RESUMEN
Background Hypercoagulability is a major pathologic event in COVID-19. Factor VIII plays an important role in hemostasis, and high levels of factor VIII have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and severe disease. Little is known about the impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes in patients with hemophilia A. Methodology Retrospective data of adult male patients with COVID-19 with and without hemophilia A were retrieved from the TriNetX database (Cambridge, USA). The 1:1 propensity score-matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Patients were matched for age, race, body mass index, and medical comorbidities. Thirty-day outcomes were assessed. Results We identified 1,758 patients with pre-existing hemophilia A diagnosis prior to COVID-19 diagnosis and 5,191,908 comparators. After 1:1 propensity score matching, groups were balanced on demographics and comorbidities. All-cause mortality rates were similar between the two groups (HR 0.805; 95% CI 0.467-1.389). The frequency of severe infection, ICU admission, and composite thrombotic events did not differ between the groups. Patients with hemophilia A were hospitalized more frequently than those without a history of hemophilia A (19.2% vs. 14.4%; p<0.05). Additionally, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and composite bleeding events occurred more frequently in patients with hemophilia A (3.2% vs. 2.2%; p<0.05 and 4.0% vs. 2.8%; p<0.05, respectively). Conclusions The mortality of individuals with hemophilia A due to COVID-19 is comparable to the general population but with higher risks of hospitalization and bleeding.
RESUMEN
Thromboembolism is one of the most severe manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thrombotic complications have been reported even with the administration of thromboprophylaxis. This has led many experts to have variable opinions on the most effective prophylactic strategy and to anticipate the discovery of the ideal dosing of anticoagulation to reduce thromboembolic events and related mortality. We performed a systematic review to evaluate whether therapeutic-dose anticoagulation is superior to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation by comparing mortality rates, bleeding risks, and rates of thromboembolism. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to create our systematic review. Twenty-two records were collected from PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), after which they undertook quality appraisals. A total of 124 studies were analyzed in six systematic reviews and meta-analyses, one pooled analysis, two multicenter retrospective cohort studies, one observational study, one retrospective chart review, one evidence-based protocol, and four narrative reviews.