RESUMEN

Pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (P-aHUS) is a rare condition characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and kidney injury from thrombotic microangiopathy. P-aHUS occurs in approximately 1 in 25,000 pregnancies and is strongly related to complement dysregulation and pregnancy-related disorders, such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet (HELLP) syndrome, resulting in adverse perinatal and fetal outcomes. Complement dysregulation in P-aHUS is commonly attributed to genetic mutations or autoantibodies affecting complement factors, including CFH , CFI , and MCP. We present a case of a 25-year-old primigravida who experienced severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome followed by the development of complicated P-aHUS during the early postpartum period. The patient exhibited severe clinical manifestations, including hypertensive emergency, central nervous system involvement, renal impairment, and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Timely initiation of eculizumab therapy resulted in successful disease remission. Further genetic analysis revealed a likely rare pathogenic MCP gene variant.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare form of thrombotic microangiopathy associated with high morbidity and high mortality. Eculizumab, a humanized anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, was the first medication approved for treating aHUS in 2011. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eculizumab treatment in pediatric patients with aHUS. DATA SOURCES: We consulted PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, and Cochrane Library databases in July 2021. The descriptors were as follows: "Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome," "aHUS," "eculizumab," "Pediatrics," "Pediatric," "Child," "Children," "Adolescent." STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The study eligibility criteria are as follows: clinical trials and observational studies that included pediatric patients with aHUS diagnosis and who were treated with eculizumab. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The participants are pediatric patients, up to 18 years old, with aHUS. The intervention was eculizumab treatment. STUDY APPRAISAL: For quality assessment, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for case series studies, and the Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS: The initial search retrieved 433 studies, from which 15 were selected after complete assessment: 9 cohorts, 4 case series, and 1 clinical trial. The publication date ranged from 2015 to 2021. In total, 940 pediatric patients were included, and 682 received eculizumab. All studies reported improvements in renal and hematological parameters in most of the patients treated with eculizumab. The mortality rate was 1.6% for all patients treated with eculizumab. LIMITATIONS: The number of studies is limited, and the included studies were methodologically heterogeneous. The studies were mostly observational and many had small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Eculizumab appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of aHUS in pediatric patients. More research is necessary to establish long-term efficacy, safety, and time of discontinuation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021266255.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an ultra-rare disease characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and renal damage. Its presentation as nephrotic syndrome (NS) during first year of life is uncommon; we describe a child with clinical and laboratory findings of NS whose renal biopsy revealed thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). A previously healthy 4-month-old male was admitted with severe dehydration, diarrhea and anuria. Laboratory results showed electrolyte disturbances, increased serum creatinine, anemia without schistocytes, thrombocytosis, normal lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, hypoalbuminemia hypercholesterolemia and decreased C3 levels. After rehydration hematuria and massive proteinuria were also documented and an initial diagnosis of NS of the first year was established. Studies seeking for infectious agents were negative. During hospitalization he continued to be oligo-anuric needing dialysis and a renal biopsy was performed, which showed TMA findings. We here considered the diagnosis of aHUS and started plasma infusions as a bridge until starting eculizumab. After two infusions urine output improved leading to discontinuation dialysis. The diagnoses of STEC infection and thrombocytopenic thrombotic purpura were ruled out. Factor B, H, I and properdin levels were normal. Antibodies against CFH negative were negative. Screening for genes causative of aHUS detected a heterozygous variant in CFHR3 of uncertain significance. On day 20, treatment was switched to eculizumab, which induced a progressive remission of the NS. This case outlines the need for a heightened diagnosis suspicion of this already rare disease since early initiation of eculizumab therapy improves its prognosis.

RESUMEN

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) treatment consists of eculizumab. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causes severe pneumonia and endothelial injury that leads to a prothrombotic state that may be complicated by macrovascular and microvascular thrombosis. Complement activation is thought to contribute to endothelial injury and there are at least seven ongoing clinical trials testing six different anti-complement strategies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including eculizumab. We herein report on a kidney transplant patient with aHUS on chronic eculizumab therapy that developed severe COVID-19 despite eculizumab administration early in the course of the disease. Although eculizumab was unable to prevent the development of severe endothelial cell injury, as assessed by increasing D-dimer levels from 292 to 10 586 ng/mL, the patient eventually recovered following dexamethasone and convalescent plasma administration.

RESUMEN

RESUMEN El síndrome urémico hemolítico (SUH) se caracteriza por la presencia de anemia hemolítica, plaquetopenia e insuficiencia renal aguda. Si bien se distingue clásicamente en típico o infeccioso y atípico, es menester reconocer situaciones clínicas en las que se pone de manifiesto, como por ejemplo, embarazo, puerperio inmediato, tumores, trasplante, drogas, etc., condiciones clínicas que han sido denominadas amplificadoras del complemento. La recurrencia postrasplante delsíndrome urémico hemolítico atípico (SUHa) ha sido descrita en porcentajes variables en pacientes con mutaciones del factor H, factor B, factor I y C3, y gen de la trombomodulina, en reportes de casos aislados. Se presenta el caso de una paciente con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) secundaria a agenesia renal, receptora preemptive de un riñón de donante vivo relacionado que presentó disfunción del injerto renal secundaria a microangiopatía trombótica, asociado a complicación neurológica, hemorragias, disfunción orgánica múltiple y óbito. Se describen los hallazgos del estudio genético y anatomopatológico de necropsia.

ABSTRACT Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is characterized by the presence of hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury. Although it is usually distinguished as typical or infectious and atypical, it is necessary to recognize clinical situations in which it is revealed, such as pregnancy, immediate postpartum period, tumors, transplantation, drugs, etc., i.e. clinical conditions that have been called complement-amplifying conditions. Post-transplantation recurrence of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) has been described in variable percentages in patients with mutations of factor H, factor B, factor I and C3, and thrombomodulin gene, in reports of isolated cases. We present the case of a patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) secondary to renal agenesis, a preemptive recipient of a related living donor kidney, which presented renal graft dysfunction secondary to thrombotic microangiopathy, associated with neurological complications, hemorrhages, multiple organ dysfunction and death. The findings of the genetic and pathological autopsy study are described.

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a potentially fatal disease that requires early diagnosis and treatment that can be made possible by applying the PLASMIC score. This study aims to evaluate this score applicability for patients with suspected TTP in a developing country. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed at a tertiary hospital in the northeastern region of Brazil. Patients were analyzed in two groups: ADAMTS13 activity <10% and activity >10%. Patients were stratified according to the PLASMIC score, and the level of agreement between the PLASMIC score and the ADAMTS13 activity was evaluated. Results: Eight patients with thrombotic microangiopathy were included. Four patients had ADAMTS13 activity <10%, all with a PLASMIC score =6. The other four had ADAMTS13 activity >10%, all with a score <6. Based on a score =6 for presumptive diagnosis of TTP, we attained a 100% diagnostic accuracy in our sample. The PLASMIC score was also able to accurately predict response to plasma exchange and the risk of long-term unfavorable outcomes. Conclusions: The reproducibility of the PLASMIC score was quite satisfactory in our sample. It accurately discriminates between patients who had ADAMTS13 deficiency and those with normal enzyme activity, precluding the need for specific laboratory evaluation, which is not always available. This score can be useful for an early diagnosis and indicates which patients will benefit from the treatment in developing countries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a potentially fatal disease that requires early diagnosis and treatment that can be made possible by applying the PLASMIC score. This study aims to evaluate this score applicability for patients with suspected TTP in a developing country. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed at a tertiary hospital in the northeastern region of Brazil. Patients were analyzed in two groups: ADAMTS13 activity <10% and activity >10%. Patients were stratified according to the PLASMIC score, and the level of agreement between the PLASMIC score and the ADAMTS13 activity was evaluated. RESULTS: Eight patients with thrombotic microangiopathy were included. Four patients had ADAMTS13 activity <10%, all with a PLASMIC score =6. The other four had ADAMTS13 activity >10%, all with a score <6. Based on a score =6 for presumptive diagnosis of TTP, we attained a 100% diagnostic accuracy in our sample. The PLASMIC score was also able to accurately predict response to plasma exchange and the risk of long-term unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of the PLASMIC score was quite satisfactory in our sample. It accurately discriminates between patients who had ADAMTS13 deficiency and those with normal enzyme activity, precluding the need for specific laboratory evaluation, which is not always available. This score can be useful for an early diagnosis and indicates which patients will benefit from the treatment in developing countries.