RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the lower airways, bronchial hyperactivity, and (reversible) airway obstruction. The Global Initiative of Asthma Guideline recommends a flowchart to diagnose asthma with first-step spirometry with reversibility and a bronchial challenge test (BPT) with histamine or methacholine as a second step [1]. The BPT is considered burdensome, time-consuming for patients and staff, can cause side effects, and is expensive. In addition, this test strongly encumbers lung function capacity. Elevated Nitric Oxide (NO) is associated with airway eosinophilic inflammation in asthma patients and can be measured in exhaled air with the Fractional exhaled (Fe) NO-test. This low-burden FeNO-test could be used as an 'add-on' test in asthma diagnostics [2, 3]. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multi-center prospective study (Trial number: NCT06230458) compares the 'standard asthma diagnostic work-up' (spirometry with reversibility and BPT) to the 'new asthma diagnostics work-up' (FeNO-test as an intermediate step between the spirometry with reversibility and the BPT), intending to determine the impact of the FeNO-based strategy, in terms of the number of avoided BPTs, cost-effectiveness and reduced burden to the patient and health care. The cost reduction of incorporating the FeNO-test in the new diagnostic algorithm will be established by the number of theoretically avoided BPT. The decrease in burden will be studied by calculating differences in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) -score and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) -score after the BPT and FeNO-test with an independent T-test. The accuracy of the FeNO-test will be calculated by comparing the FeNO-test outcomes to the (gold standard) BPTs outcomes in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The intention is to include 171 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The local medical ethics committee approved the proposed study and is considered a low-burden and risk-low study. The local medical ethics committee registration number: R23.005. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: Strengths: This is the first study that investigates the value of the FeNO-test (cut off ≥ 50 ppb) as an add-on test, to determine the impact of the FeNO-based strategy, in terms of the number of avoided BPTs, cost-effectiveness, and reduced burden on the patient and health care. LIMITATIONS: High FeNO levels may also be observed in other diseases such as eosinophilic chronic bronchitis and allergic rhinitis. The FeNO-test can be used to rule in a diagnosis of asthma with confidence, however, due to the poor sensitivity it is not suitable to rule out asthma.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is a common chronic respiratory diseases, and the relationship between pulmonary ventilation function and the prognosis of patients with suspected asthma is not well understood. This study aims to explore the impact of pulmonary ventilation functions on the prognosis of patients with suspected asthma. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with suspected asthma who were diagnosed and treated at the Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between August 2015 and January 2020. The primary outcome of interest was improvement in asthma symptoms, as measured by bronchial provocation test (BPT) results within one year after diagnosis. The impact of pulmonary ventilation functions on prognosis was explored by multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in the study. Patients with normal (OR = 0.123, p = .004) or generally normal (OR = 0.075, p = .039) pulmonary ventilation function were more likely to achieve improvement in asthma symptoms compared with patients with mild obstruction. There were no significant differences between the improvement and non-improvement groups in baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that suspected asthma patients with normal or generally normal pulmonary ventilation function are more likely to achieve improvement in asthma symptoms within one year compared to patients with mild obstruction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The methacholine challenge test (MCT) has high sensitivity but relatively low specificity for asthma diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to improve the diagnostic performance of MCT for asthma. METHODS: Data from 1,501 patients with asthma symptoms who underwent MCT between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. The patients were grouped as either the training (80%, n = 1,265) and test sets (20%, n = 236) depending on the time of referral. The conventional model (provocative concentration that causes a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]; PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL) was compared with the prediction models derived from five ML methods: logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curves (AUPRC) of each model were compared. The prediction models were further analyzed using different input combinations of FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25%-75%) values obtained during MCT. RESULTS: In total, 545 patients (36.3%) were diagnosed with asthma. The AUROC of the conventional model was 0.856 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.852-0.861), and the AUPRC was 0.759 (95% CI, 0.751-0.766). All the five ML prediction models had higher AUROC and AUPRC values than those of the conventional model, and random forest showed both highest AUROC (0.950; 95% CI, 0.948-0.952) and AUROC (0.909; 95% CI, 0.905-0.914) when FEV1, FVC, and FEF25%-75% were included as inputs. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence-based models showed excellent performance in asthma prediction compared to using PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL. The novel technology could be used to enhance the clinical diagnosis of asthma.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chest tightness-variant asthma (CTVA) is a novel atypical asthma characterized by chest tightness as the sole or primary symptom. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of bronchial provocation testing combined with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in the diagnosis of CTVA in children. METHODS: This study included 95 children aged 6-14 years with chest tightness as the sole symptom, with a duration of symptoms exceeding 4 weeks. All subjects underwent FeNO measurement, pulmonary function testing, and bronchial provocation testing using the Astograph method. Subjects with positive bronchial provocation testing were classified as the CTVA group, while those with negative results served as the non-CTVA control group. RESULTS: The lung function of children in both groups was normal. The FeNO level in the CTVA group was (22.35 ± 9.91) ppb, significantly higher than the control group (14.85 ± 5.63) ppb, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The value of FeNO in diagnosing CTVA was analyzed using an ROC curve, with an area under the curve of 0.073 (P < 0.05). The optimal cutoff point for diagnosing CTVA using FeNO was determined to be 18.5 ppb, with a sensitivity of 60.3 % and specificity of 77.8 %. There was a negative correlation between FeNO and Dmin as well as PD15 (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: FeNO can serve as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for CTVA, with the optimal cutoff point for diagnosing CTVA being 18.5 ppb. However, FeNO is not a specific diagnostic marker for CTVA and should be used in conjunction with bronchial provocation testing to enhance its diagnostic value.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to assess the real-life application of bronchial challenge test (BCT) in the management of preschool children presenting with atypical recurrent respiratory symptoms (ARRS). METHODS: We included children aged 0.5-6 years referred to a pediatric-pulmonology clinic who underwent BCT using methacholine or adenosine between 2012 and 2018 due to ARRS. BCT was considered positive based on spirometry results and/or wheezing, desaturation, and tachypnea reactions. We collected data on demographics, BCT results, pre-BCT and post-BCT treatment changes, and 3-6 months post-BCT compliance and symptom control. The primary outcome measure was the change in treatment post-BCT (step-up or step-down). RESULTS: A total of 228 children (55% males) with a mean age of 4.2 ± 0.6 years underwent BCT (52% adenosine-BCT, 48% methacholine-BCT). Children referred for methacholine were significantly younger compared with adenosine (3.6 ± 1.2 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2 years, p < .01). Methacholine and adenosine BCTs were positive in 95% and 61%, respectively. Overall, changes in management were observed in 122 (53.5%) children following BCT, with 83 (36.4%) being stepped up and 37 (17%) being stepped down. Significantly more children in the methacholine group were stepped up compared with the adenosine group (46% vs. 28%, p = .004). During the follow-up assessment, we observed a clinical improvement in 119/162 (73.4%) of the children, with nearly 87% being compliant. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the importance of BCT in the management of preschool children presenting to pediatric pulmonary units with ARRS. The change in treatment and subsequent clinical improvement observed highlight the added value of BCT to the pulmonologist.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: The multiple forced expiratory maneuvers that must be performed during methacholine test require a high degree of collaboration and can lead to fatigue. However, impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a noninvasive test, quick and easy to perform, that does not require effort-dependent maneuvers.Objectives: The primary endpoint was to evaluate the relationship between IOS and spirometry during the methacholine test. The secondary endpoint was to study the predictive value of baseline IOS in the development of bronchial hyperreactivity.Methods: Observational, prospective, cross-sectional study, with recruitment of consecutive patients from the pulmonology department with clinical suspicion of bronchial asthma with negative bronchodilator test and normal FeNO.Results: Twenty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 49 ± 18 years. Thirteen patients (52%) had a positive methacholine test. The correlation between IOS indices and FEV1 was significant (p < 0.05) in all cases. The indices with the highest predictive power were R5-20 and AX. The optimal cutoff points were an increase of greater than 32.96% in R5, greater than 120.83% for X5, an increase of 30.30 [kPa l-1s-1] in R5-20, and an increase of 1.01 [kPa l-1] for AX. Baseline oscillometry demonstrated a strong predictive value in the development of bronchial hyperreactivity, with a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 91.7%, using the cut-off point of 160.0% for R5.Conclusions: IOS may be a valuable alternative to forced spirometry in detecting bronchial hyperreactivity during the methacholine test, showing a good correlation between both tests.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Remission of childhood asthma has not been widely studied. Patients in clinical remission continue to have some degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether clinical parameters and lung function test are good parameters for discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthmatic children, including patients with persistent BHR, as measured by the methacholine challenge test (MCT). METHODS: One year after discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), MCT was performed in a group of 40 asthmatic children to confirm or exclude BHR. In all patients, ICS treatment was discontinued based on the same parameters: symptoms, spirometry, daily PEF, and negative bronchodilator test. After achieving complete asthma control for at least 6 to 12 months, ICS treatment was stepped down and discontinued. Clinical course and spirometry were followed up after ICS discontinuation. RESULTS: Positive MCT was found in 50% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the positive and negative MCT groups in age at initiation and discontinuation of ICS therapy, duration of ICS therapy, duration of stepping down period, FEV1, and PEF at the time of withdrawal of ICS and one year later. ICS treatment had to be restarted in two patients from the positive MCT group, due to recurrence of asthma symptoms. CONCLUSION: Clinical parameters, normal spirometry, daily PEF values, and a negative bronchodilator test are good parameters for discontinuing ICS treatment in asthmatic children, even in patients with persistent BHR. Children should continue to be monitored, as symptoms may recur.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Bronchial provocation tests, such as the mannitol challenge, can be performed to identify and quantify the severity of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. Studies of the mannitol challenge as a monitoring tool in asthmatic children are limited. Our primary aim was to compare the bronchial hyperresponsiveness to mannitol in treatment-naive asthmatic children between baseline and three months after receiving the indicated asthma prophylaxis. Twenty-three asthmatic patients aged 4-16 years were analyzed in this prospective cohort study. All subjects underwent the mannitol challenge at baseline and after three months of treatment with budesonide ± formoterol. The difference in the provocative dose of mannitol to induce a 15% drop in FEV1 (PD15) between baseline and follow-up, as well as its association with the presence of exercise-induced or nocturnal asthma symptoms, were evaluated. The PD15 value increased significantly post-treatment (228.5 mg [4.50-458.15]; p = 0.04). Independently of the evaluation time point, the PD15 values were significantly lower in the presence of nocturnal asthma symptoms (490 mg [122-635] vs. 635 mg [635-635]; p = 0.03), whereas there was no association between the PD15 value and the presence of exercise-induced asthma (p = 0.73). These results suggest that bronchial hyperresponsiveness to mannitol may be a potential monitoring tool in the pediatric asthmatic population, reflecting therapy response in children receiving prophylactic treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate the value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with small airway function test to replace bronchial provocation test and induced sputum test in differentiating cough variant asthma (CVA) from eosinophilic bronchitis (EB).Methods:The clinical data of 105 patients with chronic cough admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Hubei, Jianghan University from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients consisted of 40 patients with CVA (CVA group), 25 patients with EB (EB group), and 40 patients with other chronic coughs (other chronic cough group). FeNO and lung function were compared between groups. The value of FeNO, small airway function, and their combination in differentiating CVA from EB were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curves.Results:FeNO level was the highest in the CVA group [33.0 (30.0, 37.8) ppb], followed by the EB group [28.0 (25.5, 32.0) ppb], and the lowest in other chronic cough group [13.0 (11.0, 15.0) ppb]. There was significant difference in FeNO level between groups ( H value = 79.00, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1), FEV 1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF) between groups (all P > 0.05). Maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) [74 (66.0, 77.4) in the CVA group, 80 (79.0, 83.3) in the EB group, 88.0 (86.4, 90.0) in other chronic coughs group], FEF25 (%) [70.0 (60.3, 75.1) in the CVA group, 78.0 (74.1, 85.0) in the EB group, 81.7 (78.9, 86.3) in other chronic coughs group], FEF50 (%) [75.2 (67.1, 80.8) in the CVA group, 80.6 (75.7, 85.9) in the EB group, 89.4 (87.0, 90.5) in other chronic coughs group], FEF75 (%) [76.4 (68.7, 85.8) in the CVA group, 80.9 (77.4, 89.7) in the EB group, 90.8 (87.2, 94.2) in other chronic coughs group] were significantly lower in the CVA group than those in other chronic coughs group. With the exception of FEF25 (%), MMEF (%), FEF50 (%), and FEF75 (%) were significantly lower in the EB group compared with other chronic coughs group. MMEF (%) and FEF25 (%) in the CVA group were significantly lower compared with the EB group. There were significant differences in MMEF (%), FEF50 (%), and FEF75 (%) between groups ( H = 62.82, 47.04, 47.41, 49.11, all P < 0.01). There were significant differences in FEF50 (%) and FEF75 (%) between CVA and EB groups (both P > 0.05). In binary logistic regression equation, FeNO and MMEF (%) were important indexes to distinguish CVA from EB ( P < 0.05). Bronchial provocation test and induced sputum test were used as the gold standard to distinguish CVA from EB. When FeNO and MMEF (%) were used separately to distinguish CVA from EB, the optimal threshold value was 30.0 ppb and 77.7 respectively, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 and 0.82 respectively, the diagnostic sensitivity was 70% and 77.5% respectively, and the diagnostic specificity was 72% and 88% respectively. When FeNO and MMEF (%) were used in combination to distinguish CVA from EB, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89, and the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 96% respectively. Conclusion:FeNO and MMEF (%) can be used to distinguish CVA from EB. FeNO combined with MMEF (%) has a higher value in distinguishing CVA from EB than FeNO and MMEF alone.

RESUMEN

Background: Risk factors for the severity of occupational asthma (OA) are often attributed to occupational exposure. However, some recent epidemiological data suggest a link with obesity. The study aimed to analyze the relationship between obesity and the severity of (OA) assessed by non-specific bronchial provocation. Materials and Methods: We conducted an epidemiological descriptive retrospective study including patients who were referred to the Occupational Medicine Department of Farhat Hached University Hospital of Sousse, for (OA) and who have completed a non-specific bronchoprovocation test to metacholine. Results: Our population consisted of 131 cases of (OA) with a female predominance. The average BMI was 27.34 ±5.30 kg. Obesity was observed in 29.8% of cases. The non-specific metacholine bronchial provocation test revealed an average dose of PD20 at 750.4 ±656.3 µg. Severe (OA) was observed in (35.1%). After univariate analysis, obesity in asthmatics had a significant association with age (p<0.001), marital status (p=0.005), average professional seniority (p<0.001), the evolution of complaints (p=0.035) and abnormal initial spirometry (p=0.044). As for the severity of (OA), the univariate analytical study did not show a significant link with obesity (p=0.68). Conclusion: The association between obesity and OA is not an easy task and should be made using more accurate tools to measure body fat percentage. The preventive role of the occupational physician is essential in factories in order to make more prudent decisions when employing workers with a high BMI in high-risk occupations. Hence the importance of regular monitoring of weight in workers exposed to asthmatics during periodic examinations.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a key feature of asthma, but it may also appear in allergic rhinitis. The type of allergen, as well as regional characteristics, play an important role in the development of BHR. The aim of our study was to analyze allergen sensitization patterns and the factors that affect BHR in allergic rhinitis patients living in temperate continental climate zone. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed allergic rhinitis patients from Eastern Slovakia who underwent skin-prick tests to aeroallergens, spirometry, histamine and methacholine bronchial provocation tests for evaluation of lower airway symptoms. We analyzed the associations between BHR and the pattern of aeroallergen sensitization, lung function parameters, and the total IgE and eosinophil levels. RESULTS: Out of 365 allergic rhinitis patients (age range 16-64 years), 114 showed BHR. Sensitization to house dust mites (HDMs) and grass were the most common. BHR was significantly associated with sensitization to dogs (odds ratio, OR = 2.15, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.13-4.11) and Alternaria (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06-4.35); however, BHR did not show a relationship with HDMs sensitization. The levels of total IgE and eosinophils were higher in the BHR-positive group. Sensitization to more than six allergens significantly increased the probability of BHR (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Dogs and Alternaria, but not HDMs, were the sensitizing agents most closely associated with BHR. High-grade sensitization and increased total IgE and eosinophil levels were characteristic clinical signs in BHR-positive allergic rhinitis patients in the temperate continental climatic zone.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been shown to be a useful clinical tool in pediatrics, but very little is known about the LUS findings of asthma in children. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to characterize LUS findings of pediatric patients before and after a chemically induced bronchospasm. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of bronchodilators on LUS findings. METHODS: Eligible children 6-17 years old presenting for a methacholine challenge test (MCT) in a pediatric respiratory clinic were recruited. Patients with viral symptoms were excluded. A six-zone LUS protocol was performed before and after the MCT, and after bronchodilator administration; video recordings were analysed by an expert blinded to the patient characteristics and MCT results. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in the study. Five patients had positive LUS findings at baseline. Nine patients out of 29 (31%) had new-onset positive LUS following a reactive MCT. There was a significant association between having a chemically induced bronchospasm and a positive LUS post-MCT (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 5.3 [1.0-27.7]; p = 0.05). Among patients who developed positive LUS findings post-MCT, four out of nine returned to having a negative LUS postbronchodilator administration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known report of an association between LUS findings and bronchospasm in pediatric patients. It is also the first documentation of resolution of LUS findings postbronchodilator administration. Most LUS findings observed were small and limited to a few intercostal spaces. Further research is required to quantify these findings and evaluate the effect of salbutamol on LUS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: The potential for immunotherapy to prevent asthma development has become a hot topic. This prompted us to revisit data from an early study that examined allergic sensitisation on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in children with and without respiratory symptoms. Unlike previous studies, it used both indirect and direct test methods. METHODS: The study was conducted in Kuopio, Finland, in 1994 and 247 children (55.1% boys) with a mean age 10.5 ± 1.7 years were recruited using a school survey: 165 with lower respiratory symptoms and 82 healthy controls. Each child underwent a 6-min free-running test and a methacholine test with a cumulative dose of 4900 µg. All participants underwent skin-prick tests: 127were sensitised and 120 were non-sensitised. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in lung function between the sensitised and non-sensitised children. However, sensitisation was associated with BHR which was measured by both the methacholine test (2400 µg versus >4900 µg, p < 0.001) and the free-running test (-3.5% versus -2.6%, p = 0.042). No such differences were observed among the healthy controls. Sensitisation was a predictor of allergic diseases, and only multisensitisation to a minimum of four allergens increased the incidence of asthma. CONCLUSION: Allergic sensitisation did not affect BHR in children without respiratory symptoms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Bronchial challenge test (BCT) measures current airways-hyperreactivity, however, its predictive role in pre-school children (<6 years) for the diagnosis of asthma at school age is still debatable. We aimed to find whether preschool children with a positive adenosine or methacholine BCT are more prone to asthma at school age. METHODS: We included children aged 6-13 years with respiratory symptoms that were previously referred to our pulmonary function laboratory for BCT (methacholine or adenosine, depending on the question asked) at age 10 months to 6 years (baseline). BCT was considered positive based on spirometry results or wheezing, desaturation, and tachypnea reactions. The primary outcome measure was asthma diagnosis at school age using the well-validated International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. We used logistic regression analysis to explore whether positive BCT could predict school-age asthma while including age and collected modified asthma predictive index in the model. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one of 189 children (53% males), completed the ISAAC questionnaire (response rate = 80%). Mean ages at BCT and at follow-up were 3.9 ± 1.28 and 9.4 ± 1.85 years, respectively. At baseline, 40 of 67 had a positive adenosine test and 73 of 84 had a positive methacholine BCT. Thirty-nine children were diagnosed with asthma at school age. Logistic regression analysis showed that a positive adenosine test at pre-school age was the best predictor, significantly increasing the odds of asthma at school age by 6.34 (95% CI: 1.23-32.81, p = .028), while methacholine did not show significance (p = .69). CONCLUSION: Choosing the relevant BCT for the question asked, positive adenosine, but not methacholine test, at pre-school, may predict asthma at school age.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indoor air quality has been shown to influence asthma control and outcomes. Air purifiers and high-efficiency particulate air filtration devices can improve indoor air quality by reducing the indoor levels of air pollution and allergens. However, the influence of this improved indoor air quality on asthma control remains unclear; hence, randomized controlled trials are needed to further elucidate this phenomenon. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the effect of reducing the levels of allergens and pollutants in the bedroom and living room through the use of Dyson air purifiers (Dyson Pure Cool) on asthma control. METHODS: This is an 18-month long, investigator-led, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-center trial. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to active or placebo Dyson filters. The primary outcome is the change in the scores of Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 and Asthma-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire from baseline. Secondary outcomes include changes in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second, forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio, and midexpiratory flows), peak expiratory flow measurements, airway hyperresponsiveness (assessed by methacholine bronchial challenge), fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and indoor air pollutant levels. The sample size will be 50 subjects, and all subjects will have a confirmed diagnosis of mild persistent to moderate persistent asthma along with an Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score of >1.5. RESULTS: This study was approved by the West Midlands Research Ethics Committee (18/WM/0277). The study results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals; presented at relevant scientific conferences; and shared in plain English with participants in our newsletters, in our clinics, and via the David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre website. Our trial began in September 2019 and is expected to end in August 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This is a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, investigator-led study to investigate the efficacy of a novel air purifier in improving asthma control in adults. The trial period of 18 months will facilitate the collection of robust data and will therefore generate clear signals. However, this extended trial duration may lead to patient withdrawal. Furthermore, this trial is conducted at a single center and in a location with a homogenous cohort of people, which may affect translatability. Nonetheless, it is hoped that the findings of this trial may help further inform clinicians regarding the utility of this novel device as an adjunct in asthma care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04729530; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04729530. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28624.

RESUMEN

Cough variant asthma (CVA), a common asthma phenotype characterized by nonproductive cough and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), is usually detected by bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) which are time-consuming, expensive, and unsafe. The primary study objective was to provide proof of concept for the use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), eosinophil count percentage in induced sputum (sEOS%), forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75%) % predicted value, and FEF25-75% z-scores as surrogate markers predicting BHR in young adults with suspected CVA; the secondary objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of the various techniques. Three hundred and ten subjects (median age 24 years) were included in a cross-sectional study. Subjects were characterized as BHR positive (POS) (n = 147) or BHR negative (NEG) (n = 163) according to methacholine BPT. Classification accuracies were expressed as areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Compared with BHR NEG, FEF25-75% % predicted value and FEF25-75% z-scores were lower in the BHR POS group (p < 0.001), whereas FENO (p < 0.001) and sEOS% were higher (p < 0.001). AUC values for detecting BHR were as follows: FENO, 0.98 (SD = 0.02); sEOS%, 0.98 (SD = 0.02); FEF25-75% % pred, 0.93 (SD = 0.05); FEF25-75% z scores, 0.92 (SD = 0.05). Optimal cutoff values (OCV) for BHR prediction were as follows: FENO, 32.7 ppb (sensitivity = 0.93, specificity = 0.96), sEOS%, 3.80% (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.94), FEF25-75% % predicted value, 80.0% (sensitivity = 0.90, specificity = 0.87), and FEF25-75% z-score, -0.87 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.87). Non-invasive/semi-invasive airway inflammatory or small airway functional measures might be used as surrogate markers predicting BHR in young adults with suspected CVA.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with variable symptoms suggestive of asthma but with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) often fail to be diagnosed without a bronchial provocation test, but the test is expensive, time-consuming, risky, and not readily available in all clinical settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 692 patients with FEV1≥80% predicted; normal neutrophils and chest high-resolution computed tomography; and recurrent dyspnea, cough, wheeze, and chest tightness. RESULTS: Compared with subjects negative for AHR (n=522), subjects positive for AHR (n=170) showed increased FENO values, peripheral eosinophils (EOS), and R5-R20; decreased FEV1, FEV1/Forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory flow (FEFs) (P≤.001 for all). Small-airway dysfunction was identified in 104 AHR+ patients (61.17%), and 132 AHR- patients (25.29%) (P<0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of variables used singly for an AHR diagnosis were lower than 0.77. Using joint models of FEF50%, FEF75%, or FEF25%-75% with FENO increased the AUCs to 0.845, 0.824, and 0.844, respectively, significantly higher than univariate AUCs (P <0.001 for all). Patients who reported chest tightness (n=75) had lower FEFs than patients who did not (P<0.001 for all). In subjects with chest tightness, the combination of FEF50% or FEF25%-75% with EOS also increased the AUCs substantially, to 0.815 and 0.816, respectively (P <0.001 for all versus the univariate AUCs). CONCLUSION: FENO combined with FEF50% and FEF25%-75% predict AHR in patients with normal FEV1. FEF25%-75%, FEF50%, or FEF25%-75% together with EOS also can potentially suggest asthma in patients with chest tightness.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and allergic rhinitis are associated diseases involved in the atopic march. The bronchial challenge test (BCT) is a tool that evaluates airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma. This study aimed to evaluate whether a positive BCT result is useful in assessment of paediatric AD. METHODS: This retrospective case series included 284 patients with AD who had BCT results. Clinical information and laboratory parameters were reviewed, including AD severity (using the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD]), skin hydration, and transepidermal water loss. RESULTS: Of the 284 patients who had BCT, 106 had positive BCT results and 178 had negative BCT results. A positive BCT result was associated with a history of asthma (P<0.0005), sibling with asthma (P=0.048), serum immunoglobulin E (P=0.045), eosinophil count (P=0.017), and sensitisation to food allergens in the skin prick test (P=0.027). There was no association between a positive BCT result and personal allergic rhinitis, parental atopy, sibling allergic rhinitis or AD, skin prick response to dust mites, objective SCORAD score, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, exposure to smoking, incense burning, cat or dog ownership, or AD treatment aspects (eg, food avoidance and traditional Chinese medicine). Logistic regression showed significant associations of a positive BCT result with a history of asthma (adjusted odds ratio=4.05; 95% confidence interval=1.92-8.55; P<0.0005) and sibling atopy (adjusted odds ratio=2.25; 95% confidence interval=1.03-4.92; P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paediatric AD, a positive BCT result was independently and positively associated with personal history of asthma and sibling history of atopy, but not with any other clinical parameters.

Asunto(s)