RESUMEN

Vaginal vault prolapse is one of the main reasons for reoperation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Effective correction of the vaginal apex is essential for lasting repair for these women. Apical suspension of the sacrospinous ligament is probably one of the main vaginal treatments still offered to patients today. We proposed an evaluation of the functional and anatomical results of long-term sacrospinous ligament fixation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year results of sacrospinous ligament suspension as primary repair for apical prolapse and to evaluate long-term side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed 10-year follow-up after prolapse repair using sacrospinous ligament suspension. A subjective recurrence was identified as the postoperative occurrence of swelling symptoms based on a particular item on the Italian Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. An objective recurrence was defined as a postoperative decline to stage II or below in any compartment based on the POP-Q system or the requirement for additional surgery. The assessment of postoperative subjective satisfaction was conducted using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation. Objective recurrence was remarkably high, as it was observed in 17 (56.7%) patients. Subjective recurrence was reported by ten (33.3%) women, and reintervention occurred in two (6.7%) of patients. From the point of view of quality of life, according to the PGI-I, twenty-three (76.7%) patients described some degree of improvement after surgery, four (13.3%) described their status as unmodified, and three (10%) reported some form of worsening after primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal repair with sacrospinous fixation is a long-lasting option for prolapse repair, with improvement in every POP-q parameter. Some degree of anterior recurrence, recurrence of symptoms with swelling, or an overall worsening of quality of life after surgery is possible.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is a symptom characterized by sadness, loss of interest or pleasure, feelings of guilt or low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, feelings of tiredness and poor concentration. One of the most common mental illnesses in the world and a major contributor to morbidity and mortality is depression. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the prevalence of depression and the risk factors associated with it in women who had advanced pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted to determine depression among advanced pelvic organ prolapse women at Gondar University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. All women who have advanced pelvic organ prolapse were consecutively included till it reached a total of 367 participants over four months. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain the sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics and depression status of the participants. Depression measures were obtained by using the Patient Health Questionnaire tool, which is validated in the Ethiopian local language for chronic illnesses including pelvic organ prolapse using a cut point of five and above, which is considered to indicate depression. Women who screened positive were linked to a psychiatric clinic for further evaluation and treatment. Data was entered into a computer using Epi Info version 3.5.3 and then exported to STATA version 14 for analysis. Multivariable logistic regressions were fitted and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals with a P value less than 0.05 were used to identify statistically significant factors. RESULTS: The prevalence of depression was found to be 47.1% (95% CI: 43-52%). Being rural (AOR = 4.8; CI: 1.11-16.32), having a history of divorce because of pelvic organ prolapse (AOR = 5.5; CI: 1.85-16.32) and having a history of urinary symptoms (AOR = 3.1; CI: 1.12-8.59) were found to be independently associated with depression. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of depression among women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse in this study is high as compared to other studies. Depression screening strategies should be designed for the early identification and treatment of depression among women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sacrospinous fixation is the gold standard procedure for management of apical pelvic organ prolapse by the vaginal route. However, there may be a relevant risk of neurovascular injury due to the proximity of neurovascular structures. We propose an anatomical study concerning the sacrospinous ligament with a new innovative minimally invasive technology using both a suture capturing device and a chip-on-the-tip endoscope to perform sacropinous fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Bilateral sacrospinous fixation was performed in three female cadavers, in the course of the anatomical study conducted with a specific device (the Suture Capturing I Stitch™ Device) under real time visual guidance with a chip-on -the-tip endoscope, the NanoScope™ system. RESULTS: Identification of ischial spine and sacrospinous ligament as well as feasibility of sacrospinous fixation under NanoScope™ control were always possible on both sides. CONCLUSIONS: This new innovative minimally invasive technology using both a suture capturing device and a chip-on-the-tip endoscope is relevant and could be an advantage in terms of safety and better placement of the suture on the sacrospinous ligament.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a debilitating condition impacting lives of millions of women worldwide. Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is considered an effective and durable surgical technique for treatment of apical prolapse. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes including postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters between patients who underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach compared to patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients treated for apical prolapse at a university affiliated urogynecology practice. Patients over the age of 18 who underwent abdominal SCP between 2019 and 2023 were included. The cohort was formed into two groups: (1) Patients who underwent SCP through a mini-laparotomy incision (Mini-lap group); (2) Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP (Lap/Robot group). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included in the final analysis. Ninety patients underwent either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted SCP, whereas 26 patients underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach. Study participants exhibited a mean age of 63.1 ± 10.3 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.8 ± 4.9 Kg/m2, and 77.6% of them identified as Caucasian. Upon comparison of demographic and past medical history between groups there were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, menopausal status, race, parity or comorbid conditions. Patients in the Mini-lap group were less likely to have undergone previous abdominal surgery (11.5% vs. 50.6%, p < 0.001) and had more severe apical prolapse (stage 4 prolapse, 40% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) than their counterparts in the Lap/robot group. Regarding intraoperative parameters, length of surgery was significantly shorter in the Mini-lap group compared to the Lap/robot group (97.3 ± 35.0 min vs. 242.0 ± 52.6 min, p < 0.001). When focusing on the primary outcome, postoperative complications within the first 30 days after surgery, there were no differences noted between groups. Additionally, the number of unanticipated healthcare encounters, such as phone calls, clinic visits, emergency department visits, urgent care visits, readmissions and reoperations were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-laparotomy approach for SCP is safe with comparable intra- and postoperative complications, and unanticipated healthcare encounters compared to conventional minimally invasive methods.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a mesh-less laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear suspension technique for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (PHVP). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study was conducted collecting medical records of 41 patients with symptomatic PHVP treated between November 2017 to November 2019 in Gynecologic department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. All patients had Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) scores indicating stage 3-4 PHVP and underwent mesh-less laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear suspension.The primary outcome was the subjective satisfaction rate based on responses to validated questionnaires. The secondary outcomes were the objective anatomical cure rate based on POP-Q scores and complication rates. All listed parameters were determined before the surgery and at control examinations in 1 year and 3 years after the treatment. RESULTS: The operation was completed successfully without serious complications in all patients. Mean operation time was 53.8 mins. Comparison of the scores by the questionnaires revealed a significant improvement in the quality of life in the postoperative period.The subjective satisfaction rates were 100 % (41/41) and 95 % (38/40) at 1 year and 3 years after surgery. The objective cure rates were 100 % (41/41) and 97.5 % (39/40) at 1 year and 3 years after surgery, respectively. During the follow-up, none of the patients experienced suture exposure, infection, chronic pelvic pain, or other related complications. CONCLUSION: The mesh-less laparoscopic extraperitoneal linear suspension technique avoids the use of implantable synthetic mesh. It has been shown to lead to favorable postoperative outcomes, considerable patient contentment, and low complication rates. It offers a new, cost-effective treatment option for PHVP patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Uterosacral ligaments (USLs) suspension is a well-studied, safe, and long-lasting technique for central compartment correction. Preliminary clinical experiences showed encouraging data for this technique, also for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse surgical treatment. However, up-to-date evidence for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair through high uterosacral ligaments suspension is limited. Consequently, with this study, we aimed to assess the efficiency, complications frequency, and functional results of native-tissue repair through USLs in vaginal vault prolapse. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study. Women with symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse (≥stage 2) who underwent surgery with transvaginal native-tissue repair by high uterosacral ligaments were included. Patient characteristics, preoperative assessment, operative data, postoperative follow-up visits, and re-interventions were collected from the hospital's record files. High uterosacral ligament suspension was performed according to the technique previously described by Shull. A transverse apical colpotomy at the level of the post-hysterectomy scar was performed in order to enter the peritoneal cavity. USLs were identified and transfixed from ventral to dorsal with three absorbable sutures. Sutures were then passed through the vaginal apex and tightened to close the transverse colpotomy and suspend the vaginal cuff. At the end of the surgical time, a diagnostic cystoscopy was performed in order to evaluate ureteral bilateral patency. Using the POP-Q classification system, we considered an objective recurrence as the descensus of at least one compartment ≥ II stage, or the need for a subsequent surgery for POP. The complaint of bulging symptoms was considered the item to define a subjective recurrence. We employed PGI-I scores to assess patients' satisfaction. Results: Forty-seven consecutive patients corresponding to the given period were analyzed. No intraoperative complications were observed. We observed one postoperative hematoma that required surgical evacuation. Thirty-three patients completed a minimum of one-year follow-up (mean follow-up 21.7 ± 14.6 months). Objective cure rate was observed in 25 patients (75.8%). No patients required reintervention. The most frequent site of recurrence was the anterior compartment (21.2%), while apical compartment prolapse relapsed only in 6% of patients. An improvement in all POP-Q parameters was recorded except TVL which resulted in a mean 0.5 cm shorter. Subjective recurrence was referred by 4 (12.1%) patients. The mean satisfaction assessed by PGI-I score was 1.6 ± 0.8. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that native-tissue repair through high USL suspension is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Objective, subjective, functional, and quality of life outcomes were satisfactory, with minimal complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose of study: To study the epidemiology and various methods of repair of vaginal vault prolapse in selected group of patients and the benefits of various modes of treatment in the management of vault prolapse. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with grade lll or lV vault prolapse were enrolled in our study. Sacrospinous fixation was performed in 37 patients. High risk factors for prolapse, surgical results and complications were evaluated. Results: In the current study, maximum cases of vault prolapse, 67.6%, were in the age group of 51-60 years. Out of 37 patients, 18.9% had a history of chronic cough secondary to bronchial asthma or past history of tuberculosis And 13.5% had a bowel dysfunction (chronic constipation). Vaginal vault prolapse most commonly was seen following vaginal hysterectomy (43.3%) as compared to total abdominal hysterectomy (29.7%). Most common surgery was performed for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse being sacrospinous fixation in the current study. In total, 29.7% of the patients had early post-operative complications like urinary tract infection (16.2%), urinary retention (5.4%) and buttock pain (5.4%), and 2.7% had vaginal cuff cellulitis. Dyspareunia is a common complication post-operatively following sacrospinous fixation, due to shortening of vaginal length post-procedure. Conclusion: Only 29.7% patients had complications, among which most common complication was urinary tract infection, which was treated with injectable antibiotics, urinary retention and buttock pain being the less common complication. Dyspareunia was present only in 18.9% cases post-operatively due to vaginal shortening associated with the procedure. Sacrospinous fixation is a safe and effective procedure. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-023-01757-9.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Vaginal vault prolapse, also known as apical prolapse, is a distressing condition that may affect women following hysterectomy, necessitating surgical intervention when conservative measures prove ineffective. The surgical management of apical compartment prolapse includes procedures such as laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP), abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASCP) or vaginal reconstructive procedures (VRP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of these interventions. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify eligible studies. Fourteen studies comprising a total of 1,289 women were included. The selected studies were analyzed to evaluate outcomes such as duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, blood loss, complication rates, and patient satisfaction. Results: LSCP did not demonstrate significant advantages over VRP in terms of perioperative or long-term outcomes. However, when compared to ASCP, LSCP showed shorter hospital stay, reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, and lower rates of ileus. Discussion: This systematic review contributes to evidence-based decision-making for the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. While LSCP did not exhibit substantial benefits over VRP, it emerged as a preferable option compared to ASCP due to shorter hospital stays and reduced postoperative complications. The findings from this study provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical approach for vaginal vault prolapse. However, future research should focus on long-term follow-ups, standardizing outcomes, and outcome measures, and evaluating cost-effectiveness to further enhance clinical practice.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with historical outcomes data for sacrocolpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 50 laparoscopic pectopexies performed from July 2020 to July 2022 at an academic tertiary referral center; this was the second reported use of this technique in North America. The outcomes from laparoscopic pectopexy were compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy performed at the same institution by the same surgeons (n=207). The primary outcomes were complication rate, rate of recurrent prolapse (stage II or greater), and reoperation. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were 6.0% for pectopexy and 16.5% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 0.79; P=.65). Recurrent prolapse was seen among 2.0% of patients who underwent pectopexy and 6.3% of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy at most recent follow-up (relative risk, 1.27; P=.66). The rates of reoperation were 2.0% for pectopexy and 3.9% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 1.04; P=.96). The average operative times were 138 minutes for pectopexy and 158 minutes for sacrocolpopexy. The average lengths of follow-up were 88.1 days for pectopexy and 325.5 for sacrocolpopexy. CONCLUSION: Although pectopexy was typically employed in patients with extensive pelvic adhesions or other conditions that placed them at higher risk of complications, both the success rate and the adverse event rate were similar to those in the historical cohort who underwent sacrocolpopexy. Although sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard operation for apical prolapse, our data suggest that pectopexy can be employed to offer similar outcomes in many patients with contraindications to sacral fixation. These data give us increasing confidence that we can counsel our patients that this operation is likely to produce an outcome similar to a sacrocolpopexy.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Vaginal sacrospinous fixation (VSF) without mesh and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with mesh are the most frequently performed surgical procedures for apical prolapse in the Netherlands. There is no long-term evidence suggesting the optimal technique, however. The aim was to identify which factors play a role in the choice between these surgical treatment options. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews amongst Dutch gynecologists was carried out. An inductive content analysis was performed with Atlas.ti. RESULTS: Ten interviews were analyzed. All gynecologists performed vaginal surgeries for apical prolapse, six gynecologists perform SCP themselves. Six gynecologists would perform VSF for a primary vaginal vault prolapse (VVP); three gynecologists preferred a SCP. All participants prefer a SCP for recurrent VVP. All participants have stated that multiple comorbidities could be a reason for choosing VSF, as this procedure is considered less invasive. Most participants choose a VSF in the case of older age (6 out of 10) or higher body mass index (7 out of 10). All treat primary uterine prolapse with vaginal, uterine-preserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent apical prolapse is the most important factor in advising patients which treatment they should undergo for VVP or uterine descent. Also, the patient's health status and the patient's own preference are important factors. Gynecologists who do not perform the SCP in their own clinic are more likely to perform a VSF and find more reasons not to advise a SCP. All participants prefer a vaginal surgery for a primary uterine prolapse.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The loss of apical support is usually present in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. An effective correction for the vaginal apex may be an essential part of a durable repair for these women. Apical suspension of the sacrospinous ligament is likely one of the best treatments by the vaginal route. We proposed the evaluation of the functional and anatomical long-term results of an ultralight and macroporous sling. In this prospective study, bilateral sacrospinous colposuspension was performed in 32 patients with a specific mesh. Functional assessment with several validated quality of life questionnaires and pelvic examination was performed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Pelvic examination using the POP-Q classification showed a very good efficacy of the BSC mesh with only three prolapse recurrences at 24 months after surgery. All the following QoL scores were significantly improved by two years: PFIQ-7 (p < 0.0001), PFDI-20 (p < 0.0001), and SF-12 (p < 0.0001). No improvement was achieved by the PISQ12 questionnaire. This vaginal minimally invasive procedure is effective, quick, reproducible, and easy. It may be a relevant option for a vaginal vault or cervical or uterine prolapse.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or vaginal sacrospinous fixation (VSF) is the most optimal surgical treatment in patients with POP-Q stage ≥2 vaginal vault prolapse (VVP). DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) and prospective cohort study alongside. SETTING: Seven non-university teaching hospitals and two university hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Patients with symptomatic post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, requiring surgical treatment. METHODS: Randomisation in a 1:1 ratio to LSC or VSF. Evaluation of prolapse was done using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q). All participants were asked to fill in various Dutch validated questionnaires 12 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was disease-specific quality of life. Secondary outcomes included composite outcome of success and anatomical failure. Furthermore, we examined peri-operative data, complications and sexual function. RESULTS: A total of 179 women, 64 women randomised and 115 women, participated in a prospective cohort. Disease-specific quality of life did not differ after 12 months between the LSC and VSF group in the RCT and the cohort (RCT: P = 0.887; cohort: P = 0.704). The composite outcomes of success for the apical compartment, in the RCT and cohort, were 89.3% and 90.3% in the LSC group and 86.2% and 87.8% in the VSF group, respectively (RCT: P = 0.810; cohort: P = 0.905). There were no differences in number of reinterventions and complications between both groups (reinterventions RCT: P = 0.934; cohort: P = 0.120; complications RCT: P = 0.395; cohort: P = 0.129). CONCLUSIONS: LSC and VSF are both effective treatments for vaginal vault prolapse, after a follow-up period of 12 months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. During lifetime, up to 40% of all women will develop (POP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June and December 2021, five patients were successfully treated via vNOTES Posterior Rectus Fascia Prolapse ( PREFAP) repair. No intra-operative complications or conversions occurred. CONCLUSION: In this study we demonstrated a new technique for prolapse repair, harvesting the autologous posterior rectus fascia sheath via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) as an alternative for a synthetic mesh.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Synthetic materials have been used for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). During the last 25 years, these materials were composed mostly of polypropylene (PP), whereas recently the use of polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) is of increasing interest due to its characteristics. This study aimed to compare the results after SUI/POP surgery using PVDF versus PP materials by synthesizing the data of relevant existing literature. STUDY DESIGN: This systematic review and meta-analysis included clinical trials, case-control studies, or cohort studies written in the English language. The search strategy included the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane, and grey literature (congresses IUGA, EUGA, AUGS, FIGO). All studies have to provide numeric data or odds ratios (OR) of developing a specific outcome in surgeries with PVDF compared with outcomes of other used materials. No restrictions of race or ethnicity were applied, nor chronological restrictions. Exclusion criteria were studies that included patients with cognitive impairment, dementia, stroke, or central nervous system trauma. All studies were screened by two reviewers, initially by title and abstract, and afterward by full text. Disagreements were resolved through mutual consent. All studies were assessed for their quality and bias risk. Data were extracted using a data extraction form formulated in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Our results were divided into studies dealing only with SUI patients, studies dealing only with POP patients, and cumulative analysis of variables expressed in both SUI and POP surgery. The primary outcomes were the rates of post-operative recurrence, mesh erosion, and postoperative pain after surgery with PVDF compared to PP. The secondary outcomes were post-operative sexual dissatisfaction, overall satisfaction rates, hematoma, urinary tract infection, de novo urge incontinence, and reoperation rate. RESULTS: No differences in the post-operative rates of SUI/POP recurrence, mesh erosion, and pain were found after surgery with PVDF vs surgery with PP. Patients after SUI surgery with PVDF tapes had statistically significant lower rates of de-novo urgency compared to the PP group [OR = 0.38 (0.18, 0.88), p = 0.01]; patients after POP surgery with PVDF materials had statistically significant lower rates of de-novo sexual dysfunction compared to the PP group [OR = 0.12 (0.03, 0.46), p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence that the use of PVDF in SUI/POP surgeries could be a valid alternative to PP. However our results are limited by uncertainty due to the overall low quality of the existent data. Further research and validation would contribute to better surgical techniques.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Vaginal vault prolapse is a painful condition in which the vaginal cuff descends. This report presents a case of a 65-year-old obese and diabetic female who was suffering from a third-degree vault prolapse. Conventionally used non-surgical treatments, such as exercises for the pelvic floor, are not as effective as surgical approaches for the treatment of third-degree vault prolapse. Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse can be treated safely and effectively with abdominal sacral colpopexy using a permanent mesh. Due to several risk factors, such as grand parity, advancing age, and poor lifestyle mainly involving exercise to strengthen pelvic floor musculature, the vaginal route of surgery was employed, which was found to be effective, and thus the treatment was successful. In conclusion, such individualized as well as unique approaches to such rare cases can produce efficacious results.

RESUMEN

Introducción: Las disfunciones del suelo pélvico se consideran un problema de salud en el mundo y constituyen una de las indicaciones de operaciones ginecológicas más comunes. Entre sus variantes está el prolapso de la cúpula vaginal. Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados de la corrección del prolapso de cúpula vaginal por la técnica de colpopexia, mediante fijación con tiras aponeuróticas a la pared abdominal anterior. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo. Las variables utilizadas fueron la edad, presencia de comorbilidades, el número de cirugías previas y el grado de satisfacción subjetivo de las pacientes, luego del procedimiento. Resultados: Hubo predominio de edades avanzadas en la muestra estudiada con 89,5 % de pacientes mayores de 55 años. En la mayoría de las pacientes se encontró una o más comorbilidades que favorecieron la presencia de esta afección. Un total de 8 pacientes habían sido sometidas a una cirugía correctora previa para el prolapso (30,7 %). Al mes de la cirugía el 80,7 % tenía una puntuación de 1-3 de la escala de evaluación PGI-I, valor que fue en ascenso y alcanzó el 96,1 % a los 3 meses, el 100 % a los 6 meses y al año. Conclusiones: La corrección del prolapso de la cúpula vaginal, mediante colpopexia por vía abdominal es una alternativa de tratamiento para las pacientes, fundamentalmente jóvenes o que quieren conservar la funcionalidad vaginal y la vida sexual activa.

Introduction: Pelvic floor dysfunctions are considered a health problem in the world, and constitute one of the most common indications for gynecological surgery. Among its variants is the prolapse of the vaginal vault. Objectives: To evaluate the results of the correction of the vaginal vault prolapse by the colpopexy technique by means of fixation with aponeurotic strips to the anterior abdominal wall. Methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was carried out. The variables used were age, presence of comorbidities, the number of previous surgeries and the degree of subjective satisfaction of the patients after the procedure. Results: There was a predominance of advanced ages in the sample studied with 89.5% of patients older than 55 years. In most of the patients, one or more comorbidities were found that favored the presence of this condition. A total of 8 patients had undergone previous corrective surgery for the prolapse (30.7%). One month after surgery, 80.7% had a score of 1-3 on the evaluation, a value that increased and reached 96.1% at 3 months, and 100% at 6 months, and one year. Conclusions: Vaginal vault prolapse correction by mean of abdominal way colpopexy is therapeutic alternative, mainly young, and those who want to preserve vaginal functionality, and active sexual life.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) for vaginal vault prolapse (VVP). METHODS: Long-term follow-up of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (SALTO trial). A total of 74 women were randomly assigned to LSC (n=37) or ASC (n=37). Primary outcome was disease-specific quality of life, measured with validated questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included anatomical outcome, composite outcome of success, complications, and retreatment. RESULTS: We analyzed 22 patients in the LSC group and 19 patients in the ASC group for long-term follow-up, with a median follow-up of 109 months (9.1 years). Disease-specific quality of life did not differ after long-term follow-up with median scores of 0.0 (LSC: IQR 0-17; ASC: IQR 0-0) on the "genital prolapse" domain of the Urogenital Distress Inventory in both groups (p = 0.175). Anatomical outcomes were the same for both groups on all points of the POP-Q. The composite outcome of success for the apical compartment is 78.6% (n = 11) in the LSC group and 84.6% (n = 11) in the ASC group (p = 0.686). Mesh exposures occurred in 2 patients (12.5%) in the LSC group and 1 patient (7.7%) in the ASC group. There were 5 surgical reinterventions in both groups (LSC: 22.7%; ASC: 26.3%, p = 0.729). CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up no substantial differences in quality of life, anatomical results, complications, or reinterventions between LSC and ASC were observed. Therefore, the laparoscopic approach is preferable, considering the short-term advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR6330, 18 January 2017, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5964.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION:  There are high chances of post-hysterectomy vault prolapse (PHVP) if the vault is not well supported after vaginal hysterectomy in cases of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). High uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS) and McCall's culdoplasty are the well-recommended modalities to suspend the vault after vaginal hysterectomy. As both the procedures are accessible to non-urologic gynaecologists, the study was planned in cases of POP.  Objective: The study was conducted to compare the anatomic and functional outcomes of patients undergoing vaginal HUSLS vs. McCall's culdoplasty at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective interventional study was done in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 80 patients were included and divided into two groups of 40 patients each. In one group, patients underwent high uterosacral ligament suspension and in the second group, McCall's culdoplasty was done for vault suspension. All procedures were done by two trained surgeons. The effectiveness of both the procedures was assessed by preoperative and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) (up to two years). Patients were followed for two years to see for any postoperative problem/recurrence. RESULTS: Vault suspension by HUSLS showed better results than McCall's culdoplasty, in terms of POP-Q point C, perineal body (PB), genital hiatus (GH) and total vaginal length (TVL) as compared to McCall's culdoplasty. CONCLUSION:  The anatomical correction is much better with HUSLS, which suspends the vault in the normal vaginal axis. However, it takes longer compared to McCall's culdoplasty, so the procedure should be individualised and performed with several precautions.

RESUMEN

Background: The surgical treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (PHVP) has been reported in several clinical studies, but mostly are short-term studies. This study aims to explore the mid-term efficacy of surgical treatments for PHVP. Methods: A total of 138 PHVP patients underwent surgery from January 2005 to January 2020 at the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing. The clinical data of 119 patients who completed follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Both groups of patients are diagnosed Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) III-IV stage of prolapse, with obvious prolapse-related symptoms and requiring surgical treatment. Among them, pelvic floor reconstruction surgery (RPS) was performed in patients who wanted to retain vaginal function and colpocleisis were used for frail patients who cannot tolerate RPS. We used the POP-Q scores for the objective efficacy evaluation, and use the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7) to evaluate the subjective symptom during follow up. Among them, 61 patients underwent pelvic floor RPS (Group R), and 58 received colpocleisis (Group C). Results: The surgeries in both groups were successfully completed, the median follow-up time after surgery was 4.3 years (0.25-13 years) and 5.3 years (0.33-15 years), respectively; the overall surgical success rate was 86.9% (53/61) and 100% (58/58), respectively; the subjective satisfaction rate was 90.2% (55/61) and 91.4% (53/58), respectively; and the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores in both groups were significantly improved compared with the preoperative levels (P<0.05). In Group R, 6 cases (9.8%, 6/61) were dissatisfied after surgery; in Group C, 5 cases (8.6%, 5/58) were dissatisfied after surgery. Conclusions: Reconstructive surgery and colpocleisis have a good mid-term effect on PHVP, with good outcome and few complications. The surgeon is expected to ascertain an appropriate surgical procedure based on the characteristics of the patient, the degree and the location of prolapse, in order to achieve the best surgical efficacy and minimize the damage.

RESUMEN

Objective: This study examined gynaecologists' experience and views on the management of vaginal vault prolapse (VVP) using laproscopic sarcocolpopexy (LSCP) versus open sarcocolpopexy (OSCP). Methods: In a qualitative study conducted at the University of Surrey and Homerton University Hospital, UK, from 2016 to 2017, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 consultants experienced in minimal access surgery or urogynecology. Interviews were recorded and transcripts were analyzed using the qualitative description (QD) approach. Results: Eight broad themes emerged: VVP management, LSCP for management of VVP, OSCP and vaginal surgery with or without mesh use in VVP management, laparoscopic training and support as well as surgeons' attitude towards LSCP. All participants acknowledged the importance of LSCP in the management of post-hysterectomy VVP as benefits outweighed risks in their view. OSCP was considered suitable in very specific circumstances. Vaginal surgery could be an excellent alternative to OSCP bearing in mind long-term efficacy and sexual activity in young women. Most participants agreed with national recommendations to avoid use of mesh in vaginal surgery for VVP and expressed the view that it should be done in specialised centres by trained surgeons who do such operations. Conclusions: This study showed that the acceptability of LSCP was dependent on participants' experience and consideration of the balance between patient's goals and potential risks. It provides useful guidance for future large-scale projects.