RESUMEN

The prediction of the coexistence of acute appendicitis and renal colic can be challenging, especially when the patient's symptoms point toward one diagnosis. In this case report, we describe a patient who presented to the emergency department with severe lower abdominal pain that was thought to be solely due to acute appendicitis. Further evaluation, however, revealed the simultaneous coexistence of a right ureteral stone, causing severe hydroureteronephrosis. The patient underwent prompt surgical management, including laparoscopic appendectomy, ureteroscopy, and double-J stent insertion, and had an uneventful postoperative recovery.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency abdominal disease, and recent studies have evaluated conservative treatment using antibiotics for uncomplicated appendicitis. Although the efficacy of conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis is known, its efficacy for complicated appendicitis remains unknown, so are risk factors for the conservative treatment of appendicitis. In our institution, conservative treatment has long been the first choice for most appendicitis cases, except for perforation. Therefore, this novel study investigated the outcomes of conservative treatment for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis and the risk factors associated with conservative treatment. AIM: To investigate the indication of conservative treatment by antibiotics for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis. METHODS: We investigated 270 patients who received conservative treatment for acute appendicitis at the Nishitokyo Central General Hospital, between April 2011 and February 2022. Twenty-eight (10.3%) patients were resistant to conservative treatment and underwent surgery. We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of conservative treatment for appendicitis and the risk factors for resistance to conservative treatment using the receiver operating characteristic curves and Cox hazard model. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two (89.7%) patients improved with conservative treatment. The significant and independent predictors of resistance to conservative treatment were body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C, appendicolith and Douglas sinus fluid visible on computed tomography (CT). The rate of resistance to conservative treatment was 66.7% (6/9) for patients with the above three factors, 22.9% (8/35) for patients with two factors (appendicolith and body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C), 16.7% (2/12) for patients with two factors (Douglas sinus fluid and appendicolith) and 11.1% (1/9) for patients with two factors (Douglas sinus fluid and body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C). CONCLUSION: A temperature ≥ 37.3 °C, appendicolith and Douglas sinus fluid on CT might be clinical risk factors of resistance to conservative treatment for acute appendicitis.

RESUMEN

An appendicolith is a calcified mass which can obstruct the appendix often leading to recurrent appendicitis. Failure to extract fecalith at the time of appendectomy can lead to recurrent inflammation in the appendiceal stump. We describe a 28-year-old man with stump appendicitis due to a retained fecalith postappendectomy. Our approach, akin to interval appendectomy, combines antibiotics and endoscopic intervention postinfection resolution. This case highlights the feasibility and safety of endoscopic management, offering a nonsurgical alternative to prevent the morbidity associated with revision surgery. Further exploration of nonsurgical modalities is warranted to optimize patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

A case is described in which appendicitis presented in a 73-year-old woman the day after a colonoscopy. Possible mechanisms for appendicitis aggravated by colonoscopy include barotrauma, irritation by residual glutaraldehyde type solution used for cleaning the endoscope, fecalith, and/or appendicolith being pushed into the orifice of the appendix by insufflation during the colonoscopy. This rare complication is likely most often unavoidable due to the pressure required to properly visualize the colon (which typically ranges from 9 to 57 mmHg) and the manipulation required to visualize and cannulate the ileocecal valve. Physicians should consider possibility of acute appendicitis after colonoscopy when evaluating abdominal pain after a recent colonoscopy.

RESUMEN

This case report depicts the diagnosis and management of the largest documented appendicolith found in the medical literature so far, measuring 4.5 cm. A 44-year-old male patient presented with a distended abdomen, right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain, constipation, and the inability to consume solid food. Laboratory tests revealed leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Abdominal X-rays showed a densely calcified structure in the right lower quadrant, and further imaging confirmed the diagnosis of appendicolithiasis. The surgical indication for appendectomy was determined, and an open surgical procedure was performed due to the severity of inflammation, minimal perforation, and extensive adhesions. The surgically removed appendix with the appendicolith was analyzed histologically, confirming appendicolithiasis, periappendicitis, perforation, and serositis. The patient was discharged in stable condition after postoperative management. Giant appendicoliths are rare and associated with an increased risk of complications. Diagnosis is typically clinical but can be enhanced by imaging modalities.

RESUMEN

Appendicoliths can drop into the peritoneal cavity during the course of an appendicectomy, or more commonly as a result of perforated appendicitis. We report the case of a patient with a history of recurrent retrohepatic abscesses over 7-year period due to a retained appendicolith and review the literature on perihepatic abscesses caused by retained appendicoliths. The abscess had been drained percutaneously 4 times without retrieval of the appendicolith and eventually the patient needed a laparotomy, drainage of the abscess, and extraction of the appendicolith. Treatment of abscesses secondary to dropped appendicoliths may be percutaneous, laparoscopic, or via conventional open surgery, but it is important to retrieve the appendicolith if recurrent abscess formation is to be avoided.

RESUMEN

Background: There are few studies on appendiceal abscess with appendicolith in children under 3 years old. This study aims to explore the success rate of non-surgical treatment of appendiceal abscess and assess the potential influence of an appendicolith on non-surgical treatment outcomes in children under 3 years old. Methods: The clinical data of children under 3 years old who were diagnosed with appendiceal abscess at the Wuhan Children's Hospital, China, from February 2013 to May 2020 were collected. According to the findings of ultrasonography and CT imaging, they were divided into two groups, namely, the appendicolith group and the non-appendicolith group. Results: A total of 94 children with appendiceal abscess were identified, meeting the specified study criteria, and categorized into two groups, namely, the appendicolith group (n = 51, 54.3%) and the non-appendicolith group (n = 43, 45.7%). Non-surgical treatment was unsuccessful in six out of the 94 children, yielding an overall success rate of 93.6% for non-surgical management of appendiceal abscess in children under 3 years old. The success rate for non-surgical treatment in the appendicolith subgroup was 90.2%, whereas that for the non-appendicolith subgroup was 97.7%. No statistically significant distinction was observed between the two groups (P = 0.292). Likewise, there were no significant differences in gender, age, duration of symptoms, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, rebound pain, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, and abscess cross-sectional area between the appendicolith group and the non-appendicolith group. However, there is a statistical difference in tenderness in the right lower abdomen. Conclusion: Non-surgical treatment of appendiceal abscess has a high success rate and can be considered an effective treatment strategy. In pediatric patients under 3 years old without evidence of complete intestinal obstruction or diffuse peritonitis, non-surgical treatment may be considered for appendiceal abscess.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is traditionally a clinical diagnosis where there are a range of diagnostic accuracies reported. The role of ultrasound is to improve specificity and decrease negative appendicectomy rate. It is a simple, non-invasive, easily available technique.The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an ultrasound in combination with total leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods: This study includes consecutive sampling of suspected patients from January 2021 to February 2022 with the approval of the ethical and research committee. Clinical and personal demographics and characteristics of patients were collected, including age, gender, symptoms and clinical signs. Ultrasonographic findings of fluid-filled appendiceal diameter of more than 6 mm, periappendiceal echogenic mesentry and an appendicolith were primary positive features. Laboratory inflammatory markers of total leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein were also included. Results: A total of 250 patients were included with a mean age of 25 ± 9.79 years. Total leukocyte count showed the highest sensitivity (77.68%), followed by neutrophil percentage (69.96%), C-reactive protein (67.10%) and ultrasound (62.96%). While ultrasound had the best specificity (70.59%), it was followed by C-reactive protein and total leukocyte count (64.71%) and neutrophil percentage (58.82%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity (99% and 98%) increased significantly when all four tests were combined. Conclusions: Clinical assessment with laboratory inflammatory markers and ultrasound improves the early diagnosis of appendicitis and decreases the false-positive appendicitis diagnosis, hence saving surgeons' time and relieving patients from unnecessary appendicectomies.

RESUMEN

Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring urgent surgery. Despite characteristic clinical signs, diagnosis can be challenging, leading to unnecessary appendectomies. This case report focuses on a 34-year-old male with escalating right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Imaging revealed acute appendicitis with a substantial appendicolith. Surgical intervention involved a open appendectomy with possible ileocecal resection due to cecal inflamation. Surgical findings indicated successful resection, and the patient recovered without complications. While urgent appendectomy is the norm, conservative approaches are gaining traction for peri-appendiceal abscesses. Interval appendectomy post-conservative treatment is a debated strategy. Management decisions are influenced by patient factors and disease severity. Future research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols for complicated appendicitis. The case illustrates the evolving landscape of acute appendicitis management.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Appendicolithiasis is a risk factor for perforated acute appendicitis. There is limited inpatient data on predictors of progression in appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis. METHODS: We identified adults presenting with appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis (on computed tomography) who underwent appendectomy. Logistic regression was used to investigate predictors of in-hospital perforation (on histopathology). RESULTS: 296 patients with appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis were identified; 48 (16.2%) had perforation on histopathology. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 39 (14.9) years. The mean (SD) length of stay (LOS) was 1.5 (1.8) days. LOS was significantly longer with perforated (mean [SD]: 3.0 [3.1] days) vs. non-perforated (mean [SD]: 1.2 [1.2] days) appendicitis (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, in-hospital perforation was associated with age > 65 years (OR 5.4, 95% CI: 1.4- 22.2; p = 0.015), BMI > 30 kg/m2 (OR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.3-8.9; p = 0.011), hyponatremia (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.3-9.8; p = 0.012). There was no significant association with age 25-65 years, gender, race, steroids, time-to- surgery, neutrophil percentage, or leukocyte count. CONCLUSION: Geriatric age, obesity, and hyponatremia are associated with progression to perforation in appendicolithiasis-associated non-perforated acute appendicitis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The coproliths of the appendix are accumulations of fecal remnants within its lumen. They are categorized based on their size into coproliths < 1cm, which are the most common, and giant coproliths, with a diameter > 2cm. It's important to note that the pathophysiology of acute appendicitis is characterized by the obstruction of the appendix lumen. This leads to distension due to the inability to expel secretions, ischemia, and ultimately rupture of its wall. This presentation discusses an interesting case of acute appendicitis caused by a giant coprolith. It also covers the clinical approach and information according to international literature. A 38-year-old man presented with sudden-onset right lower quadrant pain. Clinical examination revealed tenderness, a positive McBurney's point, elevated inflammation markers, and a radiopaque finding on an X-ray. A CT scan revealed a 2.5cm coprolith in the appendix. An exploratory laparoscopy revealed appendix wall rupture, followed by subumbilical incision appendicectomy and cleansing of purulent collection. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the fourth postoperative day without any complications, demonstrating a smooth recovery process. The presence of a coprolith predisposes the development of acute appendicitis. This condition is associated with a worse prognosis, as it increases the likelihood of perforation and the formation of intraperitoneal abscesses. This case underscores the clinical significance of giant coproliths as a potential etiology for acute appendicitis. Early recognition and timely surgical intervention are pivotal in achieving favorable patient outcomes.

RESUMEN

Objectives: To correlate preoperative imaging of fecaliths with what is seen in surgical specimens. Background: Early studies considered radiological findings of appendicoliths as a contraindication for nonoperative treatment of appendicitis. There is no standard definition for what is labeled as an appendicolith radiologically and little is known about the pathological correlates of these lesions. Methods: A single center, retrospective study of a consecutive series of adult patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from March 2021 to February 2022 was performed. The primary outcome was concordance between preoperative cross-sectional imaging description of appendicolith with postoperative gross pathology description. Images were retrospectively reviewed by an independent radiologist, and the presence and characteristics of appendicoliths and appendices were examined. Results: Of 88 cases of appendicitis, 86 were diagnosed preoperatively by computed tomography (CT) imaging. Appendicoliths were seen either on CT or pathology in 45 (51%) patients. Of these 45 patients, a total of 38 (84%) were identified radiographically, and 28 (62%) were identified on pathology. Of the 38 appendicoliths diagnosed on preoperative imaging, only 21 (55%) were confirmed pathologically. Additionally, of the 28 appendicoliths observed on pathology, only 21 (75%) were identified preoperatively on imaging. There was no appendiceal obstruction in 10 of the 40 cases (25%) in which retrospective radiological review identified appendicoliths. Conclusions: Discrepancies were observed between CT and pathology findings of appendicoliths. Not all appendicoliths seem to cause appendicitis. Because the presence of appendicolith influences the treatment decisions, there is a need to standardize their radiological diagnosis and better understand their pathophysiology.

RESUMEN

Chronic appendicitis is a rare cause of chronic abdominal pain that can be difficult to diagnose. We present a patient with chronic right upper quadrant pain that was finally diagnosed as chronic appendicitis. This 71-year-old male had no systemic diseases and presented to our outpatient clinic with right upper quadrant pain for one month. The pain tended to worsen in the early morning but could be relieved by bowel movements, sitting up, or walking. The findings of a physical examination, laboratory data, and abdominal ultrasound were not significant. Upper endoscopy revealed a shallow gastric ulcer at the antrum. However, the abdominal pain was not relieved by esomeprazole. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a dilated appendix with some appendicoliths in the retrocecal region. Due to chronic appendicitis, the patient underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and the histopathological examination of the removed appendix confirmed the diagnosis. The abdominal pain completely resolved after the surgery. Chronic appendicitis should be kept in mind in patients with chronic abdominal pain without a definite diagnosis. This case illustrates that in addition to right lower quadrant pain, chronic appendicitis can also present with right upper quadrant pain or vague abdominal pain. A CT scan is invaluable in the diagnosis of abdominal pain when medical treatment fails to yield improvement.

RESUMEN

Giant appendicoliths are rare appendicoliths with the largest diameter of more than 2 cm. It can increase the risk of complications such as perforation or abscess formation. This is a case of an uncommon definitive pathology diagnosed for a right iliac fossa calcification with a rare transoperative finding.

RESUMEN

Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, and surgical intervention remains the gold standard for curative treatment. Although laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with less pain, shorter hospital stays, and earlier mobilization, it is also more frequently complicated by postoperative abscesses. Retained appendicoliths are a rare complication that can serve as a nidus for repeated infections. Laparoscopic removal of the stone can provide definitive source control and reduce repeated hospital admissions. There are many surgical approaches for retrieval and this case, in particular, describes a laparoscopic hand-assisted approach while simultaneously using an interventional radiologic drain to assist with localization.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to identify predictors for recurrent appendicitis in patients with appendicitis previously treated nonoperatively. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of all adult patients with appendicitis treated at a tertiary care hospital. Patient demographics, radiographic information, management, and clinical outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was recurrent appendicitis within 6 months after discharge from the index admission. Given the competing risk of interval appendectomy, a time-to-event competing-risk analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of the 699 patients presenting with appendicitis, 74 were treated nonoperatively (35 [47%] were women; median [IQR] age, 48 [33,64] years), and 21 patients (29%) had recurrent appendicitis. On univariate and multivariate analysis, presence of an appendicolith on imaging was the only factor associated with a higher risk of recurrent appendicitis (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of appendicolith was associated with an increased risk of developing recurrent appendicitis within 6 months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Conservative management with antibiotics was recommended by the UK Surgical Royal Colleges early in the COVID-19 pandemic as the first-line treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. METHODS: This is a prospective single-centre cohort study of patients aged 16 years or over, diagnosed clinically and confirmed radiologically with acute appendicitis in a secondary care setting who were initially treated conservatively with antibiotics. The primary outcome was the response to conservative management with antibiotics. Secondary outcomes were: antibiotic duration; operative rates; surgical approach (open, laparoscopic or conversion to open); complication rates; COVID-19 positive rate; rates of readmission within 12 months; and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in the study, 67 of whom were male. Median age was 37 (range 17-93) years. A further 28 patients were excluded because of a decision to manage operatively on the index admission or because of other diagnoses. Thirty-three patients (30.3%) had surgery on the index admission after failed conservative management and 15 (13.8%) had surgery on readmission. On histology, 32/48 patients (66.7%) had a diagnosis of complicated appendicitis and 18/48 (37.5%) had a confirmed appendicolith. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high readmission rate (47/109; 43.1%) for surgery, a radiological drain or conservative management within the first year following initial conservative management. There is a significant risk of recurrence of symptoms, particularly in the presence of an appendicolith. Laparoscopic appendicectomy should be the first-line treatment, with conservative management reserved for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis who are COVID-19 positive or have comorbidities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This narrative review aims to collate the data in the existing literature on appendicoliths, by reviewing the available information on appendicoliths that have been previously reported in 24 publications, and providing the information in one article. KEY FINDINGS: Appendicoliths are frequent culprits in causing luminal obstruction of the appendix, leading to appendicitis. They are calcified masses formed as a result of the aggregation of faecal particulates and inorganic salts within the lumen of the appendix. The presence of appendicoliths in an inflamed appendix influences the patient's treatment, as surgery is usually done to avoid appendix perforation and abscess formation, and also to prevent a future recurrence of the disease. Appendicoliths are mostly imaged using CT, Ultrasound, and plain X-rays; however, CT is the most frequently used modality, particularly in the imaging of complications caused by 'retained' appendicoliths. 'Retained' appendicoliths and their consequential abscesses have been reported in the sub-hepatic and intrahepatic regions, pelvic and tubo-ovarian regions, gluteal region, subcutaneous layer, subphrenic region, and through the diaphragm into the chest cavity. CONCLUSION: This review provides useful information on the imaging appearances and complications caused by the presence of appendicoliths in an inflamed appendix, and it also provides information on the clinical implications of 'dropped' appendicoliths during appendectomy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Based on the findings of this review, it is recommended that the appropriate imaging modality (ultrasound and/or CT) should be considered when imaging appendicoliths and its complications. It is also suggested that retained appendicolith be considered a differential diagnosis when imaging patients with a history of appendectomy due to complicated appendicitis/perforation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Appendicolith causes acute appendicitis. However, surgical indications for appendicolith-related acute appendicitis have not been established. We aimed to clarify the clinical features of appendicolith-associated appendicitis and determine an appropriate treatment strategy based on the initial presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 479 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis and verified the therapeutic strategy as per the appendicolith and clinical status. RESULTS: Appendicoliths were identified in 214 of 479 patients (44.6%) using computed tomography. Surgery was more frequently required in patients with appendicolith than in patients without appendicolith (82.7 versus 64.9%; P < 0.001). The stones were smaller and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration was lower among patients with appendicoliths treated with medication alone than among those surgically treated (both P < 0.001). An appendicolith measuring ≤5 mm in diameter and CRP concentration ≤5.36 mg/dL were predictive of completion of nonsurgical therapy. CRP concentration >10 mg/dL and stone diameter of 10 mm were significantly associated with appendiceal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical therapy could be considered for patients with appendicoliths measuring ≤5 mm in diameter and in cases where the serum CRP concentration is ≤5 mg/dL. An appendicolith measuring >10 mm in diameter or CRP concentration >10 mg/dL is an indication for surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. One of its complications is postoperative formation of abscesses in the peritoneal cavity or in the retroperitoneal space. Among other things, appendicoliths left in the peritoneal cavity are responsible for this process. Their release from the lumen occurs preoperatively and during the operation. An appendicolith, with the bacteria present on its surface, provides an environment that supports the onset of an infection. CASE REPORT: The authors present a less common case of a retroperitoneal abscess caused by an incarcerated appendicolith. Unusual is the long period between appendectomy and clinical manifestations of the abscess. The patient underwent surgical treatment with abscess evacuation and extraction of the appendicolith. The postoperative course was adequate; wound healing was supported by negative wound pressure therapy. CONCLUSION: During appendectomy, it is necessary to keep in mind the risk of releasing appendicoliths and their role in infectious complications. A conscientious revision of the peritoneal cavity is required, as well as a good surgical technique. If necessary, imaging methods can help to locate the appendicolith in the postoperative period.

Asunto(s)