RESUMEN
Allergies to dogs and cats can cause enormous damage to human health and the economy. Dog and cat allergens are mainly found in dog and cat dander and are present in small particles in the air and in carpets in homes with dogs and cats. Cleaning houses and washing pets are the main methods for reducing allergens in homes; however, it is difficult to eliminate them completely. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether a TiO2 photocatalyst could degrade dog and cat allergens. Under wet conditions, exposure to the TiO2 photocatalyst for 24 h degraded Can f1, which is a major dog allergen extracted from dog dander, by 98.3%, and Fel d1, which is a major cat allergen extracted from cat dander, by 93.6-94.4%. Furthermore, under dry conditions, the TiO2 photocatalyst degraded Can f1 and Fel d1 by 92.8% and 59.2-68.4%, respectively. The TiO2 photocatalyst abolished the binding of dog and cat allergens to human IgE by 104.6% and 108.6%, respectively. The results indicated that the TiO2 photocatalyst degraded dog and cat allergens, causing a loss in their allergenicity. Our results suggest that TiO2 photocatalysis can be useful for removing indoor pet allergens and improving the partnership between humans and pets.
RESUMEN
Purpose: An objective of this study was to investigate the allergen sensitization characteristics of cat, dog and horse dander in patients with suspected allergic diseases in different geographical regions of Chinese mainland. Patients and Methods: We invited 2377 patients aged 0-86 years with suspected allergic diseases to participate in a cross-sectional survey in 11 provinces in China. Combined with the questionnaires and animal-specific IgE levels, we analyzed the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of furry animal sensitization in different regions and populations of Chinese Mainland. Results: Among the 2377 patients with suspected allergic diseases, 14.9% were sensitized to cat dander, 9.3% to dog dander and 5.5% to horse dander. Animal allergens mainly cause low-level sensitization (class 1-3). There was a significant correlation between cat, dog and horse dander allergen sIgE, with correlation coefficients (rs) all greater than 0.750. The majority (46.5%) of sIgE-positive patients were sensitized to at least two animal allergens simultaneously. The prevalence of these animals all showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing with age, and all reached the peak in young adolescence. As for the geographical factors, the sensitization rate of cats and dogs in Western was significantly higher than that in Eastern (cat: 18.4% vs 9.2%, dog: 11.6% vs 5.5%, all P < 0.001), however, no significant differences were found in horses. Aged ≤6 years, living in Western, and high animal allergen exposure elevated the risk of cat or dog sensitization. Living on a lower floor (aOR: 0.56) was a protective factor for horse sensitization. Conclusion: In this representative sample of Chinese patients with suspected allergic diseases, there was an apparent geographic variation in sensitization to cats and dogs. Age factor and living in Western also had a significant impact on animal allergen sensitization rate.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Frequently observed multiple sensitizations to several animals highlights the importance of a molecular diagnosis, distinguishing between sensitizations specific to single species and sensitizations due to cross-reactivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of a molecular diagnosis in the description of sensitization profiles in allergy patients living in Central Europe, with a particular focus on animal-derived molecules. METHODS: The molecular diagnosis was performed using the ImmunoCAP ISAC microarray. Results of 1,255 allergy patients were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The highest sensitization rates were observed for uteroglobin Fel d 1 (31.8%) and kallikrein Can f 5 (16.4%), followed by animal lipocalins Can f 1 (13.9%), Equ c 1 (6.2%), Fel d 4 (5.3%), Can f 2 (4.2%), and Mus m 1 (4.1%). Sensitization rates to serum albumins Fel d 2, Can f 3, Equ c 3, and Bos d 6 were very low, with the highest being 3.2% to Fel d 2. Detailed subanalysis confirmed the dominant role of Fel d 1 or Can f 5 and/or Can f 1 in cat- or dog-sensitized patients, respectively. Further analysis focused on lipocalins and albumins confirmed a high rate of cosensitizations within both groups. CONCLUSION: The sensitization to animal allergen molecules is very frequent in Central Europe. The most common is sensitization to species-specific cat uteroglobin Fel d 1 and dog kallikrein Can f 5, followed by sensitizations to animal lipocalins. Our data suggest that commonly observed multiple sensitizations detected by extract approach can be explained not only by true cosensitization, but also by cross-reactivity, mainly in the frame of lipocalins. Cross-reactive serum albumins are minor sensitizers and are probably not important from this point of view.