RESUMEN
The primary care clinician faces many challenges and is often left to manage complex pathology because of resource constraints at higher levels of care. One of these complex conditions is the perioperative management of antithrombotic medication. This narrative review is focused on helping the clinician navigate the complex path and multiple guidelines related to the perioperative use of antithrombotic medication. Perioperative antithrombotic guidelines (American College of Chest Physicians, European Society of Regional Anaesthesia, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia) and relevant publications were identified by a PubMed search using the terms perioperative AND anticoagulants OR antithrombotics AND guideline. Issues relevant to clinical practice were identified, and attempts were made to explain any ambiguity that arose. Adhering to basic pharmacological principles and evidence-based guidelines allows for the safe usage of antithrombotics. Knowing when to stop, continue, bridge and restart antithrombotic medication prevents perioperative morbidity and mortality. Stopping antithrombotic medication too early can lead to thromboembolic complications associated with their primary disease process. Not stopping antithrombotic medication or stopping it too late can potentially cause life-threatening bleeding, haematomas and increased transfusion requirements.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Atención Perioperativa , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
Although free-floating thrombus (FFT) poses a significant risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), optimal management strategies are uncertain. To determine the state-of-the-art of medical interventions for FFT, we conducted a systematic review of the efficacy of various medical interventions and factors influencing FFT resolution and recurrence. A comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, and ScienceDirect identified 61 studies encompassing 179 patients with FFT-related stroke or TIA treated with anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or their combinations. Primary outcomes assessed were stroke recurrence and thrombus resolution. Statistical analyses (Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, and Kruskal-Wallis test) utilized significance set at p < 0.05. Over a median follow-up of 7 months, thrombus resolution occurred in 65% of patients, while 11.2% experienced recurrence, primarily as TIAs. Cardioembolism was significantly less common in resolved cases (p = 0.025). Combination therapy (antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and statins) significantly enhanced clot resolution (OR 11.4; 95% CI 1.436-91.91; p = 0.021) compared to monotherapies. Ulcerated plaque was a significant predictor of recurrence (OR 8.2; 95% CI 1.02-66.07; p = 0.048). These findings underscore the superiority of combination therapy in FFT management and highlight the need for targeted interventions in patients with ulcerated plaques to mitigate recurrence risk.
RESUMEN
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health issue causing a significant health burden. CKD patients develop thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, and cardiovascular diseases are associated with increased hospitalization and mortality in this population. The hemostatic alterations are multifactorial in these patients; therefore, the results of different studies are varying and controversial. Endothelial and platelet dysfunction, coagulation abnormalities, comorbidities, and hemoincompatibility of the dialysis membranes are major contributors of hypo- and hypercoagulability in CKD patients. Due to the tendency of CKD patients to exhibit a prothrombotic state and bleeding risk, they require personalized clinical assessment to understand the impact of antithrombotic therapy. The evidence of efficacy and safety of antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments is limited for end-stage renal disease patients due to their exclusion from major randomized clinical trials. Moreover, designing hemocompatible dialyzer membranes could be a suitable approach to reduce platelet activation, coagulopathy, and thrombus formation. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms underlying thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with CKD, leading to cardiovascular complications in these patients, as well as the evidence and guidance for promising approaches to optimal therapeutic management.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Trombosis , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Trombosis/etiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Coagulación Sanguínea , AnimalesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications on the outcomes of sinus floor augmentation remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from electronic medical records of consecutive patients undergoing sinus floor augmentation at a single medical center. Patients were categorized into three categories: patients under antiplatelet medications, patients under anticoagulation medications, and healthy individuals. Data collected included tobacco smoking, residual alveolar bone height, timing of implant placement, materials used, vertical bone gain, early implant failure (EIF), and complications such as Schneiderian membrane perforation and postoperative bleeding. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess risk factors for EIF. Statistical significance was considered below 5%. RESULTS: Among 110 patients with 305 implants, EIF occurred in 10% of patients and 4.65% of implants. No significant difference in postoperative bleeding or EIF was found between study groups. Univariate and multivariable analyses highlighted tobacco smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 7.92), lower residual alveolar ridge height (OR = 0.81), and staged implant placement (OR = 4.64) as significant EIF risk factors in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies do not significantly elevate the risk of EIF or postoperative bleeding following sinus floor augmentation. Tobacco smoking, residual alveolar ridge height and staged sinus floor augmentation were risk factors for EIF in patients using antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications undergoing sinus floor augmentation.
RESUMEN
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is currently recommended as a default for patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, controversies arise over the role of aspirin, the optimal duration of DAPT after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor and the variability in individual responses to antiplatelet agents. Recent data indicate that monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor may have adequate anti-ischemic effects with lower bleeding risk. Additionally, discrepancies in DAPT duration recommendations and the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor, provides more uncertainty. We ask the question "does one size really fits all?" or should a more personalized strategy should be implemented.
Diseases affecting the heart and blood circulation are the leading cause of death worldwide. Treatment with drugs that prevents platelets from clumping (called antiplatelets) like aspirin plus another drug group (called P2Y12 inhibitors) like clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel, is currently recommended as a default for patients after heart attack and/or in whom coronary stents are inserted. However, it is very well documented that the response of any individual to these drugs is highly variable, and that the patients who don't respond as well to them are at increased risk of having clot events in their coronary arteries. On the other hand, people who respond to the drugs very sensitively have a higher bleeding risk. Despite these observations, there is no attempt to test the response of individuals patients to their antiplatelet drugs in routine practice. This review article looks in detail and whether the currently used strategy of "One size fits all" should be changed, given that there may well now be the chance to perform routine testing on everyone, and personalize their treatment accordingly.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is still controversial. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) versus dual antiplatelet (DAPT) therapy in management of patients with isolated and non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 79 patients diagnosed on elective coronary angiography to have either isolated CAE or non-obstructive atherosclerotic CAE. Patients were assigned in 1:1 pattern to receive either VKA (warfarin) or DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel). Patients were followed-up for nine-months. The primary endpoint was the cumulative events rate including acute coronary event, target vessel intervention, or cardiac death. Analysis of cumulative events at different time intervals, its individual components, and bleeding were considered secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Cumulative events rate was 33%, with mortality rate of 2.5%. Both treatment groups showed comparable cumulative events during the nine-months follow-up duration. Nevertheless, Kaplan-Meier analysis beyond the first 3-months of follow-up showed significantly higher event-free survival among the VKA-group. Recurrent events (≥2) were significantly higher among the DAPT-group. Both groups showed no major bleeding events. Multivariable cox-regression analysis showed that presence of significant coronary tortuosity, use of DAPT in reference to VKA, and lower percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) among those receiving VKA were significant independent predictors of clinical adverse events beyond the first 3-months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cumulative adverse events were comparable among both treatment groups for isolated non-obstructive CAE. However, adverse events were significantly more frequent in the DAPT-group beyond the first three months.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Vitamina K , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angiografía Coronaria , Dilatación Patológica , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Cryptogenic stroke refers to a type of ischemic stroke with no identifiable cause despite extensive diagnostic testing. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) treatment modality for the prevention of cryptogenic stroke has been controversial. We undertook this systematic review to compare the efficacy of PFO closure versus medical therapy in preventing recurrent cryptogenic stroke and to provide insight into the most effective treatment modality. Inclusion criteria included patients who had PFO, papers written in English language or had translation available, and papers focusing on medical therapy including drug and surgical treatment for PFO for the prevention of recurrent stroke. Exclusion criteria included articles in which full text could not be obtained and articles in which only one treatment modality was mentioned, either surgical closure or drug therapy. The databases used were PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We conducted a bias assessment through the modified Jadad scale for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and AMSTAR.Ca for meta-analysis and systematic review. The literature search identified a total of 277 papers. After screening, 12 papers were selected for the review. Among these, five were RCTs, five were meta-analyses, one was a systematic review, and one was a systematic review with network meta-analysis. The RCTs included a total of 3,336 participants, while the meta-analyses included 21,813 participants. These finalized papers examined the outcomes of PFO closure compared to medical therapy in preventing recurrent strokes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Intracerebral hemorrhages are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While the ENRICH trial supports the efficacy of surgical evacuation for lobar hemorrhages, the impact of antithrombotic therapies on minimally invasive surgery outcomes remains unexplored. This study evaluates the effects of chronic anticoagulants and antiplatelets on the technical and longterm outcomes of minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage from a single institution was analyzed (December 2015-September 2022). Data included key demographics, comorbidities, antithrombotic/reversal status, presenting clinical/radiographic characteristics, procedural metrics, and clinical outcomes. Patients were divided into control (neither therapy), antiplatelet-only, and anticoagulant-only groups, with antiplatelet/anticoagulant reversals conducted per current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Variables significant in univariate analyses (p<0.05) were advanced to multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Among 226 intracerebral hemorrhage patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, 41% (N=93) had antithrombotic medication history; 28% (N=64) received antiplatelets, and 9% (N=21) received anticoagulants. Patients on both therapies (N=6) were excluded. The antiplatelet group presented more frequently with lobar hemorrhages (56% vs. 37%; p=0.022), while patients on anticoagulants showed increased rates of intraventricular hemorrhage co-presentation (62% vs. 46%; p=0.011) compared to controls. Despite univariate analyses showing a higher postoperative hematoma volume (3.9 vs. 2.9 milliliters; p=0.020) and lower evacuation percentage (88% vs. 92%; p=0.019) for the antiplatelet group, and longer procedures for patients on anticoagulants (2.3 vs. 1.7 hours; p=0.042) compared to control, multivariable analyses indicated that antiplatelets and anticoagulants had no significant impact on these technical outcomes. Longitudinally, antithrombotics were not associated with increased rebleeding, less frequent discharge to home, lower 30-day mortality, or worse, 6-month Modified Rankin Scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on chronic antiplatelets and anticoagulants exhibited characteristic intracerebral hemorrhage phenotypes without worse technical or long-term outcomes after minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation, suggesting the procedure's safety for these patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Hemorragia Cerebral , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Cerebral/cirugía , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Cerebral/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neuroendoscopía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Ischemic stroke is a devastating disease that causes morbidity and mortality. Malnutrition following ischemic stroke is common in stroke patients. During the rehabilitation, the death rates of stroke patients are significantly increased due to malnutrition. Nutritional supplements such as protein, vitamins, fish, fish oils, moderate wine or alcohol consumption, nuts, minerals, herbal products, food colorants, marine products, fiber, probiotics and Mediterranean diets have improved neurological functions in stroke patients as well as their quality of life. Platelets and their mediators contribute to the development of clots leading to stroke. Ischemic stroke patients are treated with thrombolytics, antiplatelets, and antithrombotic agents. Several systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials recommended that consumption of these nutrients and diets mitigated the vascular, peripheral, and central complications associated with ischemic stroke (Fig. 2). Particularly, these nutraceuticals mitigated the platelet adhesion, activation, and aggregation that intended to reduce the risks of primary and secondary stroke. Although these nutraceuticals mitigate platelet dysfunction, there is a greater risk of bleeding if consumed excessively. Moreover, malnutrition must be evaluated and adequate amounts of nutrients must be provided to stroke patients during intensive care units and rehabilitation periods. In this review, we have summarized the importance of diet and nutraceuticals in ameliorating neurological complications and platelet dysfunction with an emphasis on primary and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.
Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Fibrinolíticos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/dietoterapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Dieta , Animales , Prevención Secundaria/métodosRESUMEN
The elderly represent an increasing proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Various data have shown that the benefits of percutaneous coronary revascularization are maintained in elderly patients presenting with ACS. Conversely, the management of antiplatelet therapy remains challenging and controversial, because older patients are usually at a high risk of both ischemia and bleeding. Moreover, the recommended ischemic and bleeding risk scores in patients with ACS were developed from studies with a low representation of older patients. New antiplatelet strategies have been developed, but their evidence in elderly patients is limited because they are usually underrepresented in randomized clinical trials due to their clinical complexity. The aim of this review is to summarize the different factors associated with increased ischemic and/or bleeding risk and the scientific evidence about the different antiplatelet strategies in elderly patients presenting with ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.
RESUMEN
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) in a patient with immune thrombocytopenia is a rare scenario which is very challenging to manage. Case summary: We present a rare case of a patient with immune thrombocytopenic purpura who developed double territory segment-elevation MI with cardiogenic shock. She had an extremely rare presentation with a fresh mobile thrombus in the aortic root which was trap-dooring the right coronary artery ostium and extending into the artery with an embolism into the distal left anterior descending artery. We managed this patient conservatively with excellent recovery owing to the dangerous location of the hanging thrombus, and severe thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of MI in patients with pre-existing blood disorders, with therapy tailored to the patient's presentation and treatment requirements.
RESUMEN
Interventions in structural heart disease cover many catheter-based procedures for congenital and acquired conditions including valvular diseases, septal defects, arterial or venous obstructions, and fistulas. Among the available procedures, the most common are aortic valve implantation, mitral or tricuspid valve repair/implantation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and patent foramen ovale closure. Antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter structural heart disease interventions aims to prevent thromboembolic events and reduce the risk of short-term and long-term complications. The specific approach to antithrombotic therapy depends on the type of intervention and individual patient factors. In this review, we synopsize contemporary evidence on antithrombotic therapies for structural heart disease interventions and highlight the importance of a personalized approach. These recommendations may evolve over time as new evidence emerges and clinical guidelines are updated. Therefore, it's crucial for healthcare professionals to stay updated on the most recent guidelines and individualize therapy based on patient-specific factors and procedural considerations.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) remains a significant healthcare burden, contributing to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in therapies, its prevalence persists, particularly in regions with widespread nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use and Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To comprehensively analyse the risk factors and outcomes of PUD-related upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in Pakistani population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 142 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding who underwent upper GI endoscopy from January to December 2022. Data on demographics, symptoms, length of stay, mortality, re-bleed, and Forrest classification was collected. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 53 years, and the majority was men (68.3%). Hematemesis (82.4%) and epigastric pain (75.4%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Most patients (73.2%) were discharged within five days. The mortality rates at one week and one month were 10.6% and 14.8%, respectively. Re-bleed within 24 h and seven days occurred in 14.1% and 18.3% of patients, respectively. Most ulcers were Forrest class (FC) III (72.5%). Antiplatelet use was associated with higher mortality at 7 and 30 d, while alternative medications were linked to higher 24-hour re-bleed rates. NSAID use was associated with more FC III ulcers. Re-bleed at 24 h and 7 d was strongly associated with one-week or one-month mortality. CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet use and rebleeding increase the risk of early mortality in PUD-related upper GI bleeding, while alternative medicines are associated with early rebleeding.
RESUMEN
Left ventricular thrombus is a major complication following myocardial infarction, particularly in patients with anterior myocardial infarction or dilated cardiomyopathies regardless of coronary reperfusion therapy. Embolization of mural thrombus is one of the major causes of large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke. A combination therapy of antiplatelet (single or dual antiplatelet) and anticoagulant is mandatory in the management of myocardial infarction and left ventricular thrombus with or without stroke. To our knowledge, there are no guidelines on the optimal regimen (dual or triple therapies) and timing of administration in cases of cardio-cerebral infarction. It is difficult for clinicians to balance the risks of intracranial hemorrhage and coronary stent thrombosis. Here, we describe the case of a gentleman who had recently undergone coronary intervention and presented with ischemic stroke and left ventricular thrombus, along with the management challenges in this scenario.
RESUMEN
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with cryptogenic ischaemic stroke. Potential stroke mechanisms include paradoxical embolism from a venous clot which traverses the PFO, in situ clot formation within the PFO, and atrial arrhythmias due to electrical signalling disruption. The purpose of this guideline is to provide recommendations for diagnosing, treating, and long-term managing patients with ischaemic stroke and PFO. Conversely, Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) was not considered an index event in this context because only one RCT involved TIA patients. However, this subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between TIA and stroke outcomes. The working group identified questions and outcomes, graded evidence, and developed recommendations following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for guideline development. This document underwent peer-review by independent experts and members of the ESO Guideline Board and Executive Committee. The working group acknowledges the current evidentiary gap in delineating an unequivocal diagnostic algorithm for the detection of PFO. Although transoesophageal echocardiography is conventionally held as the most accurate diagnostic tool for PFO identification, its status as the 'gold standard' remains unsubstantiated by rigorously validated evidence. We found high-quality evidence to recommend PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy in selected patients aged 18-60 years in whom no other evident cause of stroke is found but a PFO (i.e. PFO-associated stroke). The PASCAL classification system can be used to select such candidates for PFO closure. Patients with both a large right-to-left shunt and an atrial septal aneurysm benefit most from PFO closure. There is insufficient evidence to make an evidence-based recommendation on PFO closure in patients older than 60 and younger than 18 years. We found low quality evidence to suggest against PFO closure in patients with unlikely PFO-related stroke according to the PASCAL classification, except in specific scenarios (Expert Consensus). We suggest against long-term anticoagulation in patients with PFO-associated stroke unless anticoagulation is indicated for other medical reasons. Regarding the long-term AF monitoring after PFO closure, the working group concluded that there remains significant uncertainty regarding the risks and benefits associated with the use of long-term cardiac monitoring, such as implantable loop recorders. This document provides additional guidance, in the form of evidence-based recommendations or expert consensus statements, on diagnostic methods for PFO detection, and medical management after PFO closure.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The first wave of COVID led to an alarmingly high mortality rate among nursing home residents (NHRs). In hospitalised patients, the use of anticoagulants may be associated with a favourable prognosis. However, it is unknown whether the use of antithrombotic medication also protected NHRs from COVID-19-related mortality. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of current antithrombotic therapy in NHRs with COVID-19 on 30-day all-cause mortality during the first COVID-19 wave. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study linking electronic health records and pharmacy data in NHRs with COVID-19. A propensity score was used to match NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants to NHRs not using anticoagulant medication. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, which was evaluated using a logistic regression model. In a secondary analysis, multivariable logistic regression was performed in the complete study group to compare NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants and those with current use of antiplatelet therapy to those without such medication. RESULTS: We included 3521 NHRs with COVID-19 based on a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or with a well-defined clinical suspicion of COVID-19. In the matched propensity score analysis, NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants had a significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92) compared to NHRs who did not use therapeutic anticoagulants. In the secondary analysis, current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48-0.82) and current use of antiplatelet therapy (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) were both associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: During the first COVID-19 wave, therapeutic anticoagulation and antiplatelet use were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in NHRs. Whether these potentially protective effects are maintained in vaccinated patients or patients with other COVID-19 variants, remains unknown.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , COVID-19 , Casas de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Traumatic cervical internal carotid artery dissection (CICAD) is a rare condition caused by blunt trauma to the neck, often through automobile- or sports-related collisions, assaults, or falls. Herein, we report an unusual case in which engaging in a low-impact sport (tennis) caused CICAD, without a direct injury. A 56-year-old man with hypertension suddenly experienced a visual field loss in his right eye while playing tennis. Carotid echocardiography revealed severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (ICA). Angiography revealed severe and irregular stenosis of the right ICA from the bifurcation to the petrous portion, suggesting CICAD. Upon admission, the patient had left upper visual field defects in his right eye and neck pain. Antiplatelet therapy was initiated with prasugrel (3.75 mg/day), with the intent to treat surgically if the stenosis or symptoms progressed. Follow-up angiography and magnetic resonance imaging showed gradual resolution of the stenosis, and the patient was discharged on day 28 with a modified Rankin Scale score of 1. The CICAD should be considered as a diagnosis for neurological symptoms, even in the context of low-impact sports such as tennis. Antithrombotic therapy is a reasonable first-line treatment for stable CICAD.
RESUMEN
Platelets are anucleated cells that circulate in the bloodstream. Historically, platelets were thought to perform a singular function-stop bleeding via clotting. Although platelets do play a key role in hemostasis and thrombosis, recent studies indicate that platelets also modulate inflammation, and this platelet-induced inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of various diseases such as atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus. Thus, in recent years, our understanding of platelet function has broadened. In this review, we revisit the classic role of platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis and describe the newly recognized function of platelets in modulating inflammation. We cover the potential use of purinergic receptor antagonists to prevent platelet-modulated inflammation, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease, and finally, we define key questions that must be addressed to understand how platelet-modulated inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease.