Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22891120

RESUMEN

Conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery has been in clinical use since 1960. Results, particularly in high-risk populations such as the very elderly and frail, continue to improve in response to the challenges posed by this growing segment of the patient population. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a fairly recent development, performed for the first time in 2002. The last decade has seen an exponential growth in the application of this technology in higher-risk populations. Results of recent randomized prospective trials demonstrate both the future promise and current problems of the TAVI approach. Many patients deemed inoperable for AVR have been treated successfully by TAVI. However, elevated procedural and late mortality rates, excessive early and late stroke, and a significant incidence of periprosthetic aortic valve insufficiency and patient-prosthesis mismatch all suggest caution in extending this technology to patients able to undergo conventional AVR with a low risk of early or late complications.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Cardiopatías Congénitas/patología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/terapia , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/patología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Humanos , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA