RESUMEN

We present a case of refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM) in a 51-year-old Hispanic female which failed multiple treatments but found symptomatic relief with anifrolumab. Anifrolumab was the only treatment that was associated with significant improvement in the rash and pruritis of the patient and lowered her corticosteroid needs. To our knowledge, this is the only second case report that has shown success in treating refractory cutaneous symptoms of DM with anifrolumab after failing standard and multiple combinations of therapies. Anifrolumab is a new first-in-class human monoclonal antibody, which inhibits type 1 interferon receptor (IFN-1) and is used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is FDA-approved for non-renal manifestations of SLE. This IFN pathway seems to be also active in patients with DM. The presence of IFN-1 and IFN-2 has been reported in muscle biopsies of patients with inflammatory myopathies. Moreover, the IFN activation signature is present in the muscle, blood, and skin of patients with DM. IFN-1 has been assumed to activate toll-like receptors which activate the dendritic cells leading to the secretion of cytokines and chemokines. This potential pathophysiological role of IFN in DM may explain the symptom improvement experienced by our patient after starting anifrolumab treatment. Anifrolumab has additionally been shown to have a good safety profile when used to treat patients with SLE with up to three years of treatment on background conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies. In conclusion, SLE and DM share similarities in their pathophysiology and cutaneous disease involvement and can be differentiated clinically. Skin manifestations of DM can persist despite combinations of therapies even when weakness resolves. With this case report, we aim to highlight the possibility of utilizing anifrolumab for treating DM skin manifestations, especially in refractory cases. More research is needed to guide where anifrolumab stands in the therapeutic algorithm for DM. It is unknown whether it treats the myositis component, DM-related arthritis, or coexistent rheumatoid arthritis.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Skin involvement is common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but may be resistant to conventional treatment. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of anifrolumab (ANI) in refractory cutaneous manifestations of SLE. METHODS: Case series of patients with refractory cutaneous SLE from three Rheumatology Departments in Greece. Outcome measures were improvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), physician global assessment (PGA) and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI). Clinically relevant improvement in skin was defined as decrease ≥50% (CLASI50) from baseline values. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received ANI; all had active skin involvement at baseline. Mean (SD) SLEDAI and PGA at ANI initiation were 7.4 (2.7) and 1.4 (0.5), respectively, with a mean prednisone dose 4.9 (4.5) mg/day. Mean CLASI (Activity/Damage) at baseline was 13.9 (9.7)/2.9 (4.6). Patients were refractory to a mean 6.3 (1.5) immunomodulatory agents (including hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids) before the initiation of ANI. After a mean 8.5 (4.6) months, 89% (n = 16/18) of patients demonstrated significant improvement in general lupus and cutaneous disease activity, and glucocorticoid tapering. Mean SLEDAI and mean CLASI at last visit were 3.4 (1.9) and 2.1 (2.4)/1.4 (2.2), respectively, and mean daily prednisone dose decreased to 2.4 (2.2). Of note, in this group of highly refractory patients CLASI50 was achieved in 16/18 (89%) patients. One patient discontinued ANI after 4 infusions due to a varicella-zoster virus infection and one patient, who initially responded to treatment with ANI, experienced a skin flare due to temporary discontinuation due to Covid 19 infection. DORIS remission and LLDAS were attained in two (11.1%) and eleven (61.1%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anifrolumab is highly effective in various skin manifestations of SLE, even after prior failure to multiple treatments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Approval of anifrolumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2021 marked the success of a long quest to target the interferon system, in a disease wherein the latter has long been considered to play a pivotal role. Prior to anifrolumab, a number of agents had been tested in early phase clinical trials in patients with SLE, with equivocal results. Following its approval and marketing in several countries, the first reports regarding efficacy and safety in real-life clinical settings have been published, which suggest remarkable efficacy in skin manifestations of the disease, even after prior failure to multiple immunosuppressive therapies. In this report, we provide a short overview of IFN inhibitors that have been used in clinical trials of SLE, with a focus on anifrolumab; we also review all available evidence to date regarding its real-world efficacy and safety.

RESUMEN

Despite advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), it remains a chronic disease with frequent flares, requiring constant medical care, laboratory exams, hospitalisations, and the use of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids, increasing the morbidity and mortality of these patients. The past decade of research has brought to light multiple observations on the role of interferons (IFNs) in the pathogenesis of SLE, which paved the way for the development of potential novel therapies targeting the interferon pathway. Following two phase III trials, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody which binds to the type I IFN receptor, blocking the activity of type I IFNs, was approved for active SLE. This review summarises the latest research on the role and mechanisms of type I IFNs in SLE and the development and advances on new therapeutic drugs based on IFN inhibition for SLE.

RESUMEN

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs and systems. It is characterized by the production of abnormal antibodies that attack healthy cells and tissues. The disease presents a wide range of symptoms and severity, from mild to severe. Diagnosis can be complex, but the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) help to facilitate it. Incidence and prevalence vary considerably worldwide, mainly affecting adult women between the third and fourth decades of life, although it can also occur in childhood. The prognosis of SLE has improved over time, but there is still a risk of irreversible organ damage. Treatment is individualized for each patient and is based on immunosuppression and the use of corticosteroids. Biological therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, have emerged as a more specific alternative. Methotrexate, antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and monoclonal antibodies are some of the medications used to treat SLE. New therapeutic strategies are currently being developed, such as targeted therapies, immunomodulators, and biological agents. Treatment adherence, monitoring, and regular follow-up are important aspects of SLE management. This article aims to describe the characteristics of the new monoclonal antibody therapies that exist for the management of SLE.

RESUMEN

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, which poses significant challenges due to its chronic nature and complex clinical manifestations. For patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the type 1 interferon receptor (IFNAR), has emerged as a cutting-edge treatment option that can reduce disease activity, prevent organ damage from the illness or side effects resulting from medications, and enhance the quality of life for those living with SLE. Consequently, this drug has received approval from major regulatory agencies. Anifrolumab's safety, effectiveness, and long-term results are assessed in this systematic review using information from clinical trials, real-world research, and retrospective analysis. In particular, clinical investigations, such as the MUSE Phase II and TULIP Phase III trials, showed that anifrolumab significantly improved important outcomes compared to placebo, including the SLE Responder Index, major clinical response, and disease activity ratings. During extended use, anifrolumab demonstrated significant sustained efficacy and a tolerable safety profile, with controllable side events mostly associated with viral infections. Moreover, subgroup analyses, demonstrating that Asian patients and individuals with a strong interferon gene profile are particularly responsive to anifrolumab, underscore the importance of customized treatment methods. Anifrolumab's safety and effectiveness were further validated by real-world data, particularly in patients who reached the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), where the drug decreased glucocorticoid consumption and disease activity. Overall, anifrolumab shows great promise as a treatment for moderate-to-severe SLE, providing significant efficacy together with a manageable safety profile. To fully explore its therapeutic potential and optimize therapy approaches for the management of SLE, further research is necessary, especially in lupus nephritis and other disease subsets.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the treatment selection for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using data from the Kyushu Collagen Disease Network for SLE (KCDN-SLE) registry, a multicenter prospective registry in Japan. METHODS: This study used data from patients registered between August 2022 and November 2023. Clinical characteristics, purpose of agent initiation, other candidate agents, and short-term efficacy and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: We analyzed 69 previously treated patients with SLE (mean age 43.7 years; 62 females, 7 males). Hydroxychloroquine, biological agents, and immunosuppressive agents were initiated during the maintenance phase in 12, 41, and 16 patients, respectively. In patients with active organ involvement, hydroxychloroquine and biological agents were widely used for initiation. In those who already achieved treatment goals, biological agents alone were predominantly selected. The SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score and prednisolone dose declined significantly over a 6-month follow-up period. Among 48 patients with active disease, 22 achieved a lupus low disease activity state, but this had no evident association with the initiation of a biological agent. In total, 14 adverse events, predominantly infections, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Biological agents were used preferentially, and the therapeutic agents were appropriately effective and mostly achieved the purpose of agent initiation.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The advent of biological therapies has already revolutionized treatment strategies and disease course of several rheumatologic conditions, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytokines and interleukins represent a considerable portion of this family of drugs. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) dysregulation of different cytokine and interleukin-related pathways have been linked to disease development and perpetration, offering palatable therapeutic targets addressable via such mAbs. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we provide an overview of the different biological therapies under development targeting cytokines and interleukins, with a focus on mAbs, while providing the rationale behind their choice as therapeutic targets and analyzing the scientific evidence linking them to SLE pathogenesis. EXPERT OPINION: An unprecedented number of clinical trials on biological drugs targeting different immunological pathways are ongoing in SLE. Their success might allow us to tackle present challenges of SLE management, including the overuse of glucocorticoids in daily clinical practice, as well as SLE heterogenicity in treatment response among different individuals, hopefully paving the way toward precision medicine.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Anifrolumab is an inhibitor of the type I interferon receptor subunit 1 (IFNAR1) recently approved for the management of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In 2 clinical trials, it has proven effective to treat cutaneous signs. Although anifrolumab has not been indicated for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), multiple cases and case series (20 publications with a total of 78 patients) have shown good and rapid responses with this drug, both in subacute CLE and discoid lupus erythematosus, as well as in lupus panniculitis and perniosis. Two case reports of dermatomyositis have also experienced clinical improvement with anifrolumab. Clinical trials of this drug are ongoing for subacute CLE and discoid lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and progressive vitiligo. Its most common adverse effects are respiratory infections and herpes zoster. Anifrolumab may be a well-tolerated alternative in the management of CLE.

RESUMEN

Anifrolumab is a new therapeutic approach for individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) directed at blocking the type 1 interferon pathway. Despite the expanding body of literature on Anifrolumab, an essential aspect remains absent: the subjective patient experience of treatment effects and implications on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study aimed to fill this void by elucidating the nuanced perspectives of SLE patients receiving Anifrolumab treatment by conducting qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs). SLE patients at Aarhus University Hospital who had received at least three infusions of Anifrolumab were approached for inclusion in the study, which comprised two main elements: (1) qualitative IDIs and (2) collection of patient data from electronic medical records (EMRs). The IDIs were semi-structured and based on a discussion guide that included open-ended and close-ended questions. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using qualitative software to understand concepts important to patients and to understand patients' own experiences before and after Anifrolumab therapy. A clinical chart review was conducted using EMR data at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after Anifrolumab initiation. IDIs were completed with 14 patients, and EMR data was collected from 16 patients (treatment days range: 62-474). Of the 23 symptoms spontaneously reported by patients prior to Anifrolumab treatment, fatigue, joint pain, sun sensitivity, joint stiffness, skin rashes, and hair loss were the most common. Most symptoms improved, and none worsened during treatment. Patients reported significant impacts of disease on daily life before treatment: day-to-day activities, social life, emotional aspects, physical activity, concentration/memory, work/employment, and family/romantic relationships. Patients reported improvements in all aspects after treatment but were still impacted. From the EMR data, we observed a fall in disease activity after treatment initiation with a concomitant reduction in the use of corticosteroids. This study provides valuable insights into the subjective experiences of SLE patients treated with Anifrolumab, and the findings collectively contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the treatment's efficacy from the patients' perspective and its tangible effects on both subjective and objective parameters in SLE patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Alopecia associated with lupus erythematosus is broadly classified into reversible nonscarring alopecia seen in the acute phase, such as worsening of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cicatricial alopecia seen in chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus represented by discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). In DLE-induced alopecia, early therapeutic intervention before developing scarring alopecia is important, but the condition is often resistant to conventional treatment. Anifrolumab (ANI), a novel therapeutic agent for SLE that inhibits Type I interferon activity, has been shown to be effective against acute skin lesions, including alopecia, in patients with SLE. However, there are very few reports on the effect of ANI on alopecia due to DLE. We report on a 27-year-old Japanese woman with SLE whose alopecia due to chronic DLE was refractory to topical therapy and systemic therapy with oral glucocorticoid, multiple immunosuppressants, and belimumab for ∼8 years after onset and whose alopecia improved with ANI. ANI can be considered to be an effective treatment option in lupus patients presenting with alopecia due to DLE, even in the chronic refractory stage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex heterogeneous disease with multiple clinical manifestations. Recently, two medications, anifrolumab and voclosporin, have been approved for the treatment of adults with SLE and lupus nephritis (LN), respectively. We present the case of an elderly woman with LN and refractory discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), who was treated successfully with a combination of voclosporin and anifrolumab without major infections.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: SLE imposes a significant morbidity and mortality as well as a substantial burden on the healthcare system. The model aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of anifrolumab implementation against belimumab as an add-on-therapy to the standard of care (SoC) over a lifetime horizon for Emirati patients. METHODOLOGY: A microsimulation model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of anifrolumab against belimumab (IV/SC) as an add-on therapy to SoC in a hypothetical cohort of adult Emirati patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) over a lifetime horizon. The clinical data was captured from published clinical trials as; TULIP-1, TULIP-2, BLISS-52, BLISS-76 and BLISS-SC. Health utility scores were constructed according to a linear regression model from the pooled data of the two TULIP Phase III trials of anifrolumab. Our model captures direct SLE-related medical costs from the Dubai Health Authority. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model uncertainty. RESULTS: Using BICLA as a response criterion in the Johns Hopkins cohort, anifrolumab was found to be more effective than belimumab (IV/SC; the incremental discounted QALY of anifrolumab against belimumab was 0.42). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anifrolumab against belimumab IV and belimumab SC were AED 466,371 ($209,135) and AED 252,612 ($113,279), respectively, these ICERs are below the cost-effectiveness threshold in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (three times gross domestic product capita; AED 592,278). In the Toronto lupus cohort, the ICER of anifrolumab against belimumab IV and belimumab SC were AED 491,403 ($220,360) and AED 276,642 ($124,055), respectively (anifrolumab was a cost-effective option vs. belimumab IV and belimumab SC). CONCLUSION: The addition of anifrolumab to SoC is a cost-effective option versus belimumab for the treatment of adult patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE, despite being allocated to SoC. Cost-effectiveness was demonstrated by a reduction in complications and organ damage, which reflected costs and outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In addition to various immunosuppressive agents, belimumab and anifrolumab became available in Japan. We aimed to investigate glucocorticoid-free clinical remission in a single-centre retrospective cohort in October 2023. METHODS: Our cohort included patients with SLE who needed to start or increase glucocorticoids for disease activity and were followed up for more than 1 year. We investigated the rate of achievement of clinical remission off corticosteroids (CR off C), defined as no clinical score on the SLEDAI-2K without glucocorticoids, baseline predictors of CR off C, medications used when CR off C was achieved, and flare rates following CR off C. RESULTS: Out of the 60 patients followed for an average of 5.4 (±2.6) years, 17 (28.3%) achieved CR off C in 3.6 (±1.2) years after enrolment. Use of belimumab and anifrolumab accounted for eight (47.1%) of the achievers. Among the baseline data, male sex, recent enrolment, high glucocorticoid dose, and detection of immune complex (IC) significantly predicted CR off C, while lupus nephritis (LN) and a low C3 level tended to predict it. In the multivariate analysis, IC detection was the only predictor of CR off C. Clinical flares were observed in 5.9% of the achievers during a median 1.2 years after achievement of CR off C. CONCLUSION: In the era of biologics, CR off C was achieved in 28.3% of the patient cohort requiring the start or increase of glucocorticoids for disease activity, with a relatively low rate of flares, suggesting that glucocorticoid-free clinical remission is an achievable target in SLE. IC disease, represented by male sex or nephritis, is likely to benefit from currently available medications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) comprises dermatologic manifestations that may occur independently or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite advancements in refining CLE classification, establishing precise subtype criteria remains challenging due to overlapping presentations and difficulty in distinguishing morphology. Current treatments encompass preventive measures, topical therapies, and systemic approaches. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids are the sole US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for CLE, with numerous off-label treatments available. However, these treatments are often not covered by insurance, imposing a significant financial burden on patients. The exclusion of most CLE patients, particularly those without concurrent SLE, from trials designed for SLE has resulted in a lack of targeted treatments for CLE. To develop effective CLE treatments, validated outcome measures for tracking patient responsiveness are essential. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index is widely utilized for its reliability, validity, and ability to differentiate between skin activity and damage. In contrast, the FDA mandates the use of the Investigator's Global Assessment, a five-point Likert scale related to lesion characteristics, for skin-related therapeutic trials. It requires the disease to resolve or almost completely resolve to demonstrate improvement, which can be difficult when there is residual erythema or incomplete clearance that is meaningfully improved from a patient perspective. Various classes of skin lupus medications target diverse pathways, allowing tailored treatment based on the patient's lupus inflammatory profile, resulting in improved outcomes. Promising targeted therapeutic drugs include anifrolumab (anti-type 1 interferon), deucravacitinib (allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor), litifilimab (plasmacytoid dendritic cell-directed therapy), iberdomide (cereblon-targeting ligand), and belimumab (B-cell directed therapy). Despite the significant impact of CLE on quality of life, therapeutic options remain inadequate. While promising treatments for cutaneous lupus are emerging, it is crucial to underscore the urgency for skin-focused treatment outcomes and the implementation of validated measures to assess therapeutic effectiveness in clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune connective tissue disease which is characterised by vascular perturbations, inflammation, and fibrosis. Although huge progress recently into the underlying molecular pathways that are perturbed in the disease, currently no therapy exists that targets the fibrosis element of the disease and consequently there is a huge unmet medical need. Emerging studies reveal new dimensions of complexity, and multiple aberrant pathways have been uncovered that have shed light on disturbed signalling in the disease, primarily in inflammatory pathways that can be targeted with repurposed drugs. Pre-clinical animal models using these inhibitors have yielded proof of concept for targeting these signalling systems and progressing to clinical trials. This review will examine the recent evidence of new perturbed pathways in SSc and how these can be targeted with new or repurposed drugs to target a currently intractable disease.

Asunto(s)