RESUMEN

People living with HIV who experience stigma in healthcare settings are at increased risk for engaging in health avoidance behaviours, suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy, and viral non-suppression. HIV-related stigma erodes trust between patients and healthcare providers, thereby undermining both individual and public health. This study aimed to identify predictors of stigmatising attitudes, stigma practices, and fear of occupational transmission among healthcare workers in the Republic of Ireland. Data were collected from 295 healthcare workers using a standardised tool designed to measure HIV-related stigma. The outcomes examined were stigmatising attitudes, stigmatising practices (such as excessive infection precaution measures), and fear of occupational transmission. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to explore predictors at the individual, clinic, and policy levels. The results indicated that none of the models significantly predicted stigmatising attitudes. However, stigmatising practices were positively associated with never having worked in an HIV clinic, lack of knowledge or agreement with the concept of 'undetectable equals untransmittable' (U = U), and the presence of institutional policies, collectively accounting for 25.3% of the variance. Fear of occupational transmission was positively predicted by gender and lack of knowledge or agreement with U = U, explaining 23.8% of the variance. The findings highlight the critical role of U = U knowledge in reducing stigma-related behaviours and fears among healthcare workers. Enhancing knowledge and acceptance of U = U as part of comprehensive stigma interventions may help reduce the stigma experienced by people living with HIV in healthcare settings.

RESUMEN: Las personas que viven con el VIH que se enfrentan con el estigma en el contexto de cuidado médico tienen un riesgo elevado de evitar la asistencia médica, de no cumplir con el tratamiento, y de sufrir fracasos de tratamiento. El estigma relacionado con el VIH hace daño a la confianza entre los profesionales de salud y los pacientes, y tiene efectos negativos por la salud individual y la salud pública. Comprender a los factores que promueven el estigma en el contexto de cuidado médico es fundamental para que se puedan crear soluciones para abordar el problema. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo identificar a los predictores del miedo de transmisión del VIH entre los profesionales de salud en su sitio de trabajo, y de las actitudes y las prácticas estigmatizantes entre ellos. Hemos analizado datos que se recogieron de 295 profesionales de salud en Irlanda utilizando un cuestionario validado. Los resultados muestran que los predictores de las prácticas estigmatizantes incluyen no haber trabajado en una clínica de VIH; no tener conocimiento del U = U; y la presencia de políticas institucionales. El género y la falta de conocimiento del U = U eran predictores del miedo de transmisión del VIH. Mejorando el conocimiento del U = U entre los profesionales de salud puede ser una estrategia efectiva para que se reduzca el estigma en los contextos de cuidado médico.

RESUMEN

Background: Antiretroviral therapy has helped human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people live an enhanced quality of life and attempt for a pregnancy, without placing their partner at risk. Although periconceptional pre-exposure prophylaxis for the uninfected partner and consistent antiretroviral therapy for the HIV-infected partner are important to prevent HIV transmission, semen washing could be a great option to further reduce the semen viral load. Aim: The aim of this study were as follows: to determine if semen washing with intrauterine insemination provides an added safety net to HIV-serodiscordant couples when the male partner is HIV-infected and virally suppressed and to determine if the U = U concept (undetectable = untransmittable) holds true in virally suppressed HIV-infected males. Settings and Design: This was an observational study conducted in seropositive HIV men under treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in collaboration with Metropolis Laboratory, a CAP recognised private Healthcare Laboratory in Mumbai, India. Materials and Methods: Blood and semen samples were collected from a total of 110 adult HIV-1-infected males virally suppressed on HAART. These samples were processed to assess the viral load in plasma as well as raw and processed semen fractions. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Results: Only men with plasma viral loads < 1000 copies were selected in our study. Out of the 110 HIV-infected individuals, 102 (92.73%) patients had undetectable (<20 copies/ml) plasma viral load while 8 (7.27%) patients had a detectable (>20 copies/ml) viral load, who were excluded from the study. In the virally suppressed 102 men, the raw semen samples of 100 men showed an undetectable viral load, while 2 samples showed detectable contamination, even though their plasma samples from the blood showed a viral load of <20 copies/ml. The semen was then separated into the sperm and the seminal plasma samples. The seminal plasma had <20 copies/ml in 95 samples (93.14%) but a detectable viral load in 7 (6.86%) samples. After subjecting all the 102 processed (post-wash) sperm samples to quantitative analysis, an undetectable viral load of <20 copies/ml was found in all the samples. Thus, the raw sample (prewashed),seminal plasma and processed (postwash) samples were evaluated. The post-wash sperm sample showing zero contamination was frozen for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in the uninfected female partner. Conclusions: Semen washing with IUI should be advocated as a safe, efficacious way to increase the safety net and to further reduce the minimal risk of HIV transmission in serodiscordant couples in addition to the U = U concept.

RESUMEN

Despite growing understanding and acceptance of the concept of Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) among gay men, HIV stigma remains a burden for people living with HIV. This study explored perceptions of HIV among HIV seronegative gay men in Sweden in this new context. Using snowball sampling, 15 gay men born between 1980 and 2000 were recruited to the study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and data were subjected to reflexive thematic analysis. Men grew up experiencing gay stigma and were repeatedly informed by parents, schools, communities, peers, and popular culture about the dangers of HIV, and that gay men were a high-risk group. As men grew older, and the premise of HIV shifted dramatically due to U = U, some remained emotionally anchored to the pre-U = U era, while others realigned their perceptions, often after a process of reconciling emotional responses (e.g. HIV = death) with the logical-rational claims made about U = U. The study highlights key areas for future efforts, namely establishing a balance between HIV education strategies and stigma reduction initiatives. Study findings underscore the need to care for the memory of those lost during the crisis years, while also addressing the stigma faced by those currently living with HIV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The global campaign for "Undetectable equals Untransmittable" (U = U) seeks to spread awareness of HIV treatment as prevention, aiming to enhance psychological well-being and diminish stigma. Despite its potential benefits, U = U faces challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa, with low awareness and hesitancy to endorse it. We sought to develop a U = U communications intervention to support HIV counselling in primary healthcare settings in South Africa. METHODS: We used Intervention Mapping (IM), a theory-based framework to develop the "Undetectable and You" intervention for the South African context. The six steps of the IM protocol were systematically applied to develop the intervention including a needs assessment consisting of a systematic review and qualitative research including focus group discussions (FGD) and key informant (KI) interviews. Program objectives and target population were determined before designing the intervention components and implementation plan. RESULTS: The needs assessment indicated low global U = U awareness, especially in Africa, and scepticism about its effectiveness. Lay counsellors and clinic managers stressed the need for a simple and standardized presentation of U = U addressing both patients' needs for encouragement and modelling of U = U success but also clear guidance toward ART adherence behaviour. Findings from each step of the process informed successive steps. Our final intervention consisted of personal testimonials of PLHIV role models and their partners, organized as an App to deliver U = U information to patients in primary healthcare settings. CONCLUSIONS: We outline an intervention development strategy, currently in evaluation stage, utilizing IM with formative research and input from key U = U stakeholders and people living with HIV (PLHIV).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The slogan Undetectable equals Untransmittable (U = U) communicates that people living with HIV (PLHIV) who are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) will not transmit HIV to their sexual partners. We describe awareness of U = U among sexual and gender minorities (SGM) living in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru by self-reported HIV status (PLHIV, negative, unknown) during 2021 using an online survey. We estimated two models using Poisson regression for each population group: Model A including socio-demographic factors (country, gender, age, race, education, and income), and then Model B including taking ART (for PLHIV) or risk behavior, ever-taking PrEP, and HIV risk perception (for HIV-negative or of unknown HIV status). A total of 21,590 respondents were included (Brazil: 61%, Mexico: 30%, Peru: 9%). Among HIV-negative (74%) and unknown status (12%), 13% ever used PrEP. Among PLHIV (13%), 93% reported current use of ART. Awareness of U = U was 89% in both Brazil and Mexico, which was higher than in Peru 64%. Awareness of U = U was higher among PLHIV (96%) than HIV-negative (88%) and HIV-unknown (70%). In multivariate models, PLHIV with lower education were less aware of U = U, while those taking ART were more aware. Among HIV-negative, non-cisgender, lower income, and those with lower education had lower awareness of U = U, while individuals ever using PrEP had higher awareness. In conclusion, awareness of U = U varied by HIV status, socio-demographic characteristics, and HIV risk behavior. The concept of U = U should be disseminated through educational strategies and include a focus on SGM to combat HIV stigma.

RESUMEN: Indetectable = Intransmisible (I = I) comunica que las personas que viven con VIH (PVVIH) y reciben tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) no transmitirán el VIH a sus parejas sexuales. En este estudio, describimos la concienciación sobre I = I entre las minorías sexuales y de género (MSG) de Brasil, México y Perú según el estado de VIH autoreportado (PVVIH, negativo, desconocido) durante 2021 utilizando una encuesta en línea. Se estimaron dos modelos mediante regresión de Poisson para cada grupo: Modelo A, que incluyó factores sociodemográficos (país, sexo, edad, raza, educación e ingresos) y Modelo B, que incluyó recibir TAR (para PVVIH) o comportamiento de riesgo, uso de PrEP y percepción de riesgo (para VIH negativo o desconocido). Se incluyó 21,590 encuestados (Brasil: 61%, México: 30%, Perú: 9%). Entre aquellos negativos para VIH (74%) y con estado desconocido (12%), el 13% utilizó alguna vez PrEP. Entre las PVVIH (13%), el 93% reportó recibir actualmente TAR. La concienciación de I = I fue del 89% tanto en Brasil como en México, superior al 64% de Perú. La concienciación de I = I fue mayor entre PVVIH (96%) que entre los VIH-negativos (88%) y los VIH-desconocidos (70%). En los modelos multivariados, las PVVIH con menor educación eran menos conscientes de I = I, mientras que los que tomaban TAR eran más conscientes. Entre los VIH-negativos, las personas no cisgéneros, con menores ingresos y con menor educación eran menos consciente de I = I, mientras que los que tenían experiencia usando PrEP eran más conscientes. En conclusión, la concienciación sobre I = I varió según el estado serológico de VIH, las características sociodemográficas y el comportamiento de riesgo. El concepto de I = I debe difundirse a través de estrategias educativas, incluyendo un enfoque en MSG para combatir el estigma del VIH.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PrEP has been reported to facilitate openness to serodifferent sexual partnerships among sexual minority men (SMM). However, other aspects of a sexual scenario likely come into play, including whether or not condoms are used and whether or not the partner living with HIV has an undetectable viral load. This online survey study evaluated the association between PrEP status and openness to serodifferent partnering, as well as the effects of various sexual scenario variables (condom use and partner's viral load) among 268 HIV-negative SMM in the US. Each participant reported their PrEP status and rated their openness to serodifferent partnering in four sexual scenarios, which varied by condom use (with/without) and partner viral load status (detectable/undetectable). Analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were conducted to assess differences in openness to serodifferent partnering by PrEP status in each scenario, adjusting for background characteristics. A two-way repeated measures ANCOVA and a three-way mixed factorial ANCOVA, including PrEP status as a between-subjects variable, were also performed to assess the effects of condom use and partner viral load status on openness. Across all scenarios, current PrEP users expressed significantly greater openness to serodifferent partnering compared to participants who had never used PrEP. Current PrEP users were also more likely than former PrEP users to consider partnering with someone with an undetectable viral load without using condoms. Both PrEP users and PrEP-inexperienced individuals had greater openness to serodifferent partnering with a partner having an undetectable (vs. detectable) viral load, which was magnified by condom use among the latter.

RESUMEN: Se ha reportado que hombres de minorías sexuales (HMS) están más dispuestos a tener parejas sexuales serodiferentes cuando usan PrEP. Sin embargo, es probable que existan otros aspectos del contexto sexual, como el uso o no de condones y si la pareja que vive con el VIH tiene o no una carga viral indetectable. Este estudio utilizó una encuesta virtual para evaluar la asociación entre el uso de PrEP y el estar abierto a parejas serodiferentes, así como los efectos de diversas variables del contexto sexual (uso de condón y carga viral de la pareja) entre 268 SMM VIH negativos en los EE. UU. Cada participante reportó su uso de PrEP y estimó su apertura a parejas serodiferentes en cuatro contextos sexuales, que variaron según el uso de condón (con o sin) y el estado de carga viral de la pareja (detectable/indetectable). Para examinar si la apertura a tener parejas sexuales serodiferentes estaba asociada con el uso de PrEP en cada contexto sexual, se realizaron análisis de covarianza (ANCOVA), controlando por características demográficas. También se utilizó ANCOVA de medidas repetidas de dos vías y una ANCOVA de diseño factorial mixto de tres vías, incluyendo el estado de PrEP como una variable entre sujetos, para evaluar los efectos del uso de condón y el estado de carga viral de la pareja en la apertura a tener parejas sexuales serodiferentes. En todos los contextos, las personas usando PrEP en ese momento expresaron una apertura significativamente mayor a las parejas serodiferentes comparados con los participantes que nunca habían usado PrEP. Las personas usando PrEP en ese momento también eran más propensas a considerar asociarse con alguien con una carga viral indetectable sin usar condones que los que habían descontinuado PrEP. Tanto los usuarios de PrEP como las personas sin experiencia en PrEP tuvieron una mayor apertura a tener relaciones serodiferentes con una pareja que tuviera una carga viral indetectable (versus detectable), que se magnificó por el uso de condones entre los sin inexperiencia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although strong scientific evidence of the efficacy and effectiveness of treatment-as-prevention (TasP) is available, full endorsement of the "Undetectable = Untransmittable" (U = U) and "zero-risk" messages could be improved. Increasing knowledge about HIV transmission, prevention and treatment is a critical component of care efforts. The study assessed knowledge of HIV transmission and prevention strategies, and the perceived accuracy of the slogan U = U among sexual and gender minorities (SGM) in Brazil. METHODS: Cross-sectional web-based survey targeting adult SGM living in Brazil (2021-2022) recruited on social media and dating apps. We used the 12-item HIV Knowledge Assessment (HIV-KA) questionnaire to assess HIV knowledge, three items of which address pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis and TasP. Perceived accuracy of the U = U slogan was assessed with the question: "With regards to HIV-positive individuals transmitting HIV through sexual contact, how accurate do you believe the slogan U = U is?". We a priori grouped the study population into three mutually exclusive groups: people living with HIV (PLHIV), HIV negative and HIV unknown. We used logistic regression models to assess factors associated with high HIV knowledge and perception of the U = U as completely accurate. RESULTS: Of 50,222 individuals accessing the questionnaire, 23,981 were included: 5071 (21.0%) PLHIV, 17,257 (71.5%) HIV negative and 1653 (6.9%) HIV unknown. The proportion of participants with high knowledge was significantly higher for PLHIV and HIV negative (48.1% and 45.5%, respectively) compared to 26.1% of HIV unknown. More PLHIV perceived U = U as completely accurate (80.4%), compared to 60.0% of HIV negative and 42.9% of HIV unknown. HIV knowledge correlates with perceived accuracy of the U = U slogan across all groups. Higher HIV knowledge was associated with higher income and education regardless of HIV status. Among HIV-negative participants, PrEP awareness and use were associated with higher knowledge and accurate perception of the U = U slogan. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that HIV knowledge and perceived accuracy of U = U are strongly correlated, that knowledge differs according to HIV status, and that poor socio-economic is linked to poor knowledge among SGM from Brazil. Educational strategies regarding TasP, U = U and zero risk targeting socio-economically vulnerable populations are urgent in Brazil.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) message and its scientific underpinnings have been widely suggested to reduce HIV stigma. However, misunderstanding and skepticism about U = U may prevent this destigmatizing potential from being fully realized. This cross-sectional study examined associations between U = U belief (belief that someone with a sustained undetectable viral load has zero risk of sexually transmitting HIV) and HIV stigma among US sexual minority men. Differences by serostatus and effects of brief informational messaging were also explored. The survey was completed online by 106 men living with HIV and 351 HIV-negative/status-unknown men (2019-2020). Participants were 18-83 years old (M[SD] = 41[13.0]). Most were non-Hispanic White (70.0%) and gay (82.9%). Although nearly all participants (95.6%) were aware of U = U, only 41.1% believed U = U. A greater percentage of participants living with HIV (66.0%) believed U = U compared with HIV-negative/status-unknown participants (33.6%). Among participants living with HIV, U = U belief was not significantly associated with perceived, internalized, or experienced HIV stigma or with viral load prejudice (prejudice against people who have a detectable HIV viral load). Among HIV-negative/status-unknown participants, U = U belief was associated with less frequently enacted HIV discrimination, more positive feelings toward people with an undetectable viral load, and lower personal endorsement of stigmatizing beliefs. Brief informational messaging about U = U did not affect most stigma dimensions and did not favorably affect any. Interventions are needed to correct commonly held, outdated misconceptions about HIV transmission risk. Such initiatives must not only engage people living with HIV but also engage HIV-negative/status-unknown people to maximize the destigmatizing potential of U = U.

RESUMEN: Para reducir el estigma del VIH se ha recomendado difundir extensivamente el mensaje Indetectable = Intransmisible (U = U) y sus fundamentos científicos. Sin embargo, falta de comprensión y escepticismo acerca de U = U pueden impedir que se realice plenamente su potencial desestigmatizante. Este estudio transversal examinó las asociaciones entre la creencia U = U (creencia de que alguien con una carga viral indetectable sostenida tiene cero riesgo de transmitir sexualmente el VIH) y el estigma del VIH entre hombres de minorías sexuales estadounidenses. También se exploró si el efecto de los mensajes informativos breves dependía del estatus serológico. La encuesta fue completada en línea por 106 hombres que viven con el VIH y 351 hombres VIH negativos o de estatus desconocido (2019­2020). Los participantes tenían entre 18 y 83 años (M[DS] = 41[13,0]). La mayoría eran blancos no hispanos (70,0%) y gay (82,9%). Aunque casi todos los participantes (95,6%) sabían sobre U = U, sólo el 41,1% creían en U = U. Un mayor porcentaje de participantes con VIH (66,0%) creían que U = U en comparación con los participantes VIH negativos o de estatus desconocido (33,6%). Entre los participantes con VIH, la creencia U = U no se asoció significativamente con el estigma del VIH percibido, interiorizado o experimentado ni con el prejuicio sobre la carga viral (prejuicio contra las personas que tienen una carga viral de VIH detectable). Entre los participantes VIH negativos/con estatus desconocido, la creencia U = U se asoció con menor frecuencia de discriminación por VIH, sentimientos más positivos hacia las personas con una carga viral indetectable y menor respaldo personal a las creencias estigmatizantes. Los mensajes informativos breves sobre U = U no afectaron la mayoría de las dimensiones del estigma y no afectó favorablemente a ninguno. Se necesitan intervenciones para corregir conceptos frecuentes sobre el riesgo de transmisión del VIH que son erróneos y obsoletos. Para maximizar el potencial desestigmatizador de U = U, estas iniciativas no sólo deben involucrar a las personas que viven con el VIH, sino también a las personas VIH-negativas o de estatus desconocido.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Surging HIV prevalence across countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is largely a result of poor HIV care engagement and a lack of comprehensive support for key populations. This is fostered by widespread stigma across healthcare, community, and legislative settings. DISCUSSION: Throughout CEE, HIV stigma and intersectional stigma are serious obstacles to providing adequate medical care to people living with HIV. Anticipated and enacted (experienced) stigma from healthcare professionals, and fears of breaches in confidentiality, deter individuals from having an HIV test and engaging in HIV care. Furthermore, negative connotations surrounding HIV infection can lead to discrimination from family, friends, colleagues, and the public, leading to internalized stigma and depression. Key populations that have higher HIV prevalence, such as men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, transgender individuals, and sex workers, experience additional stigma and discrimination based on their behaviour and identities. This contributes to the concentrated HIV epidemics seen in these populations in many CEE countries. The stigma is exacerbated by punitive legislation that criminalizes HIV transmission and penalizes sexual orientation, drug use, gender identities, and sex work. Despite high levels of HIV stigma and intersectional stigma, there are many evidence-based interventions that have reduced stigma in other parts of the world. Here, we discuss the interventions that are currently being enacted in various countries of CEE, and we suggest additional effective, evidence-based interventions that will tackle stigma and lead to increased HIV care engagement and higher rates of viral suppression. We cover the promotion of the undetectable = untransmittable (U = U) message, stigma-reduction education and training for healthcare professionals, patient-centric approaches for testing and treatment, and advocacy for non-discriminatory legislation, policies, and practices. We also consider targeted stigma-reduction interventions that acknowledge the wider challenges faced by marginalized populations. CONCLUSIONS: HIV stigma and intersectional stigma in CEE drive poor engagement with HIV testing services and care. Widespread adoption of evidence-based interventions to tackle stigma highlighted in this review will improve the quality of life of people living with HIV, improve HIV care engagement, and ultimately slow the surging HIV prevalence and concentrated epidemics occurring throughout CEE.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and HIV treatment as prevention, which underlies the Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) campaign, are two effective biomedical approaches for HIV prevention among sexual minority men (SMM). Attitudes toward PrEP and U = U may differ between SMM emerging adults (EA: 18-24 years old) and young adults (YA: 25-29 years old) to drive differences in sexual behavior. However, to date, few studies assessed the degree to which YAs and EAs differ in their beliefs in the effectiveness of PrEP and U = U. METHOD: A national sample of 80 SMM in the USA (Mage = 25.1 years; 53.7% racial/ethnic minority; 38.8% EA; 61.3% YA) participated in a 6-month mHealth intervention for PrEP adherence. Non-parametric tests assessed differences in sexual behaviors and attitudes toward the effectiveness of PrEP and U = U between EAs and YAs using baseline data. RESULTS: Compared to EAs, higher proportions of YAs trusted PrEP's effectiveness and considered condom use unnecessary after taking PrEP. More YAs than EAs were willing to engage in sexual behaviors that they felt too risky before learning about U = U and were more comfortable having condomless sex with HIV-positive partners. Conversely, a greater proportion of EAs than YAs preferred to use condoms even when their partners are on anti-HIV medications. CONCLUSION: Overall, YAs trusted the effectiveness of U = U and PrEP more than EAs, underscoring developmental differences in SMM's perspectives on biomedical HIV prevention tools. Our findings underscore the importance of tailoring messages on biomedical HIV prevention options differently for EAs and YAs to optimize uptake.

RESUMEN

The discovery that people with an undetectable HIV viral load are unable to transmit the virus to sex partners (U = U) has ushered in a new era in HIV care. As a result of this discovery, treatment as prevention (TasP) has become a powerful tool toward ending the epidemic. However, despite its sound scientific basis, many communities affected by HIV face barriers toward adopting TasP as a complete HIV prevention strategy. In addition, most research to date has only focused on TasP in the context of committed monogamous partnerships. To identify barriers to TasP adoption among some of those most affected by HIV, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 62 sexual and gender minority individuals of varying serostatuses. Participants were identified from the results of an online survey, where those who indicated at least some awareness of TasP were invited to partake in a follow-up interview. Interviews were thematically coded to identify emergent themes relating to TasP adoption. Seven primary barriers emerged from data analysis pertaining to TasP science, internalized beliefs about HIV safety, and interactional dynamics between partners: (1) unfamiliarity with TasP science, (2) perceived limitations of TasP science, (3) difficulty changing understanding of "safe sex," (4) unwillingness to rely on partners' reports of being undetectable, (5) persistent HIV stigma, (6) less difficulty finding serosimilar partners, and (7) difficulty incorporating TasP into casual encounters. Together, these barriers confirm the existing findings about TasP adoption, and extend the literature by identifying barriers beyond a lack of education and outside of monogamous contexts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Treatment as prevention (TasP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy. Our objectives were to explore TasP attitudes and beliefs among people with HIV (PWH) who are not engaged in care and to examine attitudes and beliefs by selected characteristics. We sampled PWH who had participated in the Medical Monitoring Project (MMP), a structured interview survey, from June 2018-May 2019 to participate in 60-minute semi-structured telephone interviews. We obtained sociodemographic and behavioral quantitative data from the MMP structured interview. We used applied thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data and integrated the qualitative and quantitative data during analysis. Negative attitudes and beliefs, especially skepticism and mistrust, about TasP were pervasive. Only one participant who identified as female, was not sexually active, and had not heard of TasP held positive attitudes and beliefs about TasP. TasP messages should use clear and unambiguous language, address mistrust, and reach people who are not engaged in medical care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Evidences on the absence of risk of sexual transmission of HIV by persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) with undetectable plasma HIV-RNA (HIV-RNA <200 copies/ml) led to the worldwide campaign "U = U" (undetectable = untransmittable). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived accuracy of this message among PLWHA, HIV-negative people having unprotected sex (PHUS) and infectious diseases' (ID) physicians in Italy. A nationwide survey has been conducted using three different anonymous questionnaires (for ID physicians, PLWHA and PHUS). A total of 1121 participants filled the questionnaires: 397 PLWHA; 90 physicians; 634 PHUS. Awareness of U = U message has been reported in 74%, 92% and 47% of PLWHA, ID physicians and PHUS, respectively. The perception of accuracy of the U = U message among those aware was reported as high in 80.4%, 79.5% and 67.3% of PLWHA, ID physicians and PHUS, respectively. Physicians perceived that 11% of PLWHA have a high rate of perception of U = U, whereas among PLWHA, only 34% reported definitive positive messages from physicians. Discrepancies between awareness and perception of accuracy of the message U = U in PLWHA and physicians have been found, suggesting still low confidence in the community regarding the message itself.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

HIV disclosure to sexual partners remains a multifaceted yet stigmatised process. The 'undetectable equals untransmittable' (U = U) concept has raised ethical and moral concerns about the obligation and need to disclose, and using Internet applications to seek sex partners has modified disclosure practices. While previous qualitative literature has examined the HIV disclosure process, there is a dearth of information on this topic among gay men in the USA who have an undetectable viral load. Using thematic analysis of data collected during a period of expanded U = U knowledge, this study explores the cognitive, contextual, interpersonal and structural factors impacting undetectable gay men's HIV status disclosure decisions to sexual partners. In-depth interviews were conducted in August 2020 over Zoom with 20 gay men with undetectable viral loads. The main themes included 'sense of obligation,' 'situational disclosure' and 'partners' responsibility in the disclosure process.' Participants balanced the aforementioned factors to inform their disclosure decisions, and disclosure patterns varied across participants dependent upon thoughts regarding ethics and morality of (non-)disclosure. The findings provide new insights to how participants navigate disclosure while considering U = U, HIV criminalisation laws, and finding partners through Internet applications while providing direction for future studies and support for decriminalising HIV and expanding HIV education.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This survey aimed to understand how far the Italian infectious diseases (ID) specialists are confident in the "Undetectable = Untransmittable" (U = U) message and translate this concept into clinical practice. An anonymous survey was distributed by e-mail to 286 clinicians to collect their opinions regarding six situations potentially at risk of HIV transmission between virologically suppressed patients and seronegative individuals who possibly require postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Overall, 51% of ID specialists deemed zero risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex for undetectable patients. This answer was more frequent among HIV specialists (30% vs. 21%, p = .01) and clinicians working in teaching hospitals (35% vs. 16%, p = .03). Remarkably, 61% of participants would advise taking PEP for the HIV-negative partner in case of sexual intercourse with a seropositive person with a recent blip occurrence or absence of an HIV RNA test performed within the last 6 months (63%). Seventy-three percent of respondents deemed it essential to know patients' history of adherence to interpreting an HIV RNA test, regardless of its timing. When applying the U = U concept to daily clinical decisions, we observed an overall cautious attitude among physicians. Concerns mainly regarded the timing of the last HIV RNA test to the exposure event, especially in the absence of details on the patient's adherence. Wider diffusion and application of the U = U message are needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

One of the most significant innovations in HIV prevention is the use of HIV treatment to prevent HIV transmission. This information has been disseminated as the "Undetectable = Untransmittable" (U = U) message. Despite evidence of effectiveness, U = U awareness, belief, and understanding remains limited in some communities. In this study, we examine whether having an LGBTQ affirming healthcare provider increases U = U awareness, belief, and understanding among midlife and older gay and bisexual men in the US south, an understudied and underserved population and region where new HIV infections are increasing. We used data from the Vanderbilt University Social Networks Aging and Policy Study (VUSNAPS) on sexual minority men aged 50 to 76 from four southern US states collected in 2020-2021. We found that only one in four men reported prior awareness of U = U, but awareness was higher among men who have an LGBTQ affirming provider. Among HIV negative men, those with an affirming provider were more likely to believe and understand U = U, have more accurate risk perception, and have ever tested for HIV. Improving access to LGBTQ affirming healthcare may improve U = U awareness, belief, and understanding, which could help to curb HIV transmission in the US south.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

'Undetectable = Untransmittable', or 'U = U', is a message which communicates the scientific consensus that people living with HIV who maintain an undetectable viral load cannot sexually transmit HIV to others. This research aimed to empirically test whether a protection-framed U = U message is more effective at decreasing HIV stigma and increasing perceived accuracy of U = U than a risk-framed message. A nationally representative UK sample (N = 707) completed an online experiment. Participants viewed one of two U = U messages (protection-framed or risk-framed) and completed an online questionnaire. No evidence of a difference in HIV stigma at post-test or in perceived accuracy of U = U was found between the two message frame conditions. A minority of participants were aware of U = U prior to participation. Post-intervention, the majority of participants rated U = U as at least somewhat accurate. Higher understanding of U = U was associated with lower post-test stigma following a protection-framed message. Following a brief intervention, among a sample predominantly unaware of U = U previously, there was an overall favourable rating of U = U. No evidence was found for an effect of message framing on HIV stigma or perceived accuracy of U = U, but participants who completed a pre-test measure of stigma rated U = U as less accurate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prevention campaigns have led to a significant decrease in new HIV diagnoses in Western Europe, while other sexual transmitted infections (STIs) have shown an opposite trend. Several educational programs are promoted among young students, whereas informational campaigns addressing the general population are scarce. We aimed to investigate the level of awareness regarding STIs among the general population. METHODS: We proposed a questionnaire regarding STIs and HIV to the general population in Italy. We assigned 1 point to correct, 0.5 point to partially correct, and 0 point to wrong answers. We collected data about age, sex, region of origin, level of education and whether they were health workers. RESULTS: Overall, 2183 people answered the questionnaire, of which 555 aged over 50 years old. Being male, older than 50 years old, retired or unemployed, not educated, and no regular use of condoms were associated with lower scores. Only 16% of participants knew the Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) campaign. Overall, 2131 (97.6%) people think more educational campaigns should be offered. Of interest, 80% said the questionnaire led them to learn more about HIV and STIs. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals several gaps in general population awareness about HIV and STIs, especially among people aged over 50 years old. Most participants stated that the questionnaire was a learning opportunity. These data suggest that improvement of knowledge could start from easy-to-dispose medium, such as surveys and questionnaires delivered through social media. Furthermore, particular attention should be paid to population segmentation and campaign tailoring to enhance interventions effectiveness. Our data reinforce the need for more informational and educational campaigns tailored to the specific segments of the population.

RESUMEN

People living with HIV who maintain an undetectable viral load by adhering to antiretroviral therapy cannot transmit the virus to others. The present pre-registered study sought to investigate whether messages about this fact have the potential to decrease HIV stigma, drawing on the framework of the Elaboration Likelihood Model to test variations in message framing, and measuring issue involvement as a covariate. Participants (N = 314) were randomised to one of three conditions: control message, opinion-based message, and evidence-based message. Using a between-subjects one-way ANOVA, it was found that there was no significant effect of the U = U message on perceived risk or perceived accuracy of the message. When controlling for issue involvement, operationalised as the extent to which participants felt that they can empathise with people living with HIV, participants who received the evidence-based U = U message reported lower stigmatising attitudes than those who received the opinion-based message. These adjusted results suggested that evidence-based framing was more effective than opinion-based framing and an unrelated control message.

Asunto(s)