Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Ecol Resour ; 24(4): e13935, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332480

RESUMEN

Using high-throughput sequencing for precise genotyping of multi-locus gene families, such as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), remains challenging, due to the complexity of the data and difficulties in distinguishing genuine from erroneous variants. Several dedicated genotyping pipelines for data from high-throughput sequencing, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), have been developed to tackle the ensuing risk of artificially inflated diversity. Here, we thoroughly assess three such multi-locus genotyping pipelines for NGS data, the DOC method, AmpliSAS and ACACIA, using MHC class IIß data sets of three-spined stickleback gDNA, cDNA and "artificial" plasmid samples with known allelic diversity. We show that genotyping of gDNA and plasmid samples at optimal pipeline parameters was highly accurate and reproducible across methods. However, for cDNA data, the gDNA-optimal parameter configuration yielded decreased overall genotyping precision and consistency between pipelines. Further adjustments of key clustering parameters were required tο account for higher error rates and larger variation in sequencing depth per allele, highlighting the importance of template-specific pipeline optimization for reliable genotyping of multi-locus gene families. Through accurate paired gDNA-cDNA typing and MHC-II haplotype inference, we show that MHC-II allele-specific expression levels correlate negatively with allele number across haplotypes. Lastly, sibship-assisted cDNA-typing of MHC-I revealed novel variants linked in haplotype blocks, and a higher-than-previously-reported individual MHC-I allelic diversity. In conclusion, we provide novel genotyping protocols for the three-spined stickleback MHC-I and -II genes, and evaluate the performance of popular NGS-genotyping pipelines. We also show that fine-tuned genotyping of paired gDNA-cDNA samples facilitates amplification bias-corrected MHC allele expression analysis.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Genotipaje , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Genotipo , Alelos , Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , ADN Complementario , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Expresión Génica , Haplotipos
2.
Mol Ecol Resour ; 21(3): 982-998, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33113273

RESUMEN

Genotyping complex multigene families in novel systems is particularly challenging. Target primers frequently amplify simultaneously multiple loci leading to high PCR and sequencing artefacts such as chimeras and allele amplification bias. Most genotyping pipelines have been validated in nonmodel systems whereby the real genotype is unknown and the generation of artefacts may be highly repeatable. Further hindering accurate genotyping, the relationship between artefacts and genotype complexity (i.e. number of alleles per genotype) within a PCR remains poorly described. Here, we investigated the latter by experimentally combining multiple known major histocompatibility complex (MHC) haplotypes of a model organism (chicken, Gallus gallus, 43 artificial genotypes with 2-13 alleles per amplicon). In addition to well-defined 'optimal' primers, we simulated a nonmodel species situation by designing 'cross-species' primers based on sequence data from closely related Galliform species. We applied a novel open-source genotyping pipeline (ACACIA; https://gitlab.com/psc_santos/ACACIA), and compared its performance with another, previously published pipeline (AmpliSAS). Allele calling accuracy was higher when using ACACIA (98.5% versus 97% and 77.8% versus 75% for the 'optimal' and 'cross-species' data sets, respectively). Systematic allele dropout of three alleles owing to primer mismatch in the 'cross-species' data set explained high allele calling repeatability (100% when using ACACIA) despite low accuracy, demonstrating that repeatability can be misleading when evaluating genotyping workflows. Genotype complexity was positively associated with nonchimeric artefacts, chimeric artefacts (nonlinearly by levelling when amplifying more than 4-6 alleles) and allele amplification bias. Our study exemplifies and demonstrates pitfalls researchers should avoid to reliably genotype complex multigene families.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Genotipaje , Familia de Multigenes , Programas Informáticos , Flujo de Trabajo , Alelos , Animales , Animales Salvajes/genética , Genotipo , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA