomies represent the most common cholesteatoma surgical techniques. In this meta-analysis, we compare the postoperative quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with either CWU or CWD mastoidectomy. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the following three electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Articles were assessed for eligibility in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and data were extracted independently by two authors. Biases assessment was conducted for each study according to the Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Meta-analysis was performed for postoperative QoL following CWU versus CWD mastoidectomy. RESULTS: Our systematic review included four studies that met the inclusion criteria, three prospective cohort studies, and one retrospective cohort study. The meta-analysis did not favor treatment with one of the two surgical techniques. Postoperative QoL did not show a statistically significant difference between CWU and CWD mastoidectomies (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis results indicate that QoL is not statistically significantly better among patients who underwent CWU mastoidectomies when compared with CWD. The trend of selecting CWU over CWD mastoidectomies in selected cases - for QoL purposes - is not always based on evidence-based data. The statistically insignificant difference between the two surgical techniques suggests that an initial more radical approach might prevent patients from further surgeries, without affecting postoperative QoL.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether leaving a high facial ridge during canal wall down tympanoplasty increases the risk of residual cholesteatoma. METHODS: In this retrospective case review, 321 patients treated with primary canal wall down tympanoplasty for middle-ear cholesteatoma were divided into a completely lowered facial ridge group and a non-completely lowered facial ridge group. Factors affecting facial ridge management, residual disease rate and disease-free survival were analysed. RESULTS: Residual disease rates were 10.8 per cent in the non-completely lowered facial ridge group and 16.6 per cent in the completely lowered facial ridge group (p = 0.15). Localisation at sinus tympani, mesotympanum or supratubal recess, pre-operative extracranial complications, and destroyed ossicular chain or fixed platina were associated with a completely lowered facial ridge. Residual disease rates and disease-free survival did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Facial ridge can be managed according to cholesteatoma extension. The facial ridge can be maintained high if the cholesteatoma does not involve sinus tympani, mesotympanum or supratubal recess, without increasing the risk of residual disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our objective is to evaluate the effect of habituation on the altered ear canal acoustics after canal wall down mastoidectomy. METHODS: A total of 11 participants with single sided dry cavities and normal contralateral ear canals with normal hearing thresholds were included in the study. Filtered sound fragments were created that simulate the different acoustic properties based on the participants Real Ear to Coupler Difference (RECD) of the cavity ear and the contralateral normal ear canal. These filtered sound fragments are presented to the cavity ear canal and the contralateral normal ear canal using inserts earphones. Participants performed a subjective quality assessment of the sound fragments using paired comparison with a seven-point scale (- 3 till + 3). RESULTS: Mean assessment of sound quality revealed the following results; naturalness of sounds of the cavity ear canal is 0.29 (± 1.41; ns) in favour of the filtered sound fragment of the normal ear canal. Mean assessment of sharpness of sounds in the cavity ear canal is 1.55 (± 1.21, p = 0.55) in favour of the filtered sound fragment of the normal ear canal. Overall preference in the cavity ear canal was in favour of the normal ear canal acoustics 0.72 (SD ± 1.54 p = 0.224). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cavity ear canals seem to habituate to their altered ear canal acoustics. Transforming the ear canal acoustics of the cavity ear to normal ear canal acoustics seem to sharpen the incoming sounds. Overall assessment of quality of sound of the normal ear canal acoustics is better than the cavity acoustics.

Asunto(s)