RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is nowadays recommended to "Save the meniscus". This paradigm is based on the affirmation that an extended meniscectomy exposes to the risk of long-term secondary osteoarthritis and the global failure rate of a longitudinal tear repair remains low, whether it is the medial or lateral meniscus, with or without anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, each kind of lesion has to be studied separate. PURPOSE: The study aimed to focus on a homogeneous population of isolated repair of the bucket handle tear (BHT) of the medial meniscus (MM) in patients with stable knees to evaluate failure rate at a minimum of three years of follow-up. The secondary objectives were to evaluate any risk factors or protective factors of failure, clinical outcomes, and secondary amount of meniscectomy in failure cases compared to the amount of meniscus fixed in the first surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a BHT of the MM situated in the red-on-red or red-on white (RW) zone on a stable knee between January 2010 and December 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Failure was defined as a need for reoperation for recurrence of meniscal symptoms (pain, locking) on the medial side with per-operative confirmation of the absence of healing. The following parameters were studied: demographics (age, gender, BMI), time from injury to surgery, clinical scores (Tegner, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]), surgical findings (extent and zone of the tear), surgical management (number and type of suture). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. The mean follow-up was 77.2±24.4 [36-141] months. Twenty-seven (69%) failures were recorded. In 56% (15/27) of the reoperations, the meniscectomy amount was smaller than what it would have been done in the first surgery. All clinical scores improved significantly from pre- to post-operatively; all patients met minimal clinically important differences for all the scores. No risk factors were found significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Repairing an isolated BHT of the MM is associated with a high failure rate. Despite the failure, we observed that the meniscectomy area was smaller than documented in the primary surgery in most of the cases and repair must still be considered as the first option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort series.

RESUMEN

Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of bucket-handle meniscal tears. Materials and methods Patients treated for arthroscopic meniscal tears between March 2019 and March 2022 were reviewed. The current study included all patients with bucket handle tears diagnosed arthroscopically and having MRI scans (n=51). A control group of 58 individuals with similar demographic characteristics and meniscal tears apart from bucket handle tears was also formed. The assessment of bucket handle and non-bucket handle tears was performed blindly by a musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologist with 20 years of experience and a trainee radiologist, achieving consensus on group allocation. The MRIs were examined for various findings, including the presence of a bucket handle tear, tear location, presence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, intercondyler notch sign, double anterior horn sign, flipped meniscus sign, double posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sign, absent bow sign, and the disproportionate posterior horn sign. These well-known signs, detailed in the literature, were evaluated. Additionally, less studied and less commonly known signs such as the V sign and double anterior cruciate ligament sign were assessed. The V sign appears similarly to the letter V, resulting from the displacement of the bucket handle tear and the angle of the intact meniscus on axial images. The double anterior cruciate ligament sign is the appearance formed by the compression of the displaced meniscal part behind the anterior cruciate ligament in bucket handle tears. Results Following the retrospective evaluation of MRI scans, 44 out of 51 tears diagnosed as bucket handle tears by arthroscopy were accurately identified (sensitivity: 86.27%). The same conclusion was reached for MRI scans in 52 out of 58 tears where arthroscopy did not detect a bucket handle tear (specificity: 89.66%). The most prevalent MRI signs in patients with bucket handle tears identified by arthroscopy in the study were the intercondylar notch sign (84.31%), V sign (72.55%), double PCL sign (56.86%), double anterior horn sign (49.02%), absent bow sign (43.14%), flipped meniscus sign (19.61%), disproportionate posterior horn sign (9.80%), and double ACL sign (5.88%). The intercondylar notch sign, V sign, and double PCL sign exhibited the highest sensitivity, while flipped meniscus, disproportionate posterior horn, and double ACL sign demonstrated the highest specificity. Conclusion MRI demonstrates a high level of sensitivity and specificity in identifying meniscal bucket handle tears, particularly when considering the eight MRI signs investigated in this study.

RESUMEN

Introduction Bucket-handle tears (BHTs) of the menisci are not uncommon and can occur in isolation or in conjunction with other injuries. The torn fragment can be displaced within the intercondylar notch or flipped anteriorly. In case of anterior flipped fragment, appearances of such tears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan have been described as various signs in literature (for example double posterior cruciate ligament sign, double delta sign) but mostly in the sagittal or coronal planes. Purpose The aim of this study was to describe a unique ancillary sign that helps to identify this injury on the axial MRI plane where the anterior flipped BHT figuratively resembles a "pelican bird." Materials and Methods A retrospective review of MRI sequences of 10 consecutive patients over a 3-month period referred following a traumatic knee injury with anterior flipped meniscal tears was performed. Demographic details, clinical indication, and other associated features on the MRI were correlated following the observation of characteristic MRI appearance of a BHT. Results All 10 patients (M:F = 7:3) with a mean age of 24.7 (17-38 years) presented following a twisting injury. 6 out of 10 patients had associated soft-tissue injuries in the knee visualized on the MRI. All patients demonstrated the distinctive "pelican bird" sign on the axial sequences of anterior flipped BHT of either menisci. This was not present with BHTs with displaced fragment within the intercondylar notch. Conclusion We conclude that the "pelican sign" on an axial sequence when present correlates well with a BHT and its anterior displaced/flipped meniscal fragment. This ancillary sign can complement other previously described signs on different MRI sequences used to confirm a displaced BHT.

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Meniscal tears are amongst the most common knee injuries. Dislocated bucket handle meniscal tears in particular should receive early intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT in detecting dislocated bucket handle meniscal tears compared with the gold-standard MRI and arthroscopy. (2) Methods: Retrospectively, 96 consecutive patients underwent clinically indicated CT of the knee for suspected acute traumatic knee injuries (standard study protocol, 120 kV, 90 mAs). Inclusion criteria were the absence of an acute fracture on CT and a timely MRI (<6 months). Corresponding arthroscopy was assessed. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists analyzed the images for dislocated bucket handle meniscal tears, associated signs thereof (double posterior cruciate ligament sign, double delta sign, disproportional posterior horn sign), and subjective diagnostic confidence on a 5-point-Likert scale (1 = 'non-diagnostic image quality', 5 = 'very confident'). (3) Results: Dislocated bucket handle meniscal tears were detected on CT by standard three-plane bone kernel reconstructions with a sensitivity of 90.7% and a specificity of 99.3% by transferring the knowledge of established MRI signs. The additional use of soft-tissue kernel reconstructions in three planes increased the sensitivity by 4.0% to 94.7%, specificity to 100%, inter-rater agreement to 1.0, and the diagnostic confidence of both readers improved to a median 4/5 ('confident') in both readers. (4) Conclusions: Trauma CT scan of the knee with three-plane soft-tissue reconstructions delivers the potential for the detection of dislocated bucket handle meniscal tears with very high diagnostic accuracy.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy represents a challenge due to view obstruction by the tight posterior joint line. We are describing a new technique to overcome this obstacle using "the pulling suture technique" which is a simple, reproducible, and safe way to perform partial meniscectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: After a twisting knee injury, a 30-year-old man was complaining of left knee pain and locking. An irreparable complex bucket handle medial meniscus tear was found during diagnostic knee arthroscopy and partial meniscectomy was performed using the pulling suture technique. After visualizing medial knee compartment, a vicryl suture was introduce and looped around the torn fragment then secured by a sliding locking knot. The suture was pulled, and the torn fragment was placed under tension throughout the procedure to facilitate exposure and debridement of the tear. Then, the free fragment was extracted in one piece. DISCUSSION: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy of the bucket-handle tears is a commonly performed procedure. Due to view obstruction, cutting of the posterior part of the tear is a challenging step. Any attempts of blind resection without proper visualization can lead to articular cartilage damage or insufficient debridement. In contrast to most described techniques to overcome this problem, the pulling suture technique doesn't require any accessory portals or additional equipments. CONCLUSION: Using "the pulling suture technique" improves resection by allowing a better view of both ends of the tear and securing the resected part by the suture, which facilitates its removal as a one unit.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Failure rates of repaired bucket-handle medial meniscal tears (BHMMTs) concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are as high as 20%. The outcomes of posteromedial portal suture hook repair have not been compared with all-inside repair techniques for this subtype of meniscal lesion. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and failure rates of patients who underwent BHMMT repair concomitant with ACLR using an all-inside technique, suture hook + all-inside technique, or suture hook + outside-in technique. It was hypothesized that no significant differences in failure rates would be found between the groups. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with a BHMMT who underwent meniscal repair during primary ACLR and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were grouped based on the meniscal repair technique used: all-inside repair, suture hook + all-inside repair, or suture hook + outside-in repair. At the end of the study period, secondary medial meniscectomy rates were determined. RESULTS: The study population comprised 253 patients who underwent repair of a BHMMT with concomitant ACLR with a mean follow-up of 94.0 ± 47.6 months. A total of 114 patients (45.1%) underwent all-inside repair, 61 patients (24.1%) underwent suture hook + all-inside repair, and 78 patients (30.8%) underwent suture hook + outside-in repair. Overall, there were 36 failures. The failure rates were 20.2%, 14.8%, and 5.1%, respectively (P = .0135). All-inside repairs were >4 times more likely to fail than suture hook + outside-in repairs (hazard ratio [HR], 4.103; 95% CI, 1.369-12.296; P = .0117). Failure was also 3 times higher (HR, 2.943; 95% CI, 1.224-7.075; P = .0159) for patients <30 years of age compared with those aged ≥30 years. An additional anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) was also found to reduce the failure rate of repaired BHMMTs concomitant with ACLR. CONCLUSION: Combined suture hook + outside-in repair of BHMMTs resulted in significantly fewer failures than all other techniques. Furthermore, age <30 years and no additional ALLR were associated with higher failure rates.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reports combining patient-reported outcome measures, clinical evaluation, and radiographic assessment of postoperative healing after arthroscopic repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMT) are scarce. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for acute traumatic BHMTs between October 2011 and March 2016 with a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Postoperative outcome scores comprised the International Knee Documentation Society Score (IKDC), Lysholm score, Tegner activity score (TAS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Clinical meniscal healing failure was assessed according to Barrett's criteria. Side-to-side difference in knee laxity was measured using KT-2000. Radiographic healing was assessed by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classified according to Henning's criteria at final follow-up. RESULTS: Forty patients with a mean age of 32.0 ± 11.5 years were available for follow-up after 51.8 ± 14.3 months. Revision surgery by means of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was performed in four patients (10%) prior to the follow-up visit. The clinical healing rate was 83.3% at final follow-up. Mean IKDC score was 82.8 ± 13.8 and Lysholm score was 77.4 ± 24.8. Of all patients, 87.5% reached or exceeded the patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) criteria for the IKDC score at final follow-up. The median TAS was 6 and VAS for pain was 0.46 ± 0.9. Side-to-side difference in knee laxity was higher in patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (2.1 ± 2.7 mm) compared to isolated BHMTs (1.0 ± 2.0 mm). MR examination showed 69.4% healed, 25.0% partially healed, and 5.6% unhealed menisci. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent repair for acute traumatic BHMTs achieved good to excellent clinical outcome along with a high rate of meniscal healing at a minimum follow-up of two years. Clinical and radiological healing rates were similarly satisfactory and most patients exceeded the PASS criteria for the IKDC score. Patients were able to reach a high postoperative activity level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series; IV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Observations of a symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus in young children are infrequent. The objective of this report was to demonstrate the use of arthroscopic saucerization and repair for treating a bucket-handle tear of a lateral discoid meniscus in two young children. Two young children (a 28-month-old girl and a 5-year-old boy) presented with a bucket-handle tear of the complete type lateral discoid meniscus. Both patients received arthroscopic saucerization and repair. A full knee extension under a long leg cast was applied for one month after surgery. The two patients were able to achieve a full range of motion of their operated knees without limping or presenting an antalgic gait at the third month after surgery. Both patients and their parents felt satisfied with the treatment at the 2- and 3-year follow-ups, respectively. Our results demonstrated that arthroscopic saucerization and repair seems to be an effective treatment for bucket-handle tears of the lateral discoid meniscus in young children-even those younger than 3 years old. We reported the youngest case (a 28-month-old girl) in comparison with the findings from a literature review.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus about whether stable ramp lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries need to be repaired. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how many stable ramp lesions left in situ during ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have subsequently failed after >20 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that ACL-reconstructed knees with ramp lesions left in situ without repair have a high risk of meniscal failure over the long term. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: All patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR by a single experienced surgeon between January 1998 and December 2000 were evaluated retrospectively. Included were all cases of longitudinal tears in the meniscocapsular junction or the red zone of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus that were left in situ and identified through the anterior portals. Successful anterior probing confirmed a meniscal tear of the posterior segment. A lesion was considered stable if it was ≤2 cm and did not extend beyond the lower pole of the femoral condyle. The following data were collected preoperatively and at the last follow-up: demographics, time to surgery, side-to-side laxity, pivot shift, Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner activity scale, and meniscal failure rate. We defined 2 groups based on our findings: medial meniscal failure versus no medial meniscal failure. RESULTS: A total of 716 knees underwent primary ACLR during this period. The 39 (5.4%) stable unrepaired ramp lesions identified were included in the case series. Mean ± standard deviation follow-up was 262.1 ± 10.5 months. Eleven patients (28%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients, 8 (28.6%) had a medial meniscal failure, of which 6 (21.4%) were bucket-handle tears. The average time elapsed before complications was 87.8 ± 52 months (range, 6-156 months). The medial meniscal survival rate was 93% at 5 years, 75% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 and 20 years. The failure event mainly happened between 96 and 120 months (8 and 10 years) after ACLR. No risk factors for failure were found, but some trends appeared, such as older age, higher body mass index, and preoperative rotational instability. All postoperative scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < .0001); 16 patients (57%) returned to their sport of choice. CONCLUSION: With nearly one-third of patients developing meniscal complications, including a large share of bucket-handle tears and mostly occurring 8 years after the ACLR, it may not be wise to leave stable ramp lesions unrepaired.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The two most common causes of a meniscus tear are trauma and degenerative processes. Meniscus tears clinically present with pain, swelling and limited mobility of the knee joint. Bucket handle tear (BHT) is a full-thickness tear of the meniscus usually involving the inner portion of the medial meniscus. It is three times more likely to occur in the medial meniscus than in the lateral meniscus. Various signs such as the double anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) sign, double posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sign, and triple PCL sign have helped radiologists diagnose this tear on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This case report is about a BHT of the less commonly involved lateral meniscus identified with a double-delta sign on MRI which has rarely been reported. A comparison of various radiological signs reported in the literature has been made, which will aid radiologists in diagnosis and have importance for the medical literature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Simultaneous bucket handle tear of both lateral and medial menisci is a rarely encountered entity. MR imaging helps in pre-operative diagnosis for optimal operative planning. However, as this condition is not seen in routine practice, awareness of various imaging signs is essential to identify this condition. Few signs on coronal and sagittal images have been described in the literature but none so far on axial images. Case Presentation: We propose a novel "molar tooth sign" in the knee on axial MRI images, in which we identified in the case of a young male with recurrent knee locking after a fall from height. Conclusion: Different modes of injury can lead to different patterns of meniscal and ligament tears. Having an allied sign which is, furthermore, easy to imagine will help, not only the radiologists but also the surgeons, to identify rare types of meniscal tears similar to the index case.

RESUMEN

AIMS: The best surgical strategy for the management of displaced bucket-handle (BH) meniscal tears in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is unclear. Combining meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is thought to improve meniscal healing rates; however, patients with displaced BH meniscal tears may lack extension. This leads some to advocate staged surgery to avoid postoperative stiffness and loss of range of motion (ROM) following ACLR. METHODS: We reviewed the data for a consecutive series of 88 patients (mean age 27.1 years (15 to 49); 65 male (74%) and 23 female (26%)) who underwent single-stage repair of a displaced BH meniscal tear (67 medial (76%) and 21 lateral (24%)) with concomitant hamstring autograft ACLR. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), and Tegner score were recorded at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate meniscal repair survivorship. Analyses were performed with different cut-offs for meniscal and ACL injury-to-surgery time (within three weeks, three to ten weeks, and more than ten weeks). RESULTS: Meniscal repair survivorship at a median final follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range (IQR) 24 to 91) was 82% (95% confidence interval 70 to 89). A total of 13 meniscus repairs failed (12 requiring meniscectomy and one requiring a further meniscal repair). At final follow-up, median PROMs were: EQ-VAS 85 (IQR 75 to 90), EQ-5D Index 0.84 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), KOOS Pain 89 (IQR 80 to 94), KOOS Symptoms 82 (IQR 71 to 93), KOOS Activities of Daily Living 97 (IQR 91 to 100), KOOS Sport and Recreation 80 (IQR 65 to 90), KOOS Quality of Life 69 (IQR 53 to 86), IKDC 82.8 (IQR 67.8 to 90.8), and Tegner 6 (IQR 4 to 7). Two patients underwent revision ACLR following further injuries. One patient had an arthroscopic washout for infection at 11 days post-BH meniscal repair/ACLR. Four patients (4.5%) required a further procedure for stiffness, reduced ROM, and pain, and all were operated on within three weeks of meniscal injury. There was no difference in the interval between meniscal injury and surgery between repairs that failed and those that survived. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that concomitant ACLR with repair of displaced BH meniscal tears, even if they have been displaced for some time, appears to afford satisfactory PROMs and good survivorship. Repairs within three weeks of meniscal injury may be associated with higher rates of postoperative reintervention for stiffness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):680-686.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Menisci are involved in providing shock absorption, knee stability, and load transfer. Age, tear pattern, location, size and extent, repair time and technique, and patient habits are among various factors that affect meniscal healing. Meniscus repair has become the procedure of choice for the treatment of meniscal tears. However, treatment of meniscal tears in patients over 40 years of age is still debatable. Rare patterns of lesions have been described in the literature. We report a zone 2, partial thickness, "bucket-handle like tear" medial meniscal lesion with two attached ends in a 48-year-old male patient with persistent symptoms after six months of conservative treatment. Arthroscopic excision and debridement were performed. At a six-month follow-up, the patient regained 90% of his functional capacity.

RESUMEN

The specific meniscus injury pattern were divided into many patterns. Nowadays, the meniscus root injury, radial tear meniscus, bucket handle tear meniscus and Ramp lesion were particularly focused on many way to manage and still controversial a lot of issues. Meniscus root tears (MRTs) and Ramp lesion are the most ignored, or misdiagnosed causes of chronic knee pain. Most patients delayed seeking treatment, consequently resulting in cartilage loss, and leading to the condition progressing to osteoarthritis knee. This has resulted in the rate of MR and Ramp repair increase significantly. The bucket handle meniscus tear trend to strong saving the anatomical meniscus and avoid to menisectomy. This article, on the other hand, will reveal you how to save and secure a nearly native meniscus fixation. In case of the radial meniscus, the partial meniscectomy is still used to treat this type of injury today, but it does not prevent degenerative changes from occurring, which can lead to unfavorable outcomes. Meniscal repair is a popular procedure for treating radial tears as an alternative to surgery. However, this pattern of meniscus tear can be difficult to repair and has a high failure rate, the arthroscopic meniscus repair techniques are published.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Outcomes after repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears tend to be satisfying in the short-term follow-up. However, the literature is scarce regarding long-term data following repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears. The aim of this study was to assess long-term follow-up outcomes, focusing on knee osteoarthritis (OA) development and failure rate, and determine risk factors associated with failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, including all patients with bucket-handle tears within 4 mm of the menisco-synovial junction, who underwent meniscal repair, either isolated or combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between 2004 and 2015. A combination of all-inside, outside-in, and inside-out repair technique was used in all patients. Patients over 40 years old, concomitant multi-ligamentous injuries, and severe cartilage lesions documented intraoperatively were excluded. During the follow-up, a meniscus was considered healed using Barrett's criteria, while knee OA evaluation was performed according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification using standing knee radiographs. Patients were assessed preoperatively as well as postoperatively in terms of knee function using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS: In total, the inclusion criteria were met by 66 patients. Median age at the time of operation was 21.9 years (13-39). Median follow-up was 114 (62-176) months. Total failure rate was approximately 33% at median time of 19 (6-39) months. Osteoarthritis was statistically significantly more prevalent in patients with failed repairs (mean KL score: 2.09) in comparison to patients with successful repairs (mean KL score: 0.54) p = 0.001. In addition, successful repairs were associated with higher KOOS score as compared with failed repairs (mean ± SD, 89.6 ± 4.6 vs 77.8 ± 4.9 p < 0.001), higher IKDC score (mean ± SD, 88.2 ± 5.1 vs 79.2 ± 5.2 p < 0.001), and Lysholm score (mean ± SD, 90.3 ± 5.3 vs 78.4 ± 7.8 p < 0.001). Patients with medial meniscus repair had 4.8 higher relative likelihood of failure compared to lateral meniscus [p = 0 .014, OR = 4.8 (95% Cl 1.2, 18.6)]. Patients over 16 years old had 5.7 higher relative likelihood of failure [p = 0 .016, OR = 5.7 (95% Cl 0.04, 0.85)]. Concurrent ACLR did not have a significant effect on the postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: A high rate of clinical failure was observed after meniscal repair of bucket-handle tears. However, successful treatment led to lower rates of knee OA development and better knee function, approximately 10 years postoperatively. Meniscal repair of bucket-handle tears is recommended to improve knee function and prevent knee OA in young patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several types of meniscal tear could be presented in both acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament injury. The incidence of bucket-handle meniscus tears can be up to 30% of the overall meniscus tears cases. The case of both compartment (medial and lateral) bucket-handle meniscus is rarely occurred. CASE: A case of both medial and lateral bucket-handle meniscus tears was reported in a male of 21 years old. The patient also had a chronic anterior cruciate ligament injury. The magnetic resonance imaging also showed a rare presentation of the triple-PCL sign with the sagittal view. Arthroscopic surgery with a meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed on the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Several specific imaging signs including triple-PCL sign could be presented in a rare case of both medial and lateral bucket-handle meniscus tears. Recognition of this sign is important to have accurate preoperative diagnosis and proper treatment plan.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The two major etiologies of shoulder superior labral tears anterior to posterior (SLAP) are traumatic and degenerative processes. Bucket handle tears of the superior labrum represent one-third of labral lesions. However, in this article, we present a double bucket handle tear which has been reported once in the literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 25-year-old male presented with complaint of chronic pain in his right shoulder with a remote history of traumatic dislocation. Physical examination revealed a positive apprehension test. Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a superior labral tear with a Hill-Sach lesion. Arthroscopy showed a double bucket handle tear of superior labrum and mild biceps tendonitis along with Bankart lesion. The tear was resected and the Bankart lesion was repaired followed by supervised physical therapy. Good clinical outcomes in form of resolution of pain and shoulder instability at six months were obtained. DISCUSSION: SLAP tears are common shoulder lesion that is reported differently in the literature. Arthroscopic studies had reported the incidence between 3.9%-11.8. The diagnosis of such lesion relies on the clinical presentation and imaging. Knesek et al. classified SLAP lesions based on the integrity of the biceps anchor and the type of labral tear (Knesek et al., 2013). The standard treatment of symptomatic SLAP lesions is Arthroscopic debridement. However, non-operative management was described in the literature. CONCLUSION: Double bucket handle injuries of the superior labrum are reported in literature once. These lesions can be treated with arthroscopic debridement and Bankart repair and followed by supervised physical therapy.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our results of bucket handle meniscus tear (BHMT) repairs with an all-inside repair technique using postoperative radiological imaging to evaluate meniscus reduction and healing and use them as criteria for evaluation of repair success. METHODS: Prospective recruitment of 20 patients with 21 BHMT repairs performed with an all-inside techniqueover a period from 2013 to 2015. All patients had an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form (SKF), Lysholm Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner Activity Level Scale obtained pre-operatively and at a minimum of 24 months after surgery. All patients had postoperative knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed between 18 and 24 months after surgery to assess the stability or failure of their repairs.At 5 years after surgery, the patients were assessed with regard to whether they had undergone repeat surgery or not. RESULTS: At 2 years, the mean postoperative SKF, Lysholm and KOOS grand scores were 78.9, 88.5 and 86.8, respectively. The mean pre-injury Tegner Activity Scale was 7.6 and postoperatively it was 6.0. There was a significant difference in all pre- and postoperative outcome scores (P < 0.01). The postoperative MRIs showed that 19 of the 21 BHMT repairs had stable reduction of the tear fragment and two patients had displacement of the torn bucket handle fragment. At 5 years, one patient had undergone revision surgery. CONCLUSION: BHMTs can be repaired with all-inside techniques with good results and successful outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Bucket-handle injury to the triangular fibrocartilage complex is a rare and poorly described condition in the literature that is not included in the Palmer classification. A young man presented with right wrist torsional trauma while playing sports. He progressed with local pain and limited range of motion with a supination block. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a bucket-handle injury to the central portion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex with a volar flap, measuring 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm. The patient underwent wrist arthroscopy with debridement, removal of a loose body, and resection of the bucket-handle lesion. In the postoperative period, pain alleviation and a considerable gain in range of motion occurred. The patient was able to resume his participation in sporting activities 3 months after surgery. There is no consensus about the treatment of bucket-handle injuries to the triangular fibrocartilage complex because of the small number of cases described in the literature.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examines the relationship between meniscus tear presentations and failure rates following all-inside repair in isolation and in conjunction with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Eighty seven consecutive patients undergoing all-inside meniscal repair at a single institution from July 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Details of patient presentation, tear type and location, the presence or absence of simultaneous ACL reconstruction, and surgical repair details were recorded to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics and the primary endpoint of repair failure. RESULTS: Patients were followed for an average of 2.7 ± 0.8 years. Three patients (3.4%) experienced 30-day complications including 1 deep vein thrombosis and 2 joint aspirations. Within the study time frame, 15 repairs (17.2%) failed, with 10 (11.5%) failing within one year of the initial procedure; the average time to failure was 12.3 ± 9.0 months. Patients undergoing concurrent ACL reconstruction were less likely to experience repair failure (9.7% vs. 36.0%, p = .009), while bucket-handle repairs were more likely to fail during the study period (45.0% vs. 9.0%, p = .001). These trends remained after controlling for tear location, body mass index, and number of sutures (ACL reconstruction Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.229, p = .029; Bucket-handle OR: 9.400, p = .003). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest concurrent ACL reconstruction at the time of meniscal repair is associated with increased repair survival. The all-inside technique may be successfully used across a variety of tear types and locations, although further study of its efficacy in repairing bucket-handle tears is warranted.

Asunto(s)