RESUMEN
For surgeons and clinicians, nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy has certain difficulties and considerations. In order to aid in decision-making in these situations, this manuscript offers a thorough review of the guidelines currently in place from renowned obstetric and surgical societies, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, and others. Using AGREE II-S methodology, a comprehensive analysis of guidelines reveals differences in recommendations for anesthetics, surgical procedures, imaging modalities, and thromboembolic prophylaxis. Furthermore, a thorough discussion of strategic surgical planning is provided, covering aspects such as patient positioning, trocar placement, pneumoperitoneum generation, and thromboembolic risk management. The publication highlights that in order to maximize the results for both the mother and the fetus after nonobstetric surgery performed during pregnancy, a multidisciplinary approach and evidence-based decision-making are essential.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Surgeons may encounter a grossly normal appearing appendix in a patient with clinically suspected appendicitis. The purpose of this study is to determine the practice of pediatric surgeons in Saudi Arabia when this is encountered, and determine the reasons behind their decision making. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all pediatric surgeons in Saudi Arabia. Data points collected included demographics, peri-operative imaging preference, and personal practice when managing an intra-operative grossly normal appendix in symptomatic children. RESULTS: A total of 105 responses were obtained yielding a response rate of 33.8% The majority of respondents, 88 (87.1%) would remove the appendix while 13 (12.9%) would leave it in situ. The most common reason for removing the appendix was the possibility of microscopic/Endo appendicitis 71 (34.8%) while the most common reason for leaving the appendix in situ was the possible usage of the appendix for reconstructive benefits in the future 11 (50%). The overwhelming majority 87 (86.1%) felt that there were no sufficient guidelines on removal of the normal appearing appendix at the time of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. CONCLUSION: The majority of pediatric surgeons in Saudi Arabia would proceed with an appendectomy when an intra-operative grossly normal appendix is seen in patients suspected to have acute appendicitis. There is a clear lack of published pediatric guidelines and large studies to guide the correct course of action.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Apéndice , Cirujanos , Humanos , Arabia Saudita , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apéndice/cirugía , Apéndice/patología , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Niño , Femenino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , PediatríaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Choosing the best stump closure method for laparoscopic appendectomy has been a debated issue, especially for patients with acute appendicitis. The lack of consensus in the literature and the diverse techniques available have prompted the need for a comprehensive evaluation to guide surgeons in selecting the most optimal appendiceal stump closure method. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases from inception until December 2023 to find relevant studies according to eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of total complications. RESULTS: 25 studies with a total of 3308 patients were included in this study, overall complications did not reveal a significant advantage for any intervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53; 1.01), Superficial and deep infection risks were similar across all methods, Operative time was significantly longer with endoloop and Intracorporeal sutures (MD = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.28; 10.85) (MD = 26.1, 95% CI: 20.9; 31.29). CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in overall complications among closure methods. However, Intracorporeal sutures and endoloop techniques were associated with extended operative durations.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Metaanálisis en Red , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Tempo Operativo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). METHODS: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Humanos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Adolescente , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Francia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Femenino , Factores de Tiempo , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Satisfacción del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Schistosomal appendicitis is a rare disease, with reported prevalence rates ranging from 1.31 to 3.2 %. The presented case underscores the critical significance of considering appendicular schistosomiasis as a potential etiology in cases of acute appendicitis, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive histopathological examination for accurate diagnosis and appropriate postoperative management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old man from Guinea, with no significant medical history, presented with vomiting, persistent abdominal pain, and fatigue over five days. Physical examination revealed signs of peritoneal irritation and imaging showed features indicative of acute appendicitis. An appendectomy was conducted laparoscopically. Histological examination confirmed gangrenous appendicitis with the presence of schistosome eggs, diagnosing acute gangrenous appendicitis with schistosomiasis. The patient recovered well postoperatively and was discharged after treatment with praziquantel. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The clinical presentation of schistosomal appendicitis resembles that of other acute appendicitis cases. When suspicion arises due to risk factors, confirming schistosomiasis may involve serology, polymerase chain reaction assays, and identifying eggs in urine or feces. Computed tomography findings cannot distinguish acute appendicitis caused by Schistosoma species from other causes. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological appendix analysis is crucial for detecting conditions like schistosomiasis, warranting postoperative care. Praziquantel therapy post-surgery is vital for eradicating the disease and preventing complications.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to ascertain the prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis (AppE) in patients diagnosed with diaphragmatic endometriosis (DiaE), compare it with the prevalence in patients without DiaE, and delineate the anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions within these cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Comparison of the characteristics of patients with AppE and DiaE with the characteristics of patients with abdominal endometriosis without diaphragmatic involvement, in a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center; endometriosis center. PATIENTS: A cohort of 1765 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis INTERVENTIONS: Evaluation of correlations between demographic, clinical, and surgical variables of AppE patients with DiaE and without DiaE. We performed appendectomies selectively, in the presence of gross abnormalities of the appendix, such as endometriotic implants, edema, tortuosity, and discoloration of the organ. MEASUREMENTS: Patients' characteristics were evaluated using basic descriptive statistics (chi-square test or Fisher's exact test). A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship (hazard ratio) between patient characteristics and the presence of DiaE and AppE. MAIN RESULTS: Within a cohort of 1765 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis, 31 were identified with AppE (1.8 %), and 83 with DiaE (4.7 %). The prevalence of DiaE was significantly elevated at 30.1 % (25/83), among patients with AppE compared to those without AppE, who showed a DiaE prevalence of 7.2 % (6/83). The calculated odds ratio for DiaE given the presence of AppE was 5.5, 95 % CI 2.1-14.4, p = 0.0004, and risk ratio was 4.2, 95 % CI 1.8-9.6, p = 0.0008, indicating a profound association. Surgical interventions did not lead to significant perioperative or postoperative complications. In the group with DiaE, the left ovary was affected in 96 % of cases (24/25), p < 0.05, the right ureter in 80 % of cases (20/25), p < 0.01 (in 19/25 only the serosa was affected, due to external compression of an endometriotic nodule of the parametrium). Concurrent AppE and right diaphragm was found in 92 % of cases (23/25 patients), p < 0.001. The concurrent presence of DiaE and AppE was often associated with severe endometriosis, rASRM IV 72 % OR = 3, 95 % CI (1.216-7.872). CONCLUSION: The investigation delineates a marked association between AppE and DiaE, with an odds ratio of 5.5 and risk ratio of 4.2, suggesting a markedly increased likelihood of DiaE in patients with AppE. These statistics significantly substantiate the notion that AppE can serve as a predictive marker for DiaE, underscoring the necessity for a meticulous intraoperative assessment of diaphragmatic regions in patients diagnosed with AppE. The absence of a significant correlation between the depth of DiaE infiltration and the presence of AppE implies that the detection of AppE should prompt a thorough search for DiaE, regardless of the perceived severity of the endometriosis or preoperative results of diaphragmatic MRI.
RESUMEN
Cystica profunda is a rare benign finding of mucous-filled cysts in the submucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, more commonly found in the rectum and colon. Risk factors include rectal prolapse, inflammatory bowel diseases, pelvic radiation and being post-appendectomy. We present a case of a female patient presenting with rectorrhagia, found to have sigmoidal colitis cystica profunda (CCP) six months post-appendectomy. This case is one of the few in medical literature to highlight the direct association between laparoscopic appendectomy and CCP, previously discussed in the literature as a complication post-appendectomy in the American Journal of Gastroenterology. LEARNING POINTS: Physicians should have a high index of suspicion to rule out colitis cystica profunda (CCP) when approaching a patient with rectorrhagia following laparoscopic appendectomy.It is pivotal to make a prompt diagnosis for CCP in the context of rectorrhagia and initiate timely management.It is important to differentiate CCP from other aetiologies of lower gastrointestinal tract bleed as it is coined 'the great imitator'.
RESUMEN
Background: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic connective tissue disease defined by the loss of bone mass and density, which makes the bones more brittle and more likely to fracture over time. Bone deformity and articular instability are the subsequent symptoms. Case report: This 25-year-old man had malformed lower limbs and trouble walking due to OI and dwarfism. He arrived complaining of fever, nausea, vomiting and diffuse peri-umbilical pain. During ultrasonography a blinded, oedematous lobe formation containing an appendicolith was discovered. Acute suppurative appendicitis was diagnosed, necessitating a laparoscopic appendectomy. Because the patient had previously undergone general anaesthesia, anaesthesia was thought to be attainable. Pneumoperitoneum and a 10 mm optical port inserted into the umbilicus were used in the surgical procedure. A diagnostic laparoscopy revealed faecolith obstruction and an acute suppurative appendicitis. After an hour, a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed effectively with little blood loss. Without experiencing any difficulties because of the surgery position, the patient was discharged. Conclusion: We present a case of an OI dwarf patient with acute suppurative appendicitis. It highlights the possibility of performing laparoscopic surgery in general and a laparoscopic appendectomy in particular on OI patients. LEARNING POINTS: In rare instances involving OI, laparoscopic surgery in general and laparoscopic appendectomy in particular are practical and efficient options.
RESUMEN
We aimed to present a case of two mesocolonic hydatid cysts that mimicked the presentation of peritoneal pseudomyxoma. Hydatidosis is a zoonotic parasitic infection caused by the cestode Echinococcus spp., whose larval stage affects various organs. The present case describes a 40-year-old male patient who presented with severe lower abdominal pain and was diagnosed with acute appendicitis. The patient underwent an appendectomy and was later referred to an oncology surgery clinic because of imaging findings suggestive of peritoneal pseudomyxoma or carcinomatosis. A video-assisted laparoscopic procedure revealed two cysts and microscopic findings confirmed hydatid cysts. The patient was from a hydatidosis-endemic region of southern Brazil. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and the need for a multidisciplinary approach and careful histopathological analysis in patients with complex abdominal conditions. This also demonstrates the importance of disseminating knowledge about this condition and its management.
RESUMEN
Background: COVID-19 has further burdened the Brazilian healthcare system, especially emergencies. Patients may have delayed seeking care for surgical abdominal pain. Delays in the approach may have impacted clinical evolution and outcomes. This study evaluated appendectomies and their complications performed by the public system during one-year follow-up of COVID-19 in a hospital in southern Brazil. Materials and methods: In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, we included adult patients who underwent appendectomy from March 2019 to April 2021 (n = 162). Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (n = 78) and pandemic (n = 84) groups based on the surgery date. The analyzed variables included hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical approach, histopathological findings, COVID-19 testing, patient outcomes, and 30-day survival rate. Results: The cohorts exhibited similar epidemiology, with the sex ratio and average age being maintained. No statistical difference was found in the 30-day survival rate and clinical outcomes. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three belonged to the pandemic cohort and tested negative for COVID-19. Only 47.6 % of the patients in the pandemic cohort underwent COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction examination; one tested positive (2.5 %). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no increased risk for appendectomies during the first wave of the pandemic. Surgeries were safe during this period. Patients continued to access the emergency service despite surgical abdominal pain and restrictive measures imposed by health authorities. The similar results observed across cohorts are attributed to the readiness of the teams and the availability of medical surgical equipment in safe quantities.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Appendectomy is the standard treatment of acute appendicitis. However, recent advancements have introduced medical treatment as a potential alternative. Within this context, it's important to recognize the rare occurrence of appendiceal tumors, often incidentally discovered during histopathological examination following appendectomy. Consequently, there's a concern about the possibility of overlooking appendiceal neoplasms, particularly in cases where conservative treatment for acute appendicitis is considered. METHODS: The files of patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis between January 2015 and December 2023 and were diagnosed with neoplasia in their pathology reports were retrospectively registered. Demographic characteristics of the patients, laboratory and imaging features, details of the surgery performed, preoperative and intraoperative suspicion of neoplasm and data from pathology reports were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6446 patients were operated for acute appendicitis. Neoplasia was detected in the histopathological examination of 93 patients (1.44%). Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 51.6% of the patients by computed tomography. Neoplasm suspicion was present in 9.7% of patients in preoperative imaging methods and in 6.5% of patients intraoperatively. Only appendectomy was performed in 94.5% of patients. The most common appendiceal neoplasm is neuroendocrine tumors (40.9%), followed by appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (29%), sessile serrated adenoma (15%), and adenocarcinoma (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Although appendiceal neoplasms are relatively rare in proportion, they represent a significant numerical value due to the density of cases. Therefore, this information should be taken into consideration when evaluating treatment options for acute appendicitis.
RESUMEN
Background: The risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is increased in appendectomy patients, but it is not clear whether there is a causal relationship. We aimed to systematically estimate the causal relationship between appendectomy and IHD and its subtypes, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and angina pectoris (AP), using Mendelian randomization (MR) study methods and meta-analysis. Methods: As the discovery cohort analysis, we extracted independent genetic variants strongly associated with appendectomy from the FinnGen study (28,601 cases) as instrumental variables (IVs). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) from UK Biobank were selected for outcome data. A first two-sample MR analysis was then conducted. As the replication cohort, IVs associated with appendectomy were extracted in the UK Biobank (50,105 cases). GWAS from the FinnGen study were selected for outcome data. A second MR analysis was then performed. Finally, meta-analyses were applied to assess the combined causal effects of the MR results. Results: In the discovery cohort, there was a significant positive causal relationship between appendectomy and IHD and its subtypes AMI and AP. The replication cohort only found a positive causal relationship between appendectomy and AMI. Meta-analysis showed a positive causal relationship between appendectomy and IHD (OR: 1.128, 95% CI: 1.067-1.193, P = 2.459e-05), AMI (OR: 1.195, 95% CI: 1.095-1.305, P = 6.898e-05), and AP (OR: 1.087, 95% CI: 1.016-1.164, P = 1.598e-02). Conclusions: This comprehensive MR analysis suggests that genetically predicted appendectomy may be a risk factor for the development of IHD and its subtypes AMI and AP. We need to continue to pay attention to these links.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Appendectomies are one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. Limited English proficiency (LEP) may lead to disparities in health outcomes between English-proficient and LEP patients. This study assesses the association between LEP and postoperative outcomes in pediatric appendectomy. METHODS: We analyzed records from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database from 2010 to 2023 under 18 y of age undergoing appendectomy at our institution. LEP was defined as the need for an interpreter. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative emergency department (ED) visits within 30 d of discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred forty three children with appendicitis were identified, with 208 (18.2%) LEP and 935 (81.8%) English-proficient patients. LEP children were more likely to present with complicated appendicitis (42.8% versus 25.5%, P < 0.0001) and sepsis (34.1% versus 21.6%, P = 0.0003). LEP patients experience more serious (8.6% versus 3.9%, P = 0.02), overall complications (10.1% versus 5.5%, P = 0.006), and organ/surgical space site infections (8.2% versus 3.3%, P = 0.003). On multivariable analysis controlling for ethnicity and factors associated with complicated presentation, LEP was associated with increased postoperative ED visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.40-4.39), but not LOS (aOR 1.86, 95% CI = 0.87-3.97) or complications (aOR 1.76, 95% CI = 0.79-4.00). CONCLUSIONS: LEP is independently associated with increased postoperative ED visits. Higher rates of complications and longer LOS may be related to increased complicated appendicitis at presentation. The role of cultural preferences and other social determinants of health that contribute to these disparities needs more investigation.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis is increasingly common. Effectiveness of NOM has been studied by identifying patients via International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and no code for appendectomy. We sought to assess the accuracy of such administrative definitions. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for appendicitis at five sites across the United States. Initial management plan and clinical severity were recorded by trained abstractors. We identified a gold standard cohort of patients with surgeon-diagnosed uncomplicated appendicitis and planned NOM. We defined two administrative cohorts with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and either no surgery during initial admission (definition #1) or no surgery on day 0-1 of admission (definition #2). We compared each definition to the gold standard. RESULTS: Among 1224 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 72 (5.9%) underwent planned NOM. NOM patients were older (median [Q1-Q3] of 37 [27-56] versus 32 [25-44] y) and less frequently male (51.4% versus 54.9%), White (54.1% versus 67.6%), and privately insured (38.9% versus 50.2%) than patients managed operatively. Definition #1 had sensitivity of 0.81 and positive predictive value of 0.87 for NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. Definition #2 had sensitivity of 0.83 and positive predictive value of 0.72. The gold standard cohort had a true failure/recurrence rate of 23.6%, compared with apparent rates of 25.4% and 39.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative definitions are prone to misclassification in identifying planned NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. This likely impacts outcomes in studies using administrative databases. Investigators should disclose how misclassification may affect results and select an administrative definition that optimally balances sensitivity and specificity for their research question.
RESUMEN
Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most prevalent acute abdominal diseases and appendectomy is the definitive treatment of appendicitis. However, whether appendicitis and appendectomy cause colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. The results of observational studies are contradictory, but randomized controlled trials (RCT) cannot be conducted. Methods: Data of appendectomy, AA, and CRC were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS project. We selected several Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics for CRC: statistics for colon cancer (CC) were obtained from MRC-IEU and Neale lab, respectively; statistics for rectum cancer (RC) were obtained from MRC-IEU and FinnGen, respectively; statistics for CRC were provided by Sakaue S et al. Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to evaluate the causal relationships between exposure and outcomes. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was the most important analysis method. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the results of IVW to increase the reliability and sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: According to the results of IVW, appendectomy did not increase risk of CC: MRC-IEU (OR:1.009, 95%CI:0.984-1.035, P=0.494), Neale lab (OR:1.016, 95%CI:0.993-1.040, P=0.174); Appendectomy also did not increase risk of RC: MRC-IEU(OR:0.994, 95%CI:0.974-1.014, P=0.538), FinnGen(OR:2.791, 95%CI:0.013-580.763, P=0.706); Appendectomy also did not increase risk of CRC: Sakaue S(OR:1.382, 95%CI:0.301-6.352, P=0.678). Appendicitis did not increase risk of CC: MRC-IEU(OR:1.000, 95%CI:0.999-1.001, P=0.641), Neale lab(OR:1.000, 95%CI:1.000-1.001, P=0.319); Appendicitis also did not increase risk of RC: MRC-IEU(OR:1.000, 95%CI:0.999-1.000, P=0.361), FinnGen(OR:0.903, 95%CI:0.737-1.105, P=0.321); Appendicitis also did not increase risk of CRC: Sakaue S (OR:1.018, 95%CI:0.950-1.091, P=0.609). The results of Meta-analysis also showed appendectomy (P=0.459) and appendicitis (P=0.999) did not increase the risk of CRC. Conclusions: Appendectomy and appendicitis do not increase the risk of colorectal cancer. More clinical trials are needed in the future to verify the causal relationships.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is very controversial whether appendectomy should be performed as a routine part of the staging procedure for mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (mBOTs) or not, as the involvement of the appendix in women undergoing surgery for mBOTs and the exact magnitude of the benefit of appendectomy are unclear. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of appendiceal involvement in patients of mBOTs and morbidity associated with surgery and to evaluate recurrence-free survival after surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a cancer centre from January 2008 to December 2022 (15 years). The hospital database was searched for patients whose final diagnosis was mBOTs. All women who have been operated for mBOTs were included in the study. Descriptive analysis was performed for study variables. The survival curve was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Ninety cases whose final diagnosis was mBOTs were identified from the Cancer Registry. Of those, 39 cases were excluded as they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one patients were finally selected for the study. Of the 51 patients, appendectomy was not performed in eight patients, and the reason was not mentioned in the hospital record. The appendix was macroscopically abnormal in only two patients. None of the patients was diagnosed with mucinous borderline tumours of the appendix in our study. The appendectomy itself was not associated with any complications. Only one patient with mBOT had recurrence after four months of surgery, which was surgically treated and no patient died during the median follow-up of 36 months. CONCLUSION: If the appendix is grossly normal looking, then appendectomy can be omitted in surgery of mBOTs. mBOTs have good recurrence free and overall survival outcomes post surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA. METHOD: We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedurerelated parameters, and followup data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.0 years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5 min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6 min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23 months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor. CONCLUSION: Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of endometriosis of the appendix and the association with other pelvic localizations of the disease and to provide pathogenesis hypotheses. METHODS: Monocentric, observational, retrospective, cohort study. Patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis surgery in our tertiary referral center were consecutively enrolled. The prevalence of the different localizations of pelvic endometriosis including appendix involvement detected during surgery was collected. Included patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of appendiceal endometriosis. Women with a history of appendectomy were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred-sixty patients were included for data analysis. The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis was 2.8%. In patients affected by endometriosis of the appendix, concomitant ovarian and/or bladder endometriosis were more frequently encountered, with prevalence of 53.9% (vs 21.0% in non-appendiceal endometriosis group, p = 0.005) and 38.4% (vs 11.4%, p = 0.003), respectively. Isolated ovarian endometriosis was significantly associated to appendiceal disease compared to isolated uterosacral ligament (USL) endometriosis or USL and ovarian endometriosis combined (46.2% vs 15.4% vs 7.7%, p < 0.001). Poisson regression analysis revealed a 4.1-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of ovarian and bladder endometriosis, respectively, and a 0.1-fold risk of concomitant USL endometriosis in patients with appendiceal involvement. CONCLUSION: Involvement of the appendix is not uncommon among patients undergoing endometriosis surgery. Significant association was detected between appendiceal, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis that may be explained by disease dissemination coming from endometrioma fluid shedding. Given the prevalence of appendiceal involvement, counseling regarding the potential need for appendectomy during endometriosis surgery should be considered.