Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pers Med ; 12(9)2022 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36143316

RESUMEN

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the medium-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients with closed, displaced, and unstable, simple or complex, intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs) treated with a bridging external fixator (BEF) and optional K-wires (KWs). AO classification was used to differentiate the injuries radiographically. Clinical-functional outcomes were evaluated using the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation Score (PRWHE Score) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH). A total of 269 dorsally displaced fractures of 202 female (75%) and 67 male subjects (25%) were included, with a mean follow-up of 58.0 months. Seventy-five patients (28%) were treated by additional KWs. No differences were found comparing the two groups of patients (BEF vs. BEF + KWs) regarding age, sex, and fracture side (dominant vs. non-dominant). PRWHE and QuickDASH scores were lower in the BEF + KWs group compared to the BEF group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0007, respectively). Thus, patients treated with KWs had a better clinical outcome. Beta multivariate regression analysis confirmed that patients of the BEF + KWs group exhibited a better PRWHE score but not a better QuickDASH score. Patients treated by the BEF + KWs with the fracture on the dominant site were characterised by better clinical outcomes. Older patients had a better PRWHE score independently from the treatment. Our findings suggest that the use of BEF for DRFs with optional KWs can be indicated in both young and elderly patients of any gender, independent of limb side and fracture pattern. As the best functional results were achieved in the elderly when KWs were added, the combination of BEF and KWs seems to be mainly indicated for the treatment of DRF, also complex, in the elderly population.

2.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol ; 7(1)2021 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35076530

RESUMEN

Performing MR investigation on patients instrumented with external fixators is still controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of MR imaging of the knee structures in the presence of bridging external fixators. Different cadaveric lower limbs were instrumented with the MR-conditional external fixators Hofmann III (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), Large external Fixator (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA), XtraFix (Zymmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) and a newer implant of Ketron Peek CA30 and ERGAL 7075 pins, Dolphix®, (Citieffe, Bologna, Italy). The specimens were MR scanned before and after the instrumentation. The images were subjectively judged by a pool of blinded radiologists and then quantitatively evaluated calculating signal intensity, signal to noise and contrast to noise in the five regions of interest. The area of distortion due to the presence of metallic pins was calculated. All the images were considered equally useful for diagnosis with no differences between devices (p > 0.05). Only few differences in the quantification of images have been detected between groups while the presence of metallic components was the main limit of the procedure. The mean length of the radius of the area of distortion of the pins were 53.17 ± 8.19 mm, 45.07 ± 4.33 mm, 17 ± 5.4 mm and 37.12 ± 10.17 mm per pins provided by Zimmer, Synthes, Citieffe and Stryker, respectively (p = 0.041). The implant of Ketron Peek CA30 and ERGAL 7075 pins showed the smallest distortion area.

3.
Injury ; 45 Suppl 6: S58-63, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25457321

RESUMEN

Fractures that involve the distal area of the tibia are associated with a high percentage of complications. Soft tissue oedema, swelling, blisters, skin abrasions and open wounds could compromise the outcome of these lesions. The waiting time before surgery with ORIF is mostly due to soft tissue conditions. Early application of a simple joint-spanning external fixator would achieve the initial goal of stability and the respect of soft tissue, thereby decreasing the time necessary for definitive treatment. A total of 40 consecutive patients (22 male and 18 female) with a mean age of 52 years (range 17-82 years) with distal tibial fracture treated between January 2010 and January 2013 were evaluated. Early temporary external fixation was the first treatment step. Twenty patients had pilon fractures, characterised by the intra-articular involvement of the distal tibia with metaphyseal extension, and 20 patients had malleolar fracture-dislocation. Patients were divided into two groups, A and B. Group A comprised 10 patients with ankle fracture-dislocation and bone fragmentation, who were treated with a temporary bridging external fixation that was maintained after ORIF to exploit ligamentotaxis during the first phases of bone healing. In Group B (30 patients), the external fixation was removed after ORIF. The results of the study are in line with the recent literature: temporary external fixation in high-energy trauma and fracture-dislocation of the ankle enables soft tissue to be restored, which facilitates postoperative assessment of bone fragments by CT scan. The complication rate in this study was 5% in patients with malleolar fractures and 20% in patients with pilon fractures. The maintenance of temporary external fixation after ORIF synthesis during the entire first stage of bone healing seems to be a good method of treatment that has a low rate of soft tissue complications.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Fijadores Externos , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Traumatismos del Tobillo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Abiertas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Biomed Mater Eng ; 23(6): 485-93, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165551

RESUMEN

Effectiveness of an alternating electric current (AC) stimulation in prevention of bone deformity for comminuted intraarticular fracture of distal radius were verified by comparing postoperative results treated with a wrist-bridging external fixator combined with or without an AC stimulator (EF and NEF, respectively), and a palmar locking plate (LP). This study evaluated 92 cases (mean age 67.9 ± 11.4 years) of type C2 and 60 cases (mean age 69.7 ± 9.5 years) of type C3 distal radius fractures, as classified by the Association for Osteosynthesis. In total, 55 and 24 cases were treated with EF and NEF, respectively; and 73 cases were treated with LP. Callus appeared 27.5 ± 4.6 days postoperatively and the external skeletal fixation period was significantly shorter in the EF group than in the NEF group. The decrease in radial length was significantly lower in the EF group when compared to the LP group. There were no significant differences among the groups for the other radiographic and functional parameters. AC stimulation combined to the external fixation may be a promising method to prevent postoperative deformity in the severely comminuted intraarticular fractures by accelerating callus maturation and facilitating new bone bridging across the gap of fracture site.


Asunto(s)
Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Conminutas/terapia , Fracturas Intraarticulares/terapia , Radio (Anatomía)/patología , Anciano , Estimulación Eléctrica , Fijadores Externos , Femenino , Fracturas Conminutas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Humanos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía
5.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 3(1): 62-8, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21369480

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A second staged operation using temporary bridging external fixation (TBEF) has been widely used in patients with periarticular complex fracture, yet few papers have been published on the related complications. The purpose of this study was to report the complication rate and pitfalls directly related to TBEF through a retrospective study and to suggest some solutions. METHODS: Fifty-nine cases that were treated by using TBEF were studied among 195 periarticular complex fractures. We retrospectively collected the clinical and radiological data and then the study data was evaluated for 1) cases with unsatisfactory restoration of length, 2) cases with deep infection caused by half pins invading the zone of definitive fixation, and 3) neurovascular injuries related to half pins. RESULTS: Complications were observed in 7/59 cases (11%). Problems related to the achievement of length were observed in one case of distal tibia fracture and 2 cases of distal femur fracture. Half pin related infection was observed in 2 cases of distal femur fracture. Neurovascular injury (medial calcaneal nerve injury in a distal tibia fracture) was observed in 2 cases. Among 7 complications, four were related to using TBEF in distal femur fracture. This is because the abundant leg muscles have strong deforming force and infection might be increased due to frequent irritation by the half pins. CONCLUSIONS: TBEF is a simple procedure with several advantages. However, complications might be observed if certain principles are not followed. It is thought that many complications due to TBEF can be reduced if the half pins are not inserted in the zone of injury, restoration of length is fully achieved and the neurovascular characteristics are carefully considered. In particular, much more caution is needed in the distal femur, which has abundant muscles surrounding it.


Asunto(s)
Fijadores Externos/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación de Fractura/efectos adversos , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/métodos , Humanos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
6.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) | ID: wpr-115530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A second staged operation using temporary bridging external fixation (TBEF) has been widely used in patients with periarticular complex fracture, yet few papers have been published on the related complications. The purpose of this study was to report the complication rate and pitfalls directly related to TBEF through a retrospective study and to suggest some solutions. METHODS: Fifty-nine cases that were treated by using TBEF were studied among 195 periarticular complex fractures. We retrospectively collected the clinical and radiological data and then the study data was evaluated for 1) cases with unsatisfactory restoration of length, 2) cases with deep infection caused by half pins invading the zone of definitive fixation, and 3) neurovascular injuries related to half pins. RESULTS: Complications were observed in 7/59 cases (11%). Problems related to the achievement of length were observed in one case of distal tibia fracture and 2 cases of distal femur fracture. Half pin related infection was observed in 2 cases of distal femur fracture. Neurovascular injury (medial calcaneal nerve injury in a distal tibia fracture) was observed in 2 cases. Among 7 complications, four were related to using TBEF in distal femur fracture. This is because the abundant leg muscles have strong deforming force and infection might be increased due to frequent irritation by the half pins. CONCLUSIONS: TBEF is a simple procedure with several advantages. However, complications might be observed if certain principles are not followed. It is thought that many complications due to TBEF can be reduced if the half pins are not inserted in the zone of injury, restoration of length is fully achieved and the neurovascular characteristics are carefully considered. In particular, much more caution is needed in the distal femur, which has abundant muscles surrounding it.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Fijadores Externos/efectos adversos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación de Fractura/efectos adversos , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/etiología , Nervios Periféricos/lesiones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA