RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between baseline androgen concentrations and outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with first-line enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We previously randomized men with mCRPC to enzalutamide or AAP to compare side-effects and measured androgen concentrations. In this post-hoc analysis, patients were grouped in quartiles (Q) based on their serum androgen values. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to analyze progression-free and overall survival for baseline androgen groups, treatment subgroups and their interaction. The trial was registered at clinicaltrialsregister.eu (2017-000099-27). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received enzalutamide and 85 AAP. Overall, higher (Q4) compared with lower (Q1) baseline serum testosterone was associated with longer progression-free survival (24.8 vs. 10.7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33; 0.84) and overall survival (52.8 vs. 31.5 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28; 0.85). The risk reduction in death seemed to be treatment dependent (treatment subgroup interaction P = .04). For men in the AAP subgroup, the Q4 compared with Q1 group had a significant lower risk of death (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13; 0.73), while no difference was found for enzalutamide (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.35; 1.69). Similar results were found for the other androgens. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment serum testosterone levels may be a clinically useful biomarker for predicting mCRPC treatment responses and guiding treatment selection.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel option to treat patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) is indicated for BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC. Niraparib plus AAP demonstrated safety and efficacy in the phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial (NCT03748641). In the absence of head-to-head studies comparing PARPi regimens, the feasibility of conducting indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) to inform decisions for patients with first-line BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC has been explored. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify evidence from randomized controlled trials on relevant comparators to inform the feasibility of conducting ITCs via network meta-analysis (NMA) or population-adjusted indirect comparisons (PAIC). Feasibility was assessed based on network connectivity, data availability in the BRCA1/2 mutation-positive population, and degree of within- and between-study heterogeneity or bias. RESULTS: NMAs between niraparib plus AAP and other PARPi regimens (olaparib monotherapy, olaparib plus AAP, and talazoparib plus enzalutamide) were inappropriate due to the disconnected network, differences in trial populations related to effect modifiers, or imbalances within BRCA1/2 mutation-positive subgroups. The latter issue, coupled with the lack of a common comparator (except for olaparib plus AAP), also rendered anchored PAICs infeasible. Unanchored PAICs were either inappropriate due to lack of population overlap (vs. olaparib monotherapy) or were restricted by unmeasured confounders and small sample size (vs. olaparib plus AAP). PAIC versus talazoparib plus enzalutamide was not possible due to lack of published arm-level baseline characteristics and sufficient efficacy outcome data in the relevant population. CONCLUSION: The current randomized controlled trial evidence network does not permit robust comparisons between niraparib plus AAP and other PARPi regimens for patients with 1L BRCA-positive mCRPC. Decision-makers should scrutinize any ITC results in light of their limitations. Real-world evidence combined with clinical experience should inform treatment recommendations in this indication.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Indazoles , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Metaanálisis en Red

RESUMEN

Abiraterone acetate (ATA) is an FDA-approved prodrug that exerts its effects by irreversibly inhibiting the enzymatic activities of 17α-hydroxylase and C17,20-lyase, which are responsible for testosterone production, particularly. Drug-DNA interaction studies are conducted using various methods. In this study, CuNCs were used as a fluorescent probe for the first time to investigate drug-DNA interactions. Additionally, a new synthesis was developed for copper nanoclusters coated with phenylalanine (Phe). Ascorbic acid served as the reducing agent, while Phe was used as a surface functionalizing and stabilizing agent. Phe/CuNCs were characterized using various techniques including TEM, DLS, XPS, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Optimization studies were conducted for synthesis parameters such as ascorbic acid concentration, Phe concentration, incubation time, and incubation temperature. This new synthesis method offers various advantages such as easy synthesis procedure, short synthesis time, and compatibility with green chemistry principles. Phe/CuNCs were used as a fluorescent probe for ATA-DNA interactions. The binding constant (Ka) between ATA and DNA was calculated as 1.03 × 104. Furthermore, thermodynamic studies indicated that the effective forces involved in ATA-DNA interaction are Van der Waals and hydrogen bonding.

Asunto(s)

Antineoplásicos , Cobre , ADN , Colorantes Fluorescentes , Fenilalanina , Cobre/química , Colorantes Fluorescentes/química , ADN/química , Fenilalanina/química , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Nanopartículas del Metal/química , Espectrometría de Fluorescencia/métodos , Termodinámica , Ácido Ascórbico/química , Enlace de Hidrógeno

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC. RESULTS: Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005). CONCLUSION: We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos , Benzamidas , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Tiohidantoínas , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Tiohidantoínas/uso terapéutico , Tiohidantoínas/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo

RESUMEN

AIMS: Abiraterone treatment requires regular drug intake under fasting conditions due to pronounced food effect, which may impact patient adherence. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate adherence to abiraterone treatment in patients with prostate cancer. To achieve this aim, an abiraterone population pharmacokinetic model was developed and patients' adherence has been estimated by comparison of measured levels of abiraterone with population model-based simulations. METHODS: A total of 1469 abiraterone plasma levels from 83 healthy volunteers collected in a bioequivalence study were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. Monte Carlo simulation was used to describe the theoretical distribution of abiraterone pharmacokinetic profiles at a dose of 1000 mg once daily. Adherence of 36 prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone was then evaluated by comparing the real abiraterone concentration measured in each patient during follow-up visit with the theoretical distribution of profiles based on simulations. Patients whose abiraterone levels were ˂5th or ˃95th percentile of the distribution of simulated profiles were considered to be non-adherent. RESULTS: Based on this evaluation, 13 patients (36%) have been classified as non-adherent. We observed significant association (P = .0361) between richness of the breakfast and rate of non-adherence. Adherent patients reported significantly better overall condition in self-assessments (P = .0384). A trend towards a higher occurrence of adverse effects in non-adherent patients was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an abiraterone population pharmacokinetic model and proposed an advanced approach to medical adherence evaluation. Due to the need for administration under fasting conditions, abiraterone therapy is associated with a relatively high rate of non-adherence.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) plus prednisone is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus abiraterone in mCRPC. METHODS: In cohort D of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573), patients were chemotherapy-naïve, had disease progression ≤6 mo before screening, and had either not received prior next-generation hormonal agents for mCRPC or had received prior enzalutamide for mCRPC and had disease progression or became intolerant to enzalutamide. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus abiraterone 1000 mg orally once daily and prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily. The primary endpoints were safety, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3-modified RECIST v1.1 by BICR and overall survival (OS). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: For the 103 patients who were treated, median follow-up was 28 mo (interquartile range 26-31). The confirmed PSA response rate was 56% (58/103 patients). The ORR for patients with RECIST v1.1-measurable disease was 16% (6/37 patients). Median rPFS was 15 mo (95% confidence interval 9.2-22) and median OS was 30 mo (95% confidence interval 23-not reached); the estimated 24-mo OS rate was 58%. In total, 91% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, and 39% experienced grade 3-5 events. Grade 3/4 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was observed in 12% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. One patient died due to treatment-related myasthenic syndrome. Study limitations include the single-arm design. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab plus abiraterone and prednisone demonstrated antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. Higher incidence of grade 3/4 elevated ALT/AST occurred than was reported for the individual agents. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with metastatic castratation-resistant prostate cancer, the drug combination of pembrolizumab plus abiraterone and prednisone showed antitumor activity and acceptable safety.

RESUMEN

Abiraterone acetate (AA) serves as a medication for managing persistent testosterone production in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, its efficacy varies among individuals; thus, the identification of biomarkers to predict and follow treatment response is required. In this pilot study, we explored the potential of circulating microRNAs (c-miRNAs) to stratify patients based on their responsiveness to AA. We conducted an analysis of plasma samples obtained from a cohort of 33 mCRPC patients before and after three, six, and nine months of AA treatment. Using miRNA RT-qPCR panels for candidate discovery and TaqMan RT-qPCR for validation, we identified promising miRNA signatures. Our investigation indicated that a signature based on miR-103a-3p and miR-378a-5p effectively discriminates between non-responder and responder patients, while also following the drug's efficacy over time. Additionally, through in silico analysis, we identified target genes and transcription factors of the two miRNAs, including PTEN and HOXB13, which are known to play roles in AA resistance in mCRPC. In summary, our study highlights two c-miRNAs as potential companion diagnostics of AA in mCRPC patients, offering novel insights for informed decision-making in the treatment of mCRPC.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Biomarcadores de Tumor , MicroARNs , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Anciano , MicroARNs/sangre , MicroARNs/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/genética , MicroARN Circulante/sangre , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Proteínas de Homeodominio/genética , Proteínas de Homeodominio/sangre , Anciano de 80 o más Años

RESUMEN

This ABIGENE pharmacokinetic (PK) study sought mainly to characterize the unchanged drug PK during long-term abiraterone acetate (AA) administration in advanced prostate cancer patients (81 patients). It was observed that individual AA concentrations remained constant over treatment time, with no noticeable changes during repeated long-term drug administration for up to 120 days. There was no correlation between AA concentrations and survival outcomes. However, a significant association between higher AA concentrations and better clinical benefit was observed (p = 0.041). The safety data did not correlate with the AA PK data. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) was observed between mean AA concentration and patient age: the older the patient, the higher the AA concentration. Patient age was found to impact steady-state AA concentration: the older the patient, the higher the mean AA concentration. Altogether, these data may help to guide future research and clinical trials in order to maximize the benefits of AA metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Masculino , Acetato de Abiraterona/farmacocinética , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

The antiproliferative properties of metformin and silodosin have been observed in prostate cancer. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the molecular pathways related to these drugs may impact the levels of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in prostate cancer cells. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of metformin and silodosin on the levels of hTERT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cells. The present study employed an experimental design with a post-test-only control group. This study utilized the PC3 cell line as a model for mCRPC. A viability experiment was conducted using the CCK-8 method to determine the inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of metformin, silodosin, and abiraterone acetate (AA) after a 72-hour incubation period of PC3 cells. In order to investigate the levels of hTERT, PC3 cells were divided into two control groups: a negative control and a standard therapy with AA. Additionally, three experimental combination groups were added: metformin with AA; silodosin with AA; and metformin, silodosin and AA. The level of hTERT was measured using sandwich ELISA technique. The difference in hTERT levels was assessed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc test. The IC50 values for metformin, silodosin, and AA were 17.7 mM, 44.162 mM, and 66.9 µM, respectively. Our data indicated that the combination of metformin with AA and the combination of metformin, silodosin and AA decreased the hTERT levels when compared to control, AA, and silodosin with AA. The administration of metformin resulted in a reduction of hTERT levels in the PC3 cell line, but the impact of silodosin on hTERT levels was not statistically significant compared to AA group.

Asunto(s)

Indoles , Metformina , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Telomerasa , Humanos , Metformina/farmacología , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Telomerasa/metabolismo , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Indoles/farmacología , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células PC-3 , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Androstenos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic scenario of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has dramatically changed in recent years, with the approval of new-generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs), in combination with the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was the previous standard of care. Despite showing a similar clinical efficacy, ARSIs, all of which are administered orally, are different in terms of pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). AREAS COVERED: This review covers the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of ARSIs that have been approved for the first-line therapy of mHSPC patients, underlying the differences among these molecules and focusing on the known or possible interactions with other drugs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: Since prostate cancer occurs mainly in older age, comorbidities and the consequent polypharmacy increase the DDI risk in mHSPC patients who are candidates for ARSI. Waiting for new therapeutic options, in the absence of direct comparisons, pharmacokinetic knowledge is essential to guide clinicians in prescribing ARSI in this setting.

Asunto(s)

Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Transducción de Señal , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/farmacología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Polifarmacia , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/farmacología , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/farmacología , Animales

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 20-year-old woman with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, with uncontrolled hyperandrogenemia despite supraphysiological glucocorticoid therapy. We used abiraterone acetate, an inhibitor of the 17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase enzyme, to suppress adrenal androgen synthesis and allow physiological glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid therapy, as a proof-of-concept, before proceeding to bilateral adrenalectomy. We report the patient's clinical course, the changes in adrenal steroids, and the immunohistochemistry of the adrenals.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relevance of next-generation hormone therapies and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are not elucidated in biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combination of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP), prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT), and goserelin in biochemically relapsing men after prostatectomy, and to investigate the utility of CTCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial, 46 biochemically relapsing men were enrolled between December 2012 and January 2019. The median follow-up was 47 mo. INTERVENTION: All patients received AAP 1000 mg daily (but 750 mg during PBRT), salvage PBRT, and goserelin. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was 3-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were ≥0.2 ng/ml. The secondary outcomes included alternative bRFS (alt-bRFS) when PSA levels were ≥0.5 ng/ml and safety assessment. CTC count was assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The 3-yr bRFS and alt-bRFS were 81.5% (95% confidence interval or CI [66.4-90.3%]) and 95.6% (95% CI [83.5-98.9%]), respectively. The most common acute radiotherapy-related adverse effect (AE; all grades was pollakiuria (41.3%). The most common late AE (all grades) was urinary incontinence (15.2%). Grade 3-4 acute or late radiotherapy-related AEs were scarce. Most frequent AEs nonrelated to radiotherapy were hot flashes (76%), hypertension (63%), and hepatic cytolysis (50%, of which 20% were of grades 3-4). Of the patients, 11% had a CTC count of ≥5, which was correlated with poorer bRFS (p = 0.042) and alt-bRFS (p = 0.008). The association between CTC count and higher rates of relapse was independent of the baseline PSA level and PSA doubling time (p = 0.42 and p = 0.09, respectively). This study was nonrandomized with a limited number of patients, and few clinical events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Adding AAP to salvage radiation therapy and goserelin resulted in high bRFS and alt-bRFS. AEs remained manageable, although a close liver surveillance is advised. CTC count appears as a promising biomarker for prognosis and predicting response to treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study was a phase 2 clinical trial that exhibited the efficacy and tolerance of a novel androgen-receptor targeting agent (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone) in patients with prostate cancer who experienced rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy, in combination with prostate bed radiotherapy. The results also indicated the feasibility and potential value of circulating tumor cell detection, which constitutes a possible advance in managing prostate cancers.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains incurable and develops from biochemically recurrent PC treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) following definitive therapy for localized PC, or from metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC). In the mCSPC setting, treatment intensification of ADT plus androgen receptor (AR)-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), with or without chemotherapy, improves outcomes vs ADT alone. Despite multiple phase 3 trials demonstrating a survival benefit of treatment intensification in PC, there remains high use of ADT monotherapy in real-world clinical practice. Prior studies indicate that co-inhibition of AR and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) may result in enhanced benefit in treating tumors regardless of alterations in DNA damage response genes involved either directly or indirectly in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Three recent phase 3 studies evaluated the combination of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) with an ARSI as first-line treatment for mCRPC: TALAPRO-2, talazoparib plus enzalutamide; PROpel, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP); and MAGNITUDE, niraparib plus AAP. Results from these studies have led to the recent approval in the United States of talazoparib plus enzalutamide for the treatment of mCRPC with any HRR alteration, and of both olaparib and niraparib indicated in combination with AAP for the treatment of mCRPC with BRCA alterations. SUMMARY: Here, we review the newly approved PARPi plus ARSI treatments within the context of the mCRPC treatment landscape, provide an overview of practical considerations for the combinations in clinical practice, highlight the importance of HRR testing, and discuss the benefits of treatment intensification for patients with mCRPC.

Asunto(s)

Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Nitrilos , Piperazinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Masculino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Estados Unidos , Receptores Androgénicos/genética , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Reparación del ADN por Recombinación/efectos de los fármacos

RESUMEN

Nearly all men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) experience recurrence within 6 mo of testosterone recovery. We conducted a single-arm phase 2 trial to evaluate whether addition of dual androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to intermittent ADT improves recurrence rates for men with between one and five nonvisceral, extrapelvic metastases on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography after prior radical prostatectomy. Patients received 6 mo of androgen annihilation therapy (AAT; leuprolide, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, and apalutamide) and metastasis-directed SBRT. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.05 ng/ml 6 mo after testosterone recovery (≥150 ng/dl), with the study powered to detect an improvement from 1% to 12%. We enrolled 28 men between March 2021 and June 2022. Median follow-up was 20 mo (interquartile range 16-22). Twenty-six patients (93%) completed SBRT with 6 mo of hormone therapy, of whom six discontinued at least one ARPI; two patients withdrew prematurely. At 6 mo after testosterone recovery, PSA was maintained at <0.05 ng/ml in 13/26 patients (50%, 95% confidence interval 32-67%). Rates of grade 2 and 3 AAT toxicity were 21% and 21%. The results confirm that addition of metastasis-directed SBRT to highly potent systemic therapy can maintain low PSA after testosterone recovery, although further studies are needed to clarify the optimal systemic therapy regimen. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested a combination of intensified hormone therapy (called androgen annihilation therapy) and radiotherapy targeted at metastases in men with recurrence of metastatic prostate cancer. We found that half of patients were recurrence-free 6 months after their testosterone level recovered, and that less than a quarter of patients experienced a severe drug-related side effect. Overall, this appears to be an effective therapy with acceptable side effects. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03902951.

Asunto(s)

Leuprolida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Anciano , Leuprolida/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Tiohidantoínas/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

Abiraterone acetate causes an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-mediated mineralocorticoid excess. We present a 77-year-old man with prostate adenocarcinoma who developed signs and symptoms of mineralocorticoid excess while on abiraterone and discuss its pathophysiology and treatment options. The patient developed hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, and hypertension, indicative of increased mineralocorticoid activity, confirmed by elevated ACTH, corticosterone, and deoxycorticosterone levels. Abiraterone inhibits cytochrome P450c17 (CYP17A1), thus inhibiting testosterone and cortisol synthesis. Diminished cortisol synthesis, in turn, leads to excessive mineralocorticoid precursor production mediated by ACTH, leading to enhanced sodium absorption and potassium excretion. Abiraterone is often prescribed with low-dose prednisone to suppress ACTH; however, this strategy may not provide physiological glucocorticoid levels, resulting in ACTH-mediated mineralocorticoid excess in some patients. High-dose steroids or mineralocorticoid antagonists may activate mutant androgen receptors in prostate cancer tissue; therefore, amiloride is suggested for managing residual mineralocorticoid activity. This case highlights the importance of being vigilant for the signs and symptoms of mineralocorticoid excess in patients on abiraterone.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of novel hormonal therapies represented by enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone acetate (ABI) has reached a great progress in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The majority of mCRPC patients are elderly suffering from chronic co-morbidities requiring use of various concomitant medications. In the present study, we focused on impact of concomitant antihypertensive medication on the outcomes of mCRPC patients treated with ENZ or ABI. METHODS: In total, 300 patients were included and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) represented the only concomitant medication significantly associated with survival. The median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients using ACEIs were 15.5 and 32.3 months compared to 10.7 and 24.0 months for those not using ACEIs (p = 0.0053 and p = 0.0238, respectively). Cox multivariable analysis revealed the use of ACEIs a significant predictive factor for both rPFS (HR = 0.704, p = 0.0364) and OS (HR = 0.592, p = 0.0185). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest an association between the concomitant use of ACEIs and longer survival of mCRPC patients receiving ENZ or ABI therapy.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Antihipertensivos , Benzamidas , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes and safety profiles of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)+abiraterone/prednisone with those of ADT+docetaxel in patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based database system was established to collect prospective cohort data for patients with mHSPC in Korea. From May 2019 to November 2022, 928 patients with mHSPC from 15 institutions were enrolled. Among these patients, data from 122 patients who received ADT+abiraterone/prednisone or ADT+docetaxel as the primary systemic treatment for mHSPC were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: ADT+abiraterone/prednisone group (n=102) and ADT+docetaxel group (n=20). We compared the demographic characteristics, medical histories, baseline cancer status, initial laboratory tests, metastatic burden, oncological outcomes for mHSPC, progression after mHSPC treatment, adverse effects, follow-up, and survival data between the two groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in the demographic characteristics, medical histories, metastatic burden, and baseline cancer status were observed between the two groups. The ADT+abiraterone/prednisone group had a lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression rate (7.8% vs. 30.0%; p=0.011) and lower systemic treatment discontinuation rate (22.5% vs. 45.0%; p=0.037). No significant differences in adverse effects, oncological outcomes, and total follow-up period were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: ADT+abiraterone/prednisone had lower PSA progression and systemic treatment discontinuation rates than ADT+docetaxel. In conclusion, further studies involving larger, double-blinded randomized trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary.

RESUMEN

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) has a serious public health impact, and its incidence is rising due to the aging population. There is limited evidence and consensus to guide the management of PC in Southeast Asia (SEA). We present real-world data on clinical practice patterns in SEA for advanced PC care. Method: A paper-based survey was used to identify clinical practice patterns and obtain consensus among the panelists. The survey included the demographics of the panelists, the use of clinical guidelines, and clinical practice patterns in the management of advanced PC in SEA. Results: Most panelists (81%) voted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as the most effective test for early PC diagnosis and risk stratification. Nearly 44% of panelists agreed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for PC diagnostic and staging information aids local and systemic therapy decisions. The majority of the panel preferred abiraterone acetate (67%) or docetaxel (44%) as first-line therapy for symptomatic mCRPC patients. Abiraterone acetate (50%) is preferred over docetaxel as a first-line treatment in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients with high-volume disease. However, the panel did not support the use of abiraterone acetate in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients. Apalutamide (75%) is the preferred treatment option for patients with nmCRPC. The cost and availability of modern treatments and technologies are important factors influencing therapeutic decisions. All panelists supported the use of generic versions of approved therapies. Conclusion: The survey results reflect real-world management of advanced PC in a SEA country. These findings could be used to guide local clinical practices and highlight the financial challenges of modern healthcare.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: SUVN-1105 is a novel formulation of abiraterone acetate which was developed to demonstrate improved bioavailability, compared to Zytiga and Yonsa, and to reduce the dose and eliminate the food effect. A Phase 1 study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence, food effect, and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 to Zytiga in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The study comprised of 2 segments. Segment 1 was a single-center, 4-period crossover, open-label, fixed treatment sequence, single-dose study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 (N = 12 subjects per period). Segment 2 was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, 4-period, 4-treatment, 4-sequence crossover study to evaluate bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 against Zytiga (N = 44) under overnight fasted, modified fasted, and fed conditions. RESULTS: Abiraterone exposures appeared to increase proportionately with SUVN-1105 dose (200 mg vs. 250 mg) in Segment 1. In Segment 2, abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 in the fasted or fed conditions were higher than those of Zytiga 1000 mg in the overnight fasted conditions. Abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 decreased in the fed conditions (64% and 29% decrease in Cmax and AUC, respectively) compared to overnight fasted conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 in the fasted or fed conditions fall within the abiraterone exposures of 1000 mg Zytiga in fasted and modified fasted conditions. Single doses of SUVN-1105 were safe and well-tolerated in healthy males both in the fasted and fed conditions.

Asunto(s)

Acetato de Abiraterona , Ayuno , Humanos , Masculino , Acetato de Abiraterona/efectos adversos , Acetato de Abiraterona/farmacocinética , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Estudios Cruzados , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Voluntarios Sanos , Comprimidos , Administración Oral

RESUMEN

Malnutrition is associated with prognosis in cancer. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), based on the ratio of actual to ideal body weight and also serum albumin level, is a simple screening tool for assessing nutrition. We investigated the GNRI as a prognostic factor for oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) using a Japanese multicenter cohort. This study included a total of 175 patients with LATITUDE high-risk mHSPC, of whom 102 had received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus upfront abiraterone acetate, and 73 had received ADT plus bicalutamide (Bica), from 14 institutions associated with the Tokai Urologic Oncology Research Seminar. Patients were classified into GNRI-low (<98) or GNRI-high (≥98) groups. The GNRI was based on the body mass index and serum albumin level. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the median overall survival (OS) of a GNRI-low group (median 33.7 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.2-not reached [NR]) was significantly worse than that of a GNRI-high group (median: NR; 95% CI: NR-NR; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Bica and low GNRI (<98) as independent prognostic factors for reduced times to both castration-resistant prostate cancer and OS, and, therefore, a poor prognosis. Our findings indicate the GNRI may be a practical prognostic indicator in the evaluation of survival outcomes in patients with LATITUDE high-risk mHSPC.