RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pain relief in patients with painful spinal bone metastases (SBMs) and to identify key factors contributing to treatment outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent SBRT for painful solid tumor SBMs between March 2012 and January 2023. During this period, SBRT was performed adhering to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations for target volume delineation. To be included, patients needed to experience persistent pain directly associated with SBMs, warranting regular opioid treatment. Positive pain relief post-SBRT was defined by three criteria: 1) a decrease in the severity of pain; 2) reduction in opioid dosage; and 3) concurrent improvement in daily activities. The revised Tokuhashi score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score were used to identify crucial factors influencing treatment outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 377 patients, covering 576 lesions across 759 vertebrae. Of these, 332 lesions showed significant pain relief within 3 months following SBRT. Lower pain relief rates were observed in patients with a revised Tokuhashi score of 0-8 or in patients with diabetes mellitus. In contrast, higher relief rates were linked to treating a single painful SBM in 1 SBRT course, and greater contouring of the involved sectors according to International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations. The highest pain relief rate was observed in patients with prostate cancer (73.8%), whereas the lowest rate was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (36.4%). The presence of pre-SBRT vertebral fractures, the dosage and fraction of SBRT, and the use of concurrent systemic cancer therapies or antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, did not notably influence the pain relief efficacy of SBRT. Comprehensive medical records 6 months after SBRT treatment were available for only 362 lesions. The overall rate of pain relief observed was 32.6%. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an effective treatment approach for managing painful SBMs, achieving a pain relief rate of 57.6% within 3 months and maintaining a rate of 32.6% at 6 months after treatment. The transition to osteoblastic lesions may potentially improve the stability of SBMs, indicated by lower Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, which in turn could extend pain relief management.

RESUMEN

Background/purpose: Tooth extraction has been avoided in patients receiving antiresorptive agent (ARA) therapy. This study aimed to investigate dental findings associated with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) development in patients. Materials and methods: First, in patients treated with high-dose ARAs, the relationship between dental findings and MRONJ development was examined. Next, in patients with MRONJ undergoing surgery, the relationship between dental findings and MRONJ occurring at a site distant from the initial site was examined. Results: MRONJ occurred in 13 of 172 patients (80 of 3725 teeth) during observation. Multiple tooth loss, periodontal ligament space enlargement, alveolar bone loss, periapical osteosclerosis, and local infection symptoms were associated with MRONJ development. Tooth extraction significantly reduced MRONJ development. Regarding other-site recurrence, new MRONJ developed at other sites in 54 of 357 patients with MRONJ (171 of 5038 teeth). Multiple tooth loss, apical lesions, periodontal ligament space enlargement, and periapical osteosclerosis were significantly associated with MRONJ development. In patients with malignant tumors, tooth extraction significantly reduced the subsequent incidence of MRONJ, while in patients with osteoporosis, there was no difference in the incidence of MRONJ between patients with and without tooth extraction. Conclusion: MRONJ was more likely to develop from teeth with local infections. Extraction of teeth with local infection in patients with malignancy may be more effective than tooth preservation in preventing MRONJ.

RESUMEN

Background/purpose: Local infection is a risk factor for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), along with invasive dental treatment of the bone; the tooth that is the source of infection should be extracted prior to the administration of bone resorption inhibitors. However, which teeth should be extracted remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between dental findings prior to high-dose antiresorptive agent (ARA) administration and the subsequent development of MRONJ. Materials and methods: Patients with cancer who were scheduled to receive high-dose ARAs and referred to our hospital between 2011 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Apical lesions, enlargement of the periodontal space, thickening of the lamina dura, alveolar bone resorption of >1/3, periapical osteosclerosis, and local infection symptoms in each tooth were investigated using medical records and panoramic radiographs. Results: A total of 172 patients, 329 jaws, and 3734 teeth were registered. MRONJ developed in 68 teeth in 33 jaws of 32 patients. In tooth-by-tooth analysis, fewer teeth (P < 0.001), apical lesions (P < 0.001), periapical osteosclerosis (P < 0.001), local infection symptoms (P = 0.002), and one or more dental findings (P < 0.001) were significant factors for MRONJ development. In jaw-by-jaw analysis, old age, local infection symptoms, and number of radiographic abnormalities per tooth were significant. In patient-by-patient analysis, patients with diabetes and those with fewer teeth developed MRONJ. Conclusion: Patients with fewer teeth, apical lesions, periapical osteosclerosis, and local infection were more likely to develop MRONJ. Therefore, these teeth should be treated as much as possible before ARA administration.

RESUMEN

Osteolytic bone disease is present in about 80% of patients with multiple myeloma at the time of diagnosis. Managing bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma is a challenge and requires a multi-faceted treatment approach with medication, surgery, and radiation. The established treatments with intravenous or subcutaneous antiresorptives can cause debilitating adverse events for patients, mainly osteonecrosis of the jaw, which, traditionally, has been difficult to manage. Now, oral surgery is recommended and proven successful in 60-85% of patients. Patients with spinal involvement may benefit from surgery in the form of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for pain relief, improved mobility, and reestablished sagittal balance, as well as the restoration of vertebral height. These procedures are considered safe, but the full therapeutic impact needs to be investigated further. Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor, increases osteoblast differentiation, and recently published preliminary results in patients treated with Ixazomib maintenance have promisingly shown increased trabecular volume caused by prolonged bone formation activity. Other novel potential treatment strategies are discussed as well.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The need for prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has increased with the growing number of patients using antiresorptive agents. The scope of this systematic review (SR) was to determine whether the withdrawal of antiresorptive agents is necessary for tooth extractions in patients receiving each of the antiresorptive medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The searches were performed using the MEDLINE databases. We selected SRs, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective non-randomized clinical (observational) studies, and case reports/case series in this order of preference. RESULTS: We included one SR, one RCT, five observational studies, and three case reports. Meta-analyses were not conducted because the RCT had an extremely small sample size and the observational studies had different definitions of intervention and comparison that could not be integrated across studies. In this SR, no studies showed a benefit (i.e., a reduction in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw) of short-term withdrawal of antiresorptive agents for tooth extraction. Additionally, no studies examined the harm (i.e., an increase in femoral and vertebral fractures and skeletal-related events during bone metastasis) of withdrawal for tooth extraction. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to determine whether withdrawal before and after tooth extraction is necessary with a high certainty of evidence. Future systematic reviews including RCTs with larger samples are expected to provide such evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This systematic review provides evidence-based information for multidisciplinary collaborations related to patients receiving antiresorptive agents.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Despite the availability of safe and effective anti-osteoporosis treatments, osteoporosis continues to be undertreated. The increase in fragility fractures, which is the main clinical consequence of osteoporosis, is a major problem for healthcare systems of countries. A broad range of drugs including antiresorptive and anabolic agents are used in the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. Fracture risk assessment in drug selection is of utmost importance in terms of guiding treatment. The recommended thresholds for osteoporosis treatment decision making are based on major osteoporotic and hip fracture probabilities from the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®). Currently, antiresorptive agents are usually the first choice to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the fracture risk. Bisphosphonates and antiresorptive drugs such as denosumab, a nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor, are the most widely used drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates alone are unlikely to provide long-term protection against fracture and restore BMD in patients with severe osteoporosis and high fracture risk. In such patients, treatment with an anabolic agent such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab should be ideally initiated to achieve maximal gain in bone mass and preserve the microarchitecture. Ideally, an antiresorptive drug should be continued to maintain gain in bone mass.

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of a cohort of patients with bone metastases (BMs) from differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study including patients diagnosed with BMs from DTC between 1980 and 2021. A Cox regression was performed to study prognostic factors for 5- and 10-year survival. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed for the survival analysis and comparison between groups. Results: Sixty-three patients were evaluated. Median follow-up from BM diagnosis was 35 (15-68) months. About 30 (48.4%) patients presented with synchronous BMs. Regarding histology, 38 (60.3%) had the papillary variant. BMs were multiple in 32 (50.8%) patients. The most frequent location was the spine (60.3%). Other metastases were present in 77.8%, mainly pulmonary (69.8%). Concerning treatment, 54 (85.9%) patients received I131, with BM uptake in 31 (49.2%) and 25 (39.7%) received treatment with multikinase inhibitors. Regarding complications, 34 (54%) patients had skeletal-related events, 34 (54%) died and 5- and 10-year overall survival was 42.4% and 20.4%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis were the presence of lymph node involvement (hazard ratio (HR): 2.916; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.013-8.391; P = 0.047) and treatment with I131 (HR 0.214 (95% CI 0.069-0.665); P = 0.008) at 5 years, the presence of other metastases (HR 6.844. 95% CI 1.017-46.05; P = 0.048) and treatment with I131 (HR 0.23 (95% CI 0.058-0.913); P = 0.037) at 10 years. Conclusions: Our study reflects the management of patients with bone metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma in real clinical practice in several centers in southern Spain. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was lower in patients who were not treated with I131, had nodal involvement and/or had other metastases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Bisphosphonates have been reported to increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, it is conceivable that they may increase the risk of cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS). However, most epidemiological studies carried out thus far have not shown an increased risk of IS, though none separated by the main pathophysiologic IS subtype (cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic) which may be crucial. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the use of oral bisphosphonates increases specifically the risk of cardioembolic IS, and explored the effect of treatment duration, as well as the potential interaction between oral bisphosphonates and calcium supplements and anticoagulants. Methods: We performed a case-control study nested in a cohort of patients aged 40-99 years, using the Spanish primary healthcare database BIFAP, over the period 2002-2015. Incident cases of IS were identified and classified as cardioembolic or non-cardioembolic. Five controls per case were randomly selected, matched for age, sex, and index date (first recording of IS) using an incidence-density sampling. The association of IS (overall and by subtype) with the use of oral bisphosphonates within the last year before index date was assessed by computing the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their 95% CI using a conditional logistic regression. Only initiators of oral bisphosphonates were considered. Results: A total of 13,781 incident cases of IS and 65,909 controls were included. The mean age was 74.5 (SD ± 12.4) years and 51.6% were male. Among cases, 3.15% were current users of oral bisphosphonates, while among controls they were 2.62%, yielding an AOR of 1.15 (95% CI:1.01-1.30). Of all cases, 4,568 (33.1%) were classified as cardioembolic IS (matched with 21,697 controls) and 9,213 (66.9%) as non-cardioembolic IS (matched with 44,212 controls) yielding an AOR of 1.35 (95% CI:1.10-1.66) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.88-1.21), respectively. The association with cardioembolic IS was clearly duration-dependent (AOR≤1 year = 1.10; 95% CI:0.82-1.49; AOR>1-3 years = 1.41; 95% CI:1.01-1.97; AOR>3 years = 1.81; 95% CI:1.25-2.62; p for trend = 0.001) and completely blunted by anticoagulants, even in long-term users (AOR>1 year = 0.59; 0.30-1.16). An interaction between oral bisphosphonates and calcium supplements was suggested. Conclusion: The use of oral bisphosphonates increases specifically the odds of cardioembolic IS, in a duration-dependent manner, while leaves materially unaffected the odds of non-cardioembolic IS.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Osteoporosis is the most represented metabolic bone disease and is characterized by the reduction of bone mineral density (BMD), exposing patients to high fracture risk and disability. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the main compounds exploited in treatment of osteoporosis and significantly reduce fracture risk. Sarcopenia is the pathological reduction of muscle masses and strength, and many studies highlighted its co-existence in patients with impaired bone mass. Indeed, the pathological reduction of lean tissue has been linked to a higher risk of falls and, consequently, fractures and disability. Moreover, the pathological reduction of lean tissue seems to share many pathological mechanisms with impaired bone strength and structure; thus, in this context, we decided to conduct a retrospective case-control study aimed at evaluating the effects of BPs on lean mass and body composition. Material and methods: We enrolled postmenopausal women from our metabolic bone diseases outpatient clinic who underwent at least two consecutive dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations concomitantly to the beginning of an antiresorptive agent. The body composition of patients and controls was compared by fat masses, lean masses and android-to-gynoid ratio (A/G ratio). Results: A total of 64 female subjects were considered for the study: 41 starting a BPs and 23 without treatment were used as control. The fat masses and lean masses appeared to be unaffected by BPs. Conversely, A/G ratio was lower in BPs group after 18 months of therapy compared to baseline (p < 0.05). From the stratification based on the single BP we failed to highlight any significant difference between the tested variables. Conclusions: Bisphosphonates treatment did not modify lean tissues, however a significant reduction of A/G ratio in BP group was documented. Thus the BPs seems to act on patients body composition and extra-skeletal tissues but larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether these modifications have clinical relevance.

RESUMEN

Early breast cancer is among the most common cancers worldwide. Recent advances continue to improve outcomes and increase long-term survivorship. However, therapeutic modalities are deleterious for patients' bone health. While antiresorptive therapy may partially negate this, consequent reduction in rates of fragility fractures remains unproven. Selective prescription of bisphosphonates or denosumab may be an amicable middle ground. Recent evidence also suggests a possible role of osteoclast inhibitors as adjuvant therapy, but the evidence is modest at best. In this narrative clinical review, we explore the impact of various adjuvant modalities on bone mineral density and fragility fracture rates of early breast cancer survivors. We also review optimal patient selection for antiresorptive agents, their impact on rates of fragility fractures, and the possible role of these agents as adjuvant therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease that is a cause of morbidity and mortality. It can affect all ages but most frequently postmenopausal women. It is a silent condition, however, osteoporotic fractures can lead to significant pain and disability. In this review article, we aim to review the clinical approach to the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. We include risk assessment, investigations, and the various pharmacological and non-pharmacological options used in the treatment of osteoporosis. We have discussed the pharmacological options individually including their mechanism of action, safety profile, effects on bone mineral density and fracture risks, and duration of use. Potential new treatments are also discussed. The importance of sequence in the use of osteoporotic medicine is also highlighted in the article. An understanding of the different treatment options will hopefully help in the management of this very common and debilitating condition.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study investigated the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after dental extractions in patients receiving antiresorptive agents for osteoporosis or bone metastases. 240 patients with a median drug exposure of 43 months were retrospectively studied. The incidence of MRONJ after dental extraction in the osteoporosis cohort was 2.7 % per person-year (95 % CI 1.6-4.6 %) (n = 13/126), and for the bone metastases cohort 26.4 % per person-year (95 % CI 20.4-34.2 %) (n = 58/114). 92 % of MRONJ cases were stage 1. Dental infection as the reason for extraction increased the osteonecrosis risk in the osteoporosis (OR 22.77; 95 % CI 2.85-181.62; p = 0.003) and bone metastases cohorts (OR 2.72; 95 % CI 1.28-5.81; p = 0.010). Using leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin reduced this risk by 84 % (p = 0.003), as did antibiotics use by 86-93 % (p = 0.013). Within the bone metastases cohort, an interval since last administration of at least 3 months reduced risk of MRONJ (OR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.72-0.97; p = 0.018). Mucosal healing occurred in 11/13 patients (84.6 %; 95 % CI 54.5-98.1 %) with osteoporosis and 31/58 patients (53.4 %; 95 % CI 40.0-66.7 %) with bone metastases. In conclusion, though the MRONJ risk in this selected population taking antiresorptive agents and presenting to the Oral Maxillofacial Surgery clinic for a dental extraction is considerable and higher in those with dental infections, preventive measures such as antibiotics and use of LRPF membranes may significantly reduce that risk.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a potentially preventable adverse side effect of mainly antiresorptive drugs. MRONJ is expected to become a growing clinical problem due to the aging population and the increasing number of patients requiring antiresorptive agents. Knowledge and awareness about MRONJ and elimination of the oral and dental risk factors before starting antiresorptive therapy (AR) are fundamental to reducing the incidence of MRONJ. In urology, ARs are used primarily in patients suffering from bone metastases due to prostate cancer and to prevent cancer-treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in prostate cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy. This postal survey aimed to evaluate disease-related knowledge and awareness about implementing oral examinations for patients starting AR among Swiss, German, and Austrian urologists. A total of 176 urologists returned the completed questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 11.7%. Of the respondents, 44.9% (n = 79) and 24.4% (n = 43) stated that they give more than five first-time prescriptions of denosumab and of intravenous or oral bisphosphonates per year, respectively. Only 14.8% (n = 26) of the participating urologists had never encountered MRONJ cases related to BPs. Of the participants, 89.8% (n = 158) had implemented referrals to dentists for oral examination before initiating AR. The mean percentage of correct answers regarding the knowledge about MRONJ was 70.9% ± 11.2%. In contrast to previous surveys on MRONJ among physicians, this study showed that the participating urologists were sufficiently informed about MRONJ, as reflected by the high number of participants implementing preventive dental screenings.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Implant placement in patients with cancer receiving high-dose antiresorptive medication (HDAR) is considered contraindicated. This prospective, feasibility study tested the hypothesis that dental implants can be placed in such patients by applying a staged implant placement protocol with submerged healing. METHODS: Three groups of patients on HDAR were included as follows: group 1: patients who underwent tooth extraction, without the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ); group 2: patients with surgically treated MRONJ who had demonstrated clinical healing for at least 3 months; group 3: patients with established MRONJ who was planned for surgical resection and simultaneous implant placement. RESULTS: A total of 49 implants were placed in 27 patients (group 1: 12, group 2: 7 and group 3: 8). HDAR included bisphosphonates and denosumab. The mean HDAR time was 25 months (SD: ± 18.4, range 3-68 months). An abutment operation was performed 4 months following the implant placement (SD: ± 1.9, range 3-14 months). All patients healed uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that it is feasible to insert dental implants and perform an abutment surgery in patients with cancer on HDAR, without the development of MRONJ. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04741906.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cancer and cancer therapies are a major factor risk for osteoporosis due to bone loss and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Both factors contribute to a decrease in bone strength and, consequently, increased bone fragility and risk of fracture. Cancer-associated bone loss is a multifactorial process, and optimal interdisciplinary management of skeletal health, accurate assessment of bone density, and early diagnosis are essential when making decisions aimed at reducing bone loss and fracture risk in patients who have received or are receiving treatment for cancer. In this document, a multidisciplinary group of experts collected the latest evidence on the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment with the support of the Spanish scientific society SEOM. The aim was to provide an up-to-date and in-depth view of osteoporotic risk and its consequences, and to present a series of recommendations aimed at optimizing the management of bone health in the context of cancer. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in bone fragility especially in diabetic bone disease is increasingly recognized and researched. As skeletal frailty in diabetes does not correlate to bone mineral density (BMD) in the same way as in postmenopausal osteoporosis, BMD may not be a suitable measure of bone quality in persons with diabetes. Abundant research exists upon the effect of AGEs on bone, and though full understanding of the mechanisms of actions does not yet exist, there is little doubt of the clinical relevance. Thus, the measurement of AGEs as well as possible treatment effects on AGEs have become issues of interest. The aim of this report is to summarize results of measurements of AGEs. It consists of a systematic review of the existing literature on AGE measurements in clinical research, an evaluation of the precision of skin autofluorescence (SAF) measurement by AGE Reader® (Diagnoptics), and a short commentary on treatment of osteoporosis in patients with and without diabetes with respects to AGEs. We conclude that various AGE measures correlate well, both fluorescent and non-fluorescent and in different tissues, and that more than one target of measure may be used. However, pentosidine has shown good correlation with both bone measures and fracture risk in existing literature and results on SAF as a surrogate measurement is promising as some corresponding associations with fracture risk and bone measures are reported. As SAF measurements performed with the AGE Reader® display high precision and allow for a totally noninvasive procedure, conducting AGE measurements using this method has great potential and further research of its applicability is encouraged.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In patients with osteoporosis receiving antiresorptive agents (ARs), it has been widely practiced to withdraw ARs for several months before tooth extraction and during treatment if medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) develops. This study examined the effects of drug holidays on recovery from osteoclast suppression and the treatment outcomes. The relationship between the period of the drug holidays and treatment outcomes was examined retrospectively in 166 osteoporosis patients with MRONJ who received ARs. Histological examinations using hematoxylin and eosin staining and cathepsin K stains were performed to observe the recovery from osteoclast suppression in 43 patients in whom living bone was observed in the resection margins of the surgical specimens. Three-month AR drug holidays were not significantly correlated with the treatment outcomes of the 139 patients who underwent surgical treatment and the 27 who underwent conservative treatment. Of the 43 patients who underwent histological investigations, 16 had drug holidays from 7 to 678 days. Osteoclast suppression was observed in almost all patients, except in one without a drug holiday and one with a 261-day drug holiday. These findings suggest that AR drug holidays for approximately 3 months neither recover osteoclast suppression nor affect treatment outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cancer and cancer therapies are a major factor risk for osteoporosis due to bone loss and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Both factors contribute to a decrease in bone strength and, consequently, increased bone fragility and risk of fracture. Cancer-associated bone loss is a multifactorial process, and optimal interdisciplinary management of skeletal health, accurate assessment of bone density, and early diagnosis are essential when making decisions aimed at reducing bone loss and fracture risk in patients who have received or are receiving treatment for cancer. In this document, a multidisciplinary group of experts collected the latest evidence on the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment with the support of the Spanish scientific society SEOM. The aim was to provide an up-to-date and in-depth view of osteoporotic risk and its consequences, and to present a series of recommendations aimed at optimizing the management of bone health in the context of cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Bone modifying agents (BMA) like bisphosphonates, antiangiogenic, and antiresorptive agents are widely used to manage bone diseases and cancer. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a potentially serious complication seen in patients on BMA therapy. Dental infection is one of the primary risk factors for MRONJ manifestation; hence its complete removal before initiation of BMA is significant. This can be achieved when a medical professional understands MRONJ and its risk factors and implements timely and regular dental referrals. This multicentre study was performed to assess the knowledge about MRONJ and awareness about the implementation of dental referrals among medical professionals. A custom-designed questionnaire tool was designed and validated by a pilot study. 450 practitioners from 6 medical schools and private practitioners in and around the district were surveyed. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. 63.5% (n=80) of the respondents prescribed bisphosphonates at a frequency of 0-5 times in a month. However, 62% (n=78) of the practitioners could correctly indicate the most appropriate definition of MRONJ. Only 49.2% (n=62) of them considered dental consultation mandatory. 73% (n=92) of the practitioners were unaware of management guidelines. There exists a significant gap in the knowledge-based applications in the management of MRONJ. Lack of referrals to dentists before BMA therapy can be a pivotal factor in patient morbidity. Practitioners prescribing BMA should advise patients about regular dental visits and monitor for symptoms of MRONJ.

Asunto(s)