RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The decremental properties of the nodoventricular pathway (NVP) are uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: During short RP supraventricular tachycardia, a His-refractory premature ventricular contraction (PVC) consistently terminated the tachycardia without atrial capture immediately after the PVC. Whereas a slightly earlier PVC failed to reset the subsequent His but terminated the tachycardia without atrial capture one cycle later. CONCLUSION: These observations are diagnostic of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed-NVP and can be explained by decremental properties in the NVP itself; greater prematurity of the PVC resulted in more decremental conduction over the NVP, causing the AVNRT termination one cycle later.

RESUMEN

In the field of cardiac electrophysiology, there is a universal desire: the discovery of a flawless diagnostic maneuver for supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). This is not merely a wish but a shared odyssey. To improve diagnostic accuracy and achieve sufficient sensitivity and specificity, numerous diagnostic maneuvers have been proposed. However, each has its limitations and prompts a search for new diagnostic techniques. This continuous cycle of discovery and refinement, which we titled "SVT Quest" is reviewed in chronological sequence. This adventure in diagnosing narrow QRS tachycardia unfolds in 3 steps: Step 1 involves differentiating atrial tachycardia from other SVTs based on the observations such as V-A-V or V-A-A-V response, ΔAA interval, VA linking, the last entrainment sequence, and response to the atrial extrastimulus. Step 2 focuses on differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia based on the observations such as tachycardia reset upon the premature ventricular contraction during His refractoriness, uncorrected/corrected postpacing interval, differential ventricular entrainment, orthodromic His capture, transition zone analysis, and total pacing prematurity. Step 3 characterizes the concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular pathway and His-ventricular pathway-related tachycardia based on observations such as V-V-A response, ΔatrioHis interval, and paradoxical reset phenomenon. There is no single diagnostic maneuver that fits all scenarios. Therefore, the ability to apply multiple maneuvers in a case allows the operator to accumulate evidence to make a likely diagnosis. Let's embark on this adventure!

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and its diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have been well-established. Traditionally, AVNRT is understood to be an intranodal reentry having two bystander pathways; the upper common pathway (UCP) which connects to the atrium and the lower common pathway which connects to the ventricle. However, the existence of the UCP remains a subject of ongoing debate. The assertion of the UCP's presence is supported by electrophysiological evidence suggesting that the atrium is not essential for the perpetuation of AVNRT. Nonetheless, numerous anatomical studies have failed to identify any structure that could be conclusively designated as the UCP. The histological and electrophysiological characteristics of the slow and fast pathways, which are the core components of AVNRT, suggest the inclusion of atrial myocardium in the reentry circuit. While clear interpretation of these discrepancies remains elusive, potential explanations may be derived from existing evidence and recent research findings concerning the actual AVNRT circuit.

RESUMEN

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) sometimes recurs even after anatomical slow pathway (SP) ablation targeting the rightward inferior extension (RIE). This multicenter study aimed to determine the reasons for AVNRT recurrence. Methods and Results: Forty-six patients were treated successfully for recurrent AVNRT. Initial treatment was for 38 slow-fast AVNRTs, 3 fast-slow AVNRTs, 2 slow-slow AVNRTs, 2 slow-fast and fast-slow AVNRTs, and 1 noninducible AVNRT. All initial treatments were of RF application to the RIE; SP elimination was achieved in 11, dual AVN physiology was seen in 29, and AVNRT remained inducible in 5. The recurrent AVNRTs included 34 slow-fast AVNRTs, 6 fast-slow AVNRTs, 3 slow-slow AVNRTs, 2 slow-fast and fast-slow AVNRTs, and 1 slow-fast and slow-slow AVNRTs. Successful ablation site was within the RIE in 39 and left inferior extension in 7. In 30 of 39, the successful RIE site was in the same area or higher than that of the initial procedure. Conclusion: For a high majority (around 85%) of patients in whom AVNRT recurs after initial ablation success, the site of a second successful procedure will be within the RIE even though the RIE was originally targeted. Furthermore, a high majority (around 86%) of sites of successful ablation will be higher than those originally targeted.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular (NV/NF) pathway is mostly a bystander, retrograde bypass tract connecting the right ventricle/right bundle branch (RBB) and slow pathway that is observed in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, its prevalence and characteristics in response to pacing maneuvers have not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of AVNRT with a bystander NV/NF pathway. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 153 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of AVNRT. After exclusion of 52 patients with inadequate electrophysiologic data, 101 patients composed the study population. RESULTS: Three patients (3.0%) had bystander concealed NV/NF pathways, all of which were connected to the slow pathway. The tachycardia was typical slow pathway/fast pathway AVNRT in 2 patients and atypical fast pathway/slow pathway AVNRT in 1 patient. In all cases, His-refractory ventricular extra-stimuli (VES) reset the AVNRTs with delay through the NV/NF pathways. Ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) in the early phase also reset the AVNRT with delay. Earlier VES and middle phase of VOP did not reset the tachycardia, and further earlier VES and late phase of VOP reset the tachycardia with advance through the RBB-His conduction. CONCLUSION: A bystander NV/NF pathway was not rare in patients with AVNRT. The VES and VOP for the AVNRTs with the bystander NV/NF pathways were characterized by the 2-phase resetting phenomenon: initial transient resetting with delay through the NV/NF pathway, and late resetting with advance through the RBB-His conduction.

RESUMEN

Numerous studies have clarified the histological characteristics of the area surrounding the atrioventricular (AV) node, commonly referred to as the triangle of Koch (ToK). Although it is suggested that the conduction of electric impulses from the atria to the ventricles via the AV node involves myocytes possessing distinct conduction properties and gap junction proteins, a comprehensive understanding of this complex conduction has not been fully established. Moreover, although various pathways have been proposed for both anterograde and retrograde conduction during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the reentrant circuits of AVNRT are not fully elucidated. Therefore, the slow pathway ablation for AVNRT has been conventionally performed, targeting both its anatomical location and slow pathway potential obtained during sinus rhythm. Recently, advancements in high-density three-dimensional (3D) mapping systems have facilitated the acquisition of more detailed electrophysiological potentials within the ToK. Several studies have indicated that the activation pattern, the low-voltage area within the ToK obtained during sinus rhythm, and the fractionated potentials acquired during tachycardia may be optimal targets for slow pathway ablation. This review provides an overview of the tissue surrounding the AV node as reported to date and summarizes the current understanding of AV conduction and AVNRT circuits. Furthermore, we discuss recent findings on slow pathway ablation utilizing high-density 3D mapping systems, exploring strategies for optimal slow pathway ablation.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based slow pathway modification (SPM) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is traditionally performed at empiric sites using anatomical landmarks and test ablation feedback within the triangle of Koch (TK). While studies have described more tailored techniques such as bipolar low voltage bridge (LVB) and wavefront collision identification, few have systematically compared the diagnostic yields of each and none have investigated whether omnipolar mapping technology provides incremental benefit. The objective of this study was to compare the utility of omnipolar and bipolar-derived qualitative and quantitative measurements in identifying and localizing dual AVN substrate in patients with versus without AVNRT. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiology study with both omnipolar and bipolar mapping from 2022-2023. RESULTS: Thirteen AVNRT cases (median age 16.1 years, 512 TK points) were compared to nine non-AVNRT controls (median age 15.7 years, 332 TK points). Among qualitative variables, an omnipolar activation vector pivot, defined as a ≥45 degree change in activation direction within the TK, had the highest positive (81%) and negative predictive values (100%) for identifying AVNRT cases and had a median distance of 1 mm from SPM sites. Among quantitative variables, the optimal discriminatory performance for successful SPM sites was observed using bipolar voltage restricted to a peak frequency >340 Hz (c statistic 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Omnipolar vector pivot analysis represents an automated, annotation-independent qualitative technique that is sensitive and specific for AVNRT substrate and co-localizes with successful SPM sites. Bipolar voltage quantitatively describes SP anisotropy better than omnipolar voltage, and the addition of peak frequency signal analysis further optimizes the selection of SPM sites.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The optimal slow pathway (SP) ablation site in cases with an inferiorly located His bundle (HIS) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 45 patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, the relationship between the HIS location and successful SP ablation site was assessed in electroanatomical maps. We assessed the location of the SP ablation site relative to the bottom of the coronary sinus ostium in the superior-to-inferior (SPSI), anterior-to-posterior (SPAP), and right-to-left (SPRL) directions. The HIS location was assessed in the same manner. The HIS location in the superior-to-inferior direction (HISSI), SPSI, SPAP, and SPRL were 17.7 ± 6.4, 1.7 ± 6.4, 13.6 ± 12.3, and -1.0 ± 13.0 mm, respectively. The HISSI was positively correlated with SPSI (R2 = 0.62; P < .01) and SPAP (R2 = 0.22; P < .01), whereas it was not correlated with SPRL (R2 = 0.01; P = .65). The distance between the HIS and SP ablation site was 17.7 ± 6.4 mm and was not affected by the location of HIS. The ratio of the amplitudes of atrial and ventricular potential recorded at the SP ablation site did not differ between the high HIS group (HISSI ≥ 13 mm) and low HIS group (HISSI < 13 mm) (0.10 ± 0.06 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06; P = .38). CONCLUSION: In cases with an inferiorly located HIS, SP ablation should be performed at a lower and more posterior site than in typical cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anatomic and electrophysiologic findings suggest that the actual circuit of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) involves the perinodal atrium. However, occasional instances in which the atrium is dissociated from the AVNRT have led to the concept of an upper common pathway (UCP). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the prevalence of UCP in AVNRT using a late atrial premature depolarization (LAPD) maneuver. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with typical AVNRT by electrophysiologic studies were enrolled. For evaluation of the presence of UCP, an LAPD was given at the coronary sinus ostium (osCS) during AVNRT, and then pacing was repeated incrementally every 10 ms. Electrograms in the earliest retrograde atrial activation site (ERAS) near the proximal His were mapped and recorded during the pacing. Results were interpreted as follows: absence of UCP-an LAPD from the osCS can reset the tachycardia without depolarizing the ERAS; presence of UCP-an LAPD from the osCS can depolarize the ERAS without resetting the tachycardia; and indeterminate-an LAPD from the osCS either resets the ERAS and tachycardia simultaneously or does not reset both. RESULTS: The LAPD maneuver was performed in 126 patients with AVNRT. It demonstrated an absence of UCP in 121 (96.0%) patients and the presence of UCP in 3 (2.4%) patients; the result was indeterminate in 2 (1.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: The LAPD maneuver revealed that the presence of UCP is indicated in only rare cases of AVNRT. In most AVNRT cases, the atrium is involved in the reentry circuit.

Asunto(s)