RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Antegrade colonic enemas (ACE) can be an effective management option for defecation disorders and improve quality of life. Best practice regarding channel placement is unclear and variation may exist around preferred initial type of channel, age at placement, and underlying diagnoses. We aimed to describe practice patterns and patient characteristics around ACE channel placement. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of children with an ACE channel cared for at sites participating in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) from 2017 to 2022. Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to test the age at surgery by site with significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: 500 patients with ACE channel were included. 293 (58.6%) patients had their ACE procedure at a PCPLC center. The median age at surgery was 7.6 [IQR 5.3-11.0] years for the overall cohort and 8.1 [IQR 5.3-11.5] years for placement at PCPLC centers. For PCPLC centers, median age at placement varied significantly across centers (p = 0.009). 371 (74.2%) patients received Malone appendicostomy, 116 (23.2%) received cecostomy, and 13 (2.6%) received Neo-Malone appendicostomy. Median age of patients by channel type was 7.7 [IQR 5.3-11.0], 7.5 [IQR 5.7-11.0], and 9.8 [IQR 4.2-11.6] years, respectively. The most common indication for cecostomy was idiopathic/refractory constipation (52.6%), whereas anorectal malformation was the most common indication for Malone (47.2%) and Neo-Malone (61.5%). Among ACE channels placed at PCPLC centers, there was variation across institutions in preferred initial channel type. The 4 highest volume centers favored Malone appendicostomy over cecostomy. CONCLUSION: There is variation in practice of ACE channel placement. At specialty pediatric colorectal centers, age at time of placement and type of channel placed varied across institutions. Further work is needed to better characterize diagnosis- and age-focused patient centered outcomes to clarify recommendations for our patients who benefit from these procedures. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento , Enema , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enema/métodos , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Estreñimiento/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cecostomía/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Effective treatment for chronic constipation is a real clinical challenge, especially in patients with severe symptoms. If conservative measures do not help, usually subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis has been used as the treatment of choice for refractory slow-transit constipation, but consequences may unfavorably affect quality of life. Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy (PEC) with antegrade colonic enema (ACE) is a minimally invasive alternative to avoid radical surgery in order to improve bowel movement. Recently, of various catheter placement techniques, a laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy has been applied in clinical praxis. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 5 patients with Chait Trapdoor catheter placed for purpose of ACE by LAPEC. Main outcome was to assess clinical success of PEC defined by an improvement of at least 50% of baseline KESS at 6M. Secondary outcomes were: procedural parameters and safety of procedure. RESULTS: Since may 2019 to march 2021, LAPEC was performed in 5 patients. Median follow-up was 14 months (7V12). All PECs were placed successfully in cecum. Treatment success reached 60% (3/5) of patients. Postoperative complication occurred in three patients. CONCLUSION: LAPEC provides both endoscopic and laparoscopic visualization, thereby, significantly decreasing potential risks by ensuring precise and safe access to the cecum. Antegrade colonic enema through PEC provides improvement of bowel movement in highly selected patient with severe symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Cecostomía , Estreñimiento/cirugía , Enema , Incontinencia Fecal/cirugía , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction: We present perioperative outcomes of a single-center experience with robot-assisted antegrade colonic enema (ACE) channel creation for the treatment of chronic constipation refractory to medical therapy and compare it to the traditional open surgical approach. We also demonstrate a step-by-step video presentation of the robotic approach for cecal flap ACE performed as part of a dual continence procedure in patients with short length of appendix. Methods: A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent ACE channel creation between 2008 and 2020 was performed. We compared demographics and intraoperative and postoperative variables of the open vs robotic approach. Results: Among 28 patients, 15 were open and 13 robotic. To construct the ACE channel, a cecal flap was utilized in 36%, split appendix in 50%, full-length appendix in 11%, and sigmoid colon in 3% of patients. Both approaches showed equivalent estimated blood loss (50 mL [interquartile range; IQR = 20-100]), median length of hospital stay (7 days vs 8 days, p = 0.7), and median time to return to regular diet (4 days vs 5 days, p = 0.5) (Table 1). Patients in the open group were more likely to have a history of prior abdominal surgeries than those in the robotic group (80% vs 38.5%, p = 0.02). The risk of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or more complications (40% vs 23.1%, p = 0.04) and the rate of ACE channel stenosis (46.7% vs 7.7%, p = 0.02) were significantly higher in the open approach. Channel stenosis was significantly higher in patients with an appendix ACE channel (87.5% vs 12.5%, p < 0.05) compared to those with cecal flap ACE. [Table: see text] Conclusion: Robot-assisted ACE channel creation is a safe and acceptable alternative with a significantly lower rate of channel stenosis and other clavien dindo grade 3 complications compared to the traditional open approach. Cecal flaps are also at a lower risk of stomal stenosis than appendix.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Apéndice/cirugía , Niño , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Enema/métodos , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antegrade colonic enema (ACE) via an appendicostomy is a recognised method of treatment for medically intractable fecal incontinence and/or constipation. In case of a missing appendix, ileal neoappendicostomy (INA) is considered a suitable alternative. The aim of this study was to review the postoperative complications, functional outcome, stoma-related complications and quality of life of patients treated with this method. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed (NCBI) and Cochrane Library from inception to September 2020 using the search terms "antegrade enema" OR "continence enema". Studies on children and adults with fecal incontinence, constipation or a combination of both, who underwent ileal neoappendicostomy for ACE due to the failure of medical treatment and/or anal irrigation were included in the studies, which reported one or more of the following primary outcomes: postoperative complications, functional results, and stoma-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 780 studies were identified, 8 of which, comprising 6 studies in adults and 2 in children, were eligible for review. Overall, 139 patients were included. All studies were retrospective and the methods for reporting outcomes were highly heterogeneous. Improvements in incontinence and constipation were reported in all studies, together with an improved quality of life when reported (5 studies). Stomal stenosis and leakage rates were 0-29% and 14-60%, respectively. Postoperative complications were relatively common and included potentially life-threatening complications. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into consideration that studies of INA were few and of poorly quality; ACE via an INA had a positive impact on bowel function and quality of life. Stoma-related complications and postoperative complications remain a concern.
Asunto(s)
Incontinencia Fecal , Adulto , Niño , Estreñimiento/etiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Enema/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To allow patients with bladder and bowel dysfunctions to achieve social continence, continent catheterizable channels (CCCs) are effective alternatives to intermittent self-catheterization and enema. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe our progressive advancement from open to robotic construction of CCCs, reporting outcomes and comparing the two approaches. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of pediatric patients who underwent construction of CCCs between 2008 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were age ≤18 yr, and CCCs with or without bladder augmentation or bladder neck surgery. We compared open versus robotic approaches for demographics, and intra- and postoperative outcomes; operative time was calculated as incision-to-closure time. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Channels performed were appendicovesicostomy (APV), Monti with tapered ileum, and antegrade colonic enema (ACE). A Monti channel with tapered ileum was preferred to a spiral Monti or double Monti, as it has more robust blood supply and it was performed only with an open approach. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was success rate, defined as postoperative stomal continence. Stomal incontinence was defined as the presence of urine leakage noted by caregivers or patients and confirmed by the surgeon. Secondary outcomes were stomal stenosis (supra- and subfascial), incontinence, need for surgical revision, and surgical site infection. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 69 patients were included in the study, with 35 open and 34 robotic procedures. The robotic approach showed a significant decrease in length of hospital stay (LOS) compared with the open approach. Six primary subfascial revisions were performed in five patients--three Monti, two ACE, and one APV. Continence rates were 91.4% and 91.2% for open and robotic approaches, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery for CCCs showed acceptable postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates, which are comparable with those of the traditional open approach. Additionally, due to its minimally invasive nature, it offers advantages such as decreased postoperative pain, LOS, and time to full diet, and better cosmesis. PATIENT SUMMARY: Robotic surgery for continent catheterizable channels showed acceptable postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates, which are comparable with those of the traditional open approach.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Incontinencia Urinaria , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes , Niño , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antegrade colonic enemas are used in patients with colorectal dysfunction resistant to conservative therapy. A number of different operative techniques are applied, but their effectiveness is by and large unknown. We therefore evaluated the long-term usefulness of the left-sided percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube method in adult patients. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with colorectal dysfunction underwent insertion of a PEG tube colostomy by laparotomy between 1997 and 2006. In 2014, we evaluated how many of the patients had the tube still in place, how the patients coped with the tube, and what the reasons for the removal were. RESULTS: The main indications were severe constipation or fecal incontinence mainly related to neurological diseases. In 2014, 5 out of 21 patients had the tube still in use (median follow-up 14 years, range 11-17 years) and 4 out of 5 deceased patients had had the tube in use until their death, unrelated to this treatment (median follow-up 7 years, range 0-8 years). Four out of the 5 living patients considered the benefit of the tube to be good or excellent. Tubes were removed in 11 (52%) patients for various reasons, local skin irritation being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: A left-sided PEG tube colostomy was removed in over half of the patients, but despite that, it still seems to be a viable long-term option in the treatment of individual patients with colorectal dysfunction, when conservative methods are ineffective.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/terapia , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Enema/métodos , Gastrostomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Estreñimiento/terapia , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrostomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Surgical treatment of anal incontinence is indicated only for patients who have failed medical treatment. Sphincterorraphy is suitable in case of external sphincter rupture. In the last decade, sacral nerve stimulation has proven to be a scientifically validated solution when no sphincter lesion has been identified and more recently has also been proposed as an alternative in cases of limited sphincter defect. Anal reconstruction using artificial sphincters is still under evaluation in the literature, while indications for dynamic graciloplasty are decreasing due to its complexity and high morbidity. Less risky techniques involving intra-sphincteric injections are being developed, with encouraging preliminary results that need to be confirmed especially in the medium- and long-term. Antegrade colonic enemas instilled via cecostomy (Malone) can be an alternative to permanent stoma in patients who are well instructed in the techniques of colonic lavage. Stomal diversion is a solution of last resort.