RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is the standard surgical procedure for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, although ACDF includes risks of adjacent segment disease (ASD) and subsequent revision procedures. Various interbody cage, plate, and screw options can be utilized. Stand-alone devices were designed to overcome undesired complications of hardware prominence and associated dysphagia, soft tissue violation, and adjacent level encroachment. Implants include biomechanical structural support (cage) composed of various materials (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)/titanium) and integral fixation (screws/blades). The purpose was to compare intraoperative, short- and long-term outcomes of revision ACDF using a stand-alone implant (ACDF-ZP group) versus traditional interbody PEEK cage, titanium plate, and screw instrumentation (ACDF-CP group). METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study reviewing charts of patients who underwent revision ACDF. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included (ACDF-ZP group = 50; ACDF-CP group = 11). In-hospital incidence of dysphagia was significantly less in the ACDF-CP group (P = 0.041). Thrity-one (62.0%) of the ACDF-ZP group reported dysphagia postoperatively, half resolved by 6 weeks, and two persisted for more than 6 months. Five (45.5%) of the ACDF-CP group reported dysphagia with most resolving within 6 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in short- or long-term complications, dysphonia, or reoperation rates. No statistical significance was seen in blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, local and global alignment, or cage subsidence. CONCLUSION: Rates of dysphagia were comparable between groups at short and long-term follow-up, despite a greater incidence of postoperative dysphagia in the ACDF-ZP group. All complications and occurrences of cage subsidence were observed in the ACDF-ZP group, which may be attributed to the larger sample size. Given these findings, zero-profile stand-alone implants and traditional interbody PEEK cage, titanium plate, and screw instrumentation appear to be both safe and effective options for revision ACDF.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage, a bioactive nonmetal cage, is fabricated in a hollow cylindrical shape and has been widely used for decades with good clinical outcomes for anterior cervical fusion. However, there remain some radiological complications, such as a slightly high subsidence rate. To improve the clinical outcomes, the improved n-HA/PA66 cage now has been developed into a trapezoidal and wedge shape, a better biomechanical shape matching the cervical spine that is similar to that of the PEEK cage. However, there have been no long-term comparisons of the improved n-HA/PA66 cage and PEEK cage in anterior cervical reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with the improved n-HA/PA66 cage (n-HA/PA66 group) were matched with patients with the PEEK cage (PEEK group) by clinical presentation, segment, age and sex. All patients underwent a minimum of 6 years of follow-up. The radiographic parameters (cage subsidence, fusion status, cervical lordosis, and segmental sagittal alignment) and clinical parameters (10-point visual analogue scale, Neck Disability Index and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores) from patients were evaluated before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: The n-HA/PA66 and PEEK groups were well matched in terms of clinical presentation, segment, age, and sex at surgery. The n-HA/PA66 and PEEK cages had similar fusion rates at 6 months postoperatively (n-HA/PA66: 58.6% vs. PEEK: 51.7%, P = 0.455) and at the last follow-up (n-HA/PA66: 96.6% vs. PEEK: 93.1%, P = 0.402). The respective cage subsidence rates in the n-HA/PA66 and PEEK groups were 6.9 and 12.1% (P = 0.342). The correction of SA was similar between the groups at the final follow-up (n-HA/PA66: 4.29 ± 1.99 vs. PEEK: 3.99 ± 2.59 P = 0.464). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean cervical lordosis, visual analogue scale scores of the neck and arm, NDI scores, JOA scores or patients' overall satisfaction at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: After single-level ACDF, the improved n-HA/PA66 cage had similar excellent results in both radiological and clinical outcomes compared with the PEEK cage over 6 years of follow-up. According to these results, the improved n-HA/PA66 cage and the PEEK cage could be comparable for ACDF.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: ACDF treatment of CSM is currently recognized as a surgical method with reliable efficacy. However, the cervical radiographic findings in a certain group of patients showed that the symptoms were not completely relieved. This study will investigate the relationship between cervical parameters and prognoses after ACDF surgery. METHODS: This study collected cases of CSM treated with ACDF in Zhongda Hospital from May 2014 to June 2018. The investigators recorded gender, age, cervical sagittal parameters, fusion segment, BMI, symptom duration, and NDI score. To compare the changes of parameters after surgery and explore the correlation between each factor and NDI score. RESULTS: Generally, cervical lordosis increased and TS-CL decreased after surgery and during follow-up. Postoperative T1S, SVA and SCA decreased significantly compared to preoperative. T1S was positively correlated with CL (r = 0.245), SVA (r = 0.184), and negatively correlated with SCA (r = - 0.314) and NT (r = - 0.222). The last follow-up NDI score was positively correlated with T1S (r = 0.689), SVA (r = 0.155), TS-CL (r = 0.496), and age (r = 0.194), while negatively correlated with SCA (r = - 0.142). A linear regression model was established with the following formula: NDI = 0.809 × (T1S) - 0.152 × (CL) + 1.962 × (Sex) + 0.110 × (Age). T1S (B = 0.205, P < 0.001), CL (B = - 0.094, P = 0.041), and NT (B = 0.142, P = 0.023) were independent risk factors that affected whether the last follow-up NDI score was greater than preoperative. CONCLUSIONS: In ACDF treatment of CSM, there exists a close correlation between cervical sagittal parameters and NDI scores. T1S, CL, sex, and age were linearly dependent on NDI scores. The increase of T1S, NT, and the decrease of CL were risk factors that affected follow-up NDI score greater than preoperative. Reducing T1S is beneficial to clinical recovery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an acceptable alternative for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for a significant patient population with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy secondary to degenerative changes in the cervical spine. There are sufficient mid- and long-term data supporting performance and safety of one-level CDA. With the success of single-level cervical CDA, considerable interest exists about CDA use for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). This review analyzes the safety and efficacy of two-level CDA for treatment of symptomatic cervical DDD with focus on the Mobi-C® Cervical Disc. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes previously published articles in a literature search using keywords: 'two-level-anterior cervical arthrodesis; two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF); two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA); two-level cervical total disc replacement; two-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD); Mobi-C® disc'. EXPERT OPINION: Two-level CDA with the Mobi-C® device demonstrated equivalent, and in certain aspects, favorable outcomes compared to ACDF for treatment of symptomatic cervical 2-level degenerative disc disease (DDD) indicating a satisfactory safety and efficacy profile.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multilevel anterior cervical decompression and fixation of four and more levels is a common surgical procedure used for several diseases. METHODS: We reviewed the radiological and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy or corpectomy and fixation of four and more levels in 85 patients (55 men and 30 women) with an average age of 59.6 years. Surgical indication was multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy in 72 (85%) patients, multilevel cervical spondylodiscitis in four (5%), complex traumatic cervical fractures in four (5%), metastatic cervical spine tumor in two (2%), and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in three (3%) patients. RESULTS: There were no severe intraoperative complications such as spinal cord or vertebral artery injury or dissection. Seventy-three patients had four, 10 patients had five, and two patients had six anterior cervical level fixations. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scale scores improved (6.9 to 1.3 (p < 0.001) and 13.9 to 16.5 (p < 0.001), respectively). The Cobb angle increased from 5.7° to 17.6° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Secondary posterior fixation was necessary in three cases due to pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION: The anterior approach appears to be optimal for ventral compressive pathology and lordosis restoration to the cervical spine. Limitations of multiple level decompression and fixation included increasing pseudoarthrosis rates, especially after corpectomy, and increasing fused level numbers.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed as an alternative for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for nerve root decompression. The rationale behind CDA was to help prevent adjacent segment degeneration which potentially may lead to additional surgery. Multiple randomized controlled trials have evaluated a myriad of disc arthroplasty devices over the past 10 years and provided data regarding clinical benefits and safety. Their long-term data, reporting results at 5-10 years, presents the opportunity to comment on the overall efficacy, safety and reported complications of these devices. This report reviews results of the Prestige, proDisc-C, Mobi-C Disc and various other arthroplasty devices and provides an overall report of the longest term available data and comparisons between devices. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes previously published articles in a literature search using keywords: 'cervical disc arthroplasty', 'cervical total disc replacement', 'anterior cervical decompression and fusion', 'anterior cervical arthrodesis', 'symptomatic degenerative disc disease' and commercial names of devices. EXPERT COMMENTARY: CDA, with the devices reviewed, resulted in favorable outcomes in comparison to ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) taking in to account the long-term functional recovery, adverse events, development of adjacent segment degeneration and subsequent surgical interventions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the causes of muscular paralysis due to C5 nerve root injury after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and explore its prevention way. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2015, 310 patients underwent ACDF in our hospital. Of them, 9 cases occurred muscular paralysis due to C5 nerve root injury after operation. The clinical data of 9 patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 1 female, aged from 51 to 84 years with an average of 64 years. Two cases underwent internal fixation and intervertebral fusion with one segment, 6 cases with two segments, 1 case with three segments. Simple deltoid muscle weakness, pain, numbness happened in 7 cases, simultaneously biceps brachii muscle weakness, pain, numbness in 2 cases. Muscle strength was 0 grade in 1 case, 1 grade in 3 cases, 2 grades in 4 cases, 3 grades in 1 case. RESULTS: The follow up time of 9 patients was more than 12 months and the longest was 24 months with an average of 14 months. Muscle strength of 7 patients recovered to 4-5 grades. Recovering time after operation was directly proportional to the degree of injury, those patients with muscle strength level more than 2, usually could have significant improvement within 3 weeks. The JOA score improved from 10.89±1.89 preoperatively to 8.92±1.91 postoperative C5 nerve root palsy to 14.48±2.10 at final follow up, with significant difference(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: More complicated factors result in C5 nerve root injury after ACDF. Except those suffered severe grinding contusion and amputation, most of the patients can get satisfactory prognosis. Strict control of the operation indication, selection of the right surgical segment with accurate manipulation, control of the distraction of intervertebral space and the width of the multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy, are main methods to prevent the complication.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the causes of muscular paralysis due to C₅ nerve root injury after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and explore its prevention way.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2005 to December 2015, 310 patients underwent ACDF in our hospital. Of them, 9 cases occurred muscular paralysis due to C₅ nerve root injury after operation. The clinical data of 9 patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 1 female, aged from 51 to 84 years with an average of 64 years. Two cases underwent internal fixation and intervertebral fusion with one segment, 6 cases with two segments, 1 case with three segments. Simple deltoid muscle weakness, pain, numbness happened in 7 cases, simultaneously biceps brachii muscle weakness, pain, numbness in 2 cases. Muscle strength was 0 grade in 1 case, 1 grade in 3 cases, 2 grades in 4 cases, 3 grades in 1 case.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The follow up time of 9 patients was more than 12 months and the longest was 24 months with an average of 14 months. Muscle strength of 7 patients recovered to 4-5 grades. Recovering time after operation was directly proportional to the degree of injury, those patients with muscle strength level more than 2, usually could have significant improvement within 3 weeks. The JOA score improved from 10.89±1.89 preoperatively to 8.92±1.91 postoperative C₅ nerve root palsy to 14.48±2.10 at final follow up, with significant difference(<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>More complicated factors result in C₅ nerve root injury after ACDF. Except those suffered severe grinding contusion and amputation, most of the patients can get satisfactory prognosis. Strict control of the operation indication, selection of the right surgical segment with accurate manipulation, control of the distraction of intervertebral space and the width of the multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy, are main methods to prevent the complication.</p>