RESUMEN
Purpose: Maximum safe surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation and temozolomide chemotherapy is the current standard of care in the management of newly diagnosed high grade glioma. However, there are controversies about the optimal number of adjuvant temozolomide cycles. This study aimed to compare the survival benefits of 12 cycles against 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide adults with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas. Methods: Adult patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas, and a Karnofsky performance status>60%, were randomized to receive either 6 cycles or 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were followed-up for assessment of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by brain MRI every 3 months within the first year after treatment and then every six months. Results: A total of 100 patients (6 cycles, 50; 12 cycles, 50) were entered. The rate of treatment completion in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 91.3% and 55.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month OS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 81.3% vs 78.8%, 58.3% vs 49.8%, 47.6% vs 34.1%, and 47.6% vs 31.5%, respectively (p-value=.19). Median OS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 35 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0 to 58.9) and 23 months (95%CI, 16.9 to 29.0). The 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48- month PFS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 70.8% vs 56.9%, 39.5% and 32.7%, 27.1% vs 28.8%, and 21.1% vs 28.8%, respectively (p=.88). The Median PFS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups was 18 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 21.1) and 16 (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.9) months. Conclusion: Patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas treated with adjuvant temozolomide after maximum safe surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation do not benefit from extended adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles. Trial registration: Prospectively registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20160706028815N3. Date registered: 18/03/14.
RESUMEN
Objective: To investigate whether extending adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) improved the prognosis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients with different mutation statuses of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), p53 and different expression level of Ki67. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study that postoperative patients with newly diagnosed GBM who did not progress after receiving radiotherapy with concomitant and 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were enrolled in control group, and those received more than 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were incorporated in extended group. Patients were stratified by MGMT expression, IDH1 mutation, p53 mutation and expression level of Ki67. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Result: A total of 93 postoperative patients with newly diagnosed GBM were included in this study, 40 and 53 cases were included in control group and extended group, respectively. On the whole, extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy significantly prolonged OS and PFS of patients with newly diagnosed GBM [median OS (mOS): 29.00 months vs. 16.70 months, P < 0.001; median PFS (mPFS): 13.80 months vs. 9.60 months, P = 0.002]. The results of subgroup analysis showed that patients with methylated MGMT in extended group had significantly longer OS and PFS than those in control group; patients with IDH1 mutation benefited more from extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy than those with wild-type IDH1; there was no significant difference in the effect of extended TMZ chemotherapy on OS between GBM patients with wild-type p53 and those with mutant p53; compared with GBM patients with lower expression of Ki67, extended adjuvant TMZ treatment dramatically improved the OS and PFS of those with higher expression of Ki67. Conclusion: The therapeutic schedule of extended adjuvant TMZ significantly prolonged OS and PFS of patients with newly diagnosed GBM regardless of p53 mutation status, and patients with different MGMT methylation, IDH1 mutation and Ki67 expression level benefited differently from extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy.
RESUMEN
Standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is surgery followed by radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy with daily temozolomide (TMZ), and six subsequent TMZ 5/28-day cycles. Research has focused on identifying more effective alternatives to the current protocol, including extension of the number of adjuvant TMZ cycles. We performed a retrospective analysis of all GBM patients treated in our hospital (160 patients, 2011−2020). Median follow-up was 16.0 months. Analysis of prognostic factors was performed with a particular focus on the benefit of extending TMZ chemotherapy. Improved survival correlated with younger age, female gender, good performance status, absence of cognitive dysfunctions, no steroid use, and total tumor resection. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 months for the entire cohort. Median OS by adjuvant TMZ was 10.0 months if no adjuvant chemotherapy given (group 0), 15.0 months for patients that did not complete six TMZ cycles (group A), 24.0 months for those that did (group B), and 29.0 months for patients having received more than six cycles (group C) (p < 0.0001). At the three-year mark, 15.9% patients were alive in group A, 24.4% in group B and 38.1% in group C. Carefully selected GBM patients may derive benefit from extending the standard adjuvant chemotherapy beyond six TMZ cycles, but more data is required.
RESUMEN
Although concurrent radio-chemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) treatment for 6 cycles has been established as a standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients, the recommended duration of adjuvant TMZ remains a matter of debate. Hereby, we aimed to report for the first time our experience from Upper Egypt through comparing survival and toxicity profile between two treatment modalities of adjuvant TMZ (> six cycles versus six cycles) and delineating factors of prognostic significance in Egyptian patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated by radiation therapy with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ. Between June 2016 and February 2018, the medical records of 121 patients were eligible to be retrospectively reviewed to extract the study relevant data. All patients received concurrent radio-chemotherapy, followed by TMZ for 6 cycles in 29 patients (Group 1) and for >6 cycles in 26 patients (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 had a median PFS of 15 months (95% CI: 10.215-19.785), while those in Group 2 had a median PFS of 18 months (95% CI: 16.611-19.389). After a median follow up duration of 20 months (range: 12-41), the median OS was 18 months (95% CI: 13.420-22.580) in Group 1 and 22 months (95% CI: 18.777-25.223) in Group 2. There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of chemotherapy cycles and PFS (P=0.513) or OS (P=0.867). The extent of surgical resection was the only independent prognostic factor for both PFS (P=0.015) and OS (P=0.028) by multivariate analysis. Three grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity were encountered in 3 patients. One in the six-cycle group (neutropenia), and two in the extended cycles group (one had neutropenia and the other one developed thrombocytopenia). No statistically significant difference in the toxicity profile between both groups. The results of our study suggest that extended TMZ therapy is safe and tolerable, however it did not significantly improve PFS or OS as compared to the standard six-cycle course. Larger randomized studies are required to shed more light on this issue.
RESUMEN
In this study, we evaluated the benefit on survival of the combination of methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor gene and moderate vascularity in glioblastoma using a retrospective dataset of 123 patients from a multicenter cohort. MRI processing and calculation of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), used to define moderate- and high-vascular groups, were performed with the automatic ONCOhabitats method. We assessed the previously proposed rCBV threshold (10.7) and the new calculated ones (9.1 and 9.8) to analyze the association with survival for different populations according to vascularity and MGMT methylation status. We found that patients included in the moderate-vascular group had longer survival when MGMT is methylated (significant median survival difference of 174 days, p = 0.0129*). However, we did not find significant differences depending on the MGMT methylation status for the high-vascular group (p = 0.9119). In addition, we investigated the combined correlation of MGMT methylation status and rCBV with the prognostic effect of the number of temozolomide cycles, and only significant results were found for the moderate-vascular group. In conclusion, there is a lack of benefit of extending temozolomide treatment for patients with high vascular glioblastomas, even presenting MGMT methylation. Preliminary results suggest that patients with moderate vascularity and methylated MGMT glioblastomas would benefit more from prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESUMEN
Approximately 96% of patients with glioblastomas (GBM) have IDH1 wildtype GBMs, characterized by extremely poor prognosis, partly due to resistance to standard temozolomide treatment. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is a crucial prognostic biomarker for alkylating chemotherapy resistance in patients with GBM. However, MGMT methylation status identification methods, where the tumor tissue is often undersampled, are time consuming and expensive. Currently, presurgical noninvasive imaging methods are used to identify biomarkers to predict MGMT methylation status. We evaluated a novel radiomics-based eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model to identify MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with IDH1 wildtype GBM. This retrospective study enrolled 53 patients with pathologically proven GBM and tested MGMT methylation and IDH1 status. Radiomics features were extracted from multimodality MRI and tested by F-score analysis to identify important features to improve our model. We identified nine radiomics features that reached an area under the curve of 0.896, which outperformed other classifiers reported previously. These features could be important biomarkers for identifying MGMT methylation status in IDH1 wildtype GBM. The combination of radiomics feature extraction and F-core feature selection significantly improved the performance of the XGBoost model, which may have implications for patient stratification and therapeutic strategy in GBM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for glioblastoma is radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 cycles, although the optimal number of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide has long been a subject of debate. We performed a phase II randomized trial investigating whether extending adjuvant temozolomide for more than 6 cycles improved outcome. METHODS: Glioblastoma patients treated at 20 Spanish hospitals who had not progressed after 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were centrally randomized to stop (control arm) or continue (experimental arm) temozolomide up to a total of 12 cycles at the same doses they were receiving in cycle 6. Patients were stratified by MGMT methylation and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was differences in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02209948). RESULTS: From August 2014 to November 2018, 166 patients were screened, 7 of whom were ineligible. Seventy-nine patients were included in the stop arm and 80 in the experimental arm. All patients were included in the analyses of outcomes and of safety. There were no differences in 6-month PFS (control 55.7%; experimental 61.3%), PFS, or OS between arms. MGMT methylation and absence of measurable disease were independent factors of better outcome. Patients in the experimental arm had more lymphopenia (Pâ <â 0.001), thrombocytopenia (Pâ <â 0.001), and nausea and vomiting (Pâ =â 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuing temozolomide after 6 adjuvant cycles is associated with greater toxicity but confers no additional benefit in 6-month PFS. KEY POINTS: 1. Extending adjuvant temozolomide to 12 cycles did not improve 6-month PFS.2. Extending adjuvant temozolomide did not improve PFS or OS in any patient subset.3. Extending adjuvant temozolomide was linked to increased toxicities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Temozolomida/efectos adversos , Temozolomida/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Temozolomide (TMZ) is now standard adjuvant therapy in combination with radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute treatment-related leukemia (t-AML) associated with TMZ chemotherapy for patients with glioma is quite a rare complication. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 43-year-old man with an anaplastic astrocytoma received radiation therapy synchronized with ranimustine and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy for 15 cycles. Close follow-up magnetic resonance imaging of the head during TMZ chemotherapy showed no evidence of tumor progression. One year after the completion of TMZ chemotherapy, a bone-marrow aspiration was performed because the patient's white blood cell count decreased. He was diagnosed with t-AML based on the bone marrow examination, and then he was referred to the cancer center for the treatment of t-AML. CONCLUSIONS: In this case study, we continued adjuvant TMZ therapy beyond the recommended 6 cycles. Currently, there is no consensus as to how long the adjuvant TMZ therapy should be continued for the treatment of residual tumor showing no apparent interval change. A new decision-making tool to assess the clinical benefits against the side effects for long-term adjuvant TMZ therapy is needed.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Astrocitoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Astrocitoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Dacarbazina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , TemozolomidaRESUMEN
The goal of this study was to analyze the survival outcome according to the treatment response after completing standard treatment protocol for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) and to suggest a patient who should be considered for further treatment. After approving by our Institutional Review Board, 57 patients (38 male, 19 female; median age, 52years; age range, 16-81years) with newly diagnosed GBM who completed standard treatment protocol were examined retrospectively. According to the treatment response using the RANO criteria, there were 20 patients with complete response (CR), five patients with partial response (PR), 13 patients with stable disease (SD) and 19 patients with progressive disease (PD) after the completion of standard treatment. Patients (PR+SD+PD) with a measurable enhancing lesion were categorized the MEL group (n=37). We analyzed the difference of survival outcome between CR group and MEL group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the CR group was significantly better than that of the MEL group (18.0months vs. 3.0months, p=0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was also significantly longer in the CR group (25.0months vs. 15.0months, p=0.005). However, there was no significant difference in the survival outcome of the CR group compared with that of the subset of MEL group patients who showed PR or SD. Poor survival outcome was found only in MEL group patients who exhibited progression. Patients with a measurable enhancing lesion showing progression after completion of standard treatment protocol are appropriate candidates for further treatment.