RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study analyzes the effectiveness and safety of brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in real clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included patients with nAMD who received brolucizumab treatment and evaluated the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), macular volume, as well as the number of injections and adverse events. RESULT: The group of previously treated patients included 28 subjects (28 eyes) that were switched to brolucizumab with a loading phase. By 12 months, BCVA changed from 0.43±0.29 to 0.33±0.27 LogMAR (p=0.11), CRT decreased from 281.5±58.2 to 239.9±45.6 µm (p=0.02). The group of previously untreated patients included 29 subjects (29 eyes). By 12 months, BCVA changed from 0.47±0.32 to 0.40±0.30 LogMAR (p=0.09), CRT decreased from 333.2±77.3 to 226.2±49.6 µm (p<0.001). Patients received 6.3±0.7 injections. In this group, baseline choroidal thickness showed a statistically significant correlation with final visual acuity (r=0.54; p<0.05) and CRT (r= -0.5; p<0.05). The group of previously treated patients switched without a loading phase included 18 patients (18 eyes). By 6 months, BCVA changed from 0.42±0.2 to 0.37±0.26 LogMAR (p=0.42). CRT remained stable at 285.6±56.9 µm (p=0.97). No adverse events related to intraocular inflammation were reported during the course of 385 injections. CONCLUSION: Brolucizumab therapy helps achieve significant anatomical and functional improvements in real clinical practice both in patients switched from previous treatments and in treatment-naïve patients. Greater baseline choroidal thickness may be associated with better anatomical and functional outcomes with brolucizumab treatment.

Asunto(s)

Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/fisiopatología , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/fisiopatología

RESUMEN

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of aflibercept with brolucizumab for recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME). Observations: At week 52, no significant visual improvement was noted in the eyes treated with either brolucizumab (P = 0.527) or aflibercept (P = 0.393). The CMT decreased significantly after brolucizumab therapy (P = 0.012), but not with aflibercept (P = 0.284) at 52 weeks. The proportion of patients with IRF and SRF reduced significantly in both arms. The mean number of brolucizumab injections was significantly lower (3.93[±1.28]) than aflibercept (4.75[±1.62]) (P = 0.037) over the 52 weeks. At 52 weeks, 76.67 % of eyes treated with brolucizumab attained full macular dryness (CMT<300 µm with absence of SRF and IRF) compared to 50 % of eyes treated with aflibercept (P = 0.036). Subconjunctival hemorrhage was the only adverse event observed in the study (P = 0.701); no other systemic or ocular adverse events, such as intraocular inflammation, were reported. Conclusion and importance: The BRADIR study suggests that brolucizumab might have an edge over aflibercept in visual and anatomical outcomes that lasted 52 weeks with reduced injection frequency in case of recalcitrant DME.

RESUMEN

Background/objectives: To compare the prevalence of intra-ocular inflammation (IOI) between brolucizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after intra-vitreal injections (IVI) and to compare the IOI odds ratios (ORs) of both therapies with the prevalence of septic endophthalmitis after IVI that was previously reported in the literature. Methods: A total of 468 IVI of brolucizumab (117 eyes) were compared with 2884 IVI of aflibercept (305 eyes) regarding IOI and occlusive retinal vasculitis (RV) from December 2021 to June 2023 in this retrospective study. The OR was calculated for both anti-VEGF agents and was compared with the relative risk of septic endophthalmitis after IVI. Results: There were four eyes with unilateral IOI related to brolucizumab (3.42%), one presenting uveitis (0.85%), two vitritis (1.71%) and the last one presenting occlusive RV (0.85%), compared with two eyes presenting unilateral IOI (anterior uveitis, 0.66%) and none with RV from the aflibercept cohort. The incidence of IOI per injection with brolucizumab (0.855%) was significantly higher compared with aflibercept (0.069%, p = 0.004). The OR of IOI related to brolucizumab IVI compared with septic endophthalmitis was 20 times greater (1.49 for aflibercept, p = 0.646, versus 20.15 for brolucizumab, p < 0.001). The OR of RV with brolucizumab compared with septic endophthalmitis was 4.6. Conclusion: Data from our department suggest a much higher risk of IOI and occlusive retinal vasculitis after brolucizumab when compared with aflibercept. The risk of IOI and severe sight-threatening complications related to brolucizumab is greater than the risk of septic endophthalmitis after any IVI.

RESUMEN

Objective: To purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the 1-year outcomes and factors associated with the treatment responsiveness of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBR) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Japanese patients refractory to ranibizumab or aflibercept using a treat and extend (TAE) regimen. Methods: A total of 48 eyes of 47 nAMD patients were switched to IVBR, and 36 eyes of 35 patients (27 males and 8 females) underwent 1-year treatment after the switch. Results: The rate of dry macula was significantly higher 12 months after the switch to IVBR (p < 0.001), with a significant decrease in the mean central macular thickness (CMT) and the mean central choroidal thickness (CCT) (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). The injection interval was significantly extended from 7.0 ± 1.7 weeks to 10.3 ± 2.5 weeks 12 months after the switch (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a smaller number of prior anti-VEGF injections (p = 0.025; odds ratio: 0.947; 95% confidence interval: 0.903-0.994) and a pre-switching CCT of less than 250 µm (p = 0.023; odds ratio: 0.099; 95% confidence interval: 0.013-0.731) were associated with the good response group. Conclusions: These results suggest that IVBR may suppress disease activity and prolong the injection interval by switching for AMD patients with an insufficient response to treatment with ranibizumab and aflibercept.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the safety and efficacy of brolucizumab (Beovu®) 6 mg vs. aflibercept (Eylea®) 2 mg administered every 4 weeks in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid after the Week 52 primary endpoint analysis (from Week 52 up to Week 104, post-study termination). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked Phase 3a study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with recalcitrant nAMD (persistent residual retinal fluid despite previous frequent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment). METHODS: Study eyes were randomized 2:1 to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks for 100 weeks, or until study termination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All available efficacy (analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], central subfield thickness [CST], fluid-free status [no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid]), and safety data up to study termination, including data up to Week 104 for those participants who completed the study prior to its termination. All P values after Week 52 were nominal and reflect observed data for the efficacy analyses. RESULTS: Brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg in mean BCVA change from baseline to Week 104 (least squares mean difference, -0.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 3.0; P = 0.0169). The proportion of eyes with ≥15-letter loss was 6.2% for brolucizumab and 4.7% for aflibercept. (P = 0.0014), and a greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at Week 104 (52.5% brolucizumab vs. 28.2% aflibercept; 95% CI, 11.9-37.3; P < 0.001) in eyes treated with brolucizumab vs. aflibercept. Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was 11.5% (0.8% and 2.2%) for brolucizumab vs 6.1% (0% and 0.6%) for aflibercept, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with 52-week results, brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior in mean BCVA change with anatomic outcomes superior to aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks from baseline to Week 104 or study termination. The incidence of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was higher with brolucizumab vs. aflibercept; therefore, brolucizumab should not be used more frequently than every 8 weeks following the loading regimen.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) disease stability after brolucizumab treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 31 patients (31 eyes) with recalcitrant nAMD who were switched to brolucizumab after conventional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. We divided patients into two groups by treatment extension (TE) period: group 1 with TE < 12 weeks (N = 16) and group 2 with TE ≥ 12 weeks (N = 15). We compared outcomes between the groups at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, including morphological characteristics of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with TE ≥ 12 weeks. RESULTS: Group 2 had a significantly greater proportion of patients with dry macula (subretinal and intraretinal fluids absent) than group 1 (60 vs. 12.5%) at 2 weeks (P < 0.05). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) did not differ significantly between groups at all timepoints. Central subfield retinal thickness (CST) was significantly lower in group 2 at 2 (237.1 vs. 280.8 µm; P < 0.05), 4 (224.0 vs. 262.9 µm; P < 0.05), and 8 weeks (216.8 vs. 331.1 µm; P < 0.05). Group 2 had less vessel area (0.63 vs. 1.27 mm2; P < 0.05) and total vessel length (0.22 vs. 0.42 mm; P < 0.05). Choriocapillaris flow deficit (CCFd) was significantly lower in group 2 (42.7 vs. 48.2%; P < 0.05). Dry macula at 2 weeks (odds ratio [OR] = 8.3; P < 0.05) and a lower CCFd (OR = 0.73; P < 0.05) were associated with TE ≥ 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Early fluid-free status after switching to brolucizumab and choriocapillary function around CNV were prognostic factors for disease stability in nAMD refractory to anti-VEGF treatment.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab therapy administered on a pro re nata (PRN) basis without loading dose in treatment naïve patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) for 1 year follow-up. METHODS: Patients with recent DME (<6 months) received a mandatory brolucizumab injection at inclusion and other injections could be given on a PRN basis with an 8-week interval (between injections) at minimum. Rescue therapy with other anti-VEGF was possible in case of incomplete DME resolution after the second brolucizumab with a minimum of 1-month treatment free interval between 2 injections. The primary outcome measure was the change in (BCVA) at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures included the change in central subfield thickness (CST), the change in hard exudate surface area and microaneurysms at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included. At 12 months, the mean (SD) number of injections was 2.6 (0.8) in addition to the first mandatory injection. The mean (SD) interval between 2 consecutive injections was 3.2 (1.4) months. The mean (SD) BCVA improved from 0.62 (0.1) logMAR to 0.40 (0.16) logMAR (p = 0.012). The mean CST reduced from 397.0 (47.2) µm to 224.5 (28.1) µm (p = 0.013). The hard exudate surface area decreased significantly (p = 0.012) as did microaneurysms (p = 0.02). Seven patients required at least 1 rescue therapy. No patients experienced intra-ocular inflammatory adverse events. CONCLUSION: Brolucizumab therapy for DME is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of recent DME and has the potential to reduce the number of injections.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: In this study, our objective was to assess and compare the changes in visual and structural outcomes among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who were switched from intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) to either intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) or intravitreal faricimab (IVF) injections in a clinical setting. Materials and Methods: This observational clinical study included 20 eyes of 20 patients switched to brolucizumab and 15 eyes of 14 patients switched to faricimab from aflibercept in eyes with nAMD. We measured the structural outcome (central macular thickness (CMT)) and the visual outcome (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); logMAR) as follows: just before the most recent IVA injection (B0), one month after the most recent IVA injection (B1), just before the first IVBr or IVF injection (A0), one month after (A1) and three months after (A3) the first IVBr or IVF injection. Results: BCVA showed significant improvement at A1 (0.25 ± 0.34) and at A3 (0.19 ± 0.24) compared to A0 (0.38 ± 0.35) in the IVBr group (p = 0.0156, p = 0.0166, respectively). CMT (µm) was significantly thinner at A1 (IVBr: 240.55 ± 51.82, IVF: 234.91 ± 47.29) and at A3 (IVBr: 243.21 ± 76.15, IVF: 250.50 ± 72.61) compared to at A0 (IVBr: 303.55 ± 79.18, IVF: 270.33 ± 77.62) in the IVBr group (A1: p = 0.0093, A3: p = 0.0026) and in the IVF group (A1: p = 0.0161, A3: p = 0.0093). There was no significant difference in BCVA and CMT improvement observed between two groups at any time point (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Switching from aflibercept to either brolucizumab or faricimab has a significant anatomical effect in eyes with nAMD and both treatments appear to be effective short-term treatment options. There is a trend towards greater visual improvements and reductions in CMT with brolucizumab.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión , Humanos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the real-world 2-year treatment outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, and interventional study included 53 eyes treated with brolucizumab from October 2020 to August 2021 at 3 institutions. A modified treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen with predefined discontinuation criteria was used. The mTAE regimen was discontinued if patients responded positively and achieved a treatment interval of 16 weeks twice with no sign of recurrence. The number of patients discontinuing TAE and the visual and anatomic changes at 1 and 2 years after the first IVBr were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eyes from 38 patients (71%) completed the 2-year observation period and 7 eyes from 7 patients experienced intraocular inflammation (IOI). Of these 38 patients, 18 (47%) could discontinue the TAE at a median [interquartile range] of 13.1 [12.9-16.8] months after the first IVBr. Best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield retinal thickness, and central choroidal thickness were significantly improved compared with baseline at both 1 and 2 years after the first IVBr (all P < 0.001). An extension study revealed a 1-year recurrence rate of 5.6% (standard deviation, 5.4%) after TAE discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: While IOI is a concern with brolucizumab, careful observation allows discontinuing the TAE regimen in patients treated with IVBr. Moreover, brolucizumab may reduce the risk of recurrence after treatment interruption. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ ; R000050688 UMIN 000044374).

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of brolucizumab and aflibercept treatment in reducing the maximum thickness of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) fluid in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the HAWK and HARRIER studies. DESIGN: HAWK and HARRIER were 96-week, prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled, multicenter studies. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1775 patients across 11 countries were included in the HAWK study, and 1048 patients across 29 countries were included in the HARRIER study. INTERVENTION: After 3 monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes received injections every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks if disease activity (DA) was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes received fixed 8-week dosing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximum thickness of PEDs and sub-RPE fluid across the macula were assessed at baseline through week 96 in the brolucizumab- and aflibercept-treated patients and in the patient subgroups with DA at week 16 (matched in terms of injection number and treatment interval). RESULTS: At week 96, there were greater mean percentage reductions from baseline in maximum thickness of both PEDs and sub-RPE fluid in brolucizumab-treated patients vs. aflibercept-treated patients (PED: 19.7% [n = 336] vs. 11.9% [n = 335] in HAWK; 29.5% [n = 364] vs. 18.3% [n = 361] in HARRIER. Sub-RPE fluid: 75.4% vs. 57.3% in HAWK; 86.0% vs. 76.3% in HARRIER). A similar trend in mean percentage reductions was observed in patients with DA at week 16. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that brolucizumab achieved greater reductions in PEDs and sub-RPE fluid thickness than aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02307682 (HAWK) and NCT02434328 (HARRIER). FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

RESUMEN

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. Stata and RevMan5.4 were applied for meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Data on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CSFT), presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and/or subretinal fluid (SRF), participants with ≥1 serious adverse events, and participants with ≥1 adverse events were analyzed. Results: Six studies were finally included. Meta-analysis showed statistical differences in BCVA [SMD = -0.65, 95% CI [-0.17 to -0.23], P < 0.05], the presence of IRF and/or SRF [RR = 0.67, 95% CI [0.56-0.79], P < 0.05], and the safety of participants with ≥1 serious adverse events [RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.39-0.84], P < 0.05] between the experimental group and the control group. However, no statistical differences were observed in CSFT [SMD = -1.16, 95% CI [-2.79 to 0.47], P > 0.05] or the safety of participants with ≥1 adverse events [RR = 1.07, 95% CI [0.97-1.17], P > 0.05]. Conclusions: Compared to other anti-VEGF drugs such as Aflibercept and Ranibizumab, intravitreal injection of 6 mg Brolucizumab is more effective and safer for n-AMD, especially in the presence of IRF and/or SRF, and for participants with ≥1 serious adverse events.

Asunto(s)

Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Degeneración Macular , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico

RESUMEN

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of bi-monthly brolucimumab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) refractory to monthly aflibercept treatment. Methods: A retrospective chart review included 32 eyes of patients with refractory nAMD who switched from monthly intravitreal aflibercept treatment to bi-monthly intravitreal brolucizumab treatment. This study evaluated changes in visual acuity (VA), intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), and central macular thickness (CMT), at specific times as follows: baseline before switching (T0), 2 months after switching (T1), 4 months after switching (T2), and 6 months after switching (T3). Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) did not significantly change across all time points (0.52 ± 0.12, 0.48 ± 0.27, 0.48 ± 0.28, and 0.50 ± 0.27 logarithms of the minimum angle of resolution in T0, T1, T2, and T3, respectively). CMT significantly decreased after additional brolucizumab injections compared to the baseline (218.2 ± 48.6 and 207.9 ± 49.8 µm, respectively; p = 0.001). The PED height also significantly decreased from 251.0 ± 165.4 to 154.4 ± 115.65 µm (p < 0.001), with complete resolution in nine patients (28%). The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) before brolucizumab treatment was 262.8 ± 79.7 µm, which decreased to 233.0 ± 71.2 µm (p = 0.001) after the first injection. The final SFCT also significantly decreased after additional brolucizumab injections compared to the baseline SFCT (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Bi-monthly brolucizumab treatment proves effective for patients refractory to monthly fixed aflibercept, resulting in positive anatomical changes without significant deterioration in visual acuity. This approach provides a promising prognosis while reducing the treatment burden on refractory patients.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We compared 12-month outcomes of eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with or without complete regression of polyps observed one month after three monthly intravitreal administrations (loading phase) of aflibercept (2.0 mg/0.05 mL) or brolucizumab (6.0 mg/0.05 mL). METHODS: All patients underwent indocyanine green angiography at both baseline and 3 months after initial injection and were followed up monthly with an as-needed regimen for up to 12 months. A total of 62 patients with PCV were included: 30 eyes were treated with brolucizumab, and 32 were treated with aflibercept. Eyes with complete regression of polyps (regression group) had significantly smaller maximum polyp diameter and were more frequently treated with brolucizumab than those without complete regression (non-regression) group. RESULTS: Best corrected visual acuity was comparable between the two groups at 12 months. Although the 12-month retreatment-free proportion was comparable between the two groups (33.0% versus 27.0%, p = 0.59), a retreatment-free period was significantly longer in the regression group than in the non-regression group (8.3 ± 3.3 versus 6.5 ± 3.6 months, p = 0.022), and the number of additional injections was significantly fewer in the regression group than in the non-regression group (1.2 ± 1.2 versus 3.0 ± 2.6, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Complete regression of polyps observed after the initial phase possibly prolongs the retreatment-free period and reduces the number of additional injections irrespective of aflibercept or brolucizumab.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of combining intravitreal brolucizumab injection with sub-tenon's capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection (STTA) during the loading phase for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, untreated patients with PCV receiving intravitreal brolucizumab injections with STTA during loading at Saitama Medical University Hospital's Eye Center from May 2021 to June 2022 were analyzed. Complete regression rates of polypoidal lesions were assessed using indocyanine green angiography 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (19 eyes) participated. Best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved at eight weeks compared to baseline. No significant intraocular pressure increases occurred throughout the loading phase, while central foveal and choroidal thickness significantly reduced at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Subretinal fluid was present in all patients before treatment, rapidly resolving post-intravitreal brolucizumab injections and STTA, with residual rates of 36.8% (seven eyes) and 5.3% (one eye) at four and 12 weeks, respectively. Intraocular inflammation did not occur during the loading phase, and the complete regression rate of polypoidal lesions was 89.5% (17 eyes). CONCLUSIONS: Combining intravitreal brolucizumab injection with STTA during the loading phase may be one treatment option for PCV management.

RESUMEN

Real-world studies concerning different populations are valuable and bring new information regarding different regimens of Brolucizumab injections and their adverse reactions. The present study investigates the efficacy of a pro-re-nata regimen (PRN) for neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD). Separate from the main statistics we report the use of Brolucizumab in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). A retrospective observational single-center study was conducted on 82 eyes treated with Brolucizumab between 2021 and 2023, for nAMD. Patients were injected at intervals of at least 2 months after the loading phase. In 9 (3-20) months follow-up, only 0.26 % adverse reactions were noticed, with good resolution of retinal fluid (significant reduction of CST on SD-OCT, -72.50µ, p < 0.05), especially for subretinal fluid. 54 % of the eyes remained fluid-free. The interval of injection (INTOI, a parameter calculated by averaging the results of the division of the follow-up period to the number of injections received by each patient) was 2.68 (corresponding to an injection interval of 11 weeks). This could become an important parameter for the characterization of Brolucizumab and any other anti-VEGF therapy and could provide a more precise interval of injection in the future. Four patients also received Brolucizumab for the treatment of chronic CSC (3 doses each). All showed good response, 3 of them remaining fluid-free.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (BRZ) injections in patients with typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (typical nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: This multicentre retrospective study included 401 eyes of 398 patients with nAMD who received BRZ injection(s), with a follow-up duration of ≥12 months. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal fluid evaluation and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography were assessed. The efficacy of BRZ was compared between typical nAMD and PCV groups. RESULTS: Analyses were conducted with 280 eyes of 278 patients with typical nAMD and 121 eyes of 120 patients with PCV (mean age, 71.1 ± 8.6 years). 29 eyes (7.2%) were treatment naïve. The mean follow-up period was 15.3 ± 2.8 months; the mean number of BRZ injections within 1 year was 4.5 ± 1.7. BCVA was maintained during the follow-up period, and CST significantly improved from the first injection month and was maintained for 12 months in both the typical nAMD and PCV groups. The dry macula proportion increased from 2.7% at baseline to 56.1% at 1 month and 42.9% at 12 months. Among the 18 eyes that underwent indocyanine green angiography both before and after treatment, 10 (55.6%) showed polyp regression. Overall, the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), retinal vasculitis and occlusive retinal vasculitis was 9.4% (38 eyes), 1.2% (5 eyes) and 0.5% (2 eyes), respectively. IOI occurred from the first to the sixth injections, with an average IOI onset of 28.5 ± 1.4 days. All eyes achieved IOI resolution, although the two eyes with occlusive retinal vasculitis showed a severe visual decline after IOI resolution. CONCLUSION: Brolucizumab was effective in maintaining BCVA and managing fluid in eyes with nAMD for up to 1 year, exhibiting a high polyp regression rate. However, the not uncommon incidence of IOI and the severe visual decline caused by the rare occlusive retinal vasculitis following BRZ treatment underscore the importance of careful monitoring and timely management.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal brolucizumab in polyp regression of treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) patients and its effect on 1-year treatment outcome. METHODS: Medical records of 31 treatment-naive PCV patients, who received three monthly intravitreal brolucizumab injections followed by as-needed injections for at least a year, were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and anatomical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. Complete polyp regression rate and percentage change of vascular lesion and polyp area were evaluated after three monthly injections of brolucizumab. The effect of complete polyp regression and the impact of vascular lesion and polyp reduction rate on 1-year treatment outcome were also evaluated. RESULTS: In terms of visual outcome, best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved after 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). In terms of anatomical outcome, central macular thickness (CMT) and central choroidal thickness significantly decreased after 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Complete polyp regression was observed in 23 patients (74.2%) after three monthly injections. Group with complete polyp regression had a higher rate of achieving dry macula at 3 months (p = 0.026) and fewer number of injections (p < 0.001) compared to the group without complete polyp regression. Higher polyp reduction rate was significantly associated with higher CMT change from baseline at 3 months (p = 0.048) while higher vascular lesion reduction rate was significantly associated with higher CMT change from baseline at 12 months (p = 0.031) and fewer number of injections (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal brolucizumab injection effectively improved visual and anatomical outcomes and achieved significant polyp regression in treatment-naive PCV patients. Complete polyp regression and the reduction rate of vascular lesion size and polyp size after loading injection significantly influence the treatment outcome of PCV patients. However, careful monitoring and preoperative warning is warranted due to occurrence of brolucizumab-related IOI.

Asunto(s)

Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Coroides , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Pólipos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pólipos/tratamiento farmacológico , Pólipos/diagnóstico , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Coroides/irrigación sanguínea , Coroides/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fondo de Ojo , Neovascularización Coroidal/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Coroidal/diagnóstico , Neovascularización Coroidal/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Enfermedades de la Coroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Coroides/diagnóstico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vasculopatía Coroidea Polipoidea

RESUMEN

Long-lasting anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have become an option to reduce treatment frequency, with ongoing research exploring optimal responses and safety profiles. This review delves into molecular targets, pharmacological aspects, and strategies for achieving effective and enduring disease control in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The molecular pathways involved in macular neovascularization, including angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, are explored. VEGF, PlGF, Ang-1, and Ang-2 play crucial roles in regulating angiogenesis, influencing vessel growth, maturation, and stability. The complex interplay of these factors, along with growth factors like TGFß and bFGF, contributes to the pathogenesis of neovascular membranes. Current anti-VEGF therapies, including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab, are discussed with a focus on their pharmacokinetics and clinical applications. Strategies to achieve sustained disease control in AMD involve smaller molecules, increased drug dosages, and novel formulations. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular targets and pharmacological aspects of neovascular AMD treatment.

Asunto(s)

Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/metabolismo , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Neovascularización Patológica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To compare the one-year outcomes between intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) monotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a second-line treatment in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) who did not respond to first-line therapy. METHODS: This case-control study included eyes with PCV that do not respond to aflibercept or ranibizumab. The patients were retrospectively registered. We compared outcomes, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomical results, and the need for additional treatments, between IVBr and a combination therapy using PDT as second-line treatments for refractory PCV, after adjusting for potential confounders. We analyzed E-values to evaluate the robustness of the results against unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes received IVBr, and twenty-four underwent PDT. No apparent differences were observed in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) changes from baseline between the groups (IVBr vs. PDT: BCVA, 0.01 ± 0.47 logMAR vs. 0.04 ± 0.18 logMAR, P-value = 0.756; CMT: - 36.3 ± 99.4 µm vs. - 114.7 ± 181.4 µm, P-value = 0.146). Only in the PDT group, five eyes (20.8%) did not require additional treatment after the second-line treatment, the adjusted odds ratio indicating no further treatment needed was 11.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.42-2070.07, P-value = 0.019). The E-value for the adjusted odds ratio was 23.44. CONCLUSIONS: Both second-line treatments for PCV exhibited similar visual and anatomical outcomes. Only in the PDT-treated eyes were there some patients who did not require further treatment after second-line therapy.