RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Japan, 41 million blood donations have been screened for hepatitis B virus (HBV) during the past 8.4 years using individual donation nucleic acid amplification testing (ID-NAT) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) screening. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Transfusion-transmitted HBV infection (TT-HBV) incidence was examined. Donated blood implicated in TT-HBV was analyzed for infection stage and DNA levels. Causative HBV strains were phylogenetically analyzed. RESULTS: Among 5162 (0.013%) ID-NAT positives, window period (WP) and occult HBV infection (OBI) accounted for 3.4% (176) and 11.5% (594), respectively. No OBI-related TT-HBV occurred. Seven blood donations caused eight TT-HBV cases, six of which were in the pre-ID-NAT WP, leaving one with an unresolved infection stage. Seven cases were caused by platelet concentrate (180 mL plasma) and one case by fresh-frozen plasma (200 mL plasma), which contained estimated infectious doses varying between 2 and 2300 HBV virions. HBV subgenotypes in five cases were HBV/A2. Complete genome sequences of the transmitting A2 strains were nearly identical (99.6%-100%) and clustered in a group that included HBV/HIV-1 coinfections and a higher proportion of donors in the acute infection phase (69%) than the other group of HBV/A2 sequences (5%). DISCUSSION: The incidence of observed TT-HBV cases has significantly reduced to 0.19 per million in the ID-NAT screening period. OBI-related TT-HBV was eliminated by anti-HBc screening. Established TT-HBV cases were caused by blood products with large plasma volumes containing extremely low HBV concentrations derived from blood donors at a very early infection stage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Universal infant hepatitis B vaccination has been implemented more than three decades. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) in qualified blood donors in Nanjing, China. Plasmas of 815 qualified blood donors, collected from February through May 2019, were measured for anti-HBs and anti-HBc by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. There were 449 (55.1%) male and 366 (44.9%) female blood donors, with a median age of 28.9 years (18-60). The seroprevalence of anti-HBs was 58.8%, with no significant difference in different genders and different age groups. The overall prevalence of anti-HBc was 7.0%, with an increasing trend with age, from 0% in 18-20 years old group to 17.9% in 51-60 years old group (χ2 = 46.7965, p < .0001). The prevalence of anti-HBc in donors born after the implementation of universal hepatitis B vaccination was significantly lower than that in donors born before (1.0% vs 15.5%; χ2 = 63.6033, p < .0001). Our data suggest that more than half of the blood donors in Nanjing are anti-HBs positive. Since a blood recipient usually receives more than one unit of red blood cells or plasma, passively acquired anti-HBs in blood recipients may neutralize hepatitis B virus potentially presented in blood donors with occult hepatitis B infection. In addition, the presence of anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc in blood donors may cause unique hepatitis B serological profile in blood recipients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a poorly understood and aggressive malignancy with increasing incidence and mortality. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as one of the important risk factors of ICC. There are few reports focusing on whether isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (isolated anti-HBc, IAHBc) have prognostic role in ICC, while positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of ICC. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of IAHBc in ICC patients after curative resection, in order to identify those who have the high risk of ICC recurrence in the early stage. METHODS: We divided 209 ICC patients who underwent curative resection into 4 groups: group I (n = 40), HBsAg (-)/antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) (-)/anti-HBc (+); group II (n = 70), HBsAg (+)/anti-HBc (-); group III (n = 55), HBsAg (-)/anti-HBs (+)/anti-HBc (+); and group IV (n = 44), HBsAg (-)/anti-HBc (-). We compared the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among these four groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 16.93 months (range 1-34.6 months). The 1- and 2-year RFS and OS rates were 60% and 42%, and 78% and 63% respectively in all patients. Compared to the whole non-IAHBc patients (group II + group III + group IV), IAHBc patients (group I) showed significantly lower RFS at 1 year (39.8% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.001) and 2 years (20.7% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.001). When compared to other three individual groups, IAHBc patients (group I) also had the lowest RFS. We did not find significant difference in OS among the four groups. Further multivariate analysis revealed that IAHBc was an independent risk factor of RFS. CONCLUSIONS: IAHBc is an independent poor prognostic factor for tumor recurrence in ICC patients after curative resection.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few models to predict antiviral response of peginterferon were used in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B patients and the prediction efficacy was unsatisfied. Quantitative antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is a new predictor of treatment response. We aimed to develop a new model to identify HBeAg-positive Chinese patients who were more likely to respond to peginterferon. METHODS: Data from 140 peginterferon recipients with HBeAg-positive were applied with generalized additive models and multiple logistic regression analysis to develop a baseline scoring system to predict serological response (SR: HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion 24 weeks post-treatment) and combined response (CR: SR plus serum HBV DNA levels <2000 IU/mL 24 weeks post-treatment). RESULTS: Anti-HBc levels, alanine aminotransferase ratio, and HBeAg were retained in the final model. The new model scored from 0 to 3. Among patients with scores of 0, 1, or ≥2, SR was achieved in 6.45% (2/31), 13.21% (7/51), and 55.36% (31/56), respectively, and CR in 3.23% (1/31), 9.43% (5/53), and 25.00% (14/56), respectively. Our model has a higher AUROC for SR comparing to Chan's (Z = 2.77 > 1.96, p < 0.05) and Lampertico's (Z = 2.06 > 1.96, p < 0.05) model. The negative predictive value for SR and CR were both 100% in patients with score 0 and hepatitis B surface antigen ≥20,000 IU/mL at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher scores at baseline were more likely to respond to peginterferon. This new model may predict the treatment response.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In Germany, in addition to standard blood donor screening, further mandatory tests were introduced for HCV-RNA, HIV-1-RNA and for anti-HBc. Screening for HBV-DNA is optional. This study investigates the benefits of these additional tests for the detection of HIV, HCV, and HBV infections among German blood donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2015 we collected data on blood donations exclusively testing NAT positive (NAT yield) or reactive in only one of the screening assays. Assuming a Poisson distribution, we calculated NAT yield/reactive only rates on a per donation basis (number of yield/reactive only cases divided by the number of donations tested in the period under review) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Responding establishments covered 95% of the donations. We identified 20 HIV-1-NAT, 61 HCV-NAT and 29 HBV-NAT yield cases among approximately 46 million blood donations tested corresponding to 0·43 HIV-1 NAT, 1·32 HCV-NAT, and 0·64 HBV-NAT yield cases per million blood donations tested. For one HBsAg reactive only case and 23 anti-HBc reactive only cases in repeat donors, infection was confirmed by ID-NAT which translates into 0·02 and 0·55 cases per million donations tested. During the 8-year-observation period, one HIV-1, no HCV and four HBV transmissions associated with donations in the viremic pre-seroconversion window period were reported. CONCLUSION: Annually, NAT screening alone detected 2·5 HIV-1, 7·6 HCV, and 3·6 HBV infectious donations; anti-HBc screening alone identified 2·9 infectious donations of repeat donors with occult HBV infection. Overall, the survey results support that the currently practiced donor HIV/HCV/HBV screening strategy in Germany does ensure a high standard of blood safety.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In India, Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended at 6 wk except for hospital-deliveries. The authors examined protection afforded by the birth dose. METHODS: A case-control study was done. HBsAg and HBcAb were tested in 2671 children, 1 to 5 y and HBsAb was evaluated in a subset of 1413 children. Vaccination history was recorded. Cases were HBsAg carriers. In another analysis, children who got infected (HBsAg and/or HBcAb positive) were considered as cases. Exposed were the unvaccinated. In another analysis, exposed were those vaccinated without the birth dose. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) for HBsAg positivity with birth vaccination was 0.35 (95% CI 0.19-0.66); while with vaccination at 6 wk was 0.29 (95%CI 0.14-0.61), both compared to unvaccinated. Birth vaccination has no added protection when compared to the unvaccinated. Unvaccinated children in index study had HBsAg positivity of 4.38%. The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of HBsAg positivity was 32.6 (95% CI, 20.9 to 73.6). The odds of getting HBV infection was 0.42 (CI 0.25-0.68) with birth dose and 0.49 (CI 0.30-0.82) without the birth dose compared to the unvaccinated. Protective antibody (HBsAb) was present in about 70% of the vaccinated. In the unimmunised, in the first 2 y HBsAb protection was present in 40%. The odds ratio (OR) for HBsAb in the fully vaccinated between 4 and 5 y was 1.4 (95%CI 0.9-2.18) compared to the unvaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: The present study lends support to the pragmatic approach of the Government to vaccinate babies born at home starting at 6 wk.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the serum anti-HBc level in patients with different natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and cirrhosis,and its clinical value for distinguishing the natural history statue.Methods A total of 160 patients with chronic HBV infection from March 2015 to June 2016 were enrolled,and they were divided into immune tolerance group (n=43),HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) group (n=37),inactive carrier group (n=39) and HBeAg-negative CHB group (n=41).A total of 44 patients with HBeAg-positive cirrhosis and 46 patients with HBeAg-negative cirrhosis were enrolled too.The general conditions data were collected,and HBsAg,HBeAg,anti-HBc,HBV DNA load and HBV genotype were detected.The associations between anti-HBc level and clinical parameters were analyzed,and the diagnostic value of anti-HBc for distinguishing different natural histories was analyzed.Results The anti-HBc levels in different natural history from high to low were as following: HBeAg-positive CHB group (4.22±0.68)log10 IU/mL,HBeAg-negative CHB group (3.89±0.88)log10 IU/mL,inactive carrier group (3.07±0.68)log10 IU/mL and immune tolerance group (2.88±0.82)log10 IU/mL.The anti-HBc levels in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative cirrhosis patients were (3.04±0.82) and (3.15±0.86) log10 IU/mL,respectively.In HBeAg-positive CHB group,the anti-HBc was positively associated with ALT (r=0.353,P=0.032) and AST (r=0.421,P=0.009).In HBeAg-negative CHB group,the anti-HBc was positively associated with HBV DNA (r=0.343,P=0.028),ALT (r=0.458,P=0.003) and AST (r=0.495,P=0.001).The AUC of anti-HBc used to distinguish immune tolerance from HBeAg-positive CHB was 0.903,and the AUC used to distinguish inactive carrier from HBeAg-negative CHB was 0.833.Conclusion Anti-HBc levels in different natural history of chronic HBV infection are significantly different,and anti-HBc could be used to distinguish the natural history statue of chronic HBV infection with a higher diagnostic value than HBsAg.

RESUMEN

AIM: Few studies concerning the protective management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among health-care personnel (HCP), excluding occult HBV or carriers, have been reported. Therefore, we undertook a cross-sectional study of the updated status of HBV vaccine management by measuring the antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) along with the antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). METHODS: Both anti-HBs and anti-HBc were assessed in 1085 HCP employed by our institute. Hepatitis B virus vaccination-related histories were recorded using self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 1085 HCP, 27 (2.5%) were positive for anti-HBc, and its positive rate increased with age. Of the 1058 subjects with negative anti-HBc, 879 (83.1%) were positive for anti-HBs. The median titer of anti-HBs was 71.1 mIU/mL, which was higher in female subjects (P = 0.037). By age group, the positive rate of anti-HBs were 77.5%, 89.3%, 90.8%, and 81.6% in the groups aged ≤29, 30-39, 40-49, and ≥50 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Of the 908 subjects who reported receiving HBV vaccination, 6 (0.7%) were positive for anti-HBc. Among them, one subject was suspected to have a possible subclinical HBV infection after the HBV vaccination. CONCLUSION: We report the current HBV vaccination-related seroprevalence of anti-HBs along with anti-HBc in a Japanese tertiary medical institution consisting of more than 1000 HCP, which was an level comparable to similar sized hospitals in developed countries. Anti-HBc would be important for understanding HBV status, but not necessary for general HBV vaccine management for HCP.

RESUMEN

AIM: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after liver transplantation in HBV patients, or in HBV negative recipients of anti-hepatitis B core (HBc) positive grafts, has been prevented by prophylactic use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and/or nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NA). Vaccination against HBV is an alternative that may provide a chance to discontinue prophylaxis by producing anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 40 HBV positive recipients (HBV+ group) and 27 HBV negative recipients of anti-HBc positive grafts (HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group), who were administrated double-dose hepatitis B vaccination. Recipients were regarded as responders when anti-HBs greater than 100 IU/L was maintained for 6 months or more without HBIG. Response rates of vaccine and long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 40 patients in the HBV+ group (45%) and 18 of the 27 patients in the HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group (67%) responded to vaccination after a median of four and three times, respectively. Younger age was the only independent factor associated with vaccine response in the HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group (P = 0.03), whereas no factor was found to be an independent predictor for vaccine response in the HBV+ group. Among the 18 responders in the HBV+ group, 17 remained without NA or HBIG 8.2 years after the start of vaccination. Ten of those required periodic booster vaccination. All 18 responders in the HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group remained free from HBV prophylaxis 6.2 years after the start of vaccination. CONCLUSION: Younger recipients have a greater chance to develop sufficient anti-HBs after double-dose HBV vaccination, leading to discontinue HBV prophylaxis.

RESUMEN

Our understanding of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during immunosuppresive therapy has increased remarkably during recent years. HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive individuals has been well-described in certain immunosuppressive regimens, including therapies containing corticosteroids, anthracyclines, rituximab, antibody to tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HBV reactivation could also occur in HBsAg-negative, antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positive individuals during therapies containing rituximab, anti-TNF or HSCT.For HBsAg-positive patients, prophylactic antiviral therapy is proven to the effective in preventing HBV reactivation. Recent evidence also demonstrated entecavir to be more effective than lamivudine in this aspect. For HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc positive individuals, the risk of reactivations differs with the type of immunosuppression. For rituximab, a prospective study demonstrated the 2-year cumulative risk of reactivation to be 41.5%, but prospective data is still lacking for other immunosupressive regimes. The optimal management in preventing HBV reactivation would involve appropriate risk stratification for different immunosuppressive regimes in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc positive individuals.

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics,prevention and treatment strategy of de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV)infection after pediatric living liver transplantation.Methods In total,106 pediatric recipients undergoing living liver transplantation in Organ Transplantation Center of Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University and Organ Transplantation Center of Tianjin First Center Hospital from July 2010 to July 2014 were enrolled in this study.All surgeries were performed by the same surgical team.According to preoperative test outcomes of donor HBV serological markers,all recipients were divided into the positive (n =45)and negative (n =61)antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)donor liver groups (positive group and negative group),and the prevalence of de novo HBV infection was compared between two groups.The risk factors of de novo HBV infection in the positive group were analyzed to elucidate the clinical characteristics of de novo HBV infection in affected children.Results The incidences of de novo HBV infection in positive and negative group were 18% (8 /45 )and 2% (1 /61 )respectively.The risk factors of de novo HBV infection in recipients with positive anti-HBc were negative anti-HBs before transplantation and absence of antiviral therapy post-transplantation in recipients (both in P <0.05 ).The median interval between time of onset and time of liver transplantation was 12 months (8-48 months).Seven cases were treated with lamivudine and the remaining two cases were left untreated.All nine recipients survived.Conclusions Application of positive anti-HBc donor liver have a risk of HBV infection in recipients after pediatric liver transplantation.Absence of postoperative nucleoside analogue therapy and negative anti-HBs before transplantation acts as risk factors of de novo HBV infection in the recipients with positive anti-HBc donor liver.After liver transplantation,nucleoside analogue therapy is recommended for the pediatric recipients with positive anti-HBc donor liver to prevent the incidence of de novo HBV infection.Besides,hepatitis B vaccine should be administered prior to liver transplantation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver disease is more severe in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and alcohol-induced liver injury. Whether the same is true for alcoholic patients with cirrhosis who have recovered from previous HBV infections remains to be determined. OBJECTIVES: To document the extent of liver disease in alcoholic patients with cirrhosis who test negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and test positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). METHODS: Two hundred fifty-four alcoholic patients with cirrhosis were divided into anti-HBc-positive (N = 171) and anti-HBc-negative (N = 83) cohorts. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical features were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic scores and the prevalence of patients at high risk for short-term mortality were calculated. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with an increased risk for short-term mortality. RESULTS: Jaundice was more common in the anti-HBc-positive cohort (32.2% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.02). This cohort also had higher serum bilirubin (70.9 vs. 50.4 µM/L, p = 0.03), prothrombin times (15.6 vs. 14.4 s, p = 0.01), MELD scores (8.5 vs. 4.6, p = 0.01), i-MELD scores (28.6 vs. 24.7, p = 0.03), MDF scores (14.2 vs. 6.8, p = 0.02) and ABIC scores (7.2 vs. 6.6, p = 0.01). In addition, anti-HBC-positive patients were more often at high risk for short-term mortality (40.4% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified anti-HBc-positive status (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.10-3.36) and alcohol intake ≥150 g/day (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.10-3.66) as independent risk factors for high risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: The anti-HBc-positive state is associated with more advanced liver disease in alcoholic patients with cirrhosis. A prospective study including HBV-DNA testing and liver biopsies should be considered to validate and further elucidate these findings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may originate from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) false-negative blood donors, HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive blood donors and blood donors with both tests negative. HBV DNA may be present in all these cases and blood may be infectious. The aim of the study was to estimate the risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV in Vietnam using a stochastic Monte Carlo model. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of HBV prevalence in 1200 potential blood donors in rural Vietnam is used as basis for the Monte Carlo model together with expert panel estimates of occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) prevalence in blood donors. RESULTS: With 1 000 000 blood donors running in the model, the potential OBI ranged from 658 to 747 blood units per million at 5 percentile and from 1342 to 2507 blood units per million at 95 percentile resulting in the risk of post-transfusion hepatitis ranging from 66 to 250 blood units per million assuming that risk of post-transfusion from potential OBI is 10%. Using the manufacturer's HBsAg sensitivity, the mean rate of blood units per million donations having false-negative HBsAg results was 298 (5-95 percentile: 14-893). When the test sensitivity was set lower, false-negative tests was observed at a mean of 1087 per million (5-95 percentile: 762-3220). The fraction of potential OBI donors increased with the increasing age in both genders. CONCLUSION: Current HBsAg screening in Vietnam is insufficient in eliminating the risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection. The major risk factors are HBsAg false-negative results and OBI. Increased test sensitivity and locally validated HBsAg assays are recommended.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: Subjects positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAb) and negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are considered to have occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of occult HBV infection on aggravation of the clinical course in hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 400 subjects who were positive for anti-HCV antibody and negative for HBsAg. Among these subjects, 263 were HCV core antigen positive or HCV RNA positive (HCV carriers). We examined whether the presence of HBcAb affected the clinical course in these HCV carriers from 1996-2005. RESULTS: The HBcAb positive rates were 53.6% and 52.6% in HCV carriers and HCV RNA negative subjects, respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cumulative mortality associated with liver-related death between HCV carriers who were positive and negative for HBcAb. In multivariate analysis, age (≥65 years) and alanine aminotransferase level (≥31 IU/L) emerged as independent risk factors for HCC development and liver-related death, but the HBcAb status was not a risk factor. In addition, increased serum hepatic fibrosis markers (measured from 2001-2004) were not associated with HBcAb status. CONCLUSION: In our cohort study, the presence of HBcAb had no impact on HCC development, liver-related death and hepatic fibrosis markers in HCV carriers. Thus, our results indicate that occult HBV infection has no impact on the clinical course in HCV carriers.