RESUMEN

AIM & OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was in three-fold: (a) to analyze the factors that affect the hearing aid (HA) continuation/discontinuation in children with unilateral cochlear implant (CI); (b) to understand the parent's knowledge on binaural benefit; and (c) to find out any association between the hearing aid continuation/discontinuation with implant age and/or with duration of hearing aid use prior to surgery. METHOD: The study involved 97 participants who were parents of children with unilateral cochlear implants. A questionnaire with 30 questions was used to explore HA use and certain related perceptions, and a Likert scale was used for ranking responses. RESULTS: & Discussion: Only 31.9% children were using HA consistently, post CI activation The principal factor for discontinuation of HA was its helpfulness prior CI whereas children wore HA only because they were instructed during counseling. Participants did not perceive functional benefit bimodal fitting due to superiority of CI performance and poor residual hearing. Also, it was found that there is no association between neither the implant age nor duration of HA use before CI with the HA continuation/discontinuation on Chi-square test. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a need for structured comprehensive counseling and demonstration sessions to educate parents on binaural hearing to gain maximum benefits from non-invasive bimodal fitting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective:To investigate speech recognition among children with a unilateral cochlear implant（CI）, bilateral CI, and bimodal hearing and identify the benefits of binaural hearing. Methods:A total of 67 children with severe sensorineural hearing loss who received bilateral CI, bimodal hearing, and unilateral CI from 2012 to 2021 were recruited, including 23 cases with unilateral CI, 25 cases of bimodal hearing, and 19 cases of bilateral CI. The aided hearing threshold at 250-4000 Hz and speech recognition performance of two-syllable words and short sentences in quiet and noisy environments were tested, respectively. Results:There was no significant difference in the hearing threshold results of the bilateral CI group, the bimodal hearing group, and the unilateral CI group by ANOVA（P>0.05）. According to the paired t-test within the group, the speech recognition of disyllabic words and short sentences in quiet and noisy environments were significantly different among the three groups（P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in the speech recognition rates of disyllabic words and short sentences among the three groups in a quiet environment（P>0.05）, but there was a statistically significant difference in a noisy environment（P<0.05）. Additional multiple linear regression analysis showed no significant difference in the recognition rates of disyllabic words and short sentences between the bimodal group and the bilateral CI group in quiet and noisy environments（ß=-0.567, P>0.05; ß=-0.643, P>0.05）. There was a statistically significant difference in speech recognition of disyllabic words and short sentences between the bimodal group and the unilateral CI group in the noise environment（ß=-0.124, P<0.05）, but the difference was not statistically significant in a quiet environment（ß=-0.671, P>0.05）; there was a statistically significant difference in the recognition rate of disyllabic words and short sentences between the bilateral CI group and the unilateral CI group in the noise environment（ß=-0.226, P<0.05）, but the difference was not statistically significant in a quiet environment（ß=-0.341, P>0.05）. Conclusion:Clinicians and guardians are encouraged to provide the most comprehensive audiological evaluation for children with hearing loss. Bilateral CI and bimodal hearing have demonstrated enormous advantages over unilateral CI regarding speech recognition in noise. Bimodal hearing deems a strong recommendation if the contralateral ear has sufficient speech recognition capability. Bilateral CI should be warranted if hearing aids deemed to be ineffective.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a directional microphone (beamformer) and continuous noise reduction algorithms (CNRs) in bimodally aided cochlear implant (CI) users and to find the optimum hearing aid (HA) and CI settings of the beamformer and CNRs. METHODS: Speech reception threshold (SRT) and acceptable noise level (ANL) were assessed in twelve adult CI users for unilateral CI, unilateral HA and bimodal listening. To assess the effect of the UltraZoom beamformer and the ClearVoice™ and NoiseBlock CNRs on SRT and ANL, speech was presented from the front in multi-source speech-shaped noise. RESULTS: With unilateral CI, application of UltraZoom resulted in a significant improvement of the median SRT and ANL by 3.8 and 4.3 dB, respectively. For bimodal listening with UltraZoom, a significant improvement of 3.5 dB in median SRT was found. There was no significant effect of using the CNRs on speech intelligibility in noise or noise tolerance in either listening condition. CONCLUSION: UltraZoom should be applied on the CI to improve speech intelligibility in face to face conversations with multi-source background noise. However, due to the heterogeneous data, no recommendations for the settings of UltraZoom on the HA or of ClearVoice/NoiseBlock on either device can be given. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00010807.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The population of unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users with aidable residual hearing in the contralateral ear is continuously growing. Aiding the contralateral ear with a hearing aid has been shown to provide substantial benefit regarding speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise, sound quality, localization ability and listening effort. In this study, a dedicated hearing aid with the accompanying fitting prescription, tailored to the needs of bimodal listeners was evaluated in nine bimodal CI users. Speech intelligibility scores in noise revealed on-par performance of the dedicated bimodal fitting compared to the clinical standard prescription. 78% of the bimodal CI users preferred the dedicated bimodal fitting over the clinical standard. The minimal subject-specific finetuning effort required during the dedicated bimodal fitting process emphasizes the clinical efficiency.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Bimodal fitting (BF) allows children with cochlear implant to benefit from binaural hearing advantages. Three major binaural hearing advantages, which enhance hearing function of people with normal hearing, are head shadow effect (HSE), binaural squelch effect (BSQ) and binaural summation effect (BSU). This study in pediatric patients attempting to measure the auditory benefits of bimodal stimulation in children with long-standing use of a cochlear implant (CI), and residual hearing on the contralateral side. METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated binaural advantages in 24 children of 8-12 years who had undergone cochlear implantation in a cochlear implant center in Tehran and continuously used BF. Improved score of speech perception in noise (SPiN) under BF condition, as compared to the application of cochlear implant alone, was a binaural advantage found in this study. Each binaural advantage was measured by obtaining the SPiN score under different listening and noise conditions, using relevant formulas. The measured value of each advantage reflects the improved score of SPiN, caused by that certain advantage. RESULTS: In this study, improved mean SPiN score caused by the HSE, BSQ and BSU was, respectively, 3.13, 1.42 and 2.04 dB, indicating greater binaural advantages and hence improved SPiN, under BF condition in comparison with cochlear implant alone. CONCLUSION: Children with unilateral cochlear implant and measurable residual hearing in non-implanted ear can benefit from binaural advantages and better SPiN when hearing aid is used in the unaided ear.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study surveyed practising cochlear implant (CI) audiologists with the aim of: (1) characterizing UK clinical practice around the management and fitting of a contralateral hearing aid (HA) in adult unilateral CI users ('bimodal aiding'); (2) identifying factors that may limit the provision of bimodal aiding; and (3) ascertaining the views of audiologists on bimodal aiding. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to audiologists working at the 20 centres providing implantation services to adults in the UK. RESULTS: Responses were received from 19 of the 20 centres. The majority of centres reported evaluating HAs as part of the candidacy assessment for cochlear implantation. However, a majority also indicated that they do not take responsibility for the contralateral HA following implantation, despite identifying few practical limiting factors. Bimodal aiding was viewed as more beneficial than wearing the implant alone, with most respondents actively encouraging bimodal listening where possible. Respondents reported that fitting bimodal devices to take account of each other's settings was potentially more beneficial than independently fit devices, but such sympathetic fitting was not routine practice in any centre. DISCUSSION: The results highlight some potential inconsistencies in the provision of bimodal aiding across the UK as reported by practising audiologists. The views of audiologists about what is best practice appear to be at odds with the nature and structure of the services currently offered. CONCLUSION: Stronger evidence that bimodal aiding can be beneficial for UK patients would be required in order for service providers to justify the routine provision of bimodal aiding and to inform guidelines to shape routine clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Biological, structural, and acoustical constraints faced by cochlear implant (CI) users can alter the perception of music. Bimodal fitting not only provides bilateral hearing but can also improve auditory skills. This study was conducted to assess the impact of this amplification style on the emotional perception of music among children with hearing loss (HL). METHODS: Twenty-five children with congenital severe to profound HL and unilateral CIs, 20 children with bimodal fitting, and 30 children with normal hearing participated in this study. Their emotional perceptions of music were measured using a method where children indicated happy or sad feelings induced by music by pointing to pictures of faces showing these emotions. RESULTS: Children with bimodal fitting obtained significantly higher mean scores than children with unilateral CIs for both happy and sad music items and in overall test scores (P < .001). Both groups with HL obtained significantly lower scores than children with normal hearing (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Bimodal fitting results in a better emotional perception of music compared to unilateral CI. Given the influence of music in neurological and linguistic development and social interactions, it is important to evaluate the possible benefits of bimodal fitting prescriptions for individuals with unilateral CIs.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This paper compares language development and speech perception of children with bimodal fitting (a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the opposite ear) or bilateral cochlear implantation. METHODS: Participants were children enrolled in the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment study. Language development was assessed at 3 years of age using standardized tests. Speech perception was evaluated at 5 years of age. Speech was presented from a frontal loudspeaker, and babble noise was presented either from the front or from both sides. RESULTS: On average, there was no significant difference in language outcomes between 44 children with bimodal fitting and 49 children with bilateral cochlear implants; after controlling for a range of demographic variables. Earlier age at cochlear implant activation was associated with better outcomes. Speech perception in noise was not significantly different between children with bimodal fitting and those with bilateral cochlear implants. Compared to normal-hearing children, children with cochlear implants required a better signal-to-noise ratio to perform at the same level, but demonstrated spatial release from masking of a similar magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study found that language scores for children with bilateral implants were higher than those with bimodal fitting or those with unilateral implants, but neither reached significance level.

Asunto(s)