RESUMEN

Low back pain is a highly disabling health condition that generates high costs for patients and healthcare systems. For this reason, it is considered a serious public health problem worldwide. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) by evaluating adherence to treatment, contamination between groups, satisfaction with treatment, and understanding of the exercise instructions provided by the physiotherapist. Additionally, we sought to identify and implement necessary modifications to the exercise protocol for better suitability in older people. We conducted a prospective, registered pilot RCT comparing an 8-week group-based exercise program with a waiting list in older people (≥60 years old) with chronic low back pain. Sixty participants were recruited through social media, pamphlets, and invitations at community referral centers. The study demonstrated the feasibility of a full RCT. Participants reported high satisfaction with the treatment (i.e., 100% indicated willingness to return for future services) and a high understanding of the exercise instructions (i.e., 81.8% reported "very easy" comprehension). Adherence to the exercise program exceeded the average reported for group exercise interventions in older adults (i.e., 82.58%). Dropout was associated solely with preexisting physical activity levels. The exercise protocol was successfully adapted to better suit the needs of the older adult population. This pilot RCT demonstrates the feasibility of a full-scale RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of group exercise in improving pain intensity and disability in older adults with chronic low back pain. The implemented adjustments to the exercise protocol and overall study approach strengthen the methodological foundation and expected accuracy of the future RCT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A person's health literacy determines whether they are able to make appropriate health decisions and are able to follow treatment instructions. This is important because low health literacy is associated with mortality and extra costs to the healthcare system. Our aim was to describe the health literacy levels of British adults using a nationally representative population survey, and show how health literacy levels vary by population characteristics. METHODS: A population based cross-sectional survey including questions from two domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire™: 1) Understanding health information well enough to know what to do, and 2) Ability to actively engage with health care providers. Both domains are made up of 5 Likert style questions with 5 levels ranging from 'cannot do or always difficult' (1) to 'always easy' (5). The survey was conducted by NatCen in Britain (2018) as part of the annual British Social Attitudes survey. We used weighted descriptive analyses and regression to explore the relationship between population characteristics and health literacy. Weighted analyses were used to ensure the sample was representative of the British population. RESULTS: A total of 2309 responded to the questionnaire. The mean score for 'understanding information' was 3.98 (95% CI: 3.94, 4.02) and for 'ability to engage' was 3.83 (95% CI: 3.80, 3.87), where 5 is the highest score. 19.4% had some level of difficulty reading and understanding written health information, and 23.2% discussing health concerns with health care providers. The adjusted logistic regression for 'understanding information' showed that those with lower health literacy were more likely to be in the most socially deprived quintile (OR 2.500 95% CI: 1.180, 5.296), have a limiting health condition or disability (OR 4.326 95% CI: 2.494, 7.704), and have no educational qualifications (OR 7.588 95% CI: 3.305, 17.422). This was similar for the 'ability to engage' domain. CONCLUSIONS: This study described the distribution of health literacy levels for the British population in 2018. Interventions to improve health literacy will best be targeted at those with lower levels of education, those living in the most deprived areas, and those with a limiting health condition or disability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this article is to highlight the importance of assessing health literacy in the radiotherapy department and to discuss the challenges in practice. The paper aims to identify factors to facilitate improved access to, and understanding of, health information for patients with low health literacy. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Medline and Cochrane library. Non English language studies and non-healthcare related studies were excluded. RESULTS: The search identified 9 articles relevant to assessment of low literacy and 16 articles that address communication skills and low literacy. Four key themes were identified from the selected articles: CONCLUSION: Current health literacy screening tools as a means of identifying patients with low literacy are not suitable for use in the radiotherapy department. Patient factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and education level, as well as the use of patient's evasion techniques can indicate low literacy. To address limited literacy skills, speaking in plain English, encouraging patients to ask questions and assessing patient's understanding are important methods to promote effective communication of information in patients with low literacy skills.

Asunto(s)