Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Paediatr ; 112(12): 2486-2492, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37565393

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine if trial-related blood sampling increases the risk of later red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in very preterm infants, we compared the volume of clinical- and trial-related blood samples, in a specific trial and correlated to subsequent RBC transfusion. METHODS: For 193 very preterm infants, participating in the FortiColos trial (NCT03537365), trial-related blood volume drawn was in accordance with ethical considerations established by the European Commission. Medical records were reviewed to assess the number and accumulated volume (mL/kg) of blood samples (both clinical- and trial-related). Data were compared with the need of RBC transfusions during the first 28 days of life. RESULTS: Mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight was 28 ± 1 weeks and 1168 ± 301 g. In total, 11% of total blood volume was drawn for sampling (8.1 ± 5.1 mL/kg) and trial-related sampling accounted for 1.6 ± 0.6 mL/kg. Trial-related blood sampling had no impact on RBC transfusion (p = 0.9). CONCLUSION: Clinical blood sampling in very preterm infants is associated with blood loss and subsequent need for RBC transfusions. In a specific trial requiring blood samples, we found no additional burden of trial-related blood sampling. The study suggests that trial-related sampling is safe if European criteria are followed.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Neonatal , Eritropoyetina , Enfermedades del Prematuro , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Anemia Neonatal/terapia , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso
2.
Br J Haematol ; 188(3): 354-366, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31588563

RESUMEN

Pre-term infants have one of the highest transfusion requirements within the hospital-setting. The vast majority of blood transfusions performed in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) are for medically stable pre-term infants with anaemia of prematurity, with the aim of improving oxygen delivery to the vital organs during the crucial phase of growth and development. However, despite the frequency of transfusion in this population, the potential benefits and harms of 'top up' transfusion are not fully understood, leading to practice variation between clinicians, institutions and countries. Significant advances have been made in the prevention of anaemia of prematurity, with recent emphasis on optimising infants' circulatory volume at birth via placental transfusion and preserving infants' own blood volume through innovative minimal sampling techniques. More research is urgently needed to establish optimal transfusion thresholds for these high-risk pre-term infants, for whom benefits as well as adverse outcomes may have consequences that extend for decades throughout the recipients' life-course. In this review, we will discuss some of the consensus and controversies regarding optimal management of anaemia in pre-term infants and highlight potential areas for future research.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/terapia , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Enfermedades del Prematuro/terapia , Anemia/etiología , Constricción , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Sangre Fetal/trasplante , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Enfermedades del Prematuro/etiología , Ligadura , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Cordón Umbilical
3.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 55(4): 433-440, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246273

RESUMEN

AIM: To characterise the current transfusion practice among clinicians in Australasian neonatal units and factors that influence their decision-making. METHODS: Members of the Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN) and practitioners at their local institutions were invited to participate in a 15-question web-based survey between 1 June and 31 July 2016. The survey was designed to assess (i) haemoglobin-based transfusion thresholds; (ii) presence of local guidelines; (iii) preference for a restrictive or liberal transfusion policy; (iv) perceived benefits and risks of transfusion; and (v) use of clinical adjuncts to assist decision-making. RESULTS: Overall, 130 participants responded to at least one question. Haemoglobin transfusion thresholds for anaemia of prematurity (AOP) varied significantly from <60 to <120 g/L. Of 103 participants, 36 (35%) reported that they do not have access to local transfusion guidelines. The majority utilise multiple clinical and haematological parameters to guide their decision-making, and approximately half (45/84, 54%) believe that tissue hypoxia detected by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) may better inform transfusion thresholds. Of 102 participants, 51 (50%) support a restrictive rather than liberal transfusion policy. The most commonly reported perceived risks of transfusion for AOP were suppression of endogenous erythropoiesis and increased rates of necrotising enterocolitis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant variation in transfusion practice in Australasian neonatal units. Quality and safety initiatives may assist with improved consistency of transfusion practice across the ANZNN. However, further research is required to better define optimal transfusion thresholds, quantify potential risks of transfusion and determine clinical utility of newer adjuncts such as NIRS.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Neonatal/terapia , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anemia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Australia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Estudios de Cohortes , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Masculino , Nueva Zelanda , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 2(3-4): 99-106, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30805447

RESUMEN

Despite recent advances in neonatal and perinatal medicine, extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW) are at high risk of developing anaemia of prematurity (AOP) requiring packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. The benefit of transfusing allogenic RBCs for AOP is a controversial issue, except for disturbances in tissue oxygenation. Although the role of erythropoietin (EPO) in the pathophysiology of AOP is well known, neither early nor late recombinant human EPO therapy alters the number or volume of RBC transfusions. It is also known that one-half of the feto-placental blood volume remains outside the newborn infant's circulation at 30 weeks of gestation if the umbilical cord is clamped immediately. Delayed cord clamping (DCC) and umbilical cord milking (UCM) are the main methods for enhancing placental transfusion. The basic principle of these approaches depends on providing high haemoglobin (Hb) levels to premature infants in the delivery room. The enhancement of placental transfusion clearly results in higher Hb levels at birth, reducing the need for RBC transfusions as well as creating a better haemodynamic status during the initial hours of life. To date, enhancement of placental transfusion in the delivery room by either DCC or UCM seems to be the best preventive measure for AOP. Yet, studies on the associated neurodevelopmental outcomes are insufficient to reach a conclusion. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, treatment and preventative strategies of anaemia of prematurity in light of the current literature.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA