RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although 18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is thought to be useful for predicting the histological grade of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), it remains controversial. To date, just a few of many previous studies have included only resected cases. Therefore, we investigated 18F-FDG PET findings only in patients with resected TETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 112 patients with TETs consisting of 92 thymomas and 20 thymic carcinomas (TCs), resected at two institutes (Shizuoka Cancer Center [Shizuoka] and National Cancer Center Hospital [Tokyo]) between October 2002 and December 2015, were evaluated. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the tumor and both the histological subtype and tumor stage. The cutoff value of SUVmax for differentiating thymoma from TC was calculated. RESULTS: The SUVmax was strongly related to both the World Health Organization (WHO) histological subtype and tumor stage based on the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification (Spearman rank correlation coefficient =0.485 and 0.432; p = 0.000 and 0.000, respectively). There was a significant difference between thymoma and TC. The optimal SUVmax cutoff value for differentiating thymoma from TC was 4.58 (sensitivity: 80% and specificity: 78.3%). In contrast, there was no significant difference between low-risk (type A, AB, and B1) and high-risk (type B2 and B3) thymoma, or between type B3 thymoma and the other subtypes. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that 18F-FDG PET is useful for differentiating thymoma from TC, but not for predicting the histologic grade of thymoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation of WHO histological classification of thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TCs) with prognosis in recently treated patient cohort compared to a historical one from a single institution. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical charts and histological sections of 241 patients treated during 1997-2004. Univariate and multivariate analysis of associations between risk factors including gender, age, tumor size, myasthenia gravis, WHO histological subtype, Masaoka stage, resection status, (neo-)adjuvant therapies, and survival. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of A, AB, B1, B2, B3 thymomas and TCs patients was 100%, 100%, 94%, 80%, 94% and 45%. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 100%, 96%, 78%, 80%, 78% and 39%, respectively. The 5-year OS of patients with Masaoka stage I, II, III and IV thymomas and TCs was 96%, 89%, 59% and 50%. (Neo-)adjuvant therapies were administered more often than in the historical cohort. Tumor-related death mainly occurred in patients with stage III, IV and B2, B3 thymomas and TCs. By univariate analysis, gender, tumor size, myasthenia gravis (MG) status, histotype, Masaoka stage, resection status and treatment were associated with OS. By multivariate analysis, histological subtype, Masaoka stage, and (neo-)adjuvant therapy were revealed as independent prognostic indicators. CONCLUSIONS: WHO histological subtype, Masaoka stage and (neo-)adjuvant treatment have remained independent determinants of OS in patients with thymomas and TCs. Compared with the historical cohort during 1969-1996, prognosis of patients with B2, B3 thymomas has improved, which may be partly due to the increased use of adjuvant therapies. Prognosis of patients with TCs remained unsatisfactory, suggesting that neoadjuvant treatment should be tested to improve survival.