RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of 2 treatment methods for massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs): partial repair (PR) and PR with long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) augmentation. Biceps tendon augmentation is believed to promote better healing at the bone-tendon junction, leading to improved clinical and radiologic outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included patients with chronic, massive and irreparable RCTs involving both the supraspinatus (SSP) and infraspinatus muscles. Only patients with failure of nonoperative treatment and at least 1 year of follow-up between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the chosen treatment method. Irreparability was defined intraoperatively as the inability to achieve sustainable repair of the SSP after complete release, typically corresponding to a Goutallier classification of stage ≥ 3 and Patte classification of stage 3. The clinical assessment protocol involved measurements of range of motion and shoulder strength, as well as the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and Simple Shoulder Test score. Radiologic assessment comprised measurements of the acromiohumeral distance, Hamada classification, Sugaya classification, and Goutallier classification of both the SSP and infraspinatus. RESULTS: The study included data from 60 patients (30 in each group) with a mean age of 62.5 years and a mean follow-up period of 34.5 months. The retear rate was 43.3% for PR with LHBT augmentation and 73.3% for PR alone (P = .036). During the final examination, statistically significant differences in favor of PR with LHBT augmentation were observed for the CMS (76.2 ± 10.9 vs. 70.9 ± 11.5, P = .034), Sugaya classification (3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9, P = .035), and acromiohumeral distance (5.8 ± 2 mm vs. 4.7 ± 1.3 mm, P = .021). There were no significant differences between the groups in range of motion, shoulder strength, Hamada classification, Simple Shoulder Test score, and postoperative Goutallier stage. CONCLUSION: PR with LHBT augmentation for patients with irreparable, massive RCTs provides a lower retear rate and better humeral head centralization, as well as improved results measured by the CMS, compared with PR alone.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Artroscopía/métodos , Tendones/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rango del Movimiento ArticularRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether trans-tendon suture bridge repair with tenotomized pathologic biceps tendon augmentation improves mid-term clinical outcomes for high-grade partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesions or not. METHODS: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of arthroscopic trans-tendon suture bridge repair with tenotomized pathologic biceps tendon augmentation was conducted. Total 115 patients (44 men and 71 women) with minimum 2 years follow-up were enrolled in our study. Their mean age was 59.7 ± 7.6 (38-77) years and mean follow-up were 6.9 ± 2.5 (2 ~ 10) years. Clinical assessment and radiological outcomes using post-operative MRI were evaluated at last follow-up. RESULTS: All these tears were high-grade PASTA lesions in which mean cuff tear size (exposed footprint) was anteroposterior length 15.7 ± 6.3 mm (5-25 mm) and mediolateral width 10.1 ± 3.6 mm 6.4 mm (5-16 mm). At last follow-up, mean pain VAS, ASES, UCLA, and SST scores were improved from pre-operative values of 5, 59, 21, and 7 to post-operative values of 1, 84.4, 29.5, and 9.4, respectively (p value < 0.001). ROM such as forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation to the back were improved from a pre-operative mean of 148° (±24), 144° (±24), L2 (Buttock-T7) to a post-operative mean of 161° (±10), 160.0° (±12), and T12 (L3-T5), respectively (p value < 0.001). Follow-up MRI showed Sugaya classification type I in 24 patients (20.9%), type II in 78 patients (67.8%), type III in 11 patients (9.6%) and type 4 in 2 patients (1.7%) were found. As complications, shoulder stiffness was found in five patients, Popeye deformity in two patients and retear in two patients. Revision surgery of the retear was performed in 2 patients. At the last follow-up, 17% (20/115 patients) reported occasional discomfort at the extremes of range of motion during a heavy work or sports activities. CONCLUSIONS: In high-grade PASTA lesions, arthroscopic trans-tendon suture bridge repair with tenotomized pathologic biceps tendon augmentation could be a useful treatment modality capable of preserving rotator cuff footprint, providing simultaneous biceps tenodesis, inducing better tendon healing and possibly preventing tendon buckling and residual pain of the conventional trans-tendon repair methods. These specific methods showed satisfactory outcomes and decreased residual shoulder discomfort (17%) at mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective case study.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Tendones/cirugía , Tenotomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although various surgical techniques have been used to treat irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), debate remains regarding which treatment is most effective. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of partial rotator cuff repair versus repair with augmentation of the tenotomized long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). METHODS: This study included 76 patients with large to massive RCTs. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with LHBT augmentation was performed in 39 patients (group I), while partial repair was performed in 37 patients (group II). Clinical and functional outcomes were compared with a visual analog scale for pain and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and Korean Shoulder Score. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 29.6 ± 7.8 months (range, 24-51 months). Significant improvements in pain and clinical scores were observed in both groups at the last follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in pain, clinical scores, or range of motion between the 2 groups at any time point. Retears were observed in 16 patients in group I (41.0%) and 14 in group II (37.8%, P = .78). Augmented LHBT pathology was observed in 10 patients (25.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Both partial repair and repair with LHBT augmentation were effective in improving clinical and radiologic outcomes. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or repaired cuff integrity were observed between the groups. The investment of operation time and effort in augmenting the LHBT in the treatment of irreparable RCTs is not recommended.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Tenotomía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/cirugía , Dimensión del Dolor , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Tendones/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Understanding of the distal biceps anatomy, mechanics, and biology during the last 75 years has greatly improved the physician's ability to advise and to treat patients with ruptured distal tendons. The goal of this paper is to review the past and current advances on complete distal biceps ruptures as well as controversies and future directions that were discussed and debated during the closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons meeting in 2015.