RESUMEN

The VITEK MS PRIME (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France), a newly developed matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system, alongside the VITEK PICKME pen (PICKME), offers easy sample preparation for bacteria and yeasts. The VITEK MS PRIME also offers two software platforms for filamentous fungi: the IVD database and the RUO database. Our study evaluated its identification agreement on 320 clinical isolates of bacteria and yeasts, comparing PICKME and traditional wooden toothpick sampling techniques against MicroIDSys Elite (ASTA) results. Additionally, we assessed the IVD (v3.2) and SARAMIS (v4.16) RUO databases on 289 filamentous fungi against molecular sequencing. The concordance rates for species-level identification of bacteria and yeasts were about 89.4% (286/320) between the PICKME and wooden toothpick, and about 83.4-85.3% between the VITEK MS PRIME and ASTA MicroIDSys Elite. Retesting with PICKME improved concordance to 91.9%. For filamentous fungi, species-level identification reached 71.3% with the IVD database and 85.8% with RUO, which significantly enhanced basidiomycetes' identification from 35.3% to 100%. Some strains in the IVD database, like Aspergillus versicolor, Exophiala xenobiotica, and Nannizzia gypsea, failed to be identified. The VITEK MS PRIME with PICKME offers reliable and efficient microorganism identification. For filamentous fungi, combined use of the RUO database can be beneficial, especially for basidiomycetes.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the performance of two latest generation matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems in routine laboratory settings, focusing on turnaround time (TAT), time to results (TTR), hands-on time, and identification rate. METHODS: We conducted a time and motion study on three workflow scenarios to simulate different laboratory settings. Overall, 618 bacterial isolates from a tertiary hospital's laboratory were processed using the VITEK MS PRIME (bioMérieux) and the MALDI Biotyper sirius (Bruker Daltonics) and their corresponding databases VITEK IVD Database 3.2 and MBT reference library 12. RESULTS: The target preparation process showed no significant difference in TAT, but the Biotyper workflow had a shorter hands-on time by 3 to 6 min. In the measurement process, TTR was three to five times shorter for the Biotyper sirius while hands-on time was significantly shorter for VITEK MS PRIME (approximately 1.5 min per target). The identification rate without retesting was 97.9% for VITEK MS PRIME and 98.9% for Biotyper sirius. Both systems achieved 100% agreement at genus and 96.2% at species level. CONCLUSION: Both systems exhibited excellent identification rates for routine bacterial isolates. Due to its high speed, the Biotyper sirius is suited for laboratories with high sample throughput and a workflow designed for processing larger batches. The VITEK MS PRIME, with its "load and go" system accommodating up to 16 targets, reduces hands-on time, making it a reasonable choice for laboratories with fewer identifications overall but a higher number of targets and a workflow designed for parallel processing on different workstations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry systems are designed for rapid and reliable microbial identification. VITEK MS PRIME is the bioMérieux's new generation instrument equipped with a continuous load-and-go sample loading system, urgent slide prioritization for critical patient samples and new internal components for faster identification. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of VITEK MS PRIME and to compare it to that of the VITEK MS system. In addition, at two sites, we performed a time-and-motion study to evaluate the efficiency of sample analysis from colony picking to slide removal from the instrument. We analyzed by VITEK MS and VITEK MS PRIME a total of 1413 isolates (1320 bacterial and 76 yeast) deriving from routine diagnostic samples that came into four laboratories in Canada, France, Italy, and Spain. VITEK MS PRIME and VITEK MS were concordant to the species and genus level for 1354/1413 (95.8%) and to the species level for 1341/1413 (94.9%). The identification and concordance rates in individual centers were largely homogenous. Overall, VITEK MS PRIME identified 1370/1413 (97.0%) of isolates compared to 1367/1413 (96.7%) identified by VITEK MS. Identification rates were consistently high for all microorganism categories. A time-and-motion study showed that the use of VITEK MS PRIME was associated with significant time saving. VITEK MS PRIME performs as well as VITEK MS and reduces the time necessary for pathogen identification. To fully optimize the laboratory process and obtain maximum efficiency, VITEK MS PRIME must be integrated into the laboratory workflow.

Asunto(s)