RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sacrum multilayer silicone foam dressings as an adjuvant prophylactic therapy compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention in a hospital population at high risk for pressure ulcer development. METHODS: An economic evaluation is performed from a healthcare payer's perspective. This evaluation is based on a Belgian publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT), linked with real-world data from administrative claims database and a Belgian cost analysis. A cost-consequences analysis with a one-year time horizon is performed. RESULTS: The RCT has shown that the risk of developing a new pressure ulcer on the sacrum was statistically significantly reduced by 41 % in the treatment group (RR = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35-0.98, p = 0.04). The absolute risk reduction of 2.0 % (95 % CI -0.1-4.1 %) coincides with a number needed to treat of 50.0 to prevent one new pressure ulcer of category II or worse. The evolution of quality of life is on average negative for patients who developed a pressure ulcer before day 3, while it is positive for patients without pressure ulcers. In a scenario with conservative assumptions, i.e. without inclusion of price discounts for the multilayer silicone foam dressings and only including costs during the hospitalization, pressure ulcer prevention with dressings on the sacrum was already cost-neutral. CONCLUSIONS: The preventive use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings on the sacrum for a population similar to the pragmatic trial population can be supported both from a clinical and economic point of view.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of analytical methods in scientific literature for comparing uncontrolled medicine trials to external controls from individual patient-level real-world data (IPD-RWD). In addition, to compare these methods with recommendations made in guidelines from European regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) organizations and with their evaluations described in assessment reports. METHODS: A systematic literature review (until March 1st 2023) in PubMed and Connected Papers was performed to identify analytical methods for comparing uncontrolled trials with external controls from IPD-RWD. These methods were compared descriptively to methods recommended in method guidelines and encountered in assessment reports of the European Medicines Agency (2015-2020) and four European HTA organizations (2015-2023). RESULTS: Thirty-four identified scientific articles described analytical methods for comparing uncontrolled trial data to IPD-RWD-based external controls. The various methods covered controlling for confounding and/or dependent censoring, correction for missing data; and analytical comparative modelling methods. Seven guidelines also focused on research design, RWD quality and transparency aspects, and four of those recommended analytical methods for comparisons with IPD-RWD. The methods discussed in regulatory (n=15) and HTA (n=35) assessment reports were often based on aggregate data and lacked transparency due to the few details provided. CONCLUSION: Literature and guidelines suggest a methodological approach to comparing uncontrolled trials with external controls from IPD-RWD similar to target trial emulation, using state-of-the-art methods. External controls supporting regulatory and HTA decision-making were rarely in line with this approach. Twelve recommendations are proposed to improve the quality and acceptability of these methods.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer treatments can impact the patients' health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). This criterion is relevant for drug reimbursement decisions. We wanted to assess the usage of HR-QoL in health technology assessments (HTA). METHODS: All HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé, the French HTA body) opinions published between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2023 for the reimbursement of breast cancer drugs were analysed. RESULTS: 51 distinct appraisals were found during the period, corresponding to 45 product-specific indications, of which 36 (80 %) including clinical studies in which HR-QoL was an endpoint. HAS explicitly rejected HR-QoL data in 25 out of 36 (69 %) indications with such data. Rejections are justified by methodological weaknesses, including lack of adjustment for type I error inflation (n=21 indications), open-label treatment (n=7), lack of a pre-specified clinically relevant HR-QoL threshold (n=6) or missing data (n=6). Regardless of rejection status, HR-QoL results were not mentioned as a determinant of value assessment in 3/36 (8 %) instances (2/25 for rejected data). CONCLUSIONS: HR-QoL data are inconsistently present in HTA assessments of new breast cancer drugs. Their methodological quality often hinders their use in determining the drug's value. POLICY SUMMARY: A rigorous and acceptable comparative experimental framework is expected for HR-QoL assessments. More detail on the precise impact of the absence or presence of HR-QoL data in the determination of the drug's added value could help understanding how this dimension is influential in the assessments.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This health technology assessment aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of yoga as therapy for burnout. Economic, ethical, legal, social and organizational aspects were considered as well. RECENT FINDINGS: Yoga as a therapy has been shown to have positive effects on a range of symptoms, including stress, anxiety and depression. Regarding work-related stress and burnout, the effects of yoga have mainly been examined in a preventative context. Meta-analyses revealed no effects on burnout severity comparing yoga with passive controls in general. Compared with passive controls, yoga had a positive effect on subjective stress. Compared to active control, yoga had an effect on the burnout subscale depersonalization on individual study level. Yoga may have positive effects on burnout, but the results are mixed. Common definitions and standardized diagnostic tools are necessary to improve research and further assess yoga as therapy for burnout. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The HTA is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022299405, on 6th February 2022.

RESUMEN

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder which primarily involves memory and cognitive functions. It is increasingly recognized that motor involvement is also a common and significant aspect of AD, contributing to functional decline and profoundly impacting quality of life. Motor impairment, either at early or later stages of cognitive disorders, can be considered as a proxy measure of cognitive impairment, and technological devices can provide objective measures for both diagnosis and prognosis purposes. However, compared to other neurodegenerative disorders, the use of technological tools in neurocognitive disorders, including AD, is still in its infancy. Objective: This report aims to evaluate the role of technological devices in assessing motor involvement across the AD spectrum and in other dementing conditions, providing an overview of the existing devices that show promise in this area and exploring their clinical applications. Methods: The evaluation involves a review of the existing literature in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases on the effectiveness of these technologies. 21 studies were identified and categorized as: wearable inertial sensors/IMU, console/kinect, gait analysis, tapping device, tablet/mobile, and computer. Results: We found several parameters, such as speed and stride length, that appear promising for detecting abnormal motor function in MCI or dementia. In addition, some studies have found correlations between these motor aspects and cognitive state. Conclusions: Clinical application of technological tools to assess motor function in people with cognitive impairments of a neurodegenerative nature, such as AD, may improve early detection and stratification of patients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy-based surveillance to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) causes substantial burden for patients and healthcare. Stool tests may help to reduce surveillance colonoscopies, by limiting colonoscopies to individuals at increased risk of AN. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included individuals aged 50-75 with surveillance indication. Before bowel preparation, participants collected samples for a multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test and two fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). Test accuracies were calculated for all surveillance indications. Only for the post-polypectomy indication, most common and associated with a relatively low CRC risk, long-term impact of stool-based surveillance was evaluated with the ASCCA model. Stool-based strategies were simulated to tune each tests' positivity threshold to obtain strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance. RESULTS: 3453 individuals had results for all stool tests and colonoscopy. 2226 had previous polypectomy, 1003 previous CRC and 224 familial risk. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AN were 0.72 (95% CI; 0.69-0.75) for the mt-sDNA test, 0.61 (95% CI; 0.58-0.64) for the FIT OC-Sensor and 0.59 (95% CI; 0.56-0.61) for the FIT FOB-Gold. Stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance, reduced the number of colonoscopies by 15-41% and required 5.6-9.5 stool tests over the lifetime of a person. Mt-sDNA-based surveillance was more costly than colonoscopy surveillance, whereas FIT-based surveillance saved costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies can be safe and cost-effective, with potential to reduce the number of colonoscopies by up to 41%.

RESUMEN

Previous reviews on the cost of illness (COI) of Parkinson's disease (PD) have often focused on health-care costs due to PD, underestimating its effects on other sectors. This systematic review determines the COI of PD from a societal perspective. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023428937). Embase, Medline, and EconLit were searched up to October 12, 2023, for studies determining the COI of PD from a societal perspective. From 2812 abstracts, 17 studies were included. The COI of PD averaged €20,911.37 per patient per year, increasing to almost €100,000 in the most severely affected patients. Health-care costs accounted for 46.1% of total costs, followed by productivity loss (37.4%) and costs to patient and family (16.4%). The COI of PD strongly varied between different geographical regions, with costs in North America 3.6 times higher compared to Asia. This study is the first to identify the relative importance of different cost items. Most important were reduced employment, government benefits, informal care, medication, nursing homes, and hospital admission. There was strong variety in the cost items that were included, with 55.2% of cost items measured in fewer than half of articles. Our review shows that PD-COI is high and appears in various cost sectors, with strong variety in the cost items included in different studies. Therefore, a guideline for the measurement of COI in PD should be developed to harmonize this. This article provides a first step toward the development of such a tool by identifying which cost items are most relevant. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This paper summarizes the results from a forum of healthcare experts, academia representatives, and public agency officials from emerging and established market countries on Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Presentations from experts provided insights into current developments and challenges, followed by interactive roundtable discussions. Emerging markets have unique healthcare systems, patient populations, resource constraints and needs. AREAS COVERED: Each roundtable explored specific topics including the role of HTA and Real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making, challenges in biosimilar value assessment and incorporating non-price criteria reflecting context-related specifications of emerging markets such as the multifaceted nature of value in healthcare decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder perspectives and system complexities. EXPERT OPINION: RWE emerged as important in understanding biosimilar value recognition and decision-making processes, with insights into its applications and challenges. Recommendations were provided for utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in pharmaceutical procurement, particularly for off-patent medicines, underscoring the importance of comprehensive evaluation frameworks and adherence to value-based principles. Overall findings suggest avenues for collaboration between industry, academia, and public agencies to address implementation barriers and promote equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare systems in emerging markets through public-private partnerships, joint capacity building and training initiatives, and knowledge transfers.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The focus on health maximisation in a healthcare economic evaluation (HEE) - that is health gains are of equal value regardless of the recipient- has significant implications as health systems attempt to address persistent and growing health inequities. This study aimed to systematically compare and contrast the equity principles of different health technology assessment (HTA) agencies and how equity is addressed in HEE guidelines. METHODS: HTA agencies were identified through the ISPOR, GEAR, iDSI, HTAi, INAHTA, HTAsiaLink, and RedETSA websites in June 2021 and updated in August 2023. Agencies websites were then searched to retrieve HEE guidelines. The guidelines were grouped into two categories: well-established and newly-developed agency guidelines, based on whether or not they published their first guidelines before 2009. Data extracted summarised the methodological details in the reference cases, including specifics on how equity featured and in what role. In those agencies where equity did not feature explicitly in the HEE guidelines, an additional search of the agency website was undertaken to understand if equity featured in those agencies' decision-making frameworks. RESULTS: The study included 46 guidelines from 51 countries. Only 30% of the guidelines were explicit about the equity assumptions. Health equity (using a broad definition) was mentioned in 29 guidelines and 14 included a specific definition while only seven recommended specific methods to incorporate inequalities. Addressing equity concerns was usually suggested as an additional analyses rather than a key part of the assessment. It was unclear how equity was incorporated into decision-making processes. In addition, equity was mentioned in other guidance - such as decision-making frameworks - provided by five agencies that did not mention it in the HEE guidelines, and 7 of 14 topic selection criteria that were identified. CONCLUSION: Equity is given less attention than efficiency in HEE guidelines. This indicates that HTA agencies while subscribing to an extra-welfarist approach have a narrow evaluative space - focusing on maximising health and not considering the opportunity cost of the equity constraint. The omission of equity and the lack of systematic approaches in guidelines poses a threat to the international endeavours to reduce inequities. It is timely for HTA agencies to reconsider their positions on equity explicitly.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

New health technologies are constantly developing. However, their impacts on health and implications for health systems are not always clear. Faced with this situation, in the last 45 years, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has taken an important role in the decision-making process related to the implementation of technologies in healthcare systems. According to the Core Model® EUnetHTA, a "full HTA" should cover nine domains: health problems and current use of technology, description and technical characteristics, safety, clinical effectiveness, costs and economic evaluation, ethical analysis, organizational aspects, patients and social aspects, legal aspects. In all domains of a HTA, the approach is evidence-based and uses epidemiological data, systematic reviews to gather the best level of proofs regarding clinical efficacy and safety of interventions and comparators and organizational and economic models. One exception is the ethical analysis, that uses value-based approach. Although in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) there are highly advanced technological environments, HTA has not yet been widely used in this field for determining the "value" of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. An example of diagnostic tool used in NICUs is the near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), a noninvasive device that enables real-time monitoring of the condition of peripheral tissues in critically ill newborns. The availability of this diagnostic tool could improve the choice of the most appropriate treatment to the clinical situation of the newborn. The expected benefit of NIRS motivates the need of a full HTA. Conclusion: HTA is still little used in Neonatal Critical Care, but it may be the appropriate tool to determine the "value" of technologies used in this field. The implementation of clinical trials and HTA may help in an evidence-based evaluation of new technologies for the neonatal critical care. This could facilitate the rapid introduction of the best health technologies into clinical practice. What is Known: • Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has taken an important role in the decision-making process related to the implementation of technologies in healthcare systems • The centrality of ethics in HTA has been known. In fact, ethics is everywhere in HTA, and value judgments permeate all levels of HTA What is New: • HTA is still little used in Neonatal Critical Care, but it may be the appropriate tool to determine the "value" of technologies used in this field • The implementation of clinical trials and HTA may help in an evidence-based evaluation of new technologies for the neonatal critical care and in introduction of the best and ethically acceptable health technologies into clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background The scarcity of resources restricts healthcare financing decisions, affecting the population's health. Health technology assessment (HTA) balances restricted budgets with the best possible health outcomes. We aim to characterize the current status of HTA in Algeria and describe the future directions for HTA implementation according to the priorities set by local stakeholders. Methods Stakeholders from the public and private sectors responded to a policy survey about the current and preferred future status of HTA implementation in Algeria. The survey was administered during an online workshop and used a widely accepted international scorecard covering eight domains: capacity building, HTA financing, process and organizational structure, scope of HTA implementation, decision criteria, standardization of methodology, use of local data, and international collaboration. After that, one-on-one interviews with another local expert were conducted to validate and modify the draft recommendations. The interviewees were representatives from government agencies, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies. Results Thirty-one experts filled out the HTA scorecard survey; most of them were from the public sector (74%). They highlighted that project-based HTA workshops or short courses were the most common form of HTA education in Algeria and recommended the establishment of postgraduate HTA training programs in the future to build sustainable capacities. They reported a lack of funding for HTA research and critical appraisal and recommended an increased public budget for HTA and the introduction of submission fees by manufacturers. There was consensus about the need for local HTA evidence generation in the future. Most of the experts advocated an explicit soft decision threshold. The interviewees further recommended using multi-criteria decision analysis in the short term. The application of quality indicators was believed to improve the reliability of the HTA process. Conclusion The results of our policy research delineate the gap between the current and preferred future status of HTA in Algeria based on insights from multiple stakeholders. The need to improve the educational HTA programs in Algeria, use local data in policy decisions, and increase funding for HTA were the most advocated recommendations.

RESUMEN

Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) are important in healthcare decision-making and resource allocation; however, expanding the scope of CEAs beyond the traditional clinicoeconomic concepts to also include value elements such as health equity has attracted much interest in recent years. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize evidence on how equity concepts have been considered in modified types of CEAs. Publicly available articles in MEDLINE were searched on January 25, 2024, to identify systematic reviews (SLRs) published in English since 2013 that incorporate health equity considerations in CEAs. Title/abstract, full-text article screening and data extraction were conducted by a single reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Results were qualitatively synthesized to identify common themes. Eight SLRs were included. Distributional CEAs (DCEA), equity-based weighting, extended CEA (ECEA), mathematical programming and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) were the most discussed approaches. A lack of consensus on the best approach for incorporating health equity into CEAs was highlighted, as these approaches are not currently consistently used in decision-making. Important limitations included scarcity of robust data to inform health equity indices, bias associated with commonly used health outcome metrics and the challenge of accounting for additional contextual factors such as fairness and opportunity costs. Proposals to expand CEAs to address equity issues come with challenges due to data unavailability, methods complexity, and decision-makers unfamiliarity with these approaches. Our review indicates that extended and distributional CEAs can support decision-making by capturing the impact of inequity on the clinical and cost-effectiveness assessment of treatments, although future modeling should account for additional contextual factors such as fairness and opportunity costs. Recommendations for actions moving forward include standardization of data collection for outcomes related to equity and familiarity with methodologies to account for the complexities of integrating health equity considerations in CEAs.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: With the purpose of supporting scientific professionals and helping them to better integrate the expertise of users in their work, a users' and relatives' panel (URP) was set up at the National Institute for Excellence in Health and Social Services in Quebec (INESSS), Canada for the social services and mental health directorate. URPs are advisory structures that mobilise the experiential knowledge of people affected by various issues. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess from a diverse stakeholders' perceptions: (1) the experience of developing and implementing the URP within the context of an Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (AHTAASS), (2) the contribution of such a URP, (3) the challenges encountered and (4) the perspectives of improvement for the following years. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a qualitative descriptive evaluation study. Nineteen interviews were conducted: six with URP members and 13 with staff representatives. The documents related to the creation of the panel, the URP minutes summarising the discussions and the reports published during that period were collected and analysed. Following a preliminary round of data analysis, a debriefing meeting was conducted with a few participants to validate the results. RESULTS: The panel was set up as part of the INESSS' desire to better integrate experiential knowledge into its recommendations. Twelve projects were presented to the panel on various themes. The URP enabled health professionals to consider dimensions they had not identified, to better integrate the experiential data collected from users into their work and to develop recommendations that made more sense to users. Panel members and INESSS professionals learned to work together, moving the working methods from consultation to collaboration and even coconstruction. Based on the panel's significant contribution, the INESSS decided to maintain it and to strengthen its place in its system to better integrate the experiential knowledge of users into its work. CONCLUSION: This research illustrates how AHTAASS can set up a URP composed exclusively of users, and how it can contribute and be evaluated. It shows that URPs are structures that value the sharing of experiential knowledge of its members, humanise decision-making and give meaning to the work done by scientific professionals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: One patient-researcher has contributed to the preparation and writing of this manuscript.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The medical technology sector is characterised by a constant influx of innovations with the potential to revolutionise patient care. In France, there are several pathways for medical devices to enter the market, from diagnosis-related group tariffs to reimbursement lists. However, traditional regulatory pathways can delay market access for innovative technologies. In response, France has established Early Access Programs to expedite patient access to medical devices. This paper looks at three of these Early Access Programs for medical devices. Innovation Funding, introduced in its final version in 2015, provides temporary coverage for innovative devices and facilitates data collection for informed funding decisions. Transitional Coverage (PECT), established in 2021, targets CE-marked devices for rare or serious conditions. Transitional coverage for digital health applications (PECAN), introduced in 2022, covers digital medical devices, either therapeutic or for patient monitoring. Innovation funding has been granted to 16 technologies out of 35 applications (46%) since 2015. 6 technologies out of 11 (64%) applications benefit from PECT. PECAN, in its first year, has granted a telemonitoring solution with a favourable opinion. The French experience could provide valuable lessons for the development of a harmonised European framework to ensure that innovative medical technologies benefit those who need them, while maintaining high safety standards.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Health technology assessment (HTA) of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), such as high-cost and one-time cell and gene therapies, is particularly challenging. Outcomes-based agreements (OBAs) are a potential solution to mitigate the risks while providing access to patients but are not widely used across Europe. This study aimed to develop policy recommendations to support the acceptability and implementation of OBAs in Europe. METHODS: A policy sandbox approach was used to engage with stakeholders and explore how HTA organizations can support reimbursement decisions regarding OBAs for ATMPs. A panel of 38 experts from across the European region was convened in 2 workshops, representing payers, HTA organizations, patients, registries, and an industry trade body. RESULTS: Policy recommendations were developed to support the appropriate consideration of OBAs for reimbursing highly uncertain technologies, such as ATMPs. If a positive HTA recommendation cannot be made at the proposed price, then a simple price discount reflecting the uncertainty is preferred over complex solutions such as OBAs. If an OBA is pursued, it should be designed collaboratively with all stakeholders to understand data collection feasibility and minimize burden to patients and providers. Payers are encouraged to approach OBAs as a tool for informed decision making, including a readiness to make negative reimbursement decisions based on unfavorable evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The study presents a policy framework for using OBAs in reimbursement decisions. OBAs must be carefully designed, focusing on appropriateness and the burden of implementation. The relevant authorities should be committed to making decisions in light of the resulting evidence.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study develops a prioritization framework to aid healthcare funding decision making in health technology assessment (HTA) in Australia using a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. METHODS: MCDA frameworks for HTAs were reviewed through literature survey to identify the initial criteria and levels within each criterion. Key stakeholders and experts were consulted to confirm these criteria and levels. A conjoint analysis using 1000Minds was undertaken with policy makers from the Department of Health to establish ranking criteria and weighting scores. Monte Carlo simulations were used to examine the sensitivity of findings to factors affecting the ranking and weighting scores. The MCDA was then applied to 6 examples of chronic care models or technologies projects to demonstrate the performance of this approach. RESULTS: Five criteria (clinical efficacy/effectiveness, safety and tolerability, severity of the condition, quality/uncertainty, and direct impact on healthcare costs) were consistently ranked highest by healthcare decision makers. Among the criteria, patient-level health outcomes were considered the most important, followed by social and ethical values. The analyses were robust to inform the uncertainty in the parameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study has developed an MCDA tool that effectively integrates key priorities for HTA reviews, reflecting the values and preferences of healthcare stakeholders in Australia. Although this tool aims to align the assessment process more closely with health benefits, it also highlights the importance of considering other criteria.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The Epilepsy Support Dog Evaluation study was commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports to inform a reimbursement decision on seizure dogs. The randomized trial found that seizure dogs reduce seizure frequency and improve health-related quality of life of persons with severe refractory epilepsy (PSREs). This article examined the cost-effectiveness (CE) of adding seizure dogs to usual care for PSREs in The Netherlands. METHODS: A microsimulation model was developed, informed by generalized linear mixed models using patient-level trial data from the Epilepsy Support Dog Evaluation study. The model adopted a 10-year time horizon and took a societal perspective. Seizure frequency was predicted as a function of time with the seizure dog. Patient utilities, caregiver utilities, and costs were predicted as a function of seizure frequency and time with the seizure dog. RESULTS: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of PSREs with a seizure dog and usual care alone were estimated at 6.28 and 5.65, respectively (Δ 0.63). For caregivers, estimated QALYs were 6.94 and 6.52, respectively (Δ 0.42). Total costs were respectively €228 691 and €226 261 (Δ €2430). Intervention costs were largely offset by savings in informal care and healthcare. The incremental CE ratio was €2314/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 91% probability of seizure dogs being cost-effective at the €50 000/QALY threshold. The incremental CE ratio fell well below this threshold in scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Seizure dogs are likely to be a cost-effective addition to usual care for PSREs in The Netherlands.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Valuing and pricing the components of combination therapies can be difficult because of competition law issues, difficulty implementing different prices for the same product in alternative uses, and attributing value to each component of the combination. We propose a value attribution solution that allows all combination components to be priced according to their relative value in the combination. METHODS: We developed a value attribution solution that is universal, symmetrical, and neutral to each combination constituent, regardless of whether it is the backbone or the add-on, and complete, meaning that it will always attribute the full value of the combination between the component parts. Moreover, it can be applied to any number of components in the combination (eg, triplets or quadruplets). We compared this solution with 2 other existing approaches. RESULTS: The results of the proposed value attribution solution sit between those of the 2 other value attribution approaches as it combines elements of each. As the degree of additivity moves further away from one in either direction, then our general approach ratios also move, reflecting the impact of the incremental value. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed value attribution solution for combination therapies differs from 2 existing approaches by being universally applicable and allowing for symmetry when neutral to the constituent components of the combination. To optimally contribute to policy debate and practice, various requirements for its implementation need to be well understood, including how to overcome (1) partial information, (2) whether its assumptions can be relaxed, and (3) implementation issues.

RESUMEN

Aim: Regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies have increasingly published frameworks, guidelines, and recommendations for the use of real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making. Variations in the scope and content of these documents, with updates running in parallel, may create challenges for their implementation especially during the market authorization and reimbursement phases of a medicine's life cycle. This environmental scan aimed to comprehensively identify and summarize the guidance documents for RWE developed by most well-established regulatory and reimbursement agencies, as well as other organizations focused on healthcare decision-making, and present their similarities and differences. Methods: RWE guidance documents, including white papers from regulatory and HTA agencies, were reviewed in March 2024. Data on scope and recommendations from each body were extracted by two reviewers and similarities and differences were summarized across four topics: study planning, choosing fit-for-purpose data, study conduct, and reporting. Post-authorization or non-pharmacological guidance was excluded. Results: Forty-six documents were identified across multiple agencies; US FDA produced the most RWE-related guidance. All agencies addressed specific and often similar methodological issues related to study design, data fitness-for-purpose, reliability, and reproducibility, although inconsistency in terminologies on these topics was noted. Two HTA bodies (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] and Canada's Drug Agency) each centralized all related RWE guidance under a unified framework. RWE quality tools and checklists were not consistently named and some differences in preferences were noted. European Medicines Agency, NICE, Haute Autorité de Santé, and the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care included specific recommendations on the use of analytical approaches to address RWE complexities and increase trust in its findings. Conclusion: Similarities in agencies' expectations on RWE studies design, quality elements, and reporting will facilitate evidence generation strategy and activities for manufacturers facing multiple, including global, regulatory and reimbursement submissions and re-submissions. A strong preference by decision-making bodies for local real-world data generation may hinder opportunities for data sharing and outputs from international federated data networks. Closer collaboration between decision-making agencies towards a harmonized RWE roadmap, which can be centrally preserved in a living mode, will provide manufacturers and researchers clarity on minimum acceptance requirements and expectations, especially as novel methodologies for RWE generation are rapidly emerging.

Asunto(s)