RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transurethral resection of Prostate(TURP)combined with endocrine therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 cases of late-stage prostate cancer with dysuria admitted between January 2014 and December 2017.We divided them into 2 groups.TURP group(n = 48)received transurethral resection of prostate,followed by regular endocrine therapy.The control group(n = 39)was only given regular endocrine therapy.Comparative analysis of indicators such as prostate-specific antigen before and after treatment,maximum urinary flow rate,residual urine volume,International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),and 5-year survival rate was performed between the two groups.Results Three months after TURP surgery,the symptoms of urinary difficulty significantly improved,and various indicators showed significant improvement compared to before the surgery.PSA levels also notably decreased compared to before the surgery.After 3 months of treatment,the TURP group showed significant improvements in IPSS,Qmax,RV,and PSA indicators compared to the control group(P<0.05).Both groups of patients experienced a gradual decrease in PSA levels after receiving standardized treatment.In the first 12 months of treatment,the PSA levels in the TURP group decreased more significantly compared to the control group,but after 12 months of treatment,the comparison difference was not statistically significant in the PSA levels between the two groups(P = 0.056).A 5-year follow-up comparison of the two groups of patients revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in survival(P = 0.734).Conclusion Transurethral resection of Prostate(TURP)combined with regular endocrine therapy can effectively improve the dysuria in prostate cancer patients,improve the quality of life of patients,and will not affect the five-year survival rate.TURP is a safe and effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common urologic emergency. However, its management is not standardized due to lack of clinical guidelines. AIMS: We retrospectively reviewed the treatment of all male patients admitted to our institution with AUR over 12 months. METHODS: Data was obtained from the HIPE (Hospital Inpatient Enquiry) data system, each patient's electronic discharge summary and from patient medical records. RESULTS: There were 130 AUR admissions during the period. About 74 admissions were due to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Of these, 45.9% (n = 34) passed their trial without catheter (TWOC). The remainder (n = 40) failed their TWOC necessitating recatheterization and consideration for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) or re-TWOC. An indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) was inserted for 27.5% (n = 11) of patients with a failed TWOC secondary to comorbidities. This group had a mean age of 78 years (range 68-96 years). Of those who failed their TWOC, 32.5% (n = 13) had a TURP on index admission. Of the remaining 16 patients with failed TWOC, 75% (n = 12) were discharged with an IDC and readmitted for an elective TURP with a median waiting time of 55 days (range 17-138 days). 18.75% (n = 3) passed a re-TWOC and thus offset the need to have any surgical intervention and 6.25% (n = 1) proceeded to a radical retropubic prostatectomy for biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Admission of patients with acute urinary retention leads to a definitive management decision and reduced prolonged catheterization.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Xanthogranulomatous reaction is rare begin disease affects many different organs, in clinical practice it is well known to affect kidney and gallbladder, but also affect male genital organs including (Testis, epididymis, and spermatic cord), we report a case 70-year old, diabetic patient presented with right scrotal swelling, had history of prior TURP, tumor markers was within normal range, ultrasound shows multiple hypo echoic lesions with moderate hydrocele, exploration done: pus found within tunica vaginalis, and destructed testicular tissue with necrosis, culture revealed (E.Coli), histopathology showed xanthogranulomatous orchitis.

RESUMEN

Objective To observe the analgesic and sedative effect of epidural dexmedetomidine injection in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and its effect on postoperative cognitive function. Methods A total of 60 patients undergoing TURP under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group and normal saline group. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group were given 0.1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine injection after epidural anesthesia, and 0.9 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was added into epidural analgesia pump after operation;patients in the normal saline group were given the same dose of normal saline. The vital signs, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation score of patients in the two groups at different time points [before intervention (T0), after intervention for 15 min (T1), after intervention for 30 min (T2), after intervention for 45 min (T3), after intervention for 60 min (T4), after surgery for 12 h (T5), after surgery for 36 h (T6)] were recorded. The mini mental state examination (MMSE) of patients in the two groups 1 d before operation and 3 d after operation were recorded. Results Compared with normal saline group, the VAS scores of patients in dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower at T1-T6 (P<0.05), and the Ramsay scores were significantly higher (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of MMSE total score [25.00(23.50, 27.50) scores] in the patients of dexmedetomidine group 3 d after operation but the memory ability score [4.00(3.00, 5.00) scores] was significantly decreased (P<0.05), and the language ability score [9.00(8.00, 9.00) scores] was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in MMSE score between the two groups in comparison with that 1 d before operation. Conclusions Epidural dexmedetomidine injection (1 μg/kg) enhancesd the analgesic effect of ropivacaine and producesd sedative effect. Although there was is no significant effect on the overall cognitive function, it might have some effect on memory function.

RESUMEN

Objective@#To observe the analgesic and sedative effect of epidural dexmedetomidine injection in patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and its effect on postoperative cognitive function.@*Methods@#A total of 60 patients undergoing TURP under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group and normal saline group. Patients in the dexmedetomidine group were given 0.1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine injection after epidural anesthesia, and 0.9 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was added into epidural analgesia pump after operation; patients in the normal saline group were given the same dose of normal saline. The vital signs, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation score of patients in the two groups at different time points[before intervention (T0), after intervention for 15 min (T1), after intervention for 30 min (T2), after intervention for 45 min (T3), after intervention for 60 min (T4), after surgery for 12 h (T5), after surgery for 36 h (T6)] were recorded. The mini mental state examination (MMSE) of patients in the two groups 1 d before operation and 3 d after operation were recorded.@*Results@#Compared with normal saline group, the VAS scores of patients in dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower at T1-T6 (P < 0.05), and the Ramsay scores were significantly higher (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of MMSE total score [25.00(23.50, 27.50) scores] in the patients of dexmedetomidine group 3 d after operation but the memory ability score [4.00(3.00, 5.00) scores] was significantly decreased (P < 0.05), and the language ability score [9.00(8.00, 9.00) scores] was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in MMSE score between the two groups in comparison with that 1 d before operation.@*Conclusions@#Epidural dexmedetomidine injection (1 μg/kg) enhancesd the analgesic effect of ropivacaine and producesd sedative effect. Although there was is no significant effect on the overall cognitive function, it might have some effect on memory function.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To examine the response to an α2receptor agonist used as a sedative for patients using long-term selective α1 blockers. METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection or holmium laser resection of the prostateunder spinal anesthesia were divided into two groups; group N (n = 37), which did not receive α1 blockers, and group T (n = 32), which was administered tamsulosin for at least 1 month before the study. Bispectral index scores, Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale scores, heart rate, and mean blood pressure were obtained under sedation using dexmedetomidine for 30 min during surgery. RESULTS: The only significant difference found between the groups were mean bloodpressure 15 min after the first loading dose injection of dexmedetomidine. Differencesbetween both groupswere noted at 15 min(group T: 100.2 ± 12.9 mmHg; group N: 90.0 ± 17.5 mmHg; P = 0.08), 20 min (group T: 99.8 ± 12.3 mmHg; group N: 87.4 ± 15.0 mmHg; P < 0.00), 25 min (group T: 99.3 ± 13.4 mmHg; group N: 85.4 ± 13.8 mmHg; P < 0.00), and 30 min (group T: 98.8 ± 13.1 mmHg; group N: 84.5 ± 13.5 mmHg; P < 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: The use of α2 agonists is appropriate during surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia patients using tamsulosin, and there is no need to alter the dose. Alertness with anesthesia involving α2 agents was maintained for patients using long-term tamsulosin and patients who did not use tamsulosin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered with the Clinical Research Informational Service ( KCT0002967 , July 2, 2018).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To explore the availability and safety of conducting low-pressure TURP assisted by a home-made cystometry and warning system.Methods 167 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients admitted from Jan 2014 to Jan 2016 were randomly assigned into cystostomy group (group A) and non-cystostomy group (group B). In group A (n = 85), 42 patients (group A1) were performed percutaneous cystostomy + TURP, and 43 (group A2) were performed continuous flushing sheath TURP. In group B (n = 82), 42 patients (group B1) were received percutaneous cystostomy + TURP, and 40 (group B2) were received continuous lfushing sheath TURP. In group A, bladder pressure was monitored in real time with a cystometry and was monitored by bladder puncture using a home-made siphon, ensuring low bladder pressure throughout TURP. Serum Na+ levels were measured before and after operation in all four groups. The operation time, the intraoperative bleeding, the weight of resected prostates and the time before which urine turned clear were recorded. The IPSS, maximum lfow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR) and life quality score (QOL) were evaluated.Results While no significant differences were found between group A1 and A2, there were significant differences between group B1 and B2, indicating cystostomy group was safer than non-cystostomy group. When compared group A1 with B1, or group A2 with B2, it showed that the safe operation time to perform prostate tissue resection was longer in cystostomy group; the weight of the resected prostates was heavier; the time before which urine turned clear were shorter; and the IPSS improvement was better. These findings presented better therapeutic effects in cystostomy group than in non-cystostomy group.Conclusions This home-made cystometry and warning system could timely detect high bladder pressure state during TURP, making it possible to avoid of high pressure, ensuring low bladder pressure lfushing during the operation, lengthening the safe operation time, increasing tissue resection ratio, reducing transurethral resection syndrome, thus helping TURP to be safer.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of bipolar transurethral plasma vaporisation (B-TUVP) as an alternative to the 'gold standard' monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a prospective randomised controlled study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 82 patients indicated for prostatectomy were assigned to two groups, group I (40 patients) underwent B-TUVP and group II (42 patients) underwent M-TURP. The safety of both techniques was evaluated by reporting perioperative changes in serum Na+, serum K+, haematocrit (packed cell volume), and any perioperative complications. For the efficacy assessment, patients were evaluated subjectively by comparing the improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and objectively by measuring the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) before and after the procedures. RESULTS: In group II, there was a significant perioperative drop in serum Na+ (from 137.5 to 129.4 mmol/L) and haematocrit (from 42.9% to 38.2%) (both P < 0.001). Moreover, one patient in group II had TUR syndrome. The remote postoperative complication rate was (15%) in group I and comprised of stress urinary incontinence (5%), bladder outlet obstruction (5%), and residual adenoma (5%). In group II, the remote postoperative complication rate was (4.8%), as two patients developed urethral stricture. There were statistically significant improvements in micturition variables postoperatively in both arms, but the magnitude of improvement was statistically more significant in group II. CONCLUSION: B-TUPV seems to be safer than M-TURP; however, the lack of a tissue specimen and the relatively high retreatment rate are major disadvantages of the B-TUVP technique. Moreover, M-TURP appears to be more effective than B-TUPV and its safety can be improved by careful case selection and adequate haemostasis.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical morbidity and effectiveness in improving symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), comparing 'button-type' bipolar plasma vaporisation (BTPV) vs transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: We conducted a literature search of published articles until November 2014. Only prospective and randomised studies with comparative data between BTPV and conventional TURP (mono- or bipolar) were included in this review. RESULTS: Six articles were selected for the analyses. In the 871 patients evaluated, 522 underwent TURP and 349 BTPV. There was a tendency for a higher transfusion rate in the TURP group, with two BTPV cases (0.006%) and 16 TURP cases (0.032%) requiring transfusions (P = 0.06). The number of complications was similar between the groups (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.31; P = 0.12; I(2) = 86%). When subdivided by severity, 10.7% (14/131) and 14.6% (52/355) of complications were classified as severe (Clavien 3 or 4) in patients who underwent BTPV and TURP, respectively (P = 0.02). The average duration of indwelling catheterisation was significantly less in patients who underwent BTPV (standardised mean difference [SMD] -0.84; 95% CI -1.54 to 0.14; P = 0.02; I(2) = 81%). Both treatments significantly improved symptoms and the postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score was similar in both groups (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -1.56 to 1.73; P = 0.92). CONCLUSION: BTPV is an effective and safe treatment for BPH. The improvement of urinary symptoms and overall complications are comparable to conventional TURP. However, BTVP appears to be associated with a lower rate of major complications and duration of indwelling catheterisation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified YV-plasty for refractory bladder neck contracture (BNC) caused by transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).Methods From June 2013 to March 2016,11 patients with BNCs secondary to TURP were included in this study.Their mean age was 63.7 years (range,56-73 years).All patients presented voiding difficulty and failed after 2 or more prior endoscopic treatments.Modified YV-reconstruction of bladder neck was performed,by incising the anterior wall of bladder neck in a T-shaped manner,and creating two well-vascularized and tension-free flaps,which offer the possibility to reconstruct a wide bladder neck.Results After a mean follow-up of 14.6 months (ranging 3-24 months),successful outcome was achieved in 9 patients without incontinence secondary by surgery.Recurrent voiding difficulty developed in 2 patients,which was cured after a following endoscopic treatment.Conclusion A wider bladder neck can be obtained through modified YV-reconstruction of bladder neck,while avoiding external urethral sphincter injury.It is an available option for refractory bladder neck contracture.

RESUMEN

Objective To discuss influence of different anesthetic methods on postoperative serum excitatory amino acid (EAA) levels and cognitive function of elderly patients operated with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Methods A total of 100 cases of elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), in Department of Anesthesiol-ogy of the hospital to be given the TURP operation at certain time were selected, and divided into general anesthesia group (n=50) and epidural group (n=50) in accordance with different anesthetic methods, who were given intubation anesthesia and epidural anesthesia respectively. The changes of serum EAA levels and cognitive function before anes-thesia, 4 hours, 8 hours, one day and four days after the operation of patients in two groups were observed and record-ed. Results Serum EAA levels 4 hours, 8 hours and one day after the operation of patients in two groups rose than be-fore (P<0.05), and the rising rates in epidural group were much lower than those in general anesthesia group (P<0.05). Meanwhile, MMSE scores of patients in two groups 4 hours, 8 hours and one day after the operation declined than be-fore (P<0.05), and the declining rates in epidural group were much lower than those in general anesthesia group (P<0.05). Four days after operation, the serum EAA levels and MMSE scores of patients in two groups returned to the levels before anesthesia (P>0.05). Conclusion Both intubation anesthesia and epidural anesthesia have effect on early cogni-tive function of elderly patients operated with TURP, and the former has less influence on early cognitive function of patients, which may have close effect on the lower rising rate of serum EAA level by epidural anesthesia.

RESUMEN

Objective To investigate the causes,treatments,and prevention of dysuria after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Methods The clinical data of 49 cases of dysuria post-TURP that were treated in our hospital from July 2004 to September 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among the cases,6 patients received silica catheterization again because of edema of the bladder neck and urethra; 9 underwent catheterization after bladder flush for delayed prostate bleeding; 20 underwent urethral dilatation or meatotomy due to meatal stenosis,5 received urethral dilatation for urethral stricture; urethral dilatation or direct vision internal urethrotomy were performed on 4 cases who had bladder neck fracture; TURP was carried out for a second time in 4 cases because of glandular residual; suprapubic cystostomy was made in 1 case of colonal carcinoma for long-term bed rest. All cases were cured after the treatment. Conclusions Meatal stenosis is the most common cause of dysuria post-TURP.Urethral dilatation is the first choice for the disease.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The combination of local anesthetics and opioids in the spinal anesthesia has a synergic analgesic effect. Therefore, we compared intraoperative conditions and clinical effects of low dose (5 mg) bupivacaine added with fentanyl versus a conventional dose(10 mg) of bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: Forty five ASA class 1 and 2 patients scheduled for a TURP were randomly divided into three groups. Group B (n = 15) received bupivacaine 10 mg, group BF (n = 15) received bupivacaine 5 mg added with fentanyl 20microgram, and group BFE received bupivacaine 5 mg added with fentanyl 20microgram and 0.2 mg epinephrine. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded every 5 minutes before and after spinal anesthesia. Sensory blockade was measured by a pin-prick test and motor blockade was evaluated by the Bromage motor scale. Side effects including pruritus, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and intraoperative pain were observed. RESULTS: The duration of sensory and motor blockade in group BF was significantly shorter than in group B and group BFE (P<0.05). Without statistical significance, hypotension (6.7%) and bradycardia (13.3%) were observed in group B and pruritus (26.7%) and nausea (13.3%) occurred in all patients who received fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of fentanyl 20microgram to low dose bupivacaine 5 mg resulted in short lasting motor and sensory block, compared with conventional dose bupivacaine 10 mg. Therefore, we concluded that the clinical application of this method could provide adequate analgesia with early discharge and no serious side effects for TURP patients.

Asunto(s)