RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human milk feeding rates in the United Kingdom are a public health concern. Changes to United Kingdom policy and practice are needed to improve lactation support. These should be informed by those with lived experience of human milk feeding and those who provide support. RESEARCH AIM: The aim of this study was to identify research, policy, and practice priorities for increasing human milk feeding rates using insights from a wide range of stakeholders. A secondary aim was to evaluate the influence of a World Café on individual attendees and their interactions within the organizations and communities of which they are a part. METHODS: The research employed a participatory qualitative design, incorporating a cross-sectional survey and World Café discussions. World Café is a novel approach to engaging stakeholders in discussion, resulting in consensus-building and participatory-driven recommendations. A pre-event survey was completed by a self-selected sample of 67 participants; 37 of these (55%) took part in World Café discussions or an online focus group. World Café discussions and the online focus groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Following the World Café, 12 participants (32%) completed a post-event survey, and eight (22%) completed an additional follow-up survey at 2 months. RESULTS: Priority policy and practice changes were identified, including enhancing education, the need for dedicated funding for human milk feeding support, the need to include family within support provision, and the need to change policy regarding media representations of infant feeding. In addition, World Café methodology proved valuable for facilitating networking and instigating changes in relation to support. CONCLUSION: World Café generated stakeholder agreed-on priorities for research and policy. Many of the recommendations from historical policy and guidance continue to be areas for further development.

RESUMEN

Objective: The purpose of this research is to develop a participatory health cadre model to enhance exclusive breastfeeding coverage through initial stages using the Imogene King model. Methods: This study employs a mixed-methods approach with sequential exploratory designs. Qualitative research utilized in-depth interviews with informants including the head of the community health center, nutrition officers from the health center, the coordinator of Maternal and Child Health (MCH) midwives, village midwives, breastfeeding mothers, families of breastfeeding mothers, and health cadres. Quantitative research respondents consist of health cadres. The quantitative study utilizes a quasi-experimental method with a design paradigm known as the one-group pre and post-test design to measure health cadre perception on exclusive breastfeeding. Results: This study yields elements from Imogene King that form a participatory health cadre model to enhance exclusive breastfeeding coverage, consisting of interaction, perception, communication, transaction, role, growth and development, time, and space. Transactions represent the objective integration of the health cadre participation model, as demonstrated by the behavioral shifts observed in mothers regarding breastfeeding their infants. The t-test results indicate that exclusive breastfeeding monitoring training is effective and successful in enhancing exclusive breastfeeding coverage (Sig. value = 0.000 < 0.05). In addition, the effectiveness of exclusive breastfeeding monitoring training falls within the category of good or high. Conclusion: The research findings indicate the success of the participatory health cadre model in improving exclusive breastfeeding coverage.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improving breastfeeding practices is a worldwide priority. Pharmacists have the opportunity to actively promote breastfeeding and educate parents as well as the general public about its benefits. RESEARCH AIMS: The aims of this study are to investigate Jordanian pharmacists' present breastfeeding support practices and perceptions regarding their need for education and training in breastfeeding support. METHODS: To examine sociodemographic characteristics of community pharmacists in Jordan and their current breastfeeding support practices and educational needs, a descriptive cross-sectional online (self-report) survey was conducted. Through social media, pharmacists working in community pharmacies in Jordan were recruited between August 2021 and February 2022. The level of breastfeeding support participants had been provided with was measured using eight items in a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 5 (Always) to 1 (Never). Each participant self-reported the frequency of advice/information given to breastfeeding women in each of these areas. Univariate and multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors associated with the level of breastfeeding support. RESULTS: Participants (N = 381) reported a high level of breastfeeding support, but expressed a need for training and education for further improvement. The breastfeeding support score of female participants was found to be 0.12 higher than that of males (Beta = 0.12, p = .02), 0.16 higher in married participants compared to non-married participants (Beta = 0.16, p = .03), and 0.10 higher in participants working in rural areas compared to those working in urban areas (Beta = 0.10, p = .04). CONCLUSION: While community pharmacists generally report a high level of breastfeeding support, our findings revealed demographic differences. Attention to specific areas of need might enhance what pharmacists could offer; however, additional research would be required to guide the specific educational content.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Breastfeeding education and support have the potential to improve breastfeeding outcomes. However, there is a lack of research on the impact of breastfeeding education on predominant breastfeeding in Nepal and other South Asian countries. This study aimed to report the rate of predominant breastfeeding at the first, fourth, and sixth months of birth and examine the influence of breastfeeding promotion on predominant breastfeeding. Methods: A community-based prospective cohort study was conducted in western Nepal. A total of 735 mother-infant pairs were recruited within 30 days of childbirth and followed up at the fourth and sixth months to collect data on infant feeding practices. Results: The rate of predominant breastfeeding at first, fourth, and sixth months were 88.6% (N = 735), 78.2% (N = 715), and 26.3% (N = 711), respectively, showing a significant decline with infant age. Mothers who received support on breastfeeding skills (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]: 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.73-3.75), those who received advice on keeping mother-infant together (AOR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.14-4.22) and who had initiated breastfeeding within 1 h of childbirth (AOR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.73-3.75), and who were educated, had higher likelihood of predominant breastfeeding at sixth month. Conclusion: This study asserts a need for continuous and focused breastfeeding promotion programs to educate and support lactating mothers.

RESUMEN

Breastfeeding has been extensively studied in relation to breast cancer risk. The results of the reviewed studies consistently show a decreased risk of breast cancer associated with breastfeeding, especially for 12 months or longer. This protective effect is attributed to hormonal, immunological, and physiological changes during lactation. Breastfeeding also appears to have a greater impact on reducing breast cancer risk in premenopausal women and specific breast cancer subtypes. Encouraging breastfeeding has dual benefits: benefiting infants and reducing breast cancer risk long-term. Healthcare professionals should provide evidence-based guidance on breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity, while public health policies should support breastfeeding by creating enabling environments. This review examines the existing literature and analyzes the correlation between breastfeeding and breast cancer risk.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding confers significant maternal and infant benefits; however, breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal in the United States. A parent's decision to breastfeed is influenced by non-modifiable and modifiable factors, including breastfeeding knowledge and self-efficacy. There is a positive correlation between high maternal self-efficacy and breastfeeding duration. Parents increasingly rely on technology for health information. RESEARCH AIM: To determine if a smartphone application affected maternal self-efficacy and breastfeeding exclusivity rates. METHOD: This study was a randomized, controlled pilot study examining the effect of an educational program, included in a smartphone application, on breastfeeding self-efficacy (assessed in postpartum Week 1 and Weeks 4-6) and breastfeeding rates (assessed in postpartum Weeks 4-6). Forty participants were recruited using block randomization to intervention (17 of 20 completed the study) and usual care (19 of 20 completed the study) groups. To examine the pre-test/post-test difference in the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form total scores, a change in score (post-intervention minus pre-intervention) was calculated for each parent. RESULT: The intervention group (phone application and usual care) showed greater change in self-efficacy scores (M = 7.6, SD = 7.8) compared to the control group (usual care; M = 1.2, SD = 3.7, p = .001). The rate of exclusive breastfeeding was nearly twice as high in the intervention group as in the control group, but did not reach statistical significance (p = .093). CONCLUSION: The investigators found enhanced breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding rates among postpartum women receiving a smartphone educational program in the first 6 weeks postpartum. Further studies on smartphone interventions will develop our understanding of this technology in improving breastfeeding rates.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Breastfeeding is the most accessible and cost-effective activity available to public health and has been shown to be one of the most effective preventive measures mothers can take to protect their children's health. Despite the well-documented benefits, the UK has one of the lowest breastfeeding rates in the world. The Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly (BBF) toolkit was developed through highly structured technical and academic collaboration, led by Yale University. It provides an evidence-based process to help countries assess their breastfeeding status and readiness to scale up, and identifies concrete measures countries can take to sustainably increase breastfeeding rates, based on data-driven recommendations. BBF is grounded in the Breastfeeding Gear Model complex adaptive systems framework which is made up of eight simultaneous conditions that sustain breastfeeding. In 2018, a committee of multi-agency stakeholders implemented the BBF process in England, collecting evidence to score the 'gear' components of England's breastfeeding environment against 54 benchmarks. The Training and Programme Delivery gear received the highest score, attributable to existing learning outcomes for health professionals and practitioners, peer supporters and specialist services, although there is a need for greater coordination and integration. The lowest scores were given for Promotion and Coordination, Goals and Monitoring due to the lack of a dedicated national strategy for breastfeeding and poor sharing of localised strategies and programmes. The process generated clear recommendations highlighting the need for more robust routine infant feeding data collection and reporting, and the necessity for strengthening leadership, monitoring and oversight to scale up and sustain breastfeeding.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aimed to investigate the impact of intrapartum and post-partum complications and newborn care practices on early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF). Data for the study came from a prospective cohort study in Ethiopia that recruited and followed pregnant and post-partum women from 2019 to 2021. Resident enumerators conducted interviews at enrolment in 2019 and follow-ups at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year post-partum. The present analysis is based on data from the baseline survey and 6 weeks follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of newborn care practices and intrapartum and post- partum complications on EIBF (the proportion of newborns who initiated breastfeeding within the first hour of birth). Overall, 2660 mother-infant pairs were included in this analysis. After adjustment, EIBF was less likely among women who experienced intrapartum haemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.97), malpresentation (AOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.72) and convulsions (AOR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.34-0.66) during childbirth. Mother-newborn skin-to-skin contact increased the likelihood of EIBF (AOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.11-1.94). Women who experienced post-partum haemorrhage (AOR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47-0.84), retained placenta for more than 30 min (AOR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24-0.52) and convulsions after delivery (AOR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.79) were less likely to initiate breastfeeding early. Also, women who had a caesarean birth (AOR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41), delivered outside of a healthcare facility (AOR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99) or had twin birth (AOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.85) were less likely to initiate breastfeeding early. Skin-to-skin contact should be encouraged whenever possible, and women with obstetric complications should be encouraged and supported to initiate breastfeeding early.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exclusive breastfeeding practice for 6 months is a critical global public health goal. In 2020, only 44% of infants globally, 31% in Central and West Africa, and 43% in Ghana, were exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life. RESEARCH AIM: To critically evaluate disparities in exclusive breastfeeding practice for 6 months in Ghana. METHODS: The scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) six-stage scoping review process. The online databases of American Psychological Association PsychInfo (APA PsychInfo), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, and Scopus were searched with keywords inclusive of Ghana, exclusive breastfeeding, breastfeeding, infant feeding, lactation, lactating, and exclusive. Eligibility criteria included full-text, peer-reviewed research articles written in the English language without limitation to specific years. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Initially, 317 records were identified, and 15 full-text articles were eligible for the scoping review. Four main themes emerged as disparities in exclusive breastfeeding practice in Ghana. The themes were healthcare (prenatal clinic visits, delivery place, exclusive breastfeeding knowledge), personal (maternal age, Human Immunodeficiency Virus status, parity, type of delivery, breast problem), employment (unemployed, formal, or informal sector worker), and sociocultural (ethnicity/region, family support, religious beliefs, cultural practices). CONCLUSION: Disparities in exclusive breastfeeding in Ghana warrant the collaborative efforts of stakeholders for successful mitigation. Future researchers should explore the role of religion and sociocultural practices to protect, promote, and support 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding in Ghana.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Breastfeeding is the optimal source of infant nutrition, yet the mother's decision to breastfeed is complex and influenced by factors including social support and breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes. This study employed a two-group pretest-posttest design to examine whether brief, online video presentations (<2.5 minutes in length) could improve breastfeeding knowledge and attitude among males and compare the outcomes between a knowledge-based and attitude-based intervention. Collegiate male participants (N = 213, 18-40 years of age) demonstrated high breastfeeding exposure (90.1% had friends/family breastfeed) and positive attitudes (89.2% accepted women could breastfeed and work outside home) yet knowledge deficits concerning breastfeeding health benefits were identified. Breastfeeding exposure was positively associated with baseline attitude (r(212)=.186, p = .006 and knowledge (r(212)=.229, p = .001. Both intervention groups reported similar gains in attitude scores; only the knowledge-based intervention reported significant gains in knowledge (M = 1.5, SD = 2.63 vs M = -.07, SD = 1.44, (t = -5.496, df = 211, p < .05). Brief online video presentations may constitute an additional exposure to or nudging toward breastfeeding, and breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes can be positively influenced in young adult males with similar interventions that are affordable and require a minimal time commitment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding self-efficacy as a construct has been theoretically and empirically linked to exclusive breastfeeding in studies globally using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF). However, its application in the Middle East and North Africa region is limited, as it has not been validated. RESEARCH AIMS: To psychometrically validate the BSES-SF among a sample of mothers in the United Arab Emirates. METHODS: We psychometrically evaluated the Arabic version of the BSES-SF using a sample of mothers (N = 457) residing in the United Arab Emirates. We used translation techniques, item-test and item-total correlations, confirmatory factor analysis, tests of reliability, and tests of validity. RESULTS: Item-test correlations of scale items ranged from 0.67 to 0.84, while item-total correlations ranged from 0.58 to 0.81. The confirmatory factor model assessed the 14-item scale to be unidimensional with satisfactory model fit indices. Our findings suggested the Arabic-language version of the BSES-SF was a reliable measure (α = 0.95) with strong construct and discriminant validity. BSES-SF scores significantly predicted exclusive breastfeeding (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI [1.02, 1.08]) and exclusive duration (ß = .06; 95% CI [0.4, 0.08]), which suggested strong predictive, validity after adjusting for parity, maternal age, maternal education, and study site. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided rigorous evidence that the BSES-SF is a valid and reliable measure of breastfeeding self-efficacy among Arabic-speaking women in the UAE. Interventions designed specifically to increase breastfeeding self-efficacy among Arabic-speaking women may be a mechanism to increase the suboptimal rates of breastfeeding exclusivity occurring in much of the MENA region.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few researchers have explored partner breastfeeding support among Black women, who report low breastfeeding rates compared to women of other cultural groups. Ways to encourage partner support of Black women's breastfeeding can be understood from an Afrocentric perspective. RESEARCH AIM: To explore perceptions of partner support among Black mothers to develop a culturally relevant framework of partner breastfeeding support. METHODS: Secondary data analyses of qualitative data from a larger prospective, cross-sectional mixed methods study were utilized. Participants from Kentucky (N = 14), aged 23-71, who breastfed for at least 6 months, were recruited to participate in individual interviews. Professionally transcribed interviews were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) thematic analysis. RESULTS: By integrating the Breastfeeding Coparenting Framework and Optimal Conceptual Theory, we identified four culturally affirming partner support themes that participants believed impacted their breastfeeding experiences: (a) doing research, (b) offering care, (c) verbalizing praise, and (d) achieving teamwork, and three culturally incongruent partner support barrier themes: (e) withdrawing commitment, (f) politicking bodies, and (g) stripping agency. CONCLUSION: Participants who breastfed for at least 6 months largely attributed their breastfeeding success to the support received from their partners. Our findings offer a culturally relevant framework of partner breastfeeding support that can facilitate intervention efforts with participants and their partners to increase breastfeeding rates among this population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Late preterm infants (LPIs; born at 340/7 to 366/7 gestational weeks) and early term infants (ETIs; 370/7 to 386/7 gestational weeks) are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality compared with more mature infants. Breastfeeding can reduce these risks, but feeding difficulties are common among these infants and breastfeeding rates are low. We conducted a systematic review to identify the interventions available to improve any breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, or breast milk yield. Methods: A literature search was performed up to February 23, 2022, using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Google Scholar, and nine articles were included. Only one article was a randomized controlled trial, and only one included ETIs. The remaining articles were quasi-experimental and included only LPIs. Outcomes included breastfeeding duration, breastfeeding exclusivity, and/or breast milk production (volume) before 6 months actual age. Results: Professional support significantly improved exclusive breastfeeding rates. A breastfeeding education program delivered at the hospital with weekly telephone follow-up postdischarge significantly increased breastfeeding rates. Neither cup feeding nor early discharge (with in-home lactation support) improved breastfeeding rates, whereas rooming-in (versus direct admission to the neonatal intensive care unit) worsened exclusive breastfeeding rates. Discussion: This is the first systematic review to identify interventions available for both LPIs and ETIs. Overall, there are limited studies that investigate interventions promoting breastfeeding in these populations. However, breastfeeding support delivered by health care professionals seems to improve breastfeeding rates. The main limitations are the lack of randomization, blinding, and adjustment for confounding variables. Experimental studies with robust methodological design are needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Germany is only moderately breastfeeding-friendly, according to a systematic inventory from 2019. Based on a reference study, a survey on the acceptance of breastfeeding in public was conducted. The aim of the work is to capture perceptions and attitudes towards public breastfeeding in a periodic comparison. In addition, differences between the general population and mothers of young children as well as between mothers with different levels of education are considered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2020, 1007 people aged 16 and older and 307 mothers with children up to 24 months were surveyed online about public breastfeeding. The results were compared with a previous survey from 2016. RESULTS: In 2020, a larger percentage of mothers breastfeed in public than in 2016; it is avoided less often. Mothers with lower levels of education are less likely to breastfeed, also in public, and more likely to report mixed reactions. Among the general population, acceptance of public breastfeeding has declined, for example, in gastronomy. About one in six (17%) explicitly rejects breastfeeding in public. Knowledge about the health effects of breastfeeding is lower among the general public than among mothers. As in 2016, knowledge about the positive effects of breastfeeding is associated with greater acceptance of public breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: The results underline the importance of measures, for example, to communicate knowledge to the population, show breastfeeding more frequently in mass media and through positive role models, and make the settings in which families live more breastfeeding-friendly. Measures should pay special attention to women with lower levels of education.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits of breastfeeding in promoting child survival are well recognized. As one of the nutritional interventions for children, exclusive breastfeeding protects babies from various diseases that contribute to infant morbidity and mortality. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has examined the influence of breastfeeding promotion programs on exclusive breastfeeding rates in sub-Saharan Africa. RESEARCH AIM: We examined the influence of breastfeeding promotion programs on exclusive breastfeeding rates at < 1 month, and at 1-5 months of breastfeeding in sub-Saharan countries including Ghana, Burkina Faso, Uganda, South Africa, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analyses study of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies was conducted by searching in electronic databases and articles' reference lists. Two investigators independently evaluated and extracted the data. A total of 131 studies were identified using five databases. Of the 10 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for systematic review, seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. We used a random-effects model to pool studies together and performed a subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Breastfeeding promotion programs resulted in significantly higher exclusive breastfeeding rates at < 1 month (OR = 1.60, 95% CI [1.36,1.86]). However, there was no significant effect observed for exclusive breastfeeding at 1-5 months. Combined interventions were more effective in improving exclusive breastfeeding rates than individual counseling or home-based counseling alone. CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding promotion programs in sub-Saharan Africa are effective in increasing exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6 months after birth.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Scaling up effective interventions, policies and programmes can improve breastfeeding (BF) outcomes. Furthermore, considerable interest exists in learning from relatively recent successful efforts that can inform further scaling up, with appropriate adaptations, across countries. The purpose of this four-country case studies analysis was to examine why and how improvements in BF practices occurred across four contrasting countries; Burkina Faso, the Philippines, Mexico and the United States of America. Literature reviews and key informant interviews were conducted to document BF trends over time, in addition to why and how BF protection, promotion and support policies and programmes were implemented at a national level. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted. The 'Breastfeeding Gear Model' and RE-AIM (Reach; Effectiveness; Adoption; Implementation; and Maintenance) frameworks were used to understand and map the factors facilitating or hindering the scale up of the national programmes and corresponding improvements in BF practices. Each of the studied countries had different processes and timing to implement and scale up programmes to promote, protect and support breastfeeding. However, in all four countries, evidence-based advocacy, multisectoral political will, financing, research and evaluation, and coordination were key to fostering an enabling environment for BF. Furthermore, in all countries, lack of adequate maternity protection and the aggressive marketing of the breast-milk substitutes industry remains a strong source of negative feedback loops that are undermining investments in BF programmes. Country-specific best practices included innovative legislative measures (Philippines), monitoring and evaluation systems (United States of America), engagement of civil society (Mexico) and behavior change communication BF promotion (Burkina Faso) initiatives. There is an urgent need to improve maternity protection and to strongly enforce the WHO Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes.

Asunto(s)