RESUMEN
Background. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in older patients, which can cause back pain and even increase morbidity. However, the optimal therapy for patients with OVCFs remains unknown. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), a minimally invasive procedure, has been a therapy option that is known to be effective in the pain management. Aim. The meta-analysis aims to summarize current best evidence on the efficacy of PVP and conservative treatment (CT) for pain management and functional results among OVCFs patients. Methods. We searched the publications on comparison of the efficacy of PVP versus CT for OVCFs patients up to November 2018. After rigorous reviewing on the quality, the data were extracted from eligible trials. All trials analyzed the summary hazard ratios of the endpoints of interest. Results. Moderate-strong evidence indicated that PVP had benefits on pain relief at 1 week and 1 month, but not at 3 months. With regard to the quality of life, no significant differences were found in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). However, there is significant difference in terms of EuroQol and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis but not the RMDQ. Moreover, there were no any benefit in terms of vertebral fracture between groups. Conclusions. The meta-analysis showed that patients treated with vertebroplasty were associated with better pain relief and improved quality of life, without increasing the incidence of vertebral fracture compared with the CT group.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Vertebroplastia , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although various studies have described the outcomes and complications of each treatment for OF 4 in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), there is still no consensus on the optimal treatment regimen. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of OF 4 in patients with OVCFs treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) compared with PV in combination with intermediate bilateral pedicle screw fixation (IBPSF). METHODS: A total of 110 patients with OF 4 in OVCFs from January 2011 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups (group A: PV, group B: PV + IBPSF). According to the guidelines of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU), OF 4 consists of 3 fracture types. The clinical and radiographic assessments were observed preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up. RESULTS: The patients were followed for an average of 60.50 ± 15.20 months (group A) and 58.20 ± 17.60 months (group B) without significant differences. No significant differences were found in BMD, BMI and cement volume between the two groups, but differences were found for operation time, blood loss, and hospitalization time. The VAS and ODI scores improved better significantly at the final follow-up in group B but not in group A. Compared with the preoperative values, the postoperative kyphosis angle and loss of fractured segment height significantly improved, but the difference between the groups was significant after 3 months postoperatively. The loss of angular correction and fractured segment height in group A were greater than those in group B. A total of 15 cases of cement leakage were observed in group A and 8 cases in group B, and no complications or revision surgeries were observed in either group. Thirteen new fractures occurred (11 in group A and 2 in group B), which was significant. CONCLUSION: PV with IBPSF could provide effective restoration and maintenance of fractured segment height and segment alignment as well as a lower rate of complications of OF 4 in OVCFs.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vertebroplastia/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cementos para Huesos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Cifosis/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Tornillos Pediculares , Periodo Posoperatorio , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare long term clinical and radiographic outcomes in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated with conservative treatment and percutaneous vertebroplasty. METHODS: The retrospective study with inclusion criteria focused on osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated by using the VAS, Oswestry and SF36 questionnaires. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated by comparing the following sagittal parameters: body angle, sagittal index of fractured vertebral body and adjacent vertebral segments kyphosis. Complications in terms of adjacent vertebral fractures and cement leakage are reported. RESULTS: Percutaneous vertebroplasty provided better vertebral body height restoration, but was associated with a higher incidence of adjacent fractures (20%) than conservative treatment (3.5%). This fact may explain why patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty had worse overall kyphotic alignment at final follow-up. Cement leakage was frequent, but always asymptomatic and generally no serious complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous vertebroplasty represents a safe treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, although it may be associated with a higher incidence of adjacent fractures and therefore worse thoracolumbar kyphosis and long-term follow-up than conservative treatment. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.